Scoring Criteria blank .pdf

This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Criteria document used to evaluate architectural and/or engineering firms for a contract opportunity. The scoring document provides a standardized evaluation framework across five primary criteria, each rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent). The evaluation criteria assess the firm's ability to provide necessary project disciplines, key personnel experience with similar project types, quality of reference information, demonstrated experience with comparable projects including relevant examples, and price competitiveness. The document also includes binary qualification requirements confirming whether the firm can meet the PER/PAR deadline and whether the firm maintains current Errors and Omissions insurance coverage. A maximum total of 10 points can be awarded across all criteria.

The document serves as an evaluation tool for reviewing firm qualifications but does not specify pricing terms, contract amounts, funding sources, set-asides, or other financial details. The form includes fields for the reviewer's name, review date, and detailed review comments to support the scoring decisions. This scoring methodology enables objective comparison of competing architectural and engineering firms based on qualifications and capability rather than price alone as the primary evaluation factor.