Scoring_Rubric_-_Parent_Pathways_.pdf
PDF 182 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Parent Pathways—Navigating Learning Together
- Solicitation number
- RFP- 25 - 307
- Issued by
- Pinellas County, Florida
About this file
The document is a Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric from the City of St. Petersburg's Education & Youth Opportunities department, providing a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing program proposals. The rubric includes seven key criteria: Program Design and Implementation, Parent Engagement and Enrichment, Resource Development and Distribution, Evidence-Based Practice and Innovation, Evaluation and Impact Tracking, Partnerships and Support, and Budget and Timeline Alignment. Each criterion is scored across four performance levels: Exceeds Expectations (10-9 points), Meets Expectations (8-6 points), Below Expectations (5-3 points), and Not Evident (2-0 points).
The scoring criteria are designed to comprehensively evaluate proposed programs, with a strong emphasis on family-centered approaches, collaborative strategies, and measurable impact. Proposals will be assessed on their ability to provide innovative academic supports, create robust parent engagement plans, develop high-quality multilingual resources, demonstrate evidence-based practices, establish clear evaluation methods, secure meaningful partnerships, and present a well-aligned budget and timeline. The rubric allows evaluators to systematically rate proposals across multiple dimensions, ensuring a thorough and objective review process that prioritizes comprehensive, strategic, and impactful programming for families and youth in the St. Petersburg community.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Parent_Pathways—Navigating_Learning_Together.pdf | ||
| Proposal_Requirements.pdf | ||
| Base_Agreement.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
City of St. Petersburg | Education & Youth Opportunities
Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric
Criteria Exceeds Expectations (10–9) Meets Expectations (8–6) Below Expectations (5–
3) Not Evident (2–0)
Program Design and Implementation
Clearly defined, family-centered programming with strong district collaboration; evidence of innovative academic supports;
thoughtfully addresses barriers
General plan supports parent involvement;
includes district partnership and basic home learning supports
Limited structure or unclear implementation plan; vague strategies to support learning at home
No clear plan or support strategy provided
Parent Engagement and Enrichment
Robust, ongoing engagement plan including workshops, tools, and feedback loops; fosters two-way communication and learning
Engagement strategy includes scheduled events and communication methods; basic parent support
Minimal engagement strategy; limited opportunities for parent involvement
No engagement strategy provided
Resource Development and Distribution
High-quality, relevant resources tailored to families’ needs; plan includes multilingual access and instructional guidance
General toolkit and distribution plan included;
materials generally support learning
Vague or underdeveloped toolkit; lacks detail or alignment with learning goals
No toolkit or resource plan included
Evidence-Based Practice and Innovation
Strong rationale for program approach with clear ties to research and prior impact;
includes innovative or culturally relevant methods
Demonstrates some use of research-informed strategies; examples of past success included
Limited use of research or past results; unclear evidence of approach
No evidence-based framework or examples of success provided
Evaluation and Impact Tracking
Comprehensive plan to measure participation and family impact;
includes data use for continuous improvement
Describes basic tracking methods and expected outcomes; some plan for using results
Limited evaluation approach; unclear how impact will be assessed or used
No evaluation plan included
Partnerships and Support
Strong letters of support; partners play active roles in program delivery or design
Includes at least one letter of support and partner reference
Weak or unclear partner roles; minimal support shown
No letters of support or partner documentation included
City of St. Petersburg | Education & Youth Opportunities
Criteria Exceeds Expectations (10–9) Meets Expectations (8–6) Below Expectations (5–
3) Not Evident (2–0)
Budget and Timeline Alignment
Budget is clear, appropriate, and maximizes impact; aligned with a realistic and effective two-year plan
Budget generally supports goals and timeline; some alignment with proposed scope
Budget lacks detail or has inconsistencies; weak connection to timeline
Budget is incomplete, unrealistic, or not aligned with project goals
Parent Pathways Scoring Rubric
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .