Sec L Attch F - Past Performance Questionnaire 08.24.20.pdf

PDF 733 KB Posted

Attached to
Draft RFP No. 89233220RNA000002 Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
89233220RNA000002
Issued by
Department of Energy

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for a draft request for proposal related to the management and operation of the Y-12 National Security Complex and Pantex Plant. The questionnaire is to be completed by references for each offeror and includes 16 questions rated on a scale from exceptional to unsatisfactory regarding the offeror's past performance in areas such as overall contract outcome, cost and schedule performance, technical performance in areas like quality management and facility management, safety and security, and management leadership. The evaluator is asked to provide comments supporting each rating and return the completed questionnaire by an unspecified due date to the National Nuclear Security Administration via email or mail. The draft RFP is being issued by the Department of Energy to manage and operate the Y-12 National Security Complex and Pantex Plant, maintaining nuclear weapons stockpile safety and supporting nonproliferation goals.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Draft RFP No. 89233220RNA000002, newest first.
File Type Posted
Sec L Attch H - Transition Price and Fee Summary 08.24.20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Sec L - Instructions Conditions and Notices to Offeror 08.24.20 (1).pdf PDF
Sec J Appendix A - Statement of Work 08.24.20.pdf PDF
Sec M - Evaluation Factors for Award 08.24.20.pdf PDF
Y-12_PX Draft RFP Announcement 08.24.20.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT F

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

Offeror are responsible for sending copies of the PPQ (Sections A - C) to references.

Instructions to Offeror

1. For each reference submitted in your proposal, enter the required information in Section A.

2. Transmit the entire questionnaire to the identified Points of Contract (POCs) and place one copy of each Section A in your proposal submittal.

NOTES:

OFFERORS MUST TRANSMIT THE QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE POC FOR EACH

REFERENCE.

ONCE COMPLETED BY THE POC, QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE DIRECTLY

TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT AS DESCRIBED ON THE FOLLOWING

PAGE. COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED FROM OFFERORS ARE NOT

ACCEPTABLE.

Draft RFP No. 89233220RNA000002

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Evaluator

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is procuring services to manage and operate the Pantex Plant and the Y-12 National Security Complex which includes maintenance of the safety, security and reliability of the nation's nuclear weapons stockpile, supporting nuclear nonproliferation goals and objectives, and serving as the Nation’s repository for highly enriched uranium. Evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section A below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Information, as defined by Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 2.101 and 3.104, and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than TBD, 2020, to:

[TBD]

Tel. No: (XXX) xxx-xxxx Via email: xxx@nnsa.doe.gov

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable however NNSA will prefer typed or computer generated responses. All evaluations must relate solely to the Offeror and the contract, task, or order identified in SECTION A. Please answer each question in SECTION B by circling one of the ratings:

E = Exceptional - The Offeror’s performance was substantially and consistently above contract requirements. Contractor displayed an overall superior understanding of contract requirements, and used innovative approaches leading to enhanced performance.

VG = Very Good - The Offeror’s performance was above contract requirements. Contractor displayed a thorough understanding of contract requirements.

S = Satisfactory - The Offeror’s performance met contract requirements. The performance contain some minor problems for which proposed corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

M = Marginal - The Offeror’s performance was below contract requirements. The Contractor displayed a lack of thorough understanding of contract requirements in one or more significant performance areas. The Contractor’s proposed corrective actions were only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U = Unsatisfactory - The Offeror’s performance completely failed to meet the contract requirements. Contractor displayed a total lack of understanding of contract requirements. The contractor’s performance contained serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective

Draft RFP# 89233220RNA000002 actions appear or were ineffective.

Neutral: The Offeror lacks a record of relevant or available past performance history. There is no expectation of either successful or unsuccessful performance based on the Offeror’s past performance record.

In addition, please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please type or print clearly the requested information in SECTION C for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above via email. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

SECTION A (To Be Completed by the Offeror)

Name of Offeror Submitting Proposal:

Parent Company or Team Member (i.e. subcontractor) Submitting Reference:

Contract Number:

Name of Prime Contractor (if prime contractor is comprised of multiple companies, list the name of the prime contractor AND all member companies):

Task or Order No., if applicable:

Period of Performance:

Dollar Value:

Description of Work/Scope of Effort:

Point of Contact (POC) Name:

POC Title:

POC Email:

POC Phone Number:

SECTION B (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

E-Exceptional; VG-Good; S-Satisfactory M-Marginal; U-Unsatisfactory; N-Neutral

1. Overall Contract Outcome: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to attract, manage, and retain a productive work force, which promotes work force diversity and is capable of operating a diverse industrial production capability and/or maintain a highly skilled manufacturing capability.

Comments:

2. Cost Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to accurately forecast, control, and report costs throughout all phases of the contract.

3. Schedule Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules for production and/or manufacturing.

4. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to manage a robust quality management system that prevents and detects defects. Ability to conduct ongoing self-assessment processes to assess performance in programmatic missions as well as in supporting operations and administration. Ability to support external audits, reviews, and appraisals.

5. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to perform overall integrated planning, acquisition, maintenance, operation, construction, management and disposition of Government-owned and Contractor-leased facilities, infrastructure, and real property.

6. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to ensure safety and health management processes to support the safe performance of all work across a diverse set of mission areas including conduct of environmental tests, small scale experiments, and hazardous waste management. Demonstrated ability to perform complex and hazardous work while meeting all regulatory requirements and adequately protecting the environment and public health.

7. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to maintain secure and effective information systems for organizational operations and for activities involving general purpose programming, data collection, data processing, report generation, software, electronic and telephone communications, and computer security.

8. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to maintain safeguards and security programs including counterintelligence, physical security, protection of property, information, and high value assets; classification and declassification of information and materials; materials, control and accountability; computer security; and personnel security and access control for staff and visitors.

9. Technical Performance: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to perform hazardous material processing, low tolerance component production, and high quality manufacturing activities as part of a large, complex, and diverse enterprise.

10. Management-Leadership: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to maintain the Customer’s interests while dealing with external stake holders such as but not limited to state, local and tribal governments, other government agencies, and public interest groups.

11. Management-Leadership: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to provide intellectual leadership and management expertise in a complex, multi-disciplinary industrial production environment to include annual assessment process to evaluate the safety, performance, and reliability of weapons based on physics and engineering analysis, experiments, and computer simulations.

12. Teaming and Partnering: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to work with teaming partners/subcontractors to create a coherent organization in order to effectively, efficiently, and safely perform the required scope of work and achieve overall organizational performance and goals.

13. Customer Satisfaction: E VG S M U N Degree of customer satisfaction based on the contractor's cooperative behavior, general business-like concern for the interest of the customer, and customer orientated management practices.

14. Commitment to Small Business: E VG S M U N Rate the Contractor’s prior performance with subcontracting plan goals for small businesses, veteran-owned small business, service-disabled veteran-owned small business, HUBzone small business, small disadvantaged businesses, and woman-owned small businesses and monetary targets for such concerns.

15. Safety and Performance Culture: E VG S M U N Demonstrated ability to implement and maintain a strong safety culture and performance culture.

16. Any additional comments about the contractor. Please provide a description of any problems and conflicts encountered, regulatory performance, etcetera:

SECTION C (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

1. Name of Evaluator: _

2. Position and Title:

3. Administrating Authority/Agency:

4. Email:

5. Tel. Nos: Voice ; Facsimile

6. Signature: Date:

ATTACHMENT F
NOTES:
PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR
SECTION B (To Be Completed by Evaluator)
SECTION C (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .