Section_M_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award_SRUs.pdf
PDF 257 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair of AN/APG 68 F-16 C/D Multi SRU Repair
- Solicitation number
- FA825125R0005
About this file
Section M of the solicitation outlines the evaluation factors for award for a five-year requirements contract for radar repairs for F-16 Aircraft. The procurement will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified "Approved Source" offerors, with price as the only evaluated factor. The government intends to award the contract to a single awardee but reserves the right to award no contract at all.
Key evaluation criteria include: (1) Price Reasonableness - assessing whether the proposed price represents what a prudent person would pay based on market prices, (2) Price Balance - ensuring no individual contract line items are significantly overstated or understated, and (3) Total Evaluated Price (TEP) calculation. All offerors must be identified as an approved source in the Government's Screen Analysis Worksheet Form 762, meet all solicitation requirements, and have a satisfactory past performance record. The award will be made to the lowest-priced, technically acceptable offeror listed as an approved source.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA825125R0005 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| CDRLs.pdf | ||
| WD.pdf | ||
| Section_L_Proposal_Instructions_SRUs.pdf | ||
| Combined_ITMDESC_Report.pdf | ||
| Combined_QAIRQMT_Report.pdf | ||
| SOW.pdf | ||
| PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS.pdf | ||
| Combined_QUALRQMT.pdf | ||
| Combined_RDL_Report.pdf | ||
| TRNSPDATA_REPORT.pdf | ||
| Combined_UIIEC_Report.pdf | ||
| Special_Packaging_Instruction.pdf | ||
| PWS.pdf | ||
| FA825125R0005.pdf |
Show all 15
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SECTION M
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
A. INTRODUCTION
1. This acquisition will utilize Lowest Priced procedures restricted to technically qualified
“Approved Source” offeror(s). This acquisition shall use price as the only evaluated factor.
2. The government intends to award the requirement(s) represented in this solicitation to one awardee. However, the Government reserves the right to award no contract at all.
B. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PROCEDURES:
1. The government shall evaluate proposals based on the evaluation factor below.
a. Factor 1 – Price
i. Evaluation Base: Standard Form 33
ii. The Offeror’s price will be evaluated based upon the Total Evaluated Price
(TEP). The Offeror’s Price Proposal will be evaluated for the criteria of Price
Reasonableness and Balance.
a) Price Reasonableness: The proposed price will be evaluated for
Price Reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it will represent a price to the Government that a prudent person would pay when consideration is given to prices in the market.
Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through cost and price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404. For additional information see FAR 31.201-3.
b) Balance: The Government may also determine a proposal unacceptable should the proposed prices be unbalanced.
Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more items/Contract Line
Item Numbers (CLINS) is significantly overstated or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques as those defined by FAR 15.404-1.
c) Total Evaluated Price (TEP): A TEP will be calculated to be used for evaluation of offers to determine the lowest priced proposal.
The TEP calculation will be a summation of all Contract Line
Item Pricing.
2. Solicitation Requirements, Terms, and Conditions:
a. In addition to meeting Factor 1, the government expects all offerors to meet all solicitation requirements, to include terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and required delivery schedules.
b. Furthermore, all Offeror’s shall be identified as an approved source in the Government’s
Screen Analysis Worksheet Form 762.
c. Offerors not identified on the Form 762 are encouraged to contact the aforementioned government representative to obtain technical pre-qualification information. However, per FAR 9.202(e), the government reserves the right to not to delay contract award in order to provide a potential offeror with an opportunity to demonstrate its ability to meet the standards.
3. The process for the evaluation and contractor responsibility determination of proposals is as follows:
a. This award will be made to the offeror that is listed and an approved source and submitted the proposal with the lowest Total Evaluated Price
b. Past Performance record and history will be assessed as one of the multiple standards required for a successful offeror to be determined responsible as described in FAR 9.104.
Contractors shall meet the required delivery dates, as well as the terms and conditions in this solicitation, to be determined responsible.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .