QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS.pdf

Amendment One SP4703-22-Q-0045

Demolition of Implant

In reference to the contract above the solicitation has been amended to include the following:

1. Question Is there a hazmat report available? Without that, the demo cost could almost double or triple in size if portions of the exterior are friable asbestos. A massive undertaking for containment could be necessary.

Answer: No Hazmat report is available. With respect to containment, if a containment is required, it should be erected in accordance with the sentence in the SOW that says “This work shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable building codes, environmental, safety and health directives regarding the mitigation and disposal of asbestos, lead, and asbestos containing materials.”.

2. Question: In lieu of a report, can we include a cost for an asbestos assessment in the base bid, and offer unit pricing for additional hazmat abatement?

Answer: Testing of materials for characterization may be included in the base bid, but no additional funds will be available for additional hazmat abatement.

3. Question: the owner allows the contractor to use a diesel/propane powered Bobcat with a scrubber in the building?

Answer: Use of contractor vehicles such as those mentioned in question 3 will be allowed so long as the contractor understands that said vehicles may NOT be stored inside the building at any time. If the vehicle is idle for any length of time, it must be parked outside the building.

4. Question: Will the owner allow the contractor to place a dumpster directly outside one of the bay openings on the west side of the building?

Answer: Yes.

5. Question: Will the owner be responsible for cutting and capping the incoming sprinkler line and electrical conduit to the demo area?

Answer: No. DSCR shops will provide support to de-energize and depressurize these lines. The sprinkler riser shall be capped at the first available union in the pipe and the shops will verify no leaks in the capping.

6. Question: Can the owner confirm that they want to dispose of all furniture (tables and chairs) as well as both window AC units?

Answer: An answer is still pending on the AC unit on the west side. All other spoils are the property of the contractor for disposal or salvage value.

7. Question: Will a full-time superintendent be required, with OSHA 30, First Aid/CPR, and CQM certifications?

Answer: Since the job should not be of an extraordinarily long duration, the full time presence of a superintendent shouldn’t be required.

However, because of the nature of the work, safety and the materials involved, the presence of a superintendent is desired.

8. Question: Will a full time industrial hygienist need to be employed by the contractor to monitor air quality, since the demo will be occurring inside another occupied building?

Answer: Since the area is not normally occupied and it is not a hospital or child care center, my answer would be no. Air quality monitoring is not required unless it falls under the sentence in the SOW that say “This work shall be conducted in accordance with all applicable building codes, environmental, safety and health directives regarding the mitigation and disposal of asbestos, lead, and asbestos containing materials.”.

9. Question: Will an asbestos abatement work plan be required to be approved by the DSCR industrial Hygienist, prior to start of demo?

Answer: Yes

10. Question: Hazardous Materials – Asbestos Flooring and Wallboard; and Lead Paint

The Sign on the Door at the Cafeteria says Non-Friable Asbestos floor tiles and wallboard. This sounds like there is an environmental report or material lab analysis of the tile and wallboard.

Can you please check with the environmental section to see if there is written information on these materials?

Answer: The report has been attached the Amendment

11. Question: The SF 1442, Block 12, a.; says a Bond is required for this project. The FAR and DLA do not typically require a bond on projects under $100k. A bond costs significant money. Did you mean to require a bond? This project cost will not be near $100k.

Answer: A bond is needed for requirements in excess of $35,000 = Payment Bond.

Painting SOW- any paint on the southeast wall that matches the interior of the office on the southeast side of the implant should be removed as well. When the project is complete, it should look as if the implant had never been there before.

All other terms and conditions remain the same

ASBESTOS RE-INSPECTION REPORT FOR BUILDING NO. 60

AT

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DEFENSE SUPPLY CENTER RICHMOND

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA

June 1, 2018

Revision 2

Prepared by

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BALTIMORE DISTRICT

Environmental and Munitions Design Center Environmental and Explosive Safety Section

2 Hopkins Plaza Baltimore, Maryland 21201

Asbestos Re-inspection Report Building No. 60 June 1, 2018

This report describes specific activities and findings related to the asbestos re-inspection for the interior and exterior of Building 60. This report was reviewed and approved by the following individuals:

Stephen B. Epps

Project Lead Industrial Hygienist Asbestos Inspector/ Management Planner VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004379 Management Planner No. 3304001667 Environmental and Munitions Design Center Environmental Safety Office United States Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore District

Genet A. Tulu

Industrial Hygienist Asbestos Inspector VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004380 Environmental and Munitions Design Center Environmental Safety Office United States Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore District

EPPS.STEPHEN.

B.1253431918

Digitally signed by EPPS.STEPHEN.B.1253431918 DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, cn=EPPS.STEPHEN.B.1253431918 Date: 2018.06.05 14:40:40 -04'00'

TULU.GENET.ADUG

NA.1377252230

Digitally signed by

TULU.GENET.ADUGNA.1377252230

DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=DoD, ou=PKI, ou=USA, cn=TULU.GENET.ADUGNA.1377252230 Date: 2018.11.01 12:05:52 -04'00'

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of Work

1.2 Purpose

2.0 PROCESS

2.1 Sample Collection Procedures

2.2 Analytical Standards and Result Evaluation

Table 1. ACM Hazard Ranking

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

4.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

5.0 RECOMMENDATION

Table 2. Summary of Asbestos Containing Homogenous Areas (2006-2018)

Table 3. Hazard Assessment of ACM

Table 4. Non Asbestos Homogenous Areas (2006-2013)

Figure 1. Location of ACM or PACM

APPENDIX A. PHOTGRAPHS OF ACM

APPENDIX B. INSPECTOR LICENSES

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Baltimore District personnel have been tasked with conducting an installation wide, comprehensive Asbestos re-inspection for non-school and non-childcare facilities located at the Defense Supply Center Richmond (DSCR).

This installation is located at 8000 Jefferson Davis Highway in Richmond, Virginia and supports the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).

This re-inspection is a requirement under the approved installation Asbestos Management Plan that covers all federal buildings on the installation (Zia, 2013) and will provide the necessary surveillance information to identify and assess the condition of known Asbestos Containing Building Materials (ACBM), also referred in this report as Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) and identify ACM that is new or missed on previous surveys. This report will serve the DSCR, DF-Free Environmental Management Division in ensuring that their operation and maintenance (O&M) program minimizes or eliminates the exposure to asbestos fibers during routine operations in or around ACBM. Additionally, this report will provide the preliminary information necessary in the planning process during projects that may involve renovation or demolition of ACBM in compliance with provisions of the Clean Air Act.

Mr. Stephen Epps (VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004379) and Ms. Genet Tulu (VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004380) conducted the re-inspection of Building No. 60 on April 20, 2018.

The survey was conducted in accordance with State and Federal regulations. During the survey building materials known to be ACBM were verified and additional homogenous areas suspected to be Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) were visually identified, their quantity measured, and sampled for analysis, where necessary in accordance with EPA regulation 40 CFR 763 and the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act.

During this survey all ACM materials that were identified during the previous survey in 2013 and 2006 were visually inspected and quantities verified. These materials are expansion joint, preformed pipe insulation, preformed pipe fittings, six types of 12”x12” floor tile, and three types of 9x9 floor tiles, drywall or sheetrock wall boards and joint compound identified in area B-002,003,004 and D-002. Additional homogenous areas and ACM were not identified during this survey.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Scope of Work

An asbestos re-inspection survey was completed for Building No. 60 located at the Defense Supply Center Richmond in Richmond, Virginia. The re-inspection was conducted by personnel from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Baltimore District, Environmental and Explosives Safety Section (EESS) at the request of USACE Norfolk District on behalf of Defense Logistics Agency Installation Support at Richmond. This re-inspection was conducted on April 20, 2018 by Virginia licensed asbestos inspectors and in accordance with all applicable state and federal regulations.

1.2 Purpose

This survey identifies and evaluates ACM, PACM, or suspect materials that were not previously identified, if any. The re-inspection incorporates findings from a previous survey that was conducted on June 18, 2013 by Zia Engineering & Environmental Consultants, LLC (Zia). The goal of this re-inspection is to assess the condition of previously identified ACM, PACM, and to conduct visual and physical assessments on any previously un-sampled suspect homogenous areas. If ACM or PACM is found, the report identifies the areas and materials that contain ACM or PACM, the quantity of the material, current condition, hazard assessment, and updated diagrams that show the materials location.

2.0 PROCESS

The asbestos re-inspection was performed in accordance with 40 CFR Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and EPA 40 CFR Part 61 National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). The re-inspection included visual identification of existing and accessible suspect homogenous building materials. In addition, an assessment of condition, friability, and estimate of material quantity was made. Field information was organized as per the AHERA concept of homogenous area. A homogenous area is defined as a suspect material of similar age, appearance, function and texture. Homogenous areas were grouped building-wide to determine if additional or new samples need to be collected.

A thorough attempt was made to access all areas for visual and physical verification of suspect ACM. However, due to the partial destructive nature of collecting building samples for asbestos analysis and some areas may be inaccessible or conditions may present a challenge to safe entry or access to the materials, EESS personnel do not guarantee that all ACM or PACM in the building were located and identified. Additionally, this report details suspect ACM or PACM as identified at the time of inspection only. Quantities of suspect ACM listed in this report are rough field measurements only and if removal is necessary they must be verified by contractors prior to commencement of work.

Initially the 2013 Asbestos report from the inspection from Zia was reviewed by EESS inspectors. If the materials found to be ACM or PACM were re-located and quantity verified, their condition will be assessed and reported. It is possible that some ACM or PACM materials identified on previous survey were not located or were ruled out through further sampling and analysis during this survey.

2.1 Sample Collection Procedures

If additional suspect homogenous areas that were not sampled or considered during the previous survey were located during this re-inspection, their size will be quantified and the material may be sampled for verification. Bulk confirmatory samples of suspect ACM will then be collected in the following manner;

1) Materials will be divided into homogenous areas.

2) Representative samples of each of the following homogeneous area categories may be collected or material may be assumed to contain asbestos.

• Thermal System Insulation (TSI) is insulation material applied to boilers, pipes, fittings, tanks, ducts, or on other interior structural components to prevent heat loss or gain, or water condensation, or for other purposes. For suspect TSI a minimum of three bulk samples are required to be collected for verification.

• Surfacing material means material that is sprayed-on, troweled-on, or otherwise applied to surfaces, such as acoustical plaster on ceiling and fireproofing materials on structural members or other materials on surfaces for acoustical, fireproofing, or other purposes. For suspect surfacing material a minimum of three bulk samples are required to be collected for homogenous area less than 1,000 square feet, a minimum of 5 bulk samples are required for a homogenous area greater than 1,000 square feet and less than 5,000 square feet, and a minimum of 7 bulk samples are required for a homogenous area greater than 5,000 square feet.

• Miscellaneous material means interior building material on structural components, structural members or fixtures, such as floor and ceiling tiles, and does not include surfacing material or thermal system insulation. For suspect miscellaneous material a minimum of two bulk samples are required to be collected for verification.

3) After collection, each sample will be packaged in a sealed plastic bag, labeled, and a sample Chain of Custody will be prepared. Additionally a field sampling log with the sample number, sampled material type, location where the sample was collected, and quantity of the material will be maintained.

2.2 Analytical Standards and Result Evaluation

Bulk samples of suspect ACM collected will be analyzed by the accepted method of polarized light microscopy (PLM) using the Environmental Protection Agency’s method, EPA-600 visual estimate. Some samples may be prepared using gravity tracked matrix reduction method (ELAP 198.6) since the binding material may be obstructing the view of asbestos fibers. Additionally, for non-friable or organically bound bulk samples, when trace amount asbestos is identified during the PLM analysis the inspector may choose to submit these samples for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) with the NY ELAP198.4 method for a definitive assessment. The bulk samples were analyzed by Aerosol Monitoring and Analytical Services, Inc. (AMA Inc.).

This laboratory is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accredited Program (NVLAP Accreditation No. 101143-0) an accreditation sponsored by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)).

Samples analyzed having no identified asbestos are reported as “NAD” (No Asbestos Detected).

Those containing less than 1% asbestos are reported as “TR” (Trace). Those containing asbestos were reported with the type and percentage of asbestos. In compliance with the AHERA regulations, material is considered an ACM when it contains greater than one percent asbestos.

The one percent cut off is consistent with EPA's definition under the asbestos National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). However, the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) has a standard with a definition for both "asbestos" and "asbestos-containing materials." This definition of asbestos does not have a one percent cut off, therefore, asbestos that is present in percentages less than one percent continues to be covered by the OSHA standard. Work operations conducted in areas where the asbestos or asbestos product is below one percent is considered an "unclassified" operation and would need to adhere to some of the requirements under OSHA, therefore results that have trace asbestos will be considered ACM for worker protection purposes.

Materials found to contain asbestos will then be assessed utilizing the following hazard ranking table (Table 1).

Table 1. ACM Hazard Ranking Assessment Category ACM Condition ACM Disturbance Potential

7 Significantly Damaged* Any 6 Damaged Significant Damage 5 Damaged Damage 4 Damaged Low 3 Good Significant Damage 2 Good Damage 1 Good Low

* The difference between damage and significantly damaged is that significantly damaged means damage evenly distributed across 10% or more of the functional space or localized over 25% of the functional space

3.0 BUILDING DESCRIPTION

Building No. 60 was constructed in approximately 1953 and is approximately 692,485 square feet. It is mainly of concrete block construction on a concrete foundation with flat roof. Interior finished include carpet, vinyl tile, and concrete floors, fiberglass batting insulation, suspended ceiling, and sheetrock and concrete block walls.

4.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

Mr. Stephen Epps (VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004379) and Ms. Genet Tulu (VA Asbestos Inspector No. 3303004380) conducted the re-inspection of this building on April 20, 2018. Upon reviewing the 2013 inspection report prepared by Zia and conducting the building walkthrough, the following ACM were verified;

• Expansion Joint

• Preformed pipe insulation and pipe fitting

• Various types of 12”x 12” floor tiles and mastic (orange, blue, gray smear, white/gray/green, white smear over various tile layers, fossil tile patch over various tile layers)

• Various types of 9”x 9” floor tiles and mastic ( dark brown, gray, light brown)

• HVAC vibration damper cloth

• Sheet rock wall board and joint compound

• Wall paper over drywall and joint compound

During the re-inspection no additional homogenous areas were identified. All ACM from previous survey was verified and the materials condition assessment can be found in Tables 2 and 3. A consolidated list of materials that were ruled out as ACM to date, either through the experience and knowledge of an accredited inspector or sample analysis can be found in Table 4.

5.0 RECOMMENDATION

Sheetrock Wall Boards and Joint

During this survey wall board throughout the offices adjacent to Bay C and inside of Bay B and D were verified ACM. This wall board is comprised of sheet rock also referred to as drywall and joint compound material, which is comprised of an asbestos containing mud. This material was found in fair condition and in some areas it was encapsulated with wall paper. Asbestos containing drywall or joint compound mud can easily become friable especially in the office areas adjacent to Bay C as the building condition is deteriorating. Additionally the probability of rendering this material friable during maintenance and renovation projects is very high. If removal is planned, it must be done so by trained personnel and every efforts must be made to handle this material in a manner that keeps it in whole pieces and suppresses dust by utilize wet methods. The materials must not be shattered, crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to dust. The following power tools cannot be used in the removal or handling of this material, sander, saw, grinder, or chipping tools. Refer to the AMP for specific guidance on maintenance, removal, and disposal of asbestos containing materials.

Floor Tile

There are several designs of 12” x 12” and 9” x 9” floor tile with mastic that were assumed and verified as ACM. The 9” X 9” floor tiles were assumed as ACM at the discretion of the inspector, while the surrounding 12” x 12” tile were verified ACM. This flooring material is considered non friable and if maintained appropriately does not readily become friable. A few of the tiles were found in poor condition, displaced and chipped. These damaged tiles should at a minimum be removed by trained and qualified personnel. Some of the flooring was found intact and can be left in-place or encapsulated. During planned building renovations or when asbestos-containing flooring is in poor condition and cannot easily be left in place, removal may be necessary and should be conducted by trained personnel. Refer to the AMP for further guidance on the removal, maintenance, cleaning, and disposal of asbestos containing floor tiles.

Duct Vibration Dampener Cloth

Assumed asbestos containing vibration dampener cloth was identified on the air handling unit inside of Bay D. This material is utilized to absorb the vibration while joining the supply air plenum to the supply ducts. This material was not sampled during the current and previous surveys, since doing so will compromise the system and may introduce asbestos fibers into the air handling unit. This material was found in poor condition and it is highly recommended that it be removed as soon as possible and replaced with modern non asbestos containing material.

Refer to the AMP for further guidance on the removal and disposal of asbestos containing vibration dampener cloth.

Pipe Insulation and Pipe Fitting

Asbestos containing pipe insulation and fittings were found thought the building. This material was found in fair condition throughout the building. A few areas were found in poor condition, where age and impact related deterioration was noted. During the inspection one area with damaged pipe fitting from what appears to be impact damage was observed and recommendation to remove this material were made to the DSCR POC (Figure 3). The exterior cloth material on the rest of the pipe insulation in this building was seen in fair condition and should be repaired or encapsulated to maintain its integrity until such time that removal is scheduled. Refer to the AMP for specific guidance on maintenance, removal, and disposal of asbestos containing materials

Expansion Joint

The black or gray fibrous rope like expansion joint material between the slabs of concrete was found throughout the warehouse and verified to be asbestos containing. This material was found intact and is not considered friable. If maintenance activities require the removal or cutting of this material then it must be conducted by trained personnel in accordance with the guidance in the AMP.

Table 2. Summary of Asbestos Containing Homogenous Areas (2006-2018) Homogenous Area Description Assumed Verified

ACM

Quantity % Asbestos

12” x 12” blue floor tile and mastic Sampled 2006 x 150 SF 8% Chrysotile

12” x 12” grey smear floor tile and mastic

Sampled 2006 x 300 SF 6% Chrysotile

12” x 12” orange floor tiles and mastic Sampled 2006 x 5185 SF 14% Chrysotile

12” x 12” white/gray/green floor tiles and mastic x 1675 SF NA

12” x 12” white smear with mastic over orange and tan tile with mastic

Sampled 2013 x 1220 SF 7% Chrysotile

12” x 12” fossil tile with black mastic over

Sampled 2013 x 8 SF 7% Chrysotile

9” x 9” light brown floor tile with mastic x 240 SF NA

9” x 9” dark brown floor tile with mastic x 240 SF NA

9” x 9” grey floor tile with mastic x 2640 SF NA Cloth vibration dampener x 1 EA NA

Expansion Joint

Sampled 2006 x 8600 LF 60% Chrysotile

White basket weave wallpaper over drywall and joint compound

Sampled 2013 x 9,760 SF <1% Chrysotile

Sheet rock and joint compound

Sampled 2006 x 6,672 SF 2% Chrysotile

Preformed pipe insulation x 3100 LF NA

Preformed pipe fitting x 12 LF/ 61

EA

NA

NA= Not Assessed, LF =Linear Feet, SF= Square Feet, EA= each, “=inches, ‘=feet, %=percent, >=greater than, <= less than

Table 3. Hazard Assessment of ACM M at er ia l

L oc at io n

Fr ia bi lit y

A ss es sm en t

C at eg or y*

Ju st ifi ca tio n

C ha ng e in es sm en t

12” x 12” blue floor tile and mastic

Office space adjacent to Bay C, Corridor C-002 and Room C-

Non- Friable

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition potential for damage

No

12” x 12” grey smear floor tile and mastic

Office space adjacent to Bay C, Corridor C-002

Non- Friable

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition potential for damage

No

12” x 12” orange floor tiles and mastic

Office spaces in Bays B and D, B-002-004, and D002

Non Friable white/gray/gre en floor tiles and mastic

Office space adjacent to Bay C, Corridor C- 002, Office C-003-005

Non- Friable white smear with mastic over orange and tan tile with mastic

Office space adjacent to Bay D, D-002

Non- Friable

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition potential for damage

No

12” x 12” fossil tile with black mastic over

Office space adjacent to Bay D, D-002

Non- Friable

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition potential for damage

No

9” x 9” light brown floor tile with mastic

Office space adjacent to Bay C, Corridor C-

Non- Friable

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition potential for damage

No

9” x 9” dark brown floor tile with mastic

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition for damage

No

9” x 9” grey floor tile with mastic

2 Intact, during renovation and demolition for damage

No

Cloth vibration dampener

On HVAC Unit in Bay D

Non- Friable

6 Damaged and high potential for further damage when HVAC unit is on.

No

Expansion Joint

Between adjoining concrete flooring throughout bay A-E.

Non- Friable

1 Intact and low disturbance potential

M at er ia l

L oc at io n

Fr ia bi lit y es sm en t

C at eg or y*

Ju st ifi ca tio n

C ha ng e in es sm en t

White basket weave wallpaper over drywall and joint compound

Office space inside Bay D, D-002

Non- Friable

2 Intact and potential for damage during maintenance and renovation

No

Sheet rock and joint compound

B002-B004, D-002, and C-005-C007, C- 010, C-014

Non- Friable

5 Wall board deteriorating in offices adjacent to Bay C along with other building materials due to moisture and mold

No

Preformed pipe insulation

Below ceiling throughout bays A-E, and in office area adjacent to bay C

Friable 5 Exterior encapsulating material damage in various areas and potential for damage during operation and maintenance activities

No

Preformed pipe fitting

Below ceiling throughout bays A-E

Friable 5 1/61 pipe fitting material was significantly damaged and overall in similar condition as the pipe insulation material

Yes

Table 4. Non Asbestos Homogenous Areas (2006-2013)

Homogenous Areas Non Suspect Not ACM 4” Black cove base and mastic x

2’x4’ fissured/pinhole ceiling tile x White duct mastic x

4” light gray cove base and mastic x Tile grout x

4” blue cove base and mastic x 4” brown cove base and mastic x

Orange duct mastic x Gray duct coating x

12” x 12” white/gray smear floor tiles and mastic x Fiberglass pipe insulation x

Fiberglass ceiling/roof panels x 2’ x 4’ Squared fiberglass ceiling tile x

Foil duct insulation x Fiberglass batting insulation x

Floor patch x

Figure 1. Location of ACM or PACM

APPENDIX A. PHOTGRAPHS OF ACM

Photo 1: Expansion Joint between concrete slabs (Bays A-E)

2 3

Photo 2: 4” preformed pipe insulation, Photo 3: preformed pipe fitting, and Photo 4: 6” preformed pipe insulation, (office area adjacent to Bay C and throughout Bays A-E).

Photo 5: 12” x 12” Orange floor tiles and mastic (Offices D-002 and B002-0004)

Photo 6: 12” x 12” blue floor tiles and 12” x 12” gray smear floor tiles with mastic

Photo 7-8: Cloth Vibration Dampener on air handling unit

Photo 9: 12” x 12” white smear tiles and 12” x 12” fossil patch tiles with black mastic over layers of orange tile with and tan tile with

Photo 10: 9” x 9” dark brown and light brown floor tiles with mastic

Photo 11: 12” x 12” white gray and green floor tiles with mastic

APPENDIX B. INSPECTOR LICENSES

/ I

EXPIRES ON .

}ZQ.~~p~~ALTH of0fi¥]JE\~JO;il~1:;;L ; ~ Depa_rtmeJlfof_l>!ofessiqnal and Occupa.f,i0n~}~egti1~tion '')\:.1

·~Ll'.~966;May:lJ~~:lff~f;i~~~,;»o3:;~;~rr~'.'.;~, :~3233fi~- _ .. ~4{: 04-30-20~9~ ~ :n~a304001667 ;c.t;;:t:::L:,'i-<:/:·.·- ·

BOARD FOR ASBESTOS, LEAD/ AND HOME INSPECTORS

- ASBEsTd$ .MANA~tEtl/1ENTJ?~ANi~E~-·-~·rcENSE

;~,;,./ 'i~t:,g~i'.' ... '.i~~f STEPHEN BARRY EPPS !llliil 5624 JOHNNYCAKE RD GWYNN.OAK;Jy1D . :re'-. _.. __ ,~, can be verified at http://Www.dpor.vi;~{nia.g~~

~::~ ttf~~ -~; I

(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PRIVILEGES AND INSTRUCTIONS) DPOR-LIC (02/2017)

EXPIRES . .ON _ :}:

04-30-20 f9~ti

~COMMONWEALTH oJIViVIJRGJ[NJLA;:~.~ :

· .· Department.of Professional and Occupati~naLR.egul~ti~n · ·fj ··fi'.· •· ·· t~~Y'~f 'f~~~~~;:;~~"'f f'"'~;~s~li

;;"ti;[ NUMBEA

.::!~:?R,~~B4379

BOARD FOR A;g/3ESif.QS, - ~Efl\!2.Ff'\ND ·!ti9fl.1E~J~9?§CTORS

· ASBESTOS INSPECTOR LICENSE~ •/r · ~~r ~$,,,,;. f~f ;;f: ~1~~~

STEPHEN BARRY EPPS .. - . .,. , - ...

5624 JOHNNYCAKE RD

GWYNN.OAK, MD ?14Q?.,

'V f 'f ~ ~; ·r 2,~::J?

can be verified athttp://WWw.dpor.virginia.gov "' , · ,,,,,_

JJCIJ~

t~;:)tli~~

(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PRIVILEGES AND INSTRUCTIONS)

DPOR-LIC (0212017)

EXPIRES_pl)l, ·<>;

04-30-201~!.> l~::~~fl~~~~~~~~1::¥lr

FOR ~SBESTOS, LEAPr AND ·J;!OM!;,lN$PECTORS

GENET ADU:;~[ t ~r~::~~r tr~;;~2

1944 YOUNGSTON RD

JAB.R(;:IJSVI

..... :- :~· .. ··:·:_:::::r1:::'.:_ r..).·f::

• :;i;:t..t11< can be verified at http://~.dpor.vi;g/n~d!~~J

(SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR PRIVILEGES AND INSTRUCTIONS)

NU MSES

!~'.~~q~g_b43so

:.- X· :.· j 'Jii'd

DPOR-LIC (0212017)