Solicitation Attachment 4 Past Performance Report Form.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Ships Engineering and Planning Support (SEPS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0018922R0006
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire template for a Navy solicitation seeking engineering services. The solicitation seeks proposals for Ships Engineering and Planning Support (SEPS) to provide engineering services including Carrier Availability Planning Systems development, feasibility studies, material identification and tracking, ship change documents, production cost estimates, and repair specifications for U.S. Naval aircraft carriers and vessels. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by references for offerors' previous contracts and returned by the solicitation due date to evaluate offerors' likelihood of successful performance. It requests ratings and comments on quality, timeliness, and responsiveness factors including recruiting, retention, contract requirements satisfaction, timeliness of reporting and invoicing, problem resolution, and cost control.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation Attachment 5 Questions and Answers continued2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation N0018922R0006 Amendment 2.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Attachment 5 Questions and Answers continued.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Attachment 2 SEPS Contract Pricing Spreadsheet Updated.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Solicitation N0018922R0006 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Attachment 5 Questions and Answers.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation N0018922R0006.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Attachment 1 DRAFT DD254.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Attachment 3 Past Performance Information Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation Attachment 2 SEPS Contract Pricing Spreadsheet.xls | XLS spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT FORM
Complete and return NLT the due date of the solicitation to:
Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) Contracting Department Attn: Elysia Allen, Code 230 Phone: (757) 443-1386 Email: elysia.allen@navy.mil On behalf of:
Company’s Name:
POC, Title/Position:
Email Address:
Contract/Purchase Order No.:
| Contract Amount: |
| $ |
Contract Type:
| Period of Performance: |
| Click or tap to enter a date. – Click or tap to enter a date. |
Business Address:
Phone Number:
NOTE: DO NOT RETURN TO THE CONTRACTOR WHO ORIGINATED THIS REQUEST
The completion of this questionnaire is requested from your agency/company in order for the U.S. Naval Supply System (NAVSUP) Fleet Logistics Center Norfolk (FLCN) to evaluate the aforementioned contractor’s past performance on previous contracts and efforts as it relates to the probability of successful accomplishment of the work required by the Government, relative to the award of a contract resulting from the solicitation.
Completed by:
Command/Company’s Name:
POC, Title/Position:
Email Address
Business Address:
Phone Number:
N0018920R3025
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Quality:
1. Recruiting: The offeror’s demonstrated ability to recruit personnel with the skill sets, qualifications/certifications, experience and security clearance required of the contract. Provide additional comments if necessary.
Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Retention: The offeror’s demonstrated ability to maintain a stable workforce.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3. Meeting Contract Requirements: The offeror’s demonstrated history of delivering products and services that met or exceeded the requirements of the contract.
a. How would you describe your level of customer satisfaction?
Click or tap here to enter text.
b. Were there instances of rework and/or deficiency reports? (If yes, explain)
Click or tap here to enter text.
c. Did the contractor engage in effective and/or innovative work applications that were beneficial to the Government?
Click or tap here to enter text.
Timeliness:
1. Did the Contractor meet/comply with performance schedules?
Click or tap here to enter text.
a. Rate the timeliness of submission of requested information, reports and invoicing.
Click or tap here to enter text.
Responsiveness:
1. Describe the offeror’s demonstrated ability to respond to customer concerns Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Describe the offeror’s efforts to isolate and resolve problems and take systematic improvement action. Please include:
· the number and severity of problems
· the effectiveness of corrective actions taken.
Click or tap here to enter text.
3. Contractor's cost control. Did the contractor deliver at the agreed-to price/cost? Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/under-run, Government- imposed schedule changes, etc.)
Additional Observations/Information:
1. Identify the contractor's overall strengths and weaknesses.
Click or tap here to enter text.
2. Given hindsight, are you satisfied that the contract was awarded to this contractor? Would you be pleased to have this contractor perform work for you again? Why?
Click or tap here to enter text.
3. Are you aware of any other contracted efforts performed by this contractor similar in nature to this contract? Please identify contract/program and point of contact.
Click or tap here to enter text.
4. Is there anyone else we should send this questionnaire to? Please identify by name, organization, and phone number.
(If more comment space needed, please attach additional pages.)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .