Scoring Criteria blank .pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY 2026 CDBG Sewerage Improvements
- Solicitation number
- PE-68130-NONST-2026-000000011
- Issued by
- Terrell County, Georgia
About this file
This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Criteria form used to evaluate Architectural and/or Engineering firms for an unspecified state or local contract opportunity. The evaluation framework assesses firms across five primary criteria: ability to provide necessary disciplines for the project, key personnel experience with similar project types, quality of reference information, demonstrated experience with comparable projects with examples provided, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 2 points, with designations for poor, good, and excellent performance. The form also includes verification checkpoints regarding the firm's ability to meet PER/PAR deadlines and confirmation of Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.
The scoring document does not specify project details, contract duration, pricing structures, or award timelines. Instead, it functions as an evaluation template with space for reviewer comments, reviewer name, and review date. The form indicates that evaluation will be conducted by named contact personnel reviewing a specific firm at a designated address, but these identifying details are left blank in the template provided.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section 3.pdf | ||
| Notice for RFP newspaper ad.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2
2. Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .