Attachment II Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 35 KB Posted

Attached to
Steering System for NOAA Ship Fairweather Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
SOL_1305M225Q0028
Issued by
Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for evaluating contractor performance on a reference contract, to be submitted to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov by February 5, 2024, at 4:00 PM EST. The questionnaire is related to a solicitation for a steering system for the NOAA Ship Fairweather.

The template evaluates three key performance areas: Quality of Service, Schedule, and Management, using a five-tier rating system (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, and Unsatisfactory). Each section requires evaluators to assess the contractor's performance against specific criteria, including meeting contract requirements, timeliness of delivery, problem resolution, and overall management effectiveness. The template requires basic evaluator information including name, contact details, and agency/company name, along with the reference contract number being evaluated.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Steering System for NOAA Ship Fairweather, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sol_1305M225Q0028_Amd_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - FA-808612-D_GENERAL ARRANGEMENT STEERING GEAR 274 VANE MOTORS.pdf PDF
Sol_1305M225Q0028_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Sol_1305M225Q0028.pdf PDF
Attachment I Past Performance Information Form.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #:_______________________________
(the contract the evaluation is based on)

Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________

Evaluator’s email: ____________________ Evaluator’s Phone Number: _______________

Evaluator’s Agency or Company Name: ____________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov no later than 5 February 2025 4:00 PM Eastern Standard Time (EST).

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

Source Selection Information

Source Selection Information

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: Rater’s Signature: Date:

Send Completed Questionnaire to jim.vannatta@noaa.gov no later than 5 Feb 2024 at 4:00 PM EST.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .