S02 - D.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 171 KB Posted
- Attached to
- W065--DME Services - FCC VISN 10 IN & MI
- Solicitation number
- 36C25025R0036
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template used to evaluate previous contractor performance, requested by Andrea J. McKinney, Contract Specialist at the VA. The questionnaire is designed to assess contractors' past performance across multiple dimensions using a 4-point rating scale: Outstanding (O)/High Confidence, Acceptable (A)/Confidence, Marginal (M)/Little Confidence, and Unacceptable (U)/No Confidence.
The evaluation covers several key performance areas including accuracy of data management, procedure coding compliance, medical records security, computer/communications compliance, quality control programs, management effectiveness, patient scheduling, and customer complaint resolution. The form includes sections for basic contract information, customer/agency identification, evaluator details, and requires both numerical ratings and narrative responses about contractor strengths, weaknesses, and potential concerns. The questionnaire concludes with questions about any contract terminations and requires an overall performance rating and evaluator signature. Completed questionnaires are to be submitted electronically to Andrea.McKinney@va.gov.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 36C25025R0036 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C25025R0036 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 - 36C25025R0036 Document 12.31.24.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 - 36C25025R0036 Document 12.31.24 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 - D.2 QASP (FINAL dated 12.15.23).pdf | ||
| 36C25025R0036.docx | DOCX document | |
| S02 - 36C25025R0036 Line Items Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
D.3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
MESSAGE TO THE EVALUATOR: Your assistance is requested by Andrea J. McKinney, Contract Specialist, to assist with establishing the performance history for the Company (Offeror) named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contract Specialist respectively requests you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please email the complete past performance questionnaire(s) to: Andrea.McKinney@va.gov. If enough space is not provided, please attach additional information to this questionnaire.
PAST – PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Part I
a. Contractor:
b. Contract number:
c. Contract type:
d. Was this a competitive contract? Yes ___________ No ________
e. Period of performance:
f. Initial contract price: $____________________________
g. Current/final contract price: $____________________________
CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
a. Customer or agency name:
b. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
c. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other commands:
EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
a. Evaluator’s name:
b. Evaluator’s title:
c. Evaluator’s phone/fax number:
d. Number of year’s evaluator worked on subject contract:
mailto:andrea.mckinney@va.gov
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION Page 2 of 4
Part II Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate number using the scale provided. This scale is defined as follows:
Performance Assessment
Rating Description
Outstanding (O) / High Confidence
(HC)
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many requirements to the client’s/agency’s benefit.
The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were highly effective.
Acceptable (A) / Confidence (C)
The Offeror’s performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some requirements to the client’s/agency’s benefit.
The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the offeror were effective.
Marginal (M) / Little Confidence
(LC)
The Offeror’s performance somewhat met contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained problems for which corrective action was taken by the offer and the actions appeared to be resolved marginally.
Unacceptable (U) / No Confidence
(NC)
Performance did not meet contractual requirements. The contractual requirements reflected a serious problem for which the offeror has yet to identify corrective actions or the offeror proposed actions that were not fully implemented.
PERFORMANCE
P1. Contractor maintained accurate data, and provided compliance with procedure coding, medical records security and workload reporting. U M A O
P2. Contractor provided necessary compliance with computer/communications compliance to meet contract requirements U M A O
Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses:
QUALITY
Q1. Contractor had an effective quality control program to ensure contract compliance.
U M A O
Q2. Contractor demonstrated ability to identify and correct weaknesses in management (relative to contract personnel (quantity and/or quality) and quality of service.
U M A O
Q3. Contractor demonstrated ability to correct deficiencies in contract performance.
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION Page 3 of 4
Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses. Provide additional sheets as required:
SCHEDULE
S1. Timeliness/effectiveness of patient scheduling without extensive customer guidance.
U M A O Provide any explanation you may feel is required to clarify any of the above responses. Provide additional sheets as required:
MANAGEMENT
M1. Contractor provided experienced/qualified management personnel to meet contract requirements U M A O
M2. Contractor provided experienced/qualified staff to meet requirements.
M3. Contractor resolved customer complaints timely U M A O
Part III Narrative Summary
a. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?
b. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?
c. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
d. Are there any other issues not covered you feel important to note about performance of this contractor?
Part IV
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION Page 4 of 4
Government contracts only: Has/was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes ____ Default ____ Convenience _____ Pending Terminations ____ NO ____ If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet price, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)
Considering all the information provided above, please rate the contractor’s performance overall.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
D.3 PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .