State Response to submitted questions.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 11 KB Posted
- Attached to
- STATEWIDE TRAVEL ADMINISTRATOR SERVICES
- Solicitation number
- RFP 171 260000002486 4
- Issued by
- Grand Traverse County, Lansing City, Michigan
About this file
This document is a state response to vendor questions submitted during the procurement process for Michigan's Statewide Travel Administrator Services contract. The state addressed a vendor inquiry regarding the negotiability of commissions earned on state travel, clarifying that while travel management companies traditionally rely on commissions for business operations, the state maintains its position that commissions should be returned to the state to ensure best practices and unbiased booking recommendations.
The state indicated a willingness to consider negotiations on the commission return requirement, suggesting some flexibility in this contractual term while still prioritizing the objective of eliminating potential conflicts of interest in travel booking decisions. This response reflects the state's commitment to obtaining cost-effective travel administration services while remaining open to vendor concerns about business viability under the proposed commission structure.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Vendor Questions | State Response |
| Are "all commissions earned on State Travel" negotiable? I'd imagine that travel management companies rely heavily on those commissions in order to stay in business. | The state maintains the position that commissions be returned to ensure best practice and unbiased bookings. However, negotiations could be considered. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .