S02 36C24623Q0642 Attachment III - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 41 KB Posted

Attached to
6515--OR Lighting System
Solicitation number
36C24623Q0642
Issued by

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for a federal contractor bidding on solicitation number 36C24623Q0642 from the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6. The opportunity is for an OR lighting system. The questionnaire requires references to rate the contractor's performance on previous contracts on a scale of 1 to 6, with 1 being unsatisfactory and 6 being exceptional. Ratings of 1 or 2 must include a narrative explanation. Categories for ratings include management and staffing, quality control, scheduling, problem identification and resolution, and overall performance. Space is provided for remarks. Upon completion, the form is to be faxed to the number provided for consideration in the bid evaluation.

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ __________________________ Fax Number: ____________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ___________________________

Project Title or Brief Description of Work: _________________________________________________

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ____________________ Dollar Amount: $____________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: ___________________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________ Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ Fax Number: _____________________ _____________________________ Email Address: _____________________

C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT: __________________

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE

EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5 6

NEUTRAL UNSATISFA

CTORY

MARGINAL SATISFACTO

RY

VERY

GOOD

EXCEPTION

AL

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements.

There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

Performance met contractual requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirement s and exceeded some to the government’ s benefit.

There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit.

Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER________________

The contractor:

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

5. Followed approved quality control plan.

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies

9. Identified problems as they occurred.

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.

12. Developed realistic progress schedules.

13. Met established project schedules.

14. Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

15. Was responsive to contract changes.

16. Provided adequate project supervision.

17. Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

18. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

19. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

20. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. 1 2 3 4 5 6

21. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6

22.

Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

23. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

24. Is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES/NO

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________CONTRACT NUMBER_________________

NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE REMARKS AS THIS IS SOMETIMES VITAL TO ACCURATE RATING

OF THE CONTRACTOR.

Remarks: ______________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .