Scoring Criteria blank .pdf
PDF 116 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FY 2026 CDBG Boys & Girls Club Renovation
- Solicitation number
- PE-75160-NONST-2026-000000006
- Issued by
- Georgia
About this file
This is a Statement of Qualifications Scoring Form used by state or local agencies to evaluate architectural and engineering firms submitting proposals for project work.
The form provides a standardized evaluation framework for assessing firm qualifications across five key criteria: ability to provide necessary project disciplines, key personnel experience with the project type, quality of reference information, previous experience with similar projects, and price competitiveness. Each criterion is scored on a point scale with ratings of Poor (0 points), Good (1 point), or Excellent (2 points), allowing for a maximum total of 10 points. The form includes mandatory compliance verification items, specifically requiring reviewers to confirm whether the firm can meet PER/PAR deadlines and whether the firm maintains Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.
The evaluation form includes designated spaces for reviewer comments, the reviewer's name, and the date of review. It requires documentation of the contact name, firm name, and firm address for each evaluation. This scoring mechanism enables consistent, comparative assessment of competing architectural and engineering firms, facilitating objective selection based on demonstrated qualifications, experience, and cost factors relevant to the specific project requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Jesup CDBG 2026 Notice for RFP newspaper ad.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
SCORING
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each selected criterion.
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project. 0 1 2
2. Key personnel experience with this type of Project 0 1 2
3. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2
4. Has the Firm had experience with similar projects (provides examples)? 0 1 2
5. Is the price competitive? % 0 1 2
TOTAL POINTS
Can the firm meet PER/PAR deadline? Yes No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No
REVIEW COMMENTS: ______________________________________________________________
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .