Synopsis_20-R-2008 FINAL.pdf

N62470-20-R-2008

INDEFINITE DELIVERY INDEFINITE QUANTITY (ID/IQ) CONTRACT FOR

ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING (A-E) WORK FOR OIL MANAGEMENT,

WASTE/ HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT, TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL,

AND OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING SUPPORT

FOR NAVY, MARINE CORPS, AND OTHER DOD INSTALLATIONS, AND FEDERAL

AGENCIES

ALL INFORMATION NEEDED FOR INTERESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT A STANDARD

FORM (SF) 330, ARCHITECT ENGINEER QUALIFICATIONS IS CONTAINED HEREIN.

THERE IS NO SEPARATE REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) PACKAGE TO

DOWNLOAD.

This procurement will result in a single Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) contract for A-E Services for Oil Management, Waste/Hazardous Material Management, Toxic Substances Control, and other Environmental Compliance Engineering Support primarily focused in the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic’s (NAVFAC LANT’s) Area of Responsibility (AOR), which includes the continental United States (CONUS) and areas outside the continental United States (OCONUS), although the contract may require performance of services worldwide. The principal geographic regions encompassed by this contract include the following Commander Navy Installations Command (CNIC) Navy Regions: Naval District Washington (NDW), Commander, Navy Region Mid-Atlantic (CNRMA), Commander, Navy Region Southeast (CNRSE), and Commander, Navy Region Europe Africa Central (CNREURAFCENT). The contractor may also, on occasion, be tasked to provide support described herein to any DOD or other Federal agency, worldwide. These services will be procured in accordance with 40 USC Chapter 11, Selection of Architects and Engineers, as implemented by FAR Subpart 36.6. The ID/IQ contract will be for a base period of one year and four one-year option periods (if exercised). The total fee for the contract term shall not exceed $75,000,000.00. The guaranteed minimum for the contract term (including option years) is $10,000.00. Firm-fixed price task orders will be negotiated for this contract. There will be no dollar limit per task order and no dollar limit per year. Estimated start date is July 2021.

This proposed contract is being solicited on an UNRESTRICTED basis. The Small Business size standard classification is North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code 541330, Engineering Services. The size standard for this code is $16.5 million. The Government seeks the most highly qualified firm to perform the required services, based on the demonstrated competence and qualification, in accordance with the selection criteria.

The market research study Sources Sought Number: N62470-20-R-2008 conducted by NAVFAC Atlantic included an assessment of relevant qualifications and capabilities of potentially qualified firms. As a result of the market research analysis, a determination was made to solicit this procurement on an unrestricted basis inviting full and open competition. The NAVFAC Atlantic small business office concurs with this decision.

The intent of this contract is to provide comprehensive Architectural-Engineering (A-E) services to various Navy and other Department of Defense (DOD) installations / organizations world-wide in order to meet statutory compliance requirements for all applicable Final Governing Standards (FGS), DOD, Federal, State, local, and installation specific environmental laws, regulations, and guidance pertaining to the major work categories listed below. This support includes preparation of studies, plans, specifications, design documents, reports, cost estimates and all associated engineering work including but not limited to work in the following major categories:

Primary Tasks:

- Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance

- Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance

- Waste/Hazardous Material Management Compliance

Additional Tasks:

- PCB/Radon/Lead Based Paint (LBP) and Asbestos Management

- Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and Clean Water Act Compliance

- Laboratory Work

- Pesticide Management

- Environmental Condition of Property Programs

- Sustainability Work

- Air Quality and Clean Air Act (CAA) Compliance

- Environmental Management System (EMS) and Compliance Auditing Support

- Miscellaneous Tasking

Work may include minor incidental system modifications and calibrations at various facilities associated with individual task order work in order to assure compliance and allow for certification and/or testing. Examples of such minor incidental system modifications might include such things as installing a high point vent in a fuel pipe to allow for leak testing, installing a temporary blind flange in a fuel pipe to allow for leak testing a system, repairing an air filter door and replacing an air filter to allow for air emission certification of an incinerator, minor repair of an existing Back-Flow Prevention (BFP) device to allow for proper operation and certification, or other similar modifications.

The primary tasks anticipated under this contract are:

(1) Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance - The completion of PST inventories, notification forms, and management plans; certified tank inspections; third party professional engineering certification for new tank installations, tank closures and major repairs; integrity evaluations of petroleum pipelines including inspections and intelligent pigging; installation of monitoring wells, soil and groundwater sampling and analysis, completion of site checks at suspected leaking PST sites (including disposal of petroleum contaminated soil from boring and well installations) and development of corrective action plan; training of tank custodians on operations, inspections, and maintenance of PSTs and supporting equipment including automated

PST inventory control and tank/line leak detection systems. Also may include tank removal closure plan development; tank/pipe leak tightness testing; petroleum system cathodic protection testing; release detection equipment testing/certification; spill bucket testing; pipe interstitial integrity testing; pipe sump interstitial integrity testing; overfill prevention equipment testing;

PST integrity testing; and PST level gauge calibration. Generate, review, amend, and certify Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plans; and conduct prepare and provide oil handling personnel training.

The preparation of detailed construction planning engineering documents including budget estimates and assistance in preparing DD Form 1391’s may also be required for petroleum facility upgrade projects required in order to meet environmental regulations, such as to correct deficiencies noted in an installation SPCC plan or to correct UST system deficiencies.

Additionally, construction design request for proposal (RFP) package development assistance for both design-bid-build and design-build type construction projects may be required, along with associated support such as post construction award services consultation.

(2) Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance - Preparation/modification of plans and manuals such as Facility Response Plans (FRP); Oil and Hazardous Substance (OHS) Spill Contingency Plans; OHS Spill Response Plans; Integrated Contingency Response Plans (ICP);

designing, conducting, and evaluating drills and exercises to meet the National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines; designing, conducting, and evaluating joint NOSC Program/Emergency Management Program all risk/all hazard exercises; conducting Navy On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) and other Spill Response Training; design of OHS Spill Contingency Plan facilities; and also may include Navy On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) Plan Updates and Natural Resources Damage Assessment pre-incident plans.

(3) Waste/ Hazardous Material Management Compliance –The Waste Management Program including the preparation or revision of documents, plans, and reports in support of the Navy and Marine Corp’s Hazardous Waste (HW), Solid Waste (SW), Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB), Regulated Medical Waste (RMW), Pollution Prevention (P2), Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act (EPCRA), Hazardous Material (HM), Waste Material Potentially Posing an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH); Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Programs. Environmental documentation includes management, minimization, characterization, documentation, disposition, contingency, evaluation, elimination, closure and decontamination plans and studies; site investigations and evaluations; P2 Plans and opportunity assessments; HW Management Plans; EPCRA toxic release inventory (TRI) Form R Reports; Non TRI EPCRA Reporting; and permit applications. The work required may include site surveys; document reviews; soil, water, sediment, gaseous sampling and analysis; soil gas surveys; monitoring well installations and well testing; aerial and/or on-site photography;

groundwater modeling and geophysical contamination migration; risk assessments and air modeling; and designs and Post Construction Award Services (PCAS) for environmental restorations.

(4) Miscellaneous tasking to support other environmental compliance technical requirements (laboratory work, pesticide management, environmental condition of property programs, sustainability work, Environmental Management System (EMS) and compliance auditing support), and other technical media (water; air; radon; or asbestos) that may be incidental to petroleum storage tank and assets compliance, oil spill preparedness and planning compliance, and/or waste/hazardous material management compliance such as follow on studies; GIS mapping; computer aided design and drafting (CADD) drawing production; database development and/or management; pilot studies; audits; surveys; inventories; monitoring;

inspections; production of reports, work plans, and safety plans; development of specialized environmental compliance training; and other Architect Engineering (AE) services as specified by contract task order. Collection and management of Other Environmental Liabilities (OEL) data as well as engineering studies and other environmental compliance support for the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) environmental program may also be required.

All contractors are advised that registration in System for Award Management (SAM) Database is required prior to submission of a proposal. Failure to register in the SAM Database may render your firm ineligible for award. For more information, check the SAM website:

https://www.sam.gov.

The awarded contract will be subject to specific provisions addressing the avoidance of organizational conflicts of interest. The prime firm for this contract will be required to perform throughout the contract term.

Interviews may be scheduled with firms slated as the most highly qualified. Firms slated for interviews may be asked to clarify information contained in the SF330 submittal. Elaborate presentations are not desired.

Selection Criteria:

The Offeror must demonstrate its and each key sub-consultant’s qualifications with respect to the published evaluation criteria. Evaluation Criteria (1) and (2) are considered most important and equal between themselves; Criteria (3) through (7) are slightly less important and equal among themselves; Criterion (8) is of the least importance and will be used as a tie-breaker among technically equal firms. SF 330s will be evaluated to determine the most highly qualified firm based on criteria responses. Failure to provide requested data or to comply with the instructions in this Notice could result in a firm being considered less qualified or eliminated from consideration. Selection of Architect and Engineers Statute (PL 92-582) and Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 36.6 selection procedures apply. Specific evaluation criteria include:

1. Specialized Experience

2. Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence

3. Program Management and Capacity

4. Past Performance

5. Quality Control

6. Firm Location

7. Commitment to Small Business

8. Volume of Work

Criterion 1 – Specialized Experience (SF 330 Part 1 Section F): The Government will evaluate the specialized experience and technical competence of the proposed team in provision of the Primary Tasks required under this contract:

Primary Tasks:

- Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance

- Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance

- Waste/Hazardous Material Management Compliance

Submission Requirements: The Contractor shall provide a maximum of five (5) projects that were completed or substantially completed within the five years immediately preceding the SF330 due date that best illustrate specialized experience of the proposed team in the Primary Tasks outlined above. For the purposes of this submission, a project will be considered substantially complete if it has reached 80% completion based on amount invoiced as compared to maximum value, before the date of issuance of this notice. Sufficient information to determine the percent complete for substantially complete projects must be included in the project description or the project will not be considered. If more than the maximum number of projects are submitted, the Government will only evaluate projects up to the maximum number authorized in the order submitted.

On each submitted project, firms should identify which of the three (3) Primary Tasks are demonstrated by that project, and describe the work performed and how it demonstrates the firm’s ability to perform the Primary Tasks of this contract. Contracts or Task Orders that demonstrate experience with multiple Primary Tasks may be submitted, although as noted below, an IDIQ contract may not be submitted as a single project. Firms that fail to demonstrate experience with one or more of the three (3) Primary Tasks may be considered less favorably in the evaluation.

At least three (3) of the five (5) relevant projects must be in the principal geographic area of this contract. NOTE: Although Navy Regions are used to identify the principal geographical area, experience submitted under this criterion does not necessarily have to have taken place at Navy installations; rather, experience at any site(s) located in the same geographic region(s) can be used to meet this requirement.

Firms demonstrating relevant experience performing work in accordance with DOD/Navy policy and guidance may be considered more favorably. Additionally, demonstrating relevant experience performing work on DOD installations may be considered more favorably than work performed for municipalities.

The below list demonstrates the types of services the Government anticipates ordering under each primary task. Increased breadth of experience across these services may be considered more favorably than experience which is more narrowly-focused:

Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) and Assets Compliance

• Completion of PST inventories, notification forms, and management plans; certified tank inspections

• Third party professional engineering certification for new tank installations, tank closures and major repairs

• Integrity evaluations of petroleum pipelines including inspections and intelligent pigging

• Installation of monitoring wells, soil and groundwater sampling and analysis, completion of site checks at suspected leaking PST sites (including disposal of petroleum contaminated soil from boring and well installations) and development of corrective action plan

• Training of tank custodians on operations, inspections, and maintenance of PSTs and supporting equipment including automated PST inventory control and tank/line leak detection systems

• Include tank removal closure plan development

• Tank/pipe leak tightness testing

• Petroleum system cathodic protection testing

• Release detection equipment testing/certification

• Spill bucket testing and pipe interstitial integrity testing; pipe sump interstitial integrity testing

• Overfill prevention equipment testing and PST integrity testing

• PST level gauge calibration

• Preparation of detailed construction planning engineering documents

Oil Spill Preparedness and Planning Compliance

• Preparation/modification of plans and manuals such as Facility Response Plans (FRP preparation and revision of SWPPPs

• Oil and Hazardous Substance (OHS) Spill Contingency Plans and OHS Spill Response Plans

• Integrated Contingency Response Plans (ICP)

• Designing, conducting, and evaluating drills and exercises to meet the National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) Guidelines

• Conducting Navy On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) and other Spill Response Training

• Design of OHS Spill Contingency Plan facilities

• Navy On-Scene Coordinator (NOSC) Plan Updates and Natural Resources Damage Assessment pre-incident plans

Waste/ Hazardous Material Management Compliance

• The Waste Management Program including the preparation or revision of documents, plans, and reports in support of the Navy and Marine Corp’s Hazardous Waste (HW), Solid Waste (SW), Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB), Regulated Medical Waste (RMW), Pollution Prevention (P2), Emergency Planning and Community Right To Know Act (EPCRA), Hazardous Material (HM), Waste Material Potentially Posing an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH)

• Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), and Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Programs

All projects provided in the SF 330 must be completed by the office/branch/regional office/individual team member actually proposed to manage and/or perform work under this contract. Projects not meeting this requirement will be excluded from evaluation. To enable verification, firms should include the DUNS number along with each firm name in the SF330 Part I, Section F, item 25 “Firms from Section C Involved in this Project,” block (1). Include a contract number or project identification number in block 21. Include an e-mail address and phone number for the point of contact in block 23(c). Include in the project description the contract period of performance, award contract value, current contract value, information that enables a determination of whether the project is ‘substantially complete’ (as applicable), identification of the Primary Task(s) demonstrated by that project, and a summary of the work performed that demonstrates relevance to specialized experience in the Primary Task(s) identified, as outlined above. If a project was performed by a joint venture, and all joint venture partners are not on the team proposed for this contract, the firm/team should specifically address the work performed by the joint venture partner offering/teaming on this contract. Likewise, if the firm/team member worked as a subcontractor on a project, the description should clearly describe the work actually performed by the firm/team member and the roles and responsibilities of each on the project, rather than the work performed on the project as a whole. If the project description does not clearly delineate the work performed by the entity/entities offering/teaming on this contract, the project could be eliminated from consideration.

NOTE: If the Offeror is a joint venture (JV), relevant projects performed by the JV should be submitted; however, if there are no relevant projects performed by the JV, projects must be submitted for each JV partner, not to exceed a combined total of five (5) projects. At least one relevant project shall be submitted from each JV partner. The combined experience must still meet the requirement that at least three (3) projects demonstrate experience in providing services within the principal geographic area of this contract.

Projects shall be submitted on the SF-330 at Part 1 Section F and shall be completed or substantially completed projects. Projects not completed or substantially completed will be excluded from evaluation consideration. For submittal purposes, a task order on an ID/IQ contract is considered a project, as is a stand-alone contract. Do not list an ID/IQ contract as an example of a completed project. Instead, list relevant completed or substantially completed projects performed under task orders from an ID/IQ or standalone contract awards. Examples of project work submitted that do not conform to this requirement will not be evaluated.

All information for Criterion 1 should be submitted in Part 1, Section F of the SF330. The Government WILL NOT consider other SF330 information not submitted in Part 1, Section F in the evaluation of Criterion 1.

Criterion 2 - Professional Qualifications and Technical Competence (SF 330 Part 1 Section E and Section G): Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, competence, and experience of the proposed key personnel in providing services to accomplish the tasks required under this contract, including participation in example projects as outlined in the SF330, Part 1, Section G.Key personnel are individuals who will have major contract or project management responsibilities and/or will provide unusual or unique expertise. Specific disciplines that must be included in key personnel are program managers, quality control personnel, task order managers, and project managers.

Submission Requirements: Provide resumes for all proposed key personnel that illustrate specific experience in the primary tasks anticipated under this contract. Resumes are limited to one page each and should cite project specific experience and indicate proposed role in this contract. Provide professional registration, certification, licensure and/or accreditation, which should include professional registration of the engineering and surveying staff. Indicate participation of key personnel in example projects in the SF 330 Part 1 Section G.

All information for Criterion 2 should be submitted in Part 1, Sections E & G of the SF330.

The Government WILL NOT consider other SF330 information not submitted in Part 1, Sections E & G in the evaluation of Criterion 2.

Criterion 3 –Program Management and Capacity (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): The Government will evaluate the firm’s ability to plan and manage work under the contract and capacity to accomplish the work in the required time.

Submission Requirements: Describe the firm’s ability to concurrently perform and manage multiple projects in different locations to meet aggressive schedules and control costs. Provide a logical identification of explicit assignment of responsibilities among corporate team and subcontractor members. Discuss past working experience and relationship with key consultants.

Where key subcontractor(s) in a “team” is/are used or a JV has been proposed, firms that have established working relationships with the proposed subcontractors or JV partners for similar work may be considered more favorably than firms without an established working relationship.

Indicate the firm's present workload and the availability of the project team (including consultants) for the specified contract performance period.

Criterion 4 – Past Performance (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): The Government will evaluate past performance with Government agencies and private industry in terms of work quality, compliance with schedules, cost control, and stakeholder/customer satisfaction. The Government is particularly interested the quality of performance on contracts which meet the relevance standards described in Criterion 1. . Firms will be evaluated based on past performance assessments (see submission requirements below); the Government may also utilize other information provided by the firm or obtained via customer inquiries, information in Government databases, and other information available to the Government including contacts with points of contact in other criteria. Failure to provide requested data, accessible points of contact, or valid phone numbers may impact the Government’s ability to develop a positive confidence assessment.

Submission Requirements: SUBMIT A COMPLETED CPARS EVALUATION FOR EACH

EXAMPLE PROJECT LISTED UNDER CRITERION 1. IF A COMPLETED CPARS

EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment A) included in this notice is provided for the offeror or its team members to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes under Criterion 1, Specialized Experience. DO NOT

SUBMIT A PPQ WHEN A COMPLETED CPARS IS AVAILABLE.

IF A CPARS EVALUATION IS NOT AVAILABLE, ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your SF 330. If the offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before the response date set forth in this notice, the offeror should complete and submit with its response the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). Firms should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government's point of contact, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, Code ACQ21, Attn: Olga Dynov via email at olga.dynov@navy.mil, prior to the response date. Firms shall not incorporate by reference into their response PPQs or CPARS previously submitted in response to other A/E services procurements. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

Firms may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Criterion 1 Specialized Experience. Firms may also address any adverse past performance issues, but this information shall not exceed four single-sided pages in total.

Criterion 5 – Quality Control (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): The Government will evaluate the strength of the Quality Control (QC) plan proposed by the firm to ensure quality products and services under this contract, and means of ensuring quality services from their consultants/subcontractors.

Submission Requirements: Discuss the Quality Control Plan that would be utilized for this contract. Provide an organizational chart showing the inter-relationship of management and team components and discuss specific quality control processes proposed for this contract.

Identify the Quality Control Manager, including authorities assigned to that individual and discuss how the Offeror’s Quality Control Plan extends to the subcontractors.

Criterion 6 – Firm Location (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): Provided that the application of this criterion leaves an appropriate number of qualified firms, given the nature and size of the contract, firms will be evaluated on the locations of their office or offices that will be performing the work under this contract and their demonstrated knowledge of the general geographic areas in which projects could be located. Due to the worldwide coverage of this contract, offices in multiple locations would be considered an advantage.

Submission Requirements: Indicate location(s) of the office(s) that will be performing the work, including main offices, branch offices and offices of team members. Describe and illustrate the team’s knowledge of the geographic areas to be covered by this contract and how the location(s) will be advantageous to the government.

Criterion 7 – Commitment to Small Business (SF330, Part I Section H): Firms will be evaluated in terms of their extent to they have identified and committed to Small Business (SB), Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB), Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB), Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business (HUBZoneSB), Veteran-Owned Small Business (VOSB), Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB), and if applicable, Historically Black Colleges or Universities and Minority Institutions (HBCU/MI) in performance of this contract, whether as a joint venture, teaming arrangement, or subcontractor. The Government will evaluate proposals based on: (A) Past performance in utilization of small business concerns, and (B) Participation of small business concerns for this requirement.

Submission Requirements: In support of (A), all firms shall provide historical data on utilization of SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB and HBCU/MI. Large Businesses shall submit three (3) “final” or “most recent” Individual Subcontracting Reports (ISRs) for similar contracts of comparable size which show compliance with utilizing the various types of small business firms noted above. If ISRs are not FINAL or MOST RECENT they will not be considered. The MOST RECENT reporting period is 31 March 2020; therefore, any ISR submitted that is not FINAL must be from the 31 March 2020 reporting period to be considered.

Failure to provide three (3) ISRs that comply with these recency requirements may adversely impact the Government’s ability to conclude that your firm has demonstrated satisfactory past performance on utilization of small business concerns. If subcontracting goals were not met, provide an explanation. If Individual Subcontracting Reports for similar contracts of comparable size are not available, large businesses shall submit other documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for the contracts.

Small Businesses shall also submit documentation which shows their utilization of the various types of small business firms for similar contracts of relative size.

In support of (B), large businesses shall submit a draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan (Attachment B), in which they will be evaluated on the extent to which they identify and commit to the published Small Business Subcontracting Program. The Secretary of the Navy has assigned the Naval Facilities Engineering Command goals for FY20 in terms of percentages of total planned subcontracting dollars for utilization of small businesses. Demonstrate the plan to meet these goals for the base year and each option period: Small Business (SB) – 40%, HUBZone (HUB) –3%, Service Disadvantaged Businesses (SDB) – 5%, Women-Owned Small Businesses (WOSB) – 9%, and Service Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSB) – 3%. If a large business firm is selected for award, a Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Subpart 19.7 and DFARS Subpart 219.7 will be required and incorporated into the contract award.

A draft Small Business Subcontracting Plan is not required from small businesses; however, small businesses shall submit similar information on the extent to which they identify and commit to subcontracting to large business (LB), SB, SDB, WOSB, HUBZoneSB, VOSB, SDVOSB, and HBCU/MI if applicable in the performance of this contract.

The attached Small Business Subcontracting Plan template shall be used by large businesses to complete the draft subcontracting plan. Firms shall submit their “draft” Small Business Subcontracting Plans utilizing this template, and ONLY this template.

Criterion 8 - Volume of Work (SF 330 Part 1 Section H): Firms will be evaluated in accordance with DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Procedures, Guidelines and Information (PGI) 236.602-1, from data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). Firms will be evaluated in terms of work previously awarded to the firm by DoD within the past 12 months with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of contracts among qualified A-E firms, including small, disadvantaged business firms and firms that have not had prior DoD A-E contracts.

Submission Requirements: Firms do not submit data for this factor.

SF330 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS: Architect-Engineer firms that meet the requirements described in this announcement must submit a completed SF-330 package. The SF-330 shall be typed, one sided, at least 11 point font or larger. Part I shall not exceed 75 single-sided 8.5 x 11 inch pages (the page limit does not include certificates, PPQs, licenses, cover sheets, dividers, ISR’s, the Draft Subcontracting Plan, or other requested documentation (e.g., joint venture agreement, proof of A-E firm registration) provided that these do not contain any substantive information submitted in response to the synopsis or intended to demonstrate the qualifications of the firm). Part I pages shall be numbered sequentially. The organizational chart may be one page single-sided 11 by 17 inch foldout (which will count as one page towards the page limitation), using 11 point font or larger (font limitations do not apply to graphics, captions, or tables). Introductions shall be included in Sections E and F. Please include your DUNS and CAGE numbers in Block 30 of the SF-330. Failure to submit an SF 330 completed as required may result in an offeror’s elimination from consideration.

Interested firms shall submit eight (8) hard copies of the SF-330 and eight (8) CDs to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic, Code ACQ22, Attn: Olga Dynov, 6506 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23508-1278 Responses received by the Government by 2:00PM EDT on 18 August 2020 will be considered. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.

**In accordance with FAR 36.601-4(b), contracts for architect-engineering services may only be awarded to firms permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering.

Firms must submit proof that they are permitted by law as required by FAR 36.601-4(b). If a firm is in a jurisdiction that requires A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof of registration. If a firm is in a jurisdiction that does not require A-E firm registration, the firm must provide proof of eligibility to practice (e.g., a summary explaining eligibility under the laws of that jurisdiction). Failure to submit the required proof could result in a firm’s elimination from consideration.

**Firms who are offering as a joint venture should include with their submission a copy of the joint venture agreement. Failure to include the joint venture agreement may result in the firm’s elimination from further evaluation.

Late responses will be handled in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. The points of contact are either Olga Dynov, Contract Specialist, at 757-322-4436 or Jennifer McDonald, Contracting Officer, at 757-322-8154.

If an SF 254/SF 255 is submitted for this solicitation, it will not be reviewed or considered. As required above, provide verifiable evidence that your firm is permitted by law to practice the professions of architecture or engineering (e.g., state registration number).

Annotate solicitation number N62470-20-R-2008 on the bottom of the envelope or box.

NO HAND DELIVERY OF SUBMISSIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED

Express mail carriers Security Information:

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL, or UPS must follow visitor procedures and are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected following LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA. The Commercial Vehicle Inspection location for vehicles coming to NAVFAC Atlantic on the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) is located at Naval Support Activity (NSA) Hampton Roads at the Meredith Street gate off of Terminal Boulevard.

Firms should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Building #CD9 Norfolk, VA 23505

Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700 – 1530 Monday through Friday

All potential Offerors must adhere to this notice in order to avoid delay in submitting your proposal. The level of security at Lafayette River Annex may change at any time. As the level of security heightens, the amount of time required to gain access to the Lafayette River Annex also increases.

Electronic (E-mail, facsimile, etc.) submissions are not authorized.

Inquiries concerning this procurement should include solicitation number and title and be forwarded via email to Olga Dynov at olga.dynov@navy.mil.