Attachment_0001_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf

Statement of Work

For Production of the Improved Data Modem 304B, MD-1383/A

SPRBL1-17-R-0005 - ATTACHMENT 0001 - STATEMENT OF WORK

Table of Contents

1.0 Scope

2.0 Applicable Documents

3.0 Requirements

3.1 Hardware

3.2 Requirements for Item Unique Item Identification (IUID)

3.3 Procurement New Production

3.4 Requirements for Packaging

3.5 Requirements for Final Inspection and Test

3.6 IDM Maintenance

3.7 Safety Engineering

3.8 Configuration Control

3.9 Procurement Contracting Officer

3.10 Serial Number Reporting

PRBL1-17-R-0005 - ATTACHMENT 0001 - STATEMENT OF WORK

Statement of Work For Production of the Improved Data Modem 304B, MD-1383/A

1.0 Scope. This document describes the work required to be performed by a contractor to supply MD- 1383/A Improved Data Modems to be used as sustainment spares by the United States Government.

2.0 Applicable Documents.

Military Standards MIL-STD-130N Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property MIL-STD-129R Military Marking for Shipment and Storage MIL-STD-882D System Safety

MIL-STD-2073-1E chg 1 Standard Practice for Military Packaging DI-MISC-80508 Technical Report - Study/Services

MIL-HDBK-831 Preparation of Test Reports ISPM 15 Regulation of Wood Packaging Material in International Trade (2009)

3.0 Requirements.

3.1 Hardware. The contractor shall provide the following items:

Improved Data Modem (IDM) 304B, MD-1383/A.

Items shall be built in accordance with, and shall meet the performance criteria as specified in the Army Technical Data Package (TDP) for the MD-1383/A, as well as all approved ECP’s to the MD-1383/A TDP, and the manufacturer’s drawings and specifications. These drawings and specifications shall be made available to the Government during the life of the contract.

3.1.1 Software Loading. Upon completion of final acceptance testing of new IDM 304Bs, the contractor shall load the appropriate IDM Operational Flight Program (OFP) and Operating System (OS) into the hardware utilizing the Government provided Software Loader Verifier – Ethernet (SLV-E) which is a software program designed to load OFP. The SLV-E utilizes the Interconnect Assembly – Ethernet (ICA-E) to connect a computer to the IDM. The ICA-E will be provided as GFE.

3.2 Requirements for Item Unique Identification (IUID). The contractor shall mark all contract deliverables In Accordance With (IAW) DFARS clause 252.211-7003 in Section I of this contract and the following requirements.

3.2.1 IUID Marking.

3.2.1.1. New items: The contractor shall provide IUID for all items delivered under this acquisition. IUID markings shall be IAW MIL-STD-130N.

3.2.1.2 Permanency and Legibility. The IUID marking and identification plates, tags, etching, or labels when used on equipment, parts, assemblies, subassemblies, units, sets, groups, or kits shall be as permanent as the normal life expectancy of the item and be capable of withstanding the environment, test, cleaning, repair, and rebuild procedures specified for the item. Legibility shall be as required and verified for ready readability per MIL-STD-130N with change 1.

3.2.1.3 Deleterious Effect. Marking of items shall be accomplished in a manner that will not adversely affect the life and utility of the item. Marking materials creating hazardous conditions shall not be used. Placement and choice of the marking shall not create hazardous conditions.

3.2.1.4 Pricing of IUID Requirements. All efforts required by this SOW and contract, including, but not limited to, the preparation of ECPs or notification of marking deficiencies, PIPC reporting, serial number data reporting at end of contract and the actual marking of hardware, will be included in the base contract price.

3.2.2 IUID Coding. IUID markings and readability requirements shall comply with MIL-STD-130N with change 1.

3.2.2.1 Symbology markings and the order of priority for marking the hardware shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-130N. First priority is the 2D data matrix symbol (machine readable) IUID is the minimum requirement when there are severe space limitations. The second priority is the human readable characters.

The third priority is the Linear Bar Code.

3.3. Procurement New Production. All hardware shall be supplied from new production using the existing TDP as a baseline configuration and shall be the latest configuration at time of production incorporating all approved US Army ECP’s.

3.4 Requirements for Packaging: Preservation, packing and marking for shipment shall be in accordance with section 'D' of the contract.

3.4.1 Packing. Packaging shall be in accordance with MIL-STD-2073-1E. Level of Preservation (LOP):

Military, Level of Pack (LPK): B, Quantity Unit Pack (QUP): 001. Marking Shall be in accordance with

MIL-STD-129R.

3.4.2 Handling, Storage Preservation, Packaging and Shipping. The contractor shall implement an electrostatic discharge program to prevent damage to electronic components that conforms to best commercial practices. The Contractor shall establish, maintain, control and be responsible for the handling, storage, preservation, packaging and shipping to protect the quality of the materials and to prevent damage from loss, deterioration, degradation, or substitution of products.

3.4.3 Transportation. The contractor shall utilize transportation methods that enable positive tracking of shipments from point of origin to the final destination with receipt signature verification. For all newly manufactured IDM 304Bs, the contractor shall utilize ground transportation.

3.4.4 Wood Packaging. Wood packaging material includes pallets. See DLAD 52.247 9012 Requirements for Treatment of Wood Packaging Material (WPM). Wood Packaging Materials in compliance with ISPM 15, Regulation of WPM in International Trade, is applicable.

3.5 Requirements for Final Inspection and Test. The contractor shall comply with the following requirements:

3.5.1. Sites for Inspection, Testing and Acceptance. Inspection, testing and acceptance of all equipment shall be at origin. Inspection and testing shall be performed by the contractor. Acceptance shall be by the DCMA via Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF).

3.5.2 Quality System. The contractor shall establish/maintain a system for the final inspection and test of all purchased items to comply with contract requirements. The Government has the right to review the contractor’s quality system and require correction whenever it, or any portion thereof, fails to meet the requirements set forth in the contract.

3.5.3 Inspection and Testing. The contractor shall assure that all necessary inspections and tests are performed on completed products, and this shall include all inspections and tests which are normally performed for the equipment on order, including the Production Acceptance Test (PAT) in accordance with the acceptance test procedures outlined in the Production Acceptance Test A3317598 and Environmental Stress Screening (ESS) on all IDM 304B’s prior to Government acceptance IAW IDM Environmental Stress Screening Plan A3317596, which is encompassed in the IDM 304B TDP. The contractor shall submit PAT and ESS reports IAW DI-NDTI-80809B, CDRL B004. The contractor shall as a minimum perform any inspections and tests (including visual/mechanical inspections and functional tests) required to satisfy the form, fit, and function requirements of the contract.

3.5.4 Responsibility. The requirements of this SOW do not relieve the contractor of the responsibility to perform any additional tests or inspections required to assure product quality and compliance with drawings and specification requirements.

3.5.5 Records. The contractor shall maintain adequate records of inspections and tests to demonstrate that the final product satisfies contract requirements. The Government has the right to review these records at any time.

3.6 Safety Engineering. In accordance with the appropriate contract clause.

3.7 Requirements for Configuration Management.

3.7.1 Product Definition Information. The Product Definition Information describes a product’s performance, functional and physical attributes, including the requirements and design information (specifications, drawings, design descriptions and software). Interfaces, including interfaces with other products, are also documented in the Product Definition Information. The Product Definition Information shall be specified by the Contractor’s Part Number (CPN).

3.7.2 Configuration Change Process. The contractor shall establish a system for managing the configuration changes to the CPN baseline. Contractor-approved changes that adversely impact any of the CPN conditions may require re-evaluation by the Government of the CPN. Re-evaluation may include operational testing re-assessment or re-assessment of the logistics impact of the proposed change. An approved change to the design of the CPN must be verified to ascertain that the CPN has achieved the functional attributes and requirements specified in the baselined Product Definition Information (CPN) and that it is adequate for its intended purposes. The Government is not obligated to accept any CPNs that no longer meet the Government’s requirements as established by the CPN at the time of contract award. The contractor shall prepare and submit Engineering Change Proposals (ECPs) for hardware (IAW) DI-CMAN-80639, CDRL B001, Notice of Revision (NOR) IAW DI-CMAN-80642B, CDRL B002, and Specification Change Notices (SCNs) IAW DI-CMAN-80643, CDRL B003. The Government shall be the final approval authority for all ECPs or SCNs for configuration items (CIs).

3.7.2.1 Engineering Change Proposal Instructions

An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) describes the changes to be made to the CI/CSCI and all associated Government documents and data that are affected by the proposed engineering change.

ECP should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, Section 3.3.1, and DI-SESS-80639.

3.7.2.2 Deviations and Waivers. The contractor shall prepare and submit deviations and waivers IAW DI- CMAN-80640C, using EIA-649 as a guide, CDRL B005. The Government shall be the final approval authority for deviations and waivers.

3.7.2.3 Request For Variance Instructions

A Request For Variance (RFV) is a specific written authorization to depart from a particular requirement(s) of an item’s approved configuration documentation for a specific number of units or a specified period of time, either as an advance request or after the fact. The contractor shall identify the impact of the RFV on performance, operational readiness and logistics support of the affected CIs. The Government may require consideration for any RFV.

RFV should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, Section 3.3.2, and DI-SESS-80640.

3.7.2.4 Notice of Revision Instructions

A Notice of Revision (NOR) shows the detailed changes that must be made to technical documentation, except specifications, following approval of an ECP. A NOR shall be submitted for each document affected by an ECP.

NOR should be prepared in accordance with EIA-649-1, Section 3.3.4, and DI-SESS-80642.

3.7.2.5 Configuration. Each CI, as developed/built and delivered, shall conform to the cited Configuration Baseline (CB) and (if applicable) and any subsequent CB’s that will be made contractually binding by the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).

3.7.3 Application Management.

3.7.3.1 Application Management. In performing Application Management, the Government must assess the impact of design changes to the Configuration Item. The Government is the Configuration Management authority on application management for all external applications and for all major changes that affect the Contractor’s Part Number (CPN) specified in paragraph attachment 1. A major change is defined as any change that will impact any of the following conditions of the CPN:

(a) Overall performance and Form, Fit, Function and Interface (F3I) Characteristics.

(b) Reliability, Maintainability and Survivability

(c) Electromagnetic Interference (EMI), air worthiness certification, or other pertinent requirement.

(d) Safety

(e) Support, operational and training requirements

(f) Impact on Technical Manuals, Repair Parts and Special Tools Lists (RPSTLs), DMWRs, Provisioning Parts List (PPL), etc.

(g) Impact on Cost and/or Schedule.

(h) Impact on test equipment, support equipment and associated software.

(i) Software.

3.7.3.2 Application Activity. The Government is an Application Activity (AA) for changes that affect the Contractor’s CPN. As part of the Government’s Application Management process, the Government as AA does have a right to review or be notified of changes made by the Contractor that will affect any of the conditions identified in paragraph 3.7.3.1. Any changes that affect these conditions shall be submitted for Government review or notification IAW the procedures outlined in para 3.7.2. Configuration changes not directly affecting the configuration baseline conditions identified in paragraph 37.3.1 do not require Government review or notification.

3.8 Procurement Contracting Officer. The Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) is the single point of contact within the Government. Only the PCO can approve or direct changes or additions to the contract.

3.9 Requirement for Contractor Performed First Article Testing

3.9.1 General. First Article Testing (FAT) shall be conducted if the contractor has not already passed a FAT for the -304B. Upon production of the first articles, the contractor shall conduct a FAT IAW the Government furnished Production Acceptance Test A3317598 and IDM Environmental Stress Screening Plan A3317596.

The contractor shall utilize four (4) IDM 304Bs for the FAT that are of a full rate production configuration.

The contractor shall successfully complete FAT, to the Governments satisfaction, prior to entering into full rate production. If the contractor fails to successfully complete the FAT to the Governments satisfaction, the contractor shall analyze the test failures and implement corrective actions within 60 days to produce new representative full rate production assets. Upon production of the new test assets, the contractor shall repeat the FAT. The contractor shall continue this process until successful completion of the FAT to the Governments satisfaction. The contractor shall provide a FAT Report IAW DI-NDTI-80809B, CDRL A002, and MIL-HDBK-831. The contractor shall perform First Article Testing (FAT) in accordance with the contract, the TDP, and this SOW. FAT requirements may be waived for prior vendors with concurrence from CECOM. As part of FAT, the contractor shall:

a. Develop the test procedures and plans necessary to demonstrate that the pre-production test units conform to the requirements established by the applicable specification(s) and other technical data provided in this contract.

b. Select 1 each pre-production test unit used for FAT.

c. Notify the Government and test the 1 each First Article unit.

d. Provide a First Article Test Report to the Government which documents the FAT results.

e. Insure all equipment used to take performance readings for acceptance tests are kept within the performance parameters delineated by the manufacturer of that equipment. All equipment manufactured by the contractor shall be listed and the parameters established and maintained for this equipment also.

3.9.2 Test Plan. The contractor shall prepare and submit a First Article Test Plan in accordance with DI- NDTI-81307A, CDRL A001, as implemented by the DD Form 1423 for DI-NDTI-81307A. In addition to the information required by DI-NDTI-81307A, this submission shall contain:

a. The delineation and allocation of tests to be performed on the First Article unit and the order of such tests (this may be prescribed in applicable technical data).

b. Step-by-step test procedures for each test and the data sheets to be employed to document the results of testing.

c. Identification of required test facilities, equipment and personnel.

d. Test milestones schedules and the contractor's test readiness posture.

e. A table which cross references the paragraph number of the specification requirement (including a brief description of the requirement) and the associated paragraph number of the First Article Test Plan.

3.9.3 Production of First Article Unit. The FAT sample shall be assembled at the same location at which production units will be assembled, using the same parts, materials, and manufacturing processes to be employed for subsequent production.

3.9.4 FAT Report. A FAT Report shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with FAR 52.209-3 and DI-NDTI-80809B. The FAT Report shall be complete, accurate, and readable and shall provide sufficient data to determine that the hardware item meets all the requirements delineated in the contract. The report will include the following:

1) General Data.

a. Contractor's name and address.

b. Contract number.

c. Nomenclature, type number and (if assigned) stock number of item represented by the First Article.

d. Name and address of plant where First Article was fabricated and assembled.

e. Place and date of performance of tests.

f. Identification (including date) of applicable equipment specifications and associated amendments.

g. Sample size or quantity submitted for test or inspection.

2) Cross Reference. A table which cross-references the paragraph numbers of the specification, the test procedures, and data sheet entry.

3) Test Results. Complete test results showing actual or quantitative observations and all required calculations. ‘GO/NOGO’ data is allowable (under certain circumstances) only with prior Government approval. Allowable tolerances for each parameter shall be presented. Test data should also include the date that the test was performed, name and signature of tester, name and signature of the Government verifier/witness and serial number of the equipment. Test results shall cite detailed qualitative and quantitative data results such as test categories, test conditions, test methods employed, and types of inspection and test equipment used during the test or inspection.

4) FAT Failures. FAT failures shall list all requirements not complied with during FAT. If none, this should be explicitly stated. For each requirement not met, a corrective action to remove the noncompliance will be proposed. This corrective action must include retest or other verification that the corrective action does remedy the problem/failure. The corrective action will address changes in design or manufacturing process which will preclude this deficiency in subsequent production units. Verified corrective action must be implemented prior to contractor entering into production.

5) FAT/Production Discrepancies. Any Government approved difference between the parts, materials and processes used to manufacture FAT samples and production units shall be documented in the FAT report.