EPoS_Attach_11_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_20170622.docx

DOCX document 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Electronic Point of Sale (EPoS) and Supporting Services
Solicitation number
SP4703-17-R-CB01
Issued by

About this file

This document includes a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract solicitation. The solicitation is for an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to provide a turn-key hardware and software solution capturing fuel retail transactions at unattended military service stations, mobile ground fueling, and aviation fueling for mobile airfields. The proposed ordering period is a five-year base period plus ten one-year option periods, for a total of fifteen years. The requirement is to deliver and install devices and sustain the hardware and software solution. The past performance questionnaire requests information about a contractor's prior work and seeks ratings in areas including quality, cost control, timeliness, management, personnel, and customer satisfaction. It will be used to evaluate proposals that are due by the closing date in response to this solicitation from the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation.

Attachment 11

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Epos_Amend_0005.zip ZIP file
Epos_Q&A__4.zip ZIP file
15 EPoS Attach 15 Group 2 Task Order 3 Fixed Installation_Sustainment PWS 20171113 CC.docx DOCX document
8 EPoS Attach 8 Solution Demonstration 20171213 CC.docx DOCX document
12 EPoS Attach 12 Group 1 Task Order 1 Active Directory PWS 20171113 CC.docx DOCX document
13 EPoS Attach 13 Group 2 Task Order 1 Fixed Software Development PWS 20171113 CC.docx DOCX document
EPoS Attach 19 Pricing Sheet for Group 3 Mobile Devices 20171113 CC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
SP470317RCB01 Amend 0004.pdf PDF
2 EPoS Attach 2 Evaluation Factors for Award 20171207 CC.DOCX DOCX document
16 EPoS Attach 16 Group 3 Task Order 1 Mobile Device Integration PWS 20171201 CC.docx DOCX document
14 EPoS Attach 14 Group 2 Task Order 2 Fixed Software Sustainment PWS 20171113 CC.docx DOCX document
Attachment 20 - Location and Pump Details Sorted.xlsm XLSM spreadsheet
3 EPoS Attach 3 IDIQ Performance Work Statement 20171213 CC.docx DOCX document
EPoS Attach 17 Pricing Sheet for Group 1 Active Directory Services 20171113 CC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1 EPoS Attach 1 Instructions to Offerors 20171207 CC.DOCX DOCX document
9 EPoS Attach 9 Cybersecurity Demonstration 20171201 CC.docx DOCX document
EPoS Attach 18 Pricing Sheet for Group 2 Fixed Facility Devices 20171113 CC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EPoS Attach 4 List of Fixed Device Locations Oct 2017 Revised 20171113 CC.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Epos_Q&A__3.zip ZIP file
SP470317RCB01_Amend_0003.pdf PDF
Epos_Q&A__2.zip ZIP file
SP470317RCB01_Amend_0002.pdf PDF
SP470317RCB01_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
EPoS_Attach_13_Group_2_Task_Order_1_Fixed_Software_Development_PWS_20170820.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_10_Key_Personnel_Resume_Template_20170803.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_15_Group_2_Task_Order_3_Fixed_Installation_Sustainment_PWS_20170820.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_19_Pricing_Sheet_for_Group_3_Mobile_Devices_20170823.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EPoS_Attach_14_Group_2_Task_Order_2_Fixed_Software_Sustainment_PWS_20170820.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_18_Pricing_Sheet_for_Group_2_Fixed_Facility_Devices_20170822.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EPoS_Solicitation_SF1449_20171011.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_12_Group_1_Task_Order_1_Active_Directory_PWS_20170820.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_17_Pricing_Sheet_for_Group_1_Active_Directory_Services_20170822.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EPoS_Attach_3_IDIQ_Performance_Work_Statement_20170913.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_4_List_of_Fixed_Device_Locations_Sept_2017.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EPoS_Attach_16_Group_3_Task_Order_1_Mobile_Device_Integration_PWS_20170820.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_2_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_20170821.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_6_Windows_10_STIG_Version_1_Release_9_April_2017.htm HTM file
EPoS_Attach_1_Instructions_to_Offerors_20171011.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_7_Employee_Confidentiality_Non-Disclosure_of_Non-Public_Information.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_9_Cybersecurity_Demonstration_20170819.docx DOCX document
EPoS_Attach_5_ASDS_STIG_Version_4_Release_3_April_2017.htm HTM file
EPoS_Attach_8_Solution_Demonstration_201708131.docx DOCX document
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 2

Solicitation SP4703-17-R-CB01 Electronic Point of Sale (EPoS) and Supporting Services Past Performance Questionnaire

From: DLA Contracting Services Office Richmond,
8000 Jefferson Davis Highway, Richmond, VA 23297-5441

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Submit completed past performance questionnaire form by Solicitation Closing Date via email to charlotte.bumgarner@dla.mil.

POC: Mrs. Charlotte Bumgarner PHONE – (804) 279-3606

This requirement is for contractor to provide a turn-key hardware and software solution that captures military fleet management fuel retail transactions at unattended military service stations, mobile ground fuel transactions and aviation fuel transactions for mobile airfield/flight line operations, at all locations stated in the PWS.

I am contacting you in reference to ________who has given us your name as a reference. My questions pertain to their record of past and current performance (if applicable). Where the term “Vendor” is used below, it refers to this firm. The information that you provide will be used in the best value evaluation. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible.

(1) Name of Contractor questionnaire is being completed for:

(2) Contract Number:

(3) Role Contractor played in Prior Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(4) Proposed Role in Pending Contract

Prime

Joint Venture Team Member

Subcontractor

(5) Length of time your agency/firm has been involved with the Offeror:
15 months

(6) Contract type:

(7) Contract value:

(8) Description of service:

(9) Is Performance on this contract being reported in CPARS

No, complete page 2 of questionnaire

Yes, answer question (i) below

(i) Has the scope of work significantly changed since the last CPAR?

No

Yes, provide details in (iv) below

(ii) Have there been any significant changes in contractor performance between the last CPAR and now?

No

Yes, answer question (iii) below

(iii) Has an out-of-cycle CPAR been initiated to document changes in performance?

No, provide details of changes in (iv) below

Yes

(iv) Comments to support answers to questions (i), (ii) and (iii):

(10) Name of agency/company completing questionnaire:

(11) Name of person completing questionnaire:

(12) Email address of person completing questionnaire:

(13) Title of person completing questionnaire:

(14) Phone number of person completing questionnaire:

(15) Date questionnaire is being completed:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on page 3.

Rating
Definition
Outstanding
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unacceptable
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Neutral
No record exists.
N/A
(Not applicable) should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Acceptable”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SURVEY FOR SERVICES
N/A
Neutral
Unacceptable
Marginal
Acceptable
Good
Outstanding

a.) QUALITY OF SERVICE:

(1) The Vendor provides a product or service that complies with the contract requirements, specifications, and standards of quality.

(2) The Vendor submits accurate deliverables / reports.

(3) How well did the Vendor establish & maintain a quality program ensuring the ongoing quality of all significant processes were performed?

(4) The Vendor utilizes personnel that were appropriate to the effort performed.

b.) COST CONTROL:

(1) The Vendor performs the effort within the estimated cost/price.

(2) The Contractor submitted accurate invoices on a timely basis.

(4) Vendor’s response to change order was timely and accurate. If the changes in costs/price were initiated or caused by the Vendor please explain in Comments Section.

c.) TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE AND DELIVERABLE SCHEDULE:

(1) The tasks required under this effort are performed in a timely manner and in accordance with the performance schedule, deliverable schedule and period of performance of the contract.

(2) The Vendor was responsive to technical and/or contractual direction.

d.) MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS:

(1) The Vendor demonstrates effective management over the effort performed.

(2) The Vendor maintains an open line of communication so that the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and/or Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR) were apprised of technical, cost, and schedule issues.

(3) The Vendor presents information and correspondence in a clear, concise, and businesslike manner.

(4) The Vendor promptly notified the COR, COTR and/or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent issues.

(5) The Vendor cooperates with the Government in providing flexible, proactive, and effective recommended solutions to identified risk areas and/or critical program issues.

(6) How well did the Vendor plan for initial implementation of the project and achieve operation of task requirements once the contract began.

e.) MANAGEMENT OF KEY and NON-KEY PERSONNEL:

(1) The labor turnover in key personnel labor categories was minimal and did not adversely affect Vendor performance.

(2) The Vendor provided the proposed qualified personnel to fulfill the requirements of the contract.

(3) The Vendor maintained a trained, qualified and experienced workforce in sufficient numbers to meet contract requirements.

f.) CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

(1) The services provided adequately met the needs of the program for the contract tasks requirement.

(2) The Vendor was able to perform with minimal or no direction from the COR or the COTR.

(3) I am satisfied with the performance of the Contractor under this effort.

COMMENTS:

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION

FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .