SF_30_Continuation_Page_Amendment_01.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

STANDARD FORM 30

CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION NUMBER

127EAS22Q0061

PAGE OF PAGES

2 2

SEE BELOW FOR QUESTIONS AND GOVERNMENT RESPONSES.

Question: Will the Government provide a rough estimate of the number of signs expected.?

Government Response: A rough estimate of road signs on level 3-5 roads is 1,300.

Question: A prior inventory was conducted in 1992. Will the Government provide access to that inventory?

Government Response: Yes, attached is the 1992 ENF Sign Inventory.

Question: Does the Government anticipate a large increase since the 1992 Sign Inventory?

Government Response: No, the Government does not anticipate large increase. Rather, the Government estimates a change of potentially 5% above or below the 1992 Sign Inventory. However, the Government does anticipate that many signs will no longer be physically in place or with visible wording.

Question: Is retro-reflectivity required to be captured in the condition of a sign?

Government Response: Yes, retro-reflectivity should be captured in condition of sign. A new column should be added to Table 1 to document the condition of retro-reflectivity and/or overall condition of sign.

Question: Is price or best value the determining factor for award?

Government Response: Please refer to Section M, “Evaluation” (pgs. 30-31) of Solicitation 127EAS22Q0061.

Question: Will the Government provide the project files and related GIS data layers corresponding to the Sign Inventory Project Map?

Government Response: The Government will provide the requested data to the awardee.

Question: Will the Government provide the mileage breakout for each of the unit areas defined in the RFQ (Amador, Georgetown, Pacific, Placerville)?

Government Response: Yes, attached is a spreadsheet with a summary of mileage breakdown per district and road list.

Question: Are there any additional attribute fields required for collection or population besides the attribute fields defined in the tables provided in the RFQ (Table 1 Sign Inventory and Table 2 Gate Inventory)?

Government Response: Yes, the following two (2) attribute fields should be added to Table 1: “Retro-reflectivity”, and “Condition”.

Additionally, the following attribute field should be added to Table 2: “Condition of Signs” or “Remarks”.