ChemPOL III RFP Questions and Answers.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 26 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SPE4A224R0002
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency Aviation
About this file
This document contains the questions and answers related to the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the ChemPOL III contract. The ChemPOL III contract is a recompete and third-generation award for the Defense Logistics Agency - Aviation to provide a total supply chain strategic solution for ChemPOL products, including supply chain management, inventory, and shipping to CONUS and OCONUS customers. The contract will cover approximately 6,680 National Stock Numbers (NSNs) across multiple Federal Supply Classes. The contract is expected to have a high volume of 13,000-17,000 delivery orders per month, with 60% from CONUS and 40% from OCONUS customers. The contract structure will be a fixed-price requirements contract with disincentives and incentives tied to performance, with a period of performance up to 10 years and an estimated total contract value of $2.2 billion. The requirement will be solicited as a small business set-aside, and best value selection methods will be used to award a single contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ChemPOL III RFP Questions
| No. | RFP Reference | Question | Government Response |
| 1 | Section L, 4.3.4, Page Limitations, Page 6 | This section states that 52.223-3, Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data and clause 252.223-7001, Hazard Warning Labels do not count towards the page limitations listed in Table 1. It does not specify a volume, should our response to these clauses be included as part of Volume VI, Contract Documentation? | Added 10.4.5 to Section L. The documention shall be provided with volume VI, Contract documentation. |
| 2 | Section L, 4.3.4, Page Limitations, Page 6 | This section states that 52.223-3, Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data and clause 252.223-7001, Hazard Warning Labels do not count towards the page limitations listed in Table 1. As per each clause, paragraphs (d) state, the apparently successful Offeror agrees to submit required documentation (Material Safety Data Sheet& Hazard Warning Labels) prior to award. Do you expect the required documentation to be submitted with the proposal submission or later, in final negotiations if successful? | Added 10.4.5.2 to Section L. The Government would like the information provided at time of proposal. |
| 3 | Section H, H-902 BACKORDER example calculations, Page 3 | Example calculations for Backorder disincentives appear to use incorrect Calendar Days Late for Category A and B. Can the Government validate the example calculations? | Updated the example. |
| 4 | RFP L19 SURGE AND SUSTAINMENT (S&S) - CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT PLAN (CAP), Page 64 | The RFP includes DLAD Procurement Note L19. Should the Capability Assessment Plan (CAP) be included outside of page count as an Appendix to Volume VI? | Added 10.4.6 to Section L. The documention shall be provided with volume VI, Contract documentation. |
| 5 | Section M, 3.6.7, Total Evaluated Price, Page 8 | Section M provides and example of how the TEP will be calculated, including screen shots of an example spreadsheet. But the example does not include all pricing components (e.g. throughput) and an actual TEP model spreadsheet was not included as an attachment of the solicitation. Can the government provide a TEP model spreadsheet that includes all pricing components (material, management, throughput) so offerors can fully understand how the TEP will be calculated. | Updated attachment #2 to have a formula that calculates unit price with throughput charge and then calculates total price, less management fee. The management fee will be within the contract price volume of the response. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .