SP7000-15-R-1064_Combined_Synopsis_-ASSIST_(Corrected_11-17-2015).pdf

ASSIST Request for Proposal (RFP) SP7000-15-R-1064

TABLE OF CONTENT

1. Period of Performance

• CLIN Schedule

2. Instructions to Offerors

3. Evaluation Criteria

4. Clauses and Provisions

Schedule of Supplies/Services Offeror must provide pricing for all option years.

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation;

proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued. This solicitation is issued as a Request for Proposal (RFP) number SP7000-15-R-1064.

This notice incorporates provisions and clauses in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-81 April 10, 2015, and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) DPN 20150420 (Effective 20 Apr 2015) Edition, and Defense Logistics Acquisition Directive (DLAD) Revision 5

PROCLTR 2015-08.

This acquisition is Unrestricted. This is a Firm Fixed Price contract type. The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code is 541511 and the small business size standard is $27.5 M.

Place of performance: DLA Document Services - 700 Robbins Ave, Bldg. 4D, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5094. (See Performance Work Statement for more details).

Any award resulting from this solicitation will be issued on a Standard Form (SF) 1449.

Base period

FY16

04/01/16 - 09/30/16 1st Option period FY17 10/01/16 - 09/30/17 2nd Option period FY18 10/01/17 - 09/30/18 3rd Option period FY19 10/01/18 - 09/30/19 4th Option period FY20 10/01/19 - 09/30/20 5th Option period FY21 10/01/20 – 03/31/21

1.1 CLIN SCHEDULE

BASE PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 16) 04/01/16 - 09/30/16

CLIN DESCRIPTION EST. QTY UNIT UNIT

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

0001 Maintenance of the Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) Application

6.0 MO $ $

1.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/12.htm%23P295_49304

0002 Maintenance of the

Government off the Shelf (GOTS) Application

6.0 MO $ $

0003 Expansion of System Capabilities

6.0 MO $ $

0004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

6.0 MO $ $

0005 DLA Document Services/ Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Support

6.0 MO $ $

0006 Other Direct Cost (ODC), in accordance with Joint Travel Regulation (JTR) Volume 2 C6002.

6.0 MO $1,000 $3,000

TOTAL

1ST OPTION PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 17) 10/01/16 - 09/30/17

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

1001 Maintenance of the COTS Application

12.0 MO $ $

1002 Maintenance of the GOTS Application

12.0 MO $ $

1003 Expansion of System Capabilities

12.0 MO $ $

1004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

12.0 MO $ $

1005 DLA Document Services/ DSPO ROM Support

12.0 MO $ $

1006 ODC, in accordance with JTR Volume 2 C6002

12.00 MO $1,000 $12,000

2nd OPTION PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 18 ) 10/01/17 - 09/30/18

PRICE

AMOUNT

2001 Maintenance of the COTS

Application

12.0 MO $ $

2002 Maintenance of the GOTS Application

12.0 MO $ $

2003 Expansion of System Capabilities

12.0 MO $ $

2004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

12.0 MO $ $

2005 DLA Document Services/ DSPO ROM Support

12.0 MO $ $

2006 ODC, in accordance with

12.0 MO $1,000 $12,000

3rd OPTION PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 19) 10/01/18 - 09/30/19

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

3001 Maintenance of the COTS Application

12.0 MO $ $

3002 Maintenance of the GOTS Application

12.0 MO $ $

3003 Expansion of System Capabilities

12.0 MO $ $

3004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

12.0 MO $ $

3005 DLA Document Services/ DSPO ROM Support

12.0 MO $ $

3006 ODC, in accordance with

4th OPTION PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 20 ) 10/01/19 - 09/30/20

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

4001 Maintenance of the COTS

12.0 MO $ $

4002 Maintenance of the GOTS

12.0 MO $ $

4003 Expansion of System Capabilities

12.0 MO $ $

4004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

12.0 MO $ $

4005 DLA Document Services/ DSPO ROM Support

12.0 MO $ $

4006 ODC, in accordance with

5th OPTION PERIOD (FISCAL YEAR 21 ) 10/01/20 – 03/31/21

PRICE

TOTAL

AMOUNT

5001 Maintenance of the COTS Application

6.0 MO $ $

5002 Maintenance of the GOTS Application

6.0 MO $ $

5003 Expansion of System Capabilities

6.0 MO $ $

5004 Qualified Products Maintenance and Support

6.0 MO $ $

5005 DLA Document Services/ DSPO ROM Support

6.0 MO $ $

5006 ODC, in accordance with

6.0 MO $1,000 $9,000

GRAND TOTAL

Any award resulting from this solicitation will be issued on a Standard Form (SF) 1449.

PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS

The proposal will include a written portion to support evaluation of technical capability. This section specifies the format and content that offerors shall use for proposals responding to this RFP. Failure to follow these instructions for formatting and content of proposals may result in rejection of the proposal without evaluation. The goal is not to restrict

2.0 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

offerors in the manner in which they will perform their work but rather to ensure a certain degree of uniformity in the format of the responses for evaluation purposes. In order to receive full consideration, offerors are encouraged to ensure that the information provided within their proposals is factual, accurate and complete.

Each offeror shall submit a proposal that clearly and concisely describes and defines the offeror’s response to the objectives/requirements contained in the RFP. Unnecessary elaboration or other presentations beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal are not desired. Elaborate artwork, expensive paper or bindings, and expensive visual or other presentation aids are neither necessary nor desired. The proposal shall contain all the pertinent information in sufficient detail in the area of the proposal where it contributes most critically to the discussion of the same information in the RFP. When necessary, the offeror shall refer to the initial discussion and identify its location within the proposal.

The offerors should also identify risks inherent in its proposal, techniques used to mitigate those risks, and where such techniques were successfully employed in other contracts.

Offerors who take exception to the provisions, terms and conditions, or any other aspect of this request, may provide for such exceptions in Section 2.2 (refer to Executive Summary – Offeror Qualifications). Alternate proposals are not authorized. Objections to any terms and conditions of the RFP may make the proposals unacceptable.

The Government will process late submissions of proposals in accordance with FAR 52.215-1. If electronic proposal is received late and is not eligible for consideration in accordance with FAR 52.215-1 and Alternate I, then the Government will reject that proposal without evaluation.

• 2.1.1 Proposal Volumes

Offerors are required to submit their proposals in separate volumes as indicated below. There shall be no reference to pricing in the Non-Price proposal or in the cover letter or executive summary.

OFFERORS: In accordance with FAR 3.104-4, it is required that your company mark material that may be source selection information as described in FAR 2.101. Source selection information shall be marked with the legend “Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104.” This includes the cover page and EACH page that may contain source selection information.

Proposals submitted shall be contained in two separate volumes with tabs separating Chapters.

Volume I: Non-Price

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor A: Technical Approach Subfactor B: Management Approach and Capabilities Subfactor C: Key Personnel

Factor 2: Past Performance /Corporate Experience

Aspect One – Relevancy/Recency Aspect Two – Quality of Historical Projects

Volume II: Price Proposal

Each volume shall contain the following items in addition to the non-price and price proposal data required by the

RFP:

Cover: The cover should indicate the following:

Title of the proposal Proposal volume Volume No.

Name and address of offeror Name and phone number of a principal point of contact

Table of Contents: The table of contents shall provide sufficient detail as to allow the elements to be easily located.

2.1.2 Written Response

Offerors must submit their proposals electronically, via email, in a ‘searchable’ PDF format. All proposals shall be submitted to the Procurement Contracting Officer and Contracting Specialist listed below no later than NOVEMBER 24th, 2015 at 10:00 AM Eastern time. It is the offeror’s responsibility to ensure any offer submitted by email is timely received. Any offers received after the closing date and time will be late and will not be accepted. The Contracting Officer’s intent is to make award without discussions.

The Offeror shall provide all resources necessary to complete the execution of the deliverables described in this Performance Work Statement, except as may otherwise be specified. The Contract Specialist will accept questions via email from prospective offers regarding the content of this Performance Work Statement no later than close of business, NOVEMBER 13th, 2015, 10:00 AM Eastern time to:

DLA DOCUMENT SERVICES

ATTN: Arina Zaitseva (Contract Specialist) 5450 Carlisle Pike, Bldg. 9 Mechanicsburg, PA 17050

PHONE: (717) 605-8498

Email: arina.zaitseva@dla.mil

DLA DOCUMENT SERVICES

ATTN: Chad Spittle (Procuring Contracting Officer) 5450 Carlisle Pike, Bldg. 9 Mechanicsburg, PA 17050

PHONE: (717) 605-8117

Email: chad.spittle@dla.mil

The Government will publish all questions and answers to www.fbo.gov prior to RFP closing date.

The RFP’s written proposal must be organized according to the following format, within the page limitations indicated, and include chapters for each of the following:

Volume Chapter Page Limit* Format*

I. Non-Price -Cover & Table of Content n/a

Not included in page counts with respect to page limitations

PDF

- Signed Offeror Cover Letter for RFP & Executive Summary

Chapter 1:

mailto:arina.zaitseva@dla.mil mailto:chad.spittle@dla.mil http://www.fbo.gov/

Factor 1: Technical

Subfactor A – Technical Approach Subfactor B – Management Approach and Capabilities Subfactor C – Key Personnel

Chapter 2:

Factor 2: Past Performance Aspect One – Relevancy/Recency Aspect Two – Quality of Historical Projects

II. Price -Cover & Table of Content

Not included in page counts with respect to page limitations

- Price Proposal

Chapter 3

Fill in the offer Unit price in the space provided (starting on page 1)

*Proposal must not exceed 55 pages. Pages exceeding the respective page limitations will not be considered part of the proposal. Font must be Times New Roman, no smaller than size 12.

2.2 SIGNED OFFEROR COVER LETTER FOR RFP AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.2.1 Signed Copy of Offeror Cover Letter for RFP Submission

The offeror shall include a signed copy of the RFP’s cover letter on company letterhead as part of the proposal submission. The cover letter must contain a statement committing the offeror to the proposal and stating its validity for a period of at least 120 days. The letter should also include the name, title, phone number and e-mail address for the persons authorized to act on behalf of the offeror.

2.2.2 Executive Summary of the Offeror’s Proposal

This summary will not be evaluated but will be used to gain an understanding of the overall proposal contents. It should identify and highlight significant features of the proposal and include the salient points contained in the various volumes and chapters.

The following format should be followed in developing the summary:

1. General Information:

a. Company name and address,

b. Company Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)

c. Dun and Bradstreet number

d. CAGE code

e. Remittance address if different than “a” above

2. An overview of Technical Capability

Volume I - NON-PRICE

2.3.1 Factor 1: TECHNICAL (Volume I, Chapter 1)

Subfactor A – Technical Approach

Describe in detail your approach to research, analyze and develop the specified deliverables and perform each specific tasking in the PWS. (Refer to Evaluation Criteria.)

Subfactor B – Management Approach and Capabilities

This subfactor is designed as an overview of the offeror’s approach to project management. Describe in detail your Management Approach and Capabilities. Offeror must provide evidence demonstrating it has current capabilities for assuring performance of the requirement. (Refer to Evaluation Criteria.)

Subfactor C – Key Personnel

The offeror must describe in great detail the knowledge, skills, and training of key personnel and labor mix that may be used in the performance of the tasks and requirements specified in the PWS.

2.3.2 Factor 2: PAST PERFORMANCE/CORPORATE EXPERIENCE (Volume I, Chapter II)

Requiring submission of Past Performance/ Corporate Experience information will permit the Government to evaluate the offeror’s proposal with respect to that experience and make a determination as to the degree of risk in making award to that offeror. The offeror shall demonstrate that it has performed projects and/or tasks of similar scope and complexity as those referenced under the scope of the RFP located in PWS

Note: The Government may seek additional past performance information from other sources known to the Government to assist in its evaluation. (Refer to Evaluation Criteria.)

2.4 Volume II - PRICE (Chapter III)

2.4.1 Pricing Instructions

Offerors are required to submit price proposals in accordance with Section 1.1 CLIN SCHEDULE. Offerors are to provide firm-fixed pricing for each CLIN. ODC Travel CLINs shall remain as specified and will not be evaluated.

The acquisition will employ the use of “best value” trade-off process. Offerors will be required to submit both non-price and price proposals. Non-price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price. As proposals become more equal in merit of non-price factors, price becomes more important.

A. Non-Price Factors

Technical Approach and Management Approach are of equal importance; and are both more important than Past Performance/Corporate Experience. It is the Government’s objective to obtain the highest technical quality at a fair and reasonable price.

3.0 EVALUATION CRITERIA

Page

Evaluation Factor #1 - Technical Approach

1A. Subfactor A: Technical Approach

The offeror shall provide a detailed description of its Technical Approach that will ensure the successful execution of the requirements outlined in the PWS. The offeror will detail how they will provide coding support for baseline system modifications to the GOTS applications components, and support for requested changes and expanded capabilities of the system. The offeror shall also provide a detailed approach to managing operating system patches, system security management, system enhancements, system administration support, and configuration management efforts. The Government also will evaluate the proposed approach to ensure that it is well- defined and logical and that the methodologies and processes can successfully meet ASSIST objectives and mitigate risk.

1B. Subfactor B: Management Approach

The offeror shall provide a detailed description of the Management Approach that will be used to ensure the successful execution of the resultant contract. This approach must describe the offeror’s plans to manage and support the ASSIST program. The offeror will detail how it will provide and maintain the application to the ASSIST user community, ensuring that it is stable and available at prescribed times of operation, with predictable performance and application response time. The coding support for baseline system modifications to the GOTS application components, and support for requested changes and expanded capabilities of the system. The offeror will detail how it will assist DLA Document Services/DSPO in developing a workflow support team capable of performing routine maintenance updates to the existing workflows.

Offeror shall also detail project management, project oversight and labor services for system problem resolution, system upgrades, system change requests (SCRs) and operating system patches, system security management, system enhancements, system administration support, and configuration management efforts.

1C. Subfactor C: Key Personnel

Certain skilled, experienced, professional, and/or technical personnel are essential for successful accomplishment of the work to be performed under the resultant contract. These are defined as “key personnel” and their resumes are to be submitted as part of the technical proposal for evaluation purposes. Offerors will be evaluated on appropriateness of the staffing mix in regards to the distribution of the tasks and subtasks described in PWS. The proposed key personnel assigned to the effort will be evaluated to determine whether the individuals possess the requisite qualifications and experience, including the benefits and competencies that those individuals bring, to ensure the successful accomplishment of ASSIST Program duties required by the PWS. Key Personnel proposed shall, at a minimum, clearly demonstrate that the person possesses the Certifications, Special and Minimum Skill Set Requirements as set forth in the RFP and PWS.

The offeror will be evaluated on the following:

a) Detailed understanding of the requirement set forth in the PWS.

b) Appropriateness and feasibility of the offeror’s management approach to carry out the requirements in the PWS.

c) Detailed description of how the offeror will manage its workflow support team capable of performing routine maintenance updates to the existing workflows.

d) The currency and appropriateness of the qualifications of Key personnel, as provided by the offeror. Resumes should clearly highlight knowledge, skills, abilities, and certifications as required in the PWS.

e) Appropriateness of the staffing mix to carry out the requirements in the PWS.

f) Demonstrated ability to manage a task of this complexity.

Evaluation factor #2 - Past Performance/Corporate Experience

The offeror shall address its level of experience in successfully providing similar services to those required under the PWS and its past performance on such projects. Each offeror will be required to clearly demonstrate within its proposal that it has sufficient experience to perform satisfactorily. The offeror shall provide:

• A brief summary of contracts, commercial or Government, performed within the last five (5) years for the

Page same or similar services proposed in this RFP that includes working with a document distribution and workflow systems in a secure environment. These summaries shall outline the type of work performed and in what ways the previous work described is similar to the current requirement.

• Each summary must list the name, address, point of contact, telephone number, dollar value, contract number, and the period of performance.

• Describe any significant problems or issues that occurred during performance of the contract and how they resolved those issues.

The Government may consider additional past performance sources including the CPARS, FAPIIS, and PPIRS system.

The past performance/corporate experience relevancy ratings will be used to rate the quality and usefulness of the past performance information provided as it applies to a performance confidence assessment.

B. Price

The total acquisition price will be determined by summing the proposed evaluated prices for each of the CLINs for a 60 months total. The total acquisition price evaluation will include all firm fixed price line items.

EVALUATION RATING SCALE

Evaluation Factors when combined are significantly more important than price. The evaluation factors are listed below in descending order of importance. Therefore, Factor # 1 subfactors are of equal importance and are more important than Factor #2. The following are the rating scales to be used for each factor:

EVALUTION FACTOR #1

1A. Subfactor A: Technical Approach

Technical Approach will be rated on an “Outstanding,” “Good,” “Acceptable,” “Marginal,” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the Technical Approach Evaluation Ratings Table.

Subfactor A: Technical Approach Evaluation Rating

Rating Evaluation Ratings Defined Outstanding Offeror has proposed a comprehensive and complete solution which details its abilities and experience in a similar operating environment, and has demonstrated a comprehensive approach in meeting the functional and performance requirements, and maintenance requirements of the GOTS and COTS applications.

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Offeror has proposed a complete solution which details its abilities and experience in a similar operating environment, and has demonstrated a complete approach in meeting the functional and performance requirements, and maintenance requirements of the GOTS and COTS applications. Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements.

Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Offeror has proposed a solution which describes its abilities and experience in a similar operating environment, and while they have an understanding of the requirements, the proposal does not show any depth. The technical approach demonstrates the offeror’s ability to meet a majority of the functional and performance requirements.

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

1B. Subfactor B: Management Approach

Management Approach will be rated on an “Outstanding,” “Good,” “Acceptable,” “Marginal,” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the Management Approach Evaluation Ratings Table.

Subfactor B.: Management Approach Evaluation Rating

Rating Evaluation Rating Defined Outstanding Offeror has provided a comprehensive, complete, and detailed approach that clearly demonstrates its ability to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix is highly relevant to the Government’s requirements and demonstrates a clear and thorough understanding of the personnel requirements for each task. The key personnel proposed, in all cases, have demonstrated extensive experience that is current and applicable experience as it relates to tasks in the PWS. The offeror’s management approach clearly demonstrates a sound understanding to identifying and applying resources to accomplish the requirements in an appropriate and efficient manner.

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Offeror has provided a complete and detailed approach that demonstrates its ability to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix fully will meet the Government’s requirements.

The key personnel proposed, exceed expectations for experience in some instances. The offeror’s management approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of identifying and applying resources to accomplish the

Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Offeror has provided an acceptable approach to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix fully will satisfy the Government’s requirements with minor changes. The experience, skill, and qualifications of the key personnel proposed meet the Government’s requirements. The offeror has provided an acceptable approach to manage the effort.

will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal minimally meets requirements and/or minimally demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

1C. Subfactor C: Key Personnel

Key Personnel will be rated on an “Outstanding,” “Good,” “Acceptable,” “Marginal,” or “Unacceptable” basis using the ratings in the Key Personnel Evaluation Ratings Table.

Subfactor C: Key Personnel Evaluation Rating

Outstanding Offeror has provided a comprehensive, complete, and detailed approach that clearly demonstrates its ability to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix is highly relevant to the Government’s requirements and demonstrates a clear and thorough understanding of the personnel requirements for each task. The key personnel proposed, in all cases, have demonstrated extensive experience that is current and applicable experience as it relates to tasks in the PWS. The offeror’s management approach clearly demonstrates a sound understanding to identifying and applying resources to accomplish the requirements in an appropriate and efficient manner.

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses.

Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Offeror has provided a complete and detailed approach that demonstrates its ability to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix fully will meet the Government’s requirements.

The key personnel proposed, exceed expectations for experience in some instances. The offeror’s management approach clearly demonstrates an understanding of identifying and applying resources to accomplish the

Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Offeror has provided an acceptable approach to manage the effort. The proposed labor mix fully will satisfy the Government’s requirements with minor changes. The experience, skill, and qualifications of the key personnel proposed meet the Government’s requirements. The offeror has provided an acceptable approach to manage the effort.

will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal minimally meets requirements and/or minimally demonstrates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

EVALUTION FACTOR #2

Past Performance/Corporate Experience will first be evaluated to determine if the Offeror has relevant or non-relevant past performance in the areas of similarity of service/support, complexity, dollar value, and contract type.

NOTE: There are two aspects to the Past Performance/Corporate Experience evaluation.

Factor 2: Past Performance/Corporate Experience Relevancy Rating (Aspect One)

Very Relevant Offeror’s past performance demonstrates contracts/accounts of same or similar services as proposed in the RFP that includes working with a document distribution system in a secure environment.

Past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Offeror’s past performance demonstrates contract/accounts that possess some of the services as proposed in the RFP that include similar scope within a secure environment.

Past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Offeror’s past performance demonstrates contract/accounts that possess some of the services as proposed in the RFP that include similar scope, however are not executed in a secure environment.

Past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Past Performance/Corporate Experience will then be evaluated to determine how well the Offeror performed on past contracts. Sources of Past Performance Information are information as solicited, past performance information from questionnaires and other past performance information such as Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) or Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (eSRS).

Factor 2: Past Performance/Corporate Experience Performance Rating (Aspect Two)

EXCEPTIONAL Offeror’s past performance record indicates that the offeror consistently meets contract requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.

Past contractual performance has been accomplished without problem s for which corrective actions taken by the offeror have been highly effective.

VERY GOOD Offeror’s past performance record indicates that the offeror consistently meets contract requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. Past contractual performance has been accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror have been effective.

SATISFACTORY Offeror’s past performance record indicates that the offeror has met contract requirements. Offeror’s past performance contains reports of some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror appear to have been or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL Offeror’s past performance record indicates that the offeror has not met some contract requirements. Offeror’s past performance contains reports of serious problems for which the offeror did not identify corrective actions or proposed corrective actions that were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

UNSATISFACTORY Offeror’s past performance record indicates that the offeror has not met most contractual requirements, recovery was not accomplished in a timely manner and proposed corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NEUTRAL Offeror has no relevant record of past performance. Offeror will not be rated favorably or unfavorably.

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE

Based on the experience Information received, a Performance Confidence Assessment rating will then be assigned to each Offeror using the Performance Confidence Assessment Table.

Performance Confidence Assessment

Non-Relevant Past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Unknown Confidence (Neutral)

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The following FAR, DFARS and DLAD clauses and provisions apply to this solicitation. The complete text of any of the clauses and provisions may be accessed in full text at http://farsite.hill.af.mil/.

SECTION 1 – PROVISIONS

FAR 52.252-01 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)

This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es): http://www.dla.mil/Acquisition and http://farsite.hil.af.mil/ .

FAR 52.209-7 – Information Regarding Responsibility Matters (Jul 2013)

FAR 52.212-1 -- Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items (Apr 2014)

FAR 52.212-3 -- Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items (Mar 2015)

The offeror shall complete only paragraphs (b) of this provision if the Offeror has completed the annual representations and certification electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site accessed through http://www.acquisition.gov . If the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (p) of this provision.

(a) Definitions. As used in this provision--

“Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States and who are economically disadvantaged in

4.0 CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ http://www.dla.mil/Acquisition http://farsite.hil.af.mil/ http://farsite.hil.af.mil/ http://www.acquisition.gov/ accordance with 13 CFR part 127. It automatically qualifies as a women-owned small business eligible under the WOSB Program.

“Forced or indentured child labor” means all work or service—

(1) Exacted from any person under the age of 18 under the menace of any penalty for its nonperformance and for which the worker does not offer himself voluntarily; or

(2) Performed by any person under the age of 18 pursuant to a contract the enforcement of which can be accomplished by process or penalties.

“Highest-level owner” means the entity that owns or controls an immediate owner of the offeror, or that owns or controls one or more entities that control an immediate owner of the offeror. No entity owns or exercises control of the highest level owner.

“Immediate owner” means an entity, other than the offeror, that has direct control of the offeror. Indicators of control include, but are not limited to, one or more of the following: Ownership or interlocking management, identity of interests among family members, shared facilities and equipment, and the common use of employees.

“Inverted domestic corporation,” means a foreign incorporated entity that meets the definition of an inverted domestic corporation under 6 U.S.C. 395(b), applied in accordance with the rules and definitions of 6 U.S.C. 395(c).

“Manufactured end product” means any end product in Federal Supply Classes (FSC) 1000-9999, except—

(1) FSC 5510, Lumber and Related Basic Wood Materials;

(2) Federal Supply Group (FSG) 87, Agricultural Supplies;

(3) FSG 88, Live Animals;

(4) FSG 89, Food and Related Consumables;

(5) FSC 9410, Crude Grades of Plant Materials;

(6) FSC 9430, Miscellaneous Crude Animal Products, Inedible;

(7) FSC 9440, Miscellaneous Crude Agricultural and Forestry Products;

(8) FSC 9610, Ores;

(9) FSC 9620, Minerals, Natural and Synthetic; and

(10) FSC 9630, Additive Metal Materials.

“Place of manufacture” means the place where an end product is assembled out of components, or otherwise made or processed from raw materials into the finished product that is to be provided to the Government. If a product is disassembled and reassembled, the place of reassembly is not the place of manufacture.

“Restricted business operations” means business operations in Sudan that include power production activities, mineral extraction activities, oil-related activities, or the production of military equipment, as those terms are defined in the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-174). Restricted business operations do not include business operations that the person (as that term is defined in Section 2 of the Sudan Accountability and Divestment Act of 2007) conducting the business can demonstrate—

(1) Are conducted under contract directly and exclusively with the regional government of southern Sudan;

(2) Are conducted pursuant to specific authorization from the Office of Foreign Assets Control in the Department of the Treasury, or are expressly exempted under Federal law from the requirement to be conducted under such authorization;

(3) Consist of providing goods or services to marginalized populations of Sudan;

(4) Consist of providing goods or services to an internationally recognized peacekeeping force or humanitarian organization;

(5) Consist of providing goods or services that are used only to promote health or education; or

(6) Have been voluntarily suspended.

Sensitive technology—

(1) Means hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, or any other technology that is to be used specifically—

(i) To restrict the free flow of unbiased information in Iran; or

(ii) To disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict speech of the people of Iran; and

(2) Does not include information or informational materials the export of which the President does not have the authority to regulate or prohibit pursuant to section 203(b)(3) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(3)).

“Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern”—

(1) Means a small business concern—

(i) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more service-disabled veterans; and

(ii) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more service-disabled veterans or, in the case of a service-disabled veteran with permanent and severe disability, the spouse or permanent caregiver of such veteran.

(2) Service-disabled veteran means a veteran, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(2), with a disability that is service-connected, as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(16).

“Small business concern” means a concern, including its affiliates, that is independently owned and operated, not dominant in the field of operation in which it is bidding on Government contracts, and qualified as a small business under the criteria in 13 CFR Part 121 and size standards in this solicitation.

“Small disadvantaged business concern, consistent with 13 CFR 124.1002,” means a small business concern under the size standard applicable to the acquisition, that--

(1) Is at least 51 percent unconditionally and directly owned (as defined at 13 CFR 124.105) by--

(i) One or more socially disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.103) and economically disadvantaged (as defined at 13 CFR 124.104) individuals who are citizens of the United States; and

(ii) Each individual claiming economic disadvantage has a net worth not exceeding $750,000 after taking into account the applicable exclusions set forth at 13 CFR 124.104(c)(2); and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled (as defined at 13.CFR 124.106) by individuals, who meet the criteria in paragraphs (1)(i) and (ii) of this definition.

“Subsidiary” means an entity in which more than 50 percent of the entity is owned—

(1) Directly by a parent corporation; or

(2) Through another subsidiary of a parent corporation.

“Veteran-owned small business concern” means a small business concern—

(1) Not less than 51 percent of which is owned by one or more veterans(as defined at 38 U.S.C. 101(2)) or, in the case of any publicly owned business, not less than 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more veterans; and

(2) The management and daily business operations of which are controlled by one or more veterans.

“Women-owned business concern” means a concern which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women; or in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the its stock is owned by one or more women; and whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

“Women-owned small business concern” means a small business concern --

(1) That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women or, in the case of any publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more women; and

(2) Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more women.

“Women-owned small business (WOSB) concern eligible under the WOSB Program (in accordance with 13 CFR part 127),” means a small business concern that is at least 51 percent directly and unconditionally owned by, and the management and daily business operations of which are controlled by, one or more women who are citizens of the United States.

(b)

(1) Annual Representations and Certifications. Any changes provided by the offeror in paragraph (b)(2) of this provision do not automatically change the representations and certifications posted on the SAMwebsite.

(2) The offeror has completed the annual representations and certifications electronically via the SAM website accessed through https://www.acquisition.gov. After reviewing the SAM database information, the offeror verifies by submission of this offer that the representation and certifications currently posted electronically at FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Items, have been entered or updated in the last 12 months, are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation (including the business size standard applicable to the NAICS code referenced for this solicitation), as of the date of this offer and are incorporated in this offer by reference (see FAR 4.1201), except for paragraphs . [Offeror to https://www.acquisition.gov/ identify the applicable paragraphs at (c) through (p) of this provision that the offeror has completed for the purposes of this solicitation only, if any. These amended representation(s) and/or certification(s) are also incorporated in this offer and are current, accurate, and complete as of the date of this offer. Any changes provided by the offeror are applicable to this solicitation only, and do not result in an update to the representations and certifications posted electronically on SAM.]

(c) Offerors must complete the following representations when the resulting contract is to be performed in the United States or its outlying areas. Check all that apply.

(1) Small business concern. The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [_] is, [_] is not a small business concern.

(2) Veteran-owned small business concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [_] is, [_] is not a veteran-owned small business concern.

(3) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a veteran-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(2) of this provision.] The offeror represents as part of its offer that it [_] is, [_] is not a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

(4) Small disadvantaged business concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents that it [_] is, [_] is not, a small disadvantaged business concern as defined in 13 CFR 124.1002.

(5) Women-owned small business concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents that it [_] is, [_] is not a women-owned small business concern.

Note: Complete paragraphs (c)(8) and (c)(9) only if this solicitation is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

(6) WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a women-owned small business concern in paragraph (c)(5) of this provision.] The offeror represents that—

(i) It [_] is, [_] is not a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [_] is, [_] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (c)(6)(i) of this provision is accurate for each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: .] Each WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the WOSB representation.

(7) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a WOSB concern eligible under the WOSB Program in (c)(6) of this provision.] The offeror represents that—

(i) It [_] is, [_] is not an EDWOSB concern, has provided all the required documents to the WOSB Repository, and no change in circumstances or adverse decisions have been issued that affects its eligibility; and

(ii) It [_] is, [_] is not a joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 127, and the representation in paragraph (c)(7)(i) of this provision is accurate for each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the name or names of the EDWOSB concern and other small businesses that are participating in the joint venture: .] Each EDWOSB concern participating in the joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the EDWOSB representation.

(8) Women-owned business concern (other than small business concern). [Complete only if the offeror is a women-owned business concern and did not represent itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents that it [_] is, a women-owned business concern.

(9) Tie bid priority for labor surplus area concerns. If this is an invitation for bid, small business offerors may identify the labor surplus areas in which costs to be incurred on account of manufacturing or production (by offeror or first-tier subofferors) amount to more than 50 percent of the contract price:

(10) HUBZone small business concern. [Complete only if the offeror represented itself as a small business concern in paragraph (c)(1) of this provision.] The offeror represents, as part of its offer, that--

(i) It [_] is, [_] is not a HUBZone small business concern listed, on the date of this representation, on the List of Qualified HUBZone Small Business Concerns maintained by the Small Business Administration, and no material changes in ownership and control, principal office, or HUBZone employee percentage have occurred since it was certified in accordance with 13 CFR part 126; and

(ii) It [_] is, [_] is not a HUBZone joint venture that complies with the requirements of 13 CFR part 126, and the representation in paragraph (c)(10)(i) of this provision is accurate for each HUBZone small business concern participating in the HUBZone joint venture. [The offeror shall enter the names of each of the HUBZone small business concerns participating in the HUBZone joint venture: .] Each HUBZone small business concern participating in the HUBZone joint venture shall submit a separate signed copy of the HUBZone representation.

(d) Representations required to implement provisions of Executive Order 11246 --

(1) Previous contracts and compliance. The offeror represents that --

(i) It [_] has, [_] has not, participated in a previous contract or subcontract subject to the Equal Opportunity clause of this solicitation; and

(ii) It [_] has, [_] has not, filed all required compliance reports.

(2) Affirmative Action Compliance. The offeror represents that --

(i) It [_] has developed and has on file, [_] has not developed and does not have on file, at each establishment, affirmative action programs required by rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor (41 CFR parts 60-1 and 60-2), or

(ii) It [_] has not previously had contracts subject to the written affirmative action programs requirement of the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor.

(e) Certification Regarding Payments to Influence Federal Transactions (31 U.S.C. 1352). (Applies only if the contract is expected to exceed $150,000.) By submission of its offer, the offeror certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that no Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a

Member of Congress on his or her behalf in connection with the award of any resultant contract. If any registrants under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 have made a lobbying contact on behalf of the offeror with respect to this contract, the offeror shall complete and submit, with its offer, OMB Standard Form LLL, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities, to provide the name of the registrants. The offeror need not report regularly employed officers or employees of the offeror to whom payments of reasonable compensation were made.

(f) Buy American Certificate. (Applies only if the clause at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.225-1, Buy American – Supplies, is included in this solicitation.)

(1) The offeror certifies that each end product, except those listed in paragraph (f)(2) of this provision, is a domestic end product and that for other than COTS items, the offeror has considered…