Amendment_0006_SF-30.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

SPE600

See attachments.

Defense Logistics Agency Energy 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 4950 Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6222

USA

See Block 14

SPE600-16-R-0716

1 4

11/17/2016

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Section M has been updated as follows:

FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

FAR 52.212-2 EVALUATION –COMMERICAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

Listed below are the evaluation factors and subfactors. FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS, paragraph (c), and FAR 52.212-2 will establish the requirements for acceptability. Proposals will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors. Proposals will be evaluated by the SSEB team against established evaluation criteria and standards. The SSA will make the final decision as to which offerors will receive an award based on the lowest price technically acceptable proposal(s). The evaluation factors and subfactors for this procurement are as follows:

FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

The SSEB members will evaluate each offeror based upon the offeror’s compliance with the solicitation requirements. The offeror’s proposal is the sole basis on which the Government will evaluate the technical merits of what is proposed.

The following subfactors are equal in importance:

SUBFACTOR

1. Supplies or services and prices/costs, Section B

2. Description/specifications/statement of work, Section C

3. Inspection and acceptance, Section E

4. Deliveries or performance, Section F

Subfactors 1-4 will be rated either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable.” These ratings are defined as follows:

ACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal conforms to the supplies and services and prices/costs in Section B, description/specifications/statement of work in Section C, inspection and acceptance in Section E, and deliveries or performance in Section F.

UNACCEPTABLE: The offeror’s proposal does not conform to any one or more of the following requirements: the services and prices/costs in Section B, description/specifications/statement of work in Section C, inspection and acceptance in Section E, and deliveries or performance in Section F.

Proposals may be comprised of individual independent offers, differentiated by product grade, shipping mode, and/or FOB point. An individual offer within a proposal may be rated “Unacceptable,” while remaining offers within the same proposal may be rated “Acceptable.” A rating will be made for each individual offer within each proposal.

Each individual offer within a proposal must receive an “Acceptable” rating for every subfactor in order to be rated technically acceptable. If an individual offer within a proposal receives a rating of “Unacceptable” for one subfactor, it will be rated technically unacceptable. Therefore, some individual offers within a proposal may be considered technically acceptable while other individual offers within the same proposal may be considered technically unacceptable.

An offeror that proposes an exception to any of the requirements of the solicitation, as related to the aforementioned subfactors, will be reviewed to determine whether the product will meet the Government’s specifications and delivery requirements, can physically be accepted and not compromise product quality. If so, an offer containing the exception will also be technically acceptable. Programmatic exceptions are addressed to all offerors via amendment. Likewise, a rating may be made “Acceptable” if an offeror corrects, the Government accepts by reason of exceptions, any subfactors previously rated “Unacceptable” by the SSEB.

The Contract Team is responsible for addressing “Unacceptable” ratings, questions, clarifications, and/or comments posed by Technical Team members and relative to each offeror’s proposal, during negotiations. All offerors will have an opportunity to make revisions to submitted proposals during negotiations and to submit a final proposal revision unless the offeror should choose to withdrawal before the time final proposal revisions are requested.

FACTOR 2: PRICE

Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contracts will result from this solicitation.

The Contract Team will evaluate proposal for pricing purposes in accordance with FAR 52.212-2

– EVALUATION – COMMERCIAL ITEMS. The lowest price is defined as the lowest laid-down price, to include transportation costs will provide the basis to make awards. The Government will award a contract or a group of contracts to the lowest price, technically acceptable, offerors in a manner resulting in the lowest overall cost to the Government for the solicited items as a whole, in accordance with the other evaluation clauses contained in the solicitation. Transportation rates will be included for intermodal containers and truck modes in accordance with M-0005/M41 EVALUATION OF OFFERS – TRANSPORTATION RATES

AND RELATED COST (DOMESTIC PC&S AND LUBES) (DLA ENERGY SEP 2000).

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.