S02_Attachment_Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 101 KB Posted
- Attached to
- NCA Continental District MATOC Pool Solicitation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 36C78624R0036
About this file
The document provided is a Past Performance Questionnaire, which is a common form used to evaluate a contractor's past performance on a federal contract. The questionnaire gathers information from the contractor as well as from a reference contact on various aspects of the contractor's performance, including their ability to provide qualified personnel, quality control, schedule management, responsiveness to changes, and overall satisfaction. The questionnaire covers a 20-point rating scale and asks the reference to provide any necessary explanations for low ratings. It also requests information on whether the contractor was issued any cure or show cause notices, if the reference would award another contract to the contractor, and if the contractor is rated in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).
The related federal contract opportunity is for an NCA (National Cemetery Administration) Multiple Award Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (MA-IDIQ) contract for the Continental District. The solicitation number is 36C78624R0036. The contract will be awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMENDMENT RFIS.pdf | ||
| S02_Attachment - Key Personnel Price Schedule Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| S02-Solicitation CND MATOC pool.pdf | ||
| S02_Attachment - MAP of National Cemeteries by District.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form.
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow).
GENERAL INFORMATION [Completed by Contractor]
Contractor Company Name
Street Address
Contractor Point of Contact Name
City
Point of Contact Phone Number
State
Reference Project Title
Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number
Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
| Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box) |
| ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel |
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [Completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name
Street Address
POC Name
City
Phone Number
State
Fax Number
Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 5 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| MARGINAL |
| SATISFACTORY |
| VERY GOOD |
| EXCEPTIONAL |
| Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| The Contractor … |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| ☐ |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
| 23 |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.” |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
| 24 |
| To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| ☐ |
YES
NO
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
Name of Person Completing Form
Signature
FOR OFFICAL USE ONLY 7 of 18
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .