Amendment__0002-Seymour_Johnson.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

K PAGE 1 OF 4

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

0002 04 September 2015 N/A

6. ISSUED BY CODE

DLA ENERGY SP0600 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN RD STE 4950

FT BELVOIR VA 22060-6222

BUYER: CARRIE BOEDING/DLA ENERGY-FEABB

PHONE: (703) 767-8422

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street,city,county,State,and ZIP Code)

X 9a. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

SP0600-15-R-0421

9b. DATED (SEE ITEM 11) 18 Aug 2015

10a. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO

DUNS: CAGE:

10b. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[ X ]The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [ ] is extended, [ X ] is not extended Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment;(b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or(c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) E. IMPORTANT: Contractor [] is not, [ ] is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE, SOLICITATION-SP0600-15-R-0421

This amendment changes paragraph 6. “Evaluation Methodology” and address Request for Information (RFI) 002 and RFI 003.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

BY

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C.DATE SIGNED

Amendment 0002

This amendment is issued to all 16 ESCO changing paragraph 6 “Evaluation Methodology” and addresses RFI 002 and RFI 003 for the Notice of Opportunity for Seymour Johnson AFB:

FIRST: Paragraph 6 “Evaluation Methodology” of the Notice of Opportunity is here by changed as follows:

FROM:

Evaluation Methodology

a. Basis for Selection:

Task Order (TO) down selection procedures as stated in the DOE basic contract, paragraph H.3.1, will be used to make an integrated assessment for a best fit decision for ESPC services at Seymour Johnson AFB.

Proposal will be evaluated using the following two factors in descending order of importance:

1) Past Performance

2) Price

The resultant TO may be awarded to the responsible ESCO who provides the best fit for achieving energy conservation and renewable energy production efforts for Seymour Johnson AFB at a reasonable price. Best fit means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in satisfying the requirement and represents the best value to the Government considering the ESCO’s past performance and price.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded:

The Government intends to award one resultant TO for this requirement.

However, the Government reserves the right not to award a TO at all.

TO:

Evaluation Methodology

a. Basis for Selection:

Task Order (TO) down selection procedures as stated in the DOE basic contract, paragraph H.3.1, will be used to make an integrated assessment for a best fit decision for ESPC services at Seymour Johnson AFB.

Proposal will be evaluated using the following two factors in descending order of importance:

1) Past Performance

2) Price

Amendment 0002

The down selection process will focus on each ESCO’s past Chiller Plant improvement performance and their reasonable ability to achieve Seymour Johnson’s energy conservation and renewable goals. The resultant TO may be awarded to the responsible ESCO who provides the best fit for achieving energy conservation and renewable energy production efforts for Seymour Johnson AFB at a reasonable price.

Best fit means the expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in satisfying the requirement and represents the best value to the Government considering the ESCO’s past performance and price.

b. Number of Contracts to be Awarded:

The Government intends to award one resultant TO for this requirement.

However, the Government reserves the right not to award a TO at all.

SECOND: The following RFIs were received from industry and are addressed as follows:

RFI 002: Past Performance, Factor 1. The current page count allowed for this section is 15 pages. Per pervious DLA AF solicitations, most notably USAFA, we were allowed roughly 5 pages per project reference (10 pages for 2 projects). Considering the fact that Seymour Johnson requires 4 projects, can you please allow additional page count for the additional project references?

RFI 002 Response: The page limit for Past Performance, Factor 1 is hereby changed as follows:

FROM: 15 pages TO: 20 pages

RFI 003: Past Performance, Factor 1. In the language below, is a modified construction completion date only needed if there was a contract modification during the construction period?

“Include the Agency/Owner point of contact (name, title, phone number, and email address), contract number, location of each project, the date of task order or contract award, the actual project construction completion date, the modified construction completion date, and the performance period term for each project.”

RFI 003 Response: Paragraph 2 of Factor 1-Past Performance is hereby changed as follows:

FROM: For each project, provide a brief narrative explaining how the project relates to each of the items (i) – (v) below. Include the Agency/Owner point of contact (name, title, phone number, and email address), contract number, location of each project, the date of task order or contract award, the actual project construction completion date, the modified

Amendment 0002 construction completion date and the performance period term for each project. For projects currently in the performance period phase, include information on whether the guaranteed savings for previous years have been achieved. ESCO submissions shall address each of the following items for each project submitted:

TO: For each project, provide a brief narrative explaining how the project relates to each of the items (i) – (v) below. Include the Agency/Owner point of contact (name, title, phone number, and email address), contract number, location of each project, the date of task order or contract award, original anticipated project construction date, the actual project construction completion date, the date and reasoning for any modification to the construction completion, and the performance period term for each project. For projects currently in the performance period phase, include information on whether the guaranteed savings for previous years have been achieved. ESCO submissions shall address each of the following items for each project submitted:

THIRD: All other terms and conditions remain as previously stated.