Advocacy_Index_Q A.ed.pdf
PDF 170 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SOL-620-13-000002
About this file
Advocacy Index Q A
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
USAID/OTI Lebanon Civic Support Initiative (LCSI)
| Q&A | on | OTI | Advocacy | Index | ||||||||||
| What | is | OTI | Advocacy | Index? | OTI | Advocacy | Index | is | an | evaluation | and | management | tool | |
| developed | by | OTI‐Lebanon | (Lebanon | Civic | Support | Initiative), | to | be | used | in | building | capacity | of | OTI |
| partners | and | grantees | to | advocate | for | change | on | local | or | national | levels. |
| How | is | an | organization | given | an | OTI | Advocacy | Index? | Each | CSO | or | youth | group | that | receives | an | |
| advocacy | grant | from | OTI‐Lebanon | is | evaluated | for | five | key | competences | necessary | in | the | |||||
| implementation | of | an | effective | advocacy | initiative. | The | group | is | assigned | a | score | between | zero | and | |||
| six | for | each | of | the | competency | areas | and | one | average | score | as | its | organizational | Advocacy | Index. | ||
| Two | such | evaluations | are | undertaken: | one | soon | after | the | grant | agreement | is | signed | (baseline) | and | |||
| the | other | once | the | grant | is | closed | (post‐evaluation). |
| What | competency | areas | are | evaluated | in | the | OTI | Advocacy | Index? | The | five | competency | areas |
| evaluated | by | OTI Advocacy Index are: NGO Linkages and Coalition Building; Engagement with Decision |
Makers; Outreach; Data Research / Utilization; and Policy Development. Evaluated are experiences and skills in those competency areas, not theoretical knowledge.
| Who | evaluates | the | CSO | or | youth | group | and | what | does | the | evaluation | process | look | like? | The |
| CSO/youth | group | representatives | are | asked | to | conduct | self‐evaluation | by | going | through | a | set | of | ||
| questions | for | each | competency | area. | The | results | are | then | analyzed | and | discussed, | and | often | ||
| amended, | during | an | interview | conducted | jointly | by | the | OTI | Advocacy | Development | Specialist | and | |||
| M&E | Specialist. |
| How | is | the | OTI | Advocacy | Index | used | in | advocacy | programming? | OTI | Advocacy | Index | is | used | as | |||
| an | evaluation | tool | to | assess | how | much | the | capacity | to | advocate | is | built | in | a | grantee | over | a | grant |
| time. | This | is | done | by | comparing | and | analyzing | the | results | of | the | two | evaluations | – | of | the | advocacy | |
| indices | for | particular | competency | areas | or | the | whole | organization | before | and | after | the | grant. | OTI | ||||
| Advocacy | Index | is | also | used | as | training | needs | assessment | and | capacity | building | planning | tool | – | this | |||
| is | done | by | sharing | the | results | of | the | baseline | evaluation | with | the | OTI | advocacy | trainer | assigned | to | ||
| the | given | grant, | and | by | discussing | what | competency | area(s) | will | be | the | focus | of | the | training | and | ||
| coaching | during | the | grant. | The | achievements | in | capacity | building | and | possible | improvements | in | ||||||
| the | future | are | also | included | in | the | After | Action | Review | debrief. | By | comparing | the | planned | and | |||
| actual | post | evaluation | indices, | OTI | can | also | evaluate | the | effectiveness | of | its | advocacy | trainers. |
“It is a great tool. I will use it in our organizational strategic planning.” – OTI grantee, after an Advocacy Index interview.
“OTI Advocacy Index will help in our work, something like this was much needed.” –OTI Advocacy
Trainer.
“Now we know where we are going.” – A youth member of a grantee organization, after an Advocacy
Index interview.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .