SP4701-25-R-0002 amend 0001.pdf

SP4701-25-R-0002 Amendment 0001

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DAT 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0001 1/14/2025

6. ISSUED BY CODE SP4701 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

DLA Contracting Services Office - Philadelphia 700 Robbins Avenue Philadelphia, PA 19111-5092 Rhonda L. Saunders (215) 737-9107

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and Zip Code) (x) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SP4701-25-R-0002

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12/19/2024

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE

FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[X]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ x ] is extended, [] is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning _1__ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

() A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN

ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [ ] is not, [ x ] is required to sign this document and return _1_ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Please see attached page.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Helena G. Tuzi

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE

30-105 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SP4701-25-R-0002 Amendment 0001 Amendment is established to extend the solicitation to 01/21/2025 to account for the holiday.

All references to page 113 “proposal that is lowest priced and technically acceptable” are hereby removed.

This award will be Best Value Trade Off.

Page 2 (iv) is hereby updated to read: The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is 541614 with a size standard of $17.5M. This contract award will be evaluated in accordance with Best Value Trade-off evaluation procedures. Award of this contract will be made on a competitive basis, using Best Value “tradeoff” procedures between Technical Approach Proposal, Past Performance, and Price. In evaluating offers, the Technical Approach Proposal is considered significantly more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is considered more important than Price. The Technical Approach Proposal sub-factors are all of equal importance. Non-Price Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price. However, as proposals become more equal in merit of Non- Price Factors, price becomes more important. The Government may consider award to other than the lowest priced contractor or other than the highest technically rated contractor.

Page 20 the paragraph “The Technical Approach Proposal is considered significantly more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is considered more important than Price. All Non-Price sub-factors are all of equal importance.” Is hereby replaced with: The Technical Approach Proposal is considered significantly more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is considered more important than Price. The Technical Approach Proposal sub-factors are all of equal importance.

Page 27 first paragraph is updated to read: made on a competitive basis, using Best Value “tradeoff” procedures between Technical Approach Proposal, Past Performance, and Price. In evaluating offers, the Technical Approach Proposal is considered significantly more important than Past Performance. Past Performance is considered more important than Price. All Technical Approach Proposal sub-factors are all of equal importance. Non-Price Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price. However, as proposals become more equal in merit of Non-Price Factors, price becomes more important. The Government may consider award to other than the lowest priced contractor or other than the highest technically rated contractor.

Page 31 Basis for Award bullet point 2 hereby reads: Award of this contract will be made on a competitive basis, using Best Value “tradeoff” procedures between Technical Approach Proposal, Past Performance, and Price. In evaluating offers, Technical Approach Proposal is considered significantly more important than past performance. Past Performance is considered more important than price. Non-Price Factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price. However, as proposals become more equal in merit of Non-Price Factors, price becomes more important. The Government may consider award to other than the lowest priced contractors or other than the highest technically rated contractors.