Attach 9 PWS QASP Guam Scrap.pdf
PDF 130 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Scrap Disposal - Guam
- Solicitation number
- SP450026R0003
- Issued by
-
Defense Logistics Agency
About this file
This document is a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for a Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services (DLA DS) scrap contract in Guam. The QASP establishes Acceptable Performance Levels (APLs) and surveillance methods to measure contractor performance throughout the contract period, including option years.
The contract involves scrap collection, removal, and disposal/recycling services at DLA DS sites. Key performance deliverables include: establishing efficient scrap collection points with containers within 30 days of contract award (no more than one failure per 12 months); performing timely scale calibration within three days of notification (no more than two failures per 12 months); safely removing inventories and disposing/recycling materials within 15 days of task order issuance (zero incidents allowed per 12 months); and completing demilitarization, demanning, or mutilation activities in compliance with all regulations (no more than two failures per 12 months). Additional requirements address post-removal documentation submission, requiring all reports, clearance requests, forms, and certificates of disposal/destruction/recycling be provided to the Contracting Officer's Representative within required timelines (no more than three instances of missing/incorrect data and three instances of late submissions per 12 months). Surveillance is conducted primarily through Contracting Officer's Representative reporting and review of Collection Summary Reports, with provision for excusable delays beyond the contractor's reasonable control. The government may impose partial or full termination, decline to exercise options, or end the contract early for failure to meet stated APLs, provided minimum government obligations have been met and a replacement contract plan is in place.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment -QASP
Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for Defense Logistics Agency Disposition Services (DLA DS) Guam Scrap
1. Purpose:
This document is to provide guidance on administering the contract such that the best possible quality in performance can be ensured through appropriate surveillance and addressing of any performance failures as appropriate. The Acceptable Performance Level (APL) is the standard the U.S. Government (USG) expects the Contractor to meet throughout the life of the contract. In general, the DLA DS Guam scrap contract will have the below APLs that will be used to measure contractor performance, though additional ones may be identified depending on the contract requirements.
2. Acceptable Performance Levels:
Deliverable Standard Time Frame
Clause Acceptable Performance
Level
Method of Surveillance
Timely TO Performance
Establish efficient scrap collection points to include containers at each DLA DS site and FCS as required.
30-days after contract award and TO issued
Section 4.b in the PWS.
No more than one (1) occurrence during a 12-month period
100% Review of Collection Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
Timely Performance
Timely scale calibration
Within three (3) days notification from the
COR
Section 6.0, in the PWS.
No more than two (2) occurrences during a 12-month period
100% Review of Collection Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
Timely Performance
Safe and timely removal of inventories;
and proper disposal/ recycling from sites.
Within 15 days from the issuance of
TO.
Section 4, in the PWS
No incidents in a 12-month period.
100% Review of Collection Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
Compliant Removal
Disposal/ Sales/ Recycling
As stated in contract.
Section 4.0, and 24.0 in the PWS
No more than one (1) incident in a 12-month period.
100% Review of Collection Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
Compliant Demil/ Deman/ Mutilation of Items
Safe, compliant and adheres to all regulations, including proper transportation, sealing, marking, classifying, outcome, preparation and submission of site plans, proper certifications, etc.
As stated in the contract.
Section 5.0 and other areas throughout
PWS.
No more than two (2) occurrences where Contractor did not meet these requirements during a 12-month period.
100% Review of Collection Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
Compliant post-removal
The Contractor provided all required
As stated in contract.
Section 3.0,
5.0 and other
No more than three
(3) occurrences
100% Review of Collection documents as outlined within the contract PWS and within the required timelines to the COR (e.g., all reports, clearance request, forms, certificates of disposal, destruction, and recycling).
areas throughout the PWS.
where submissions were returned for missing or incorrect data and no more than three (3) occurrences for late submissions during a 12-month period.
Summary Reports (CSRs) and Government Inspection.
3. Surveillance:
a. The primary method of surveillance for evaluating compliance is by Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) reporting. The COR is responsible for reporting preventive maintenance performance to the Contracting Officer (KO) promptly after the performance deadline has passed. The COR will provide when the action was required to be performed by the contractor and the date it occurred. The COR shall also include what the negative impact of the contractor’s failure to meet the APL was on the site.
b. In instances where there are late completions of PM or CM, the COR shall determine if the late performance is caused by an occurrence beyond the reasonable control of the contractor and without its fault or negligence such as, acts of God or the public enemy, acts of the USG either its sovereign or contractual capacity, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, unusually severe weather, and delays of common carriers. In such cases as there is an excusable delay, the contractor will be deemed to have made the APL for the period.
4. Reduction for Failed APL: Throughout the performance period of the contract, including options, the Contractor will follow the listed APL’s. Any additional failures apart from the listed acceptable performance standards the government may use such measures as partial or full terminations under FAR 52.212-4, not exercising options, and ending a contract early without these measures as long as it is Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) and has met its minimum government obligation for the period and a plan for a timely replacement contract is secured.
5. Combating Trafficking in Persons: The COR will monitor the vendor compliance with Combating Trafficking in Persons (CTIP) clause in accordance with DFARS PGI 222.1703(4), such that noncompliance with 52.222-50 is documented to the KO, utilizing and annually completing the CTIP checklist at DoD CTIP Website.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .