S02 - ATTACHMENT 4 - EVALUATION FACTORS - LAPAROSCOPIC SYSTEM FOR BECKLEY VAMC - 06-11-2025 02.pdf
PDF 110 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24525Q0566
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Factors file for a Laparoscopic System procurement for the Beckley VA Medical Center. The solicitation (Number 36C24525Q0566) seeks a firm-fixed price purchase order for a laparoscopic system, with quotes due by June 20, 2025. Vendors must provide comprehensive technical capabilities documentation, including details on camera systems, visualization quality, surgical monitor specifications, fluorescence imaging, insufflator features, and compatibility with existing video integration systems.
The evaluation will assess vendors across five key volumes: Technical Capability, Price, Past Performance, Trade Agreement Certificate, and an OEM Authorized Distributor Letter. Critical requirements include submitting three recent and relevant past performance references from hospital settings, completing a Trade Agreement Certificate, and providing a manufacturer's authorization letter. Vendors will be evaluated on their ability to meet technical specifications, pricing, and past performance in comparable healthcare environments. Non-responsive vendors (such as those without an OEM letter) will be disqualified. The procurement is open to all businesses and is associated with NAICS code 339112 for Surgical & Medical Instrument Manufacturing.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION FACTORS
LAPAROSCOPIC SYSTEM - BECKLEY VA MEDICAL CENTER
Volume I - Technical Capability
The offeror shall provide technical information regarding its proposed laparoscopic system solution as described in the Statement of Work with technical information required to include the following:
Ability to provide all of the required components of the laparoscopic system, clearly noting any deviations from the items, dimensions, features, etc. for any parts Demonstrate the camera system visualization quality Demonstrate the ability for visualizing perfusion during open surgery Provide information on the surgical monitor size and quality Explain the fluorescence imaging capabilities and quality Provide information on the insufflator’s features Confirm ability to connect to existing Steris video integration system Provide the Instructions for Use (IFU) or Cleaning Instructions for reprocessed/reused parts
Volume II – Price
Price - The offeror shall complete the pricing schedule provided in the above: Price/Cost Schedule.
Volume III – Past Performance
The offeror shall submit three (3) past performance references that are recent and relevant which focuses on experience within the last five (5) years in hospital settings that are comparable in size as the Beckley VA Medical Center. References shall include the contract number for the project, a brief description, and a point of contact to include an email address. The information shall be provided in 5 pages or less.
Past Performance- Acceptable or Unacceptable Rating
The Government shall make an objective assessment of the Offeror's current/past performance. It will conduct a performance acceptable assessment based on aspects of offeror's past performance that are recent and relevant which focuses on experience within the last 5 years in the hospital settings that are comparable in size as VA Capitol Health Care Network (VISN 5) or larger which contain Operating Rooms, PACUs and other critical care areas. They have to be relevant, similar in complexity, and magnitude requirements of solicitation. Performance that are not recent, relevant, similar in complexity or magnitude will be evaluated with unacceptable performance in this area.
Volume IV – Must Complete the Trade Agreement Certificate.
Must complete the Trade Agreement Certificate completely to the line-items
Volume V – Must provide an OEM Authorized Distributor Letter from the manufacturer
Must provide the OEM from the manufacturer, if no OEM letter from the manufacturer is supplied. The vendor will be considered non-responsive, and the vendor will be dis-qualified at the time request for Information (RFI) will close.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .