S02 36C24623Q0642 Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 6515--OR Lighting System
- Solicitation number
- 36C24623Q0642
About this file
This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor bidding on solicitation number 36C24623Q0642 from the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6. The opportunity is for an OR lighting system. The questionnaire requires references to rate the contractor's performance on previous contracts on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 6 being exceptional. Ratings of 1 or 2 must include a narrative explanation. Categories for ratings include management and staffing, quality control, scheduling, problem identification and resolution, and overall performance. Space is provided for remarks. Upon completion, the form is to be faxed to the number provided for consideration in the bid evaluation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ __________________________ Fax Number: ____________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ___________________________
Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _________________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $____________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: ___________________________ Title: ____________________________
Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________ _____________________________ Email Address: _____________________
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT: __________________
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE
EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.
1 2 3 4 5 6
NEUTRAL UNSATISFA
CTORY
MARGINAL SATISFACTO
RY
VERY
GOOD
EXCEPTION
AL
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements.
There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirement s and exceeded some to the government’ s benefit.
There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.
Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER________________
The contractor:
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 6
21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________CONTRACT NUMBER_________________
NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE REMARKS AS THIS IS SOMETIMES VITAL TO ACCURATE RATING
OF THE CONTRACTOR.
Remarks: ______________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .