Scoring_Rubric_-_Parent_Pathways_.pdf
PDF 182 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Parent Pathways—Navigating Learning Together
- Solicitation number
- RFP- 25 - 307
- Issued by
- Pinellas County, Florida
About this file
The document is a Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric from the City of St. Petersburg's Education & Youth Opportunities department. The rubric provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing program proposals across seven key criteria: Program Design and Implementation, Parent Engagement and Enrichment, Resource Development and Distribution, Evidence-Based Practice and Innovation, Evaluation and Impact Tracking, Partnerships and Support, and Budget and Timeline Alignment. Each criterion is scored on a 0-10 point scale, with descriptors for four performance levels: Exceeds Expectations (10-9), Meets Expectations (8-6), Below Expectations (5-3), and Not Evident (2-0).
The scoring framework emphasizes holistic program quality, focusing on family-centered approaches, district collaboration, parent involvement, resource development, evidence-based methodologies, impact measurement, and strategic partnerships. Proposals will be evaluated on the comprehensiveness of their programming, the depth of parent engagement strategies, the relevance and accessibility of resources, the strength of research backing, the robustness of evaluation methods, the quality of partnerships, and the alignment of budget with project goals. The rubric provides a structured method for consistently assessing and comparing program proposals, ensuring that funded initiatives meet high standards of educational support and community engagement.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of St. Petersburg | Education & Youth Opportunities
Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric
Criteria Exceeds Expectations (10–9) Meets Expectations (8–6) Below Expectations (5–
3) Not Evident (2–0)
Program Design and Implementation
Clearly defined, family-centered programming with strong district collaboration; evidence of innovative academic supports;
thoughtfully addresses barriers
General plan supports parent involvement;
includes district partnership and basic home learning supports
Limited structure or unclear implementation plan; vague strategies to support learning at home
No clear plan or support strategy provided
Parent Engagement and Enrichment
Robust, ongoing engagement plan including workshops, tools, and feedback loops; fosters two-way communication and learning
Engagement strategy includes scheduled events and communication methods; basic parent support
Minimal engagement strategy; limited opportunities for parent involvement
No engagement strategy provided
Resource Development and Distribution
High-quality, relevant resources tailored to families’ needs; plan includes multilingual access and instructional guidance
General toolkit and distribution plan included;
materials generally support learning
Vague or underdeveloped toolkit; lacks detail or alignment with learning goals
No toolkit or resource plan included
Evidence-Based Practice and Innovation
Strong rationale for program approach with clear ties to research and prior impact;
includes innovative or culturally relevant methods
Demonstrates some use of research-informed strategies; examples of past success included
Limited use of research or past results; unclear evidence of approach
No evidence-based framework or examples of success provided
Evaluation and Impact Tracking
Comprehensive plan to measure participation and family impact;
includes data use for continuous improvement
Describes basic tracking methods and expected outcomes; some plan for using results
Limited evaluation approach; unclear how impact will be assessed or used
No evaluation plan included
Partnerships and Support
Strong letters of support; partners play active roles in program delivery or design
Includes at least one letter of support and partner reference
Weak or unclear partner roles; minimal support shown
No letters of support or partner documentation included
City of St. Petersburg | Education & Youth Opportunities
Criteria Exceeds Expectations (10–9) Meets Expectations (8–6) Below Expectations (5–
3) Not Evident (2–0)
Budget and Timeline Alignment
Budget is clear, appropriate, and maximizes impact; aligned with a realistic and effective two-year plan
Budget generally supports goals and timeline; some alignment with proposed scope
Budget lacks detail or has inconsistencies; weak connection to timeline
Budget is incomplete, unrealistic, or not aligned with project goals
Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .