J.34_Expected_Outcomes_and_Indicators_Table._02_10_17.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SOL-617-17-000028
About this file
J.34 Expected Outcomes and Indicators Table
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFP_SOL-617-17-000028_FINAL.pdf | ||
| J.2_CDCS_2.0_RF.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.41_Local_Compensation_Plan_Summary.pdf | ||
| J.35_-_Budget_Template_ICAN.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| J.3_ICAN_Target_Districts_with_exsiting_USAID_activities.pdf | ||
| J.1_SOO.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.26_ICAN_CLA_annex.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.14_Vulnerabilities_in_Uganda_along_the_poverty_line.pdf | ||
| J.22_YLA_Gender_Analysis_and_Baseline_Assessment_Final_Draft_5.12.16_(1).pdf | ||
| J.21_ICAN_Gender_Analysis_Annex_J_Final_feb_2017.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.33_Organizational_Development_Option.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.39_-_Allowable_USG_Funding_Support_for_GOU_Entities_and_Staff.pdf | ||
| J.30_Guiding_Principles.docx | DOCX document | |
| J.23_Relevant_USAID_Activity_Decription_References.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| J.32_-_Local_Compensation_Plan_Summary.pdf | ||
| J.19_LQAS_Report_2016.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
J.25 Expected Outcomes and Indicators:
Expected Outcomes
| Base-line target |
| Targets |
| End state |
| Sub-Results |
| Potential Performance Indicators |
| Yr 1 |
| Yr 2 |
| Yr 3 |
| Yr 4 |
| Yr 5 |
| 1: Increasing Economic Opportunities for Poor Households |
| a. Strengthened agricultural productivity and livelihoods |
| · Change in percent shortfall relative to the $1.90/day 2011 PPP poverty line as a result of USG assistance. |
· Percentage of households with diversified sources of income as a result of USG assistance
· Proportion of people that have utilized financial services (disaggregated by type and sex) in the last 12 months as a result of USG assistance
· Number of individuals participating in group-based savings, micro-finance or lending programs with USG assistance
· Proportion of people that have participated in agricultural markets in the last 12 months with USG assistance
Decrease by 50%
b. Enhanced access to non-agriculture based livelihoods options
100%
c. Increased household incomes as a result of improved connection to markets and financial services
95%
85%
80%
| 2: Improving Nutrition, Especially Among Women and Children |
| a. Improved maternal, infant, and young child health and nutrition status |
· Percentage of children 6-23 months receiving a minimum acceptable diet
· Prevalence of women of reproductive age consuming a diet of minimum diversity
· Percentage of households with soap and water at a handwashing station commonly used by family members
· Number of participants of community-level nutrition interventions who practice promoted infant and young child feeding behaviors
· Number of children under five reached with nutrition interventions
· Number of pregnant and lactating women reached nutrition interventions through USG supported programs
· Percentage of exclusive breastfeeding of children under six months of age
· Number of individuals receiving nutrition related professional training through USG-supported programs
Increase of 15%
b. Increased use of safe water, sanitation facilities, hygiene practices, and products c.
40%
d. Increased consumption of diverse, safe, and nutritious food
Increase of 50%
100%
20% increase
80%
80%
| 3: Strengthening Inclusive Participation in Decision-Making at the Household, Community and Local Government Levels |
| a. Improve coordination, communication and productive linkages within households, among communities, and between communities and local government and/or other external actors in setting priorities, mobilizing resources and planning and executing priority projects, including ensuring the accountability of funds for activities that benefit the community |
| · Number of districts that have developed, shared, and implemented plans for addressing community needs, as a result of USG assistance |
· Average level of household participation in local planning and service delivery increased, as a result of USG assistance
· Proportion of households with high social capital
· Number of people using climate information or implementing risk-reducing actions to improve resilience to climate change with USG assistance
20%
b. Improved proactive risk reduction, mitigation, and management by communities and households
15%
Cross-cutting: Improved Educational Attainment
a. Improved workforce readiness for [I think that we need to add the population here; is it youth? Adults?]
b. Improved literacy and numeracy skills;
c. Improved life skills d.
e. Number of learners enrolled in primary schools and/or equivalent non-school based settings with USG support (male/female)
f. Number of learners enrolled in secondary schools and/or equivalent non-school based settings with USG support (male/female)climate information or implementing risk-reducing actions to improve resilience to climate change with USG assistance g.
*targets are binding unless changed by the TOCOR based on PPR reporting. Changes within the general scope do not require a modification to the contract.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .