TABLE 1-COMBINED TECHNICAL RISK RATINGS.pdf
PDF 200 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CRREL ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
- Solicitation number
- W913E5
About this file
This document outlines the technical capability and past performance evaluation methodology for a federal solicitation. The rating system uses a color-coded approach with five levels: Blue (Outstanding), Purple (Good), Green (Acceptable), Yellow (Marginal), and Red (Unacceptable). Each rating corresponds to a detailed description of proposal quality, risk level, and alignment with requirements.
For the Past Performance factor, offerors must provide evidence of completed contracts within the past five years that are similar in type, size, scope, and complexity. The documentation requires references with contact information to verify performance. The evaluation will assess the quality, strengths, weaknesses, and potential performance risks of the proposed work based on the contractor's previous project history.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation - W913E526RA002.pdf | ||
| Pricing Schedule.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FACTOR 1 TECHNICAL CAPABILITY RATING SYSTEM AND DEFINITIONS
Technical Factors Rating. The rating for Technical will be expressed as an adjectival assessment of Outstanding, Good, Acceptable, Marginal, or Unacceptable. The adjectival ratings will be evaluated utilizing the following adjectival rating methodology:
II. FACTOR 2 - PAST PERFORMANCE
To demonstrate past performance, the Offeror shall provide performance on past or current contracts of a similar type, size, scope and complexity, have been completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, including references, with names and contact information of the references who can verify such past performance.
TABLE 1 – COMBINED TECHNICAL/RISK RATINGS
Color Rating Description
Blue Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.
Purple Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
Green Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.
Yellow Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.
Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .