S000000370 REVISED Professional Learning Communities Support Response Packet.docx
DOCX document 50 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Professional Learning Communities Support
- Solicitation number
- S000000370
- Issued by
- Arkansas
About this file
This document is a Response Packet for a Request for Qualification (RFQ) issued by the Arkansas Department of Transformation and Shared Services Office of State Procurement (TSS OSP) on behalf of the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). The purpose of this RFQ is to establish a Qualified Vendor's List (QVL) of multiple contractors to provide professional development services supporting the implementation of Professional Learning Communities in Arkansas. The contract term is for one year with the option to renew for up to six additional one-year terms. The key focus areas for the professional development services include foundational literacy/science of reading, strengthening career pathways, strengthening instructional quality, and multi-tiered systems of support for behavioral and mental health services. Respondents must demonstrate expertise in the focus areas, experience providing professional development to entities of similar size and scope, and the ability to provide a researched-based professional learning system with documented success in improving student outcomes.
The solicitation does not specify any set-aside designations or restrictions on the types of organizations that can respond. It also does not list any incumbent vendors or current contractors, nor does it provide information on existing infrastructure or technology that requires integration. The solicitation does not include details on possible award values or budget ranges, but respondents must submit pricing information and scope and sequence of professional learning offerings prior to award, which will be provided on the QVL.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RESPONSE PACKET
S000000370
All Revisions in Red response SIGNATURE PAGE
PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION
Company:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Minority or Women-Owned Designation See the Minority and Women-Owned Business section of the Solicitation.
| ☐ Not Applicable |
| AR Certification #: ________________ |
PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION
Provide contact information to be used for Solicitation related matters.
Contact Person:
Title:
Phone:
Alternate Phone:
Email:
CONFIRMATION OF REDACTED COPY
☐ YES, a redacted copy of submission documents is enclosed.
☐ NO, a redacted copy of submission documents is not enclosed. I understand a full copy of non-redacted submission documents will be released if requested.
If a redacted copy of the submission documents is not provided with Prospective Contractor’s response packet, and neither box is checked, a copy of the non-redacted documents, except for financial data (other than pricing), will be released in response to any request made under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). See the Proprietary Information section of the Solicitation.
REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS
By signing and submitting a response to this Solicitation, Prospective Contractor represents, warrants, and certifies that they are not a Scrutinized Company and they do not currently and shall not for the aggregate term of a resultant contract:
· Boycott Israel.
· Knowingly employ or contract with illegal immigrants.
· Boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, or Ammunition Industries.
· Employ a Scrutinized Company as a contractor.
Prospective Contractor further represents, warrants, and certifies that it shall not become a Scrutinized Company during the aggregate term of a contract resulting from this Solicitation.
An official authorized to bind the Prospective Contractor to a resultant contract shall sign below. The signature below signifies agreement that any exception that conflicts with a Requirement of this Solicitation may cause the Prospective Contractor’s proposal to be rejected.
Authorized Signature: Title:
Printed/Typed Name: Date:
submission requirements checklist The following items must be submitted with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:
· Response Signature Page
· Proposed Subcontractors Form
· Recommended Options Form
· Copy of Prospective Contractor’s Equal Opportunity Policy
· Completed Serviceable Counties Form
· Completed Response Worksheet
The following items, which must be submitted prior to the Prospective Contractor’s QVL inclusion, may also be included with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:
· EO 98-04: Contract and Grant Disclosure Form
· Completed Professional Learning Solution, not to be evaluated
· Completed Pricing Breakdowns, not to be evaluated
The following items should be submitted with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal, if applicable:
· Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT)
· Redacted copy of the submission documents
RECOMMENDED OPTIONS FORM
Prospective Contractors should identify optional recommended services available to the State, along with the schedule impact and cost details of each item. If the Prospective Contractor does not offer optional recommended services, Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box. Responses to this form will not be scored for evaluation purposes.
Costs associated with the optional recommended services must be included on this form.
Prospective Contractor proposes the following optional recommended services under a resulting contract:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
Item Description:
How Will This Add Value?
Schedule Impact:
Cost Details:
☐ Prospective Contractor does not offer optional recommended services.
PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS FORM
Prospective Contractors shall complete the form for all subcontractors the Prospective Contractor proposes to use under a resulting contract (Services Contract (SRV-1) Fillable Form.) If the Prospective Contractor does not intend to use subcontractor(s), Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box.
Prospective Contractors should not include additional information relating to subcontractors on this form or as an attachment to this form.
Prospective Contractor proposes to use the following subcontractor(s) under a resulting contract:
| SUBCONTRACTOR’S COMPANY NAME |
| STREET ADDRESS |
| CITY, STATE, ZIP |
☐ Prospective Contractor does not propose to use subcontractors under a resulting contract.
Rev 5/2024 Page 2 of 2
Professional learning SOLUTION Prospective Contractors should include a narrative to address and provide a high-level overview of the solution and/or approach proposed using the requirements outlined in the Solicitation. This must include Expected Outcomes for each focus area.
Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection per Focus Area.
Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above.
PRICING BREAKDOWNS
Prospective Contractors should include a breakdown of associated costs and pricing related to the Solution offered per focus areas from the Solicitation.
Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection per Focus Area.
Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above.
Serviceable Counties Form
Contractor Name:
Northwest
Northeast
Central
Southeast
Southwest
| All | |
| ☐ | All |
| ☐ | All |
| ☐ | All |
| ☐ | All |
| ☐ | |
| Baxter | |
| ☐ | Clay |
| ☐ | Faulkner |
| ☐ | Arkansas |
| ☐ | Calhoun |
| ☐ | |
| Benton | |
| ☐ | Cleburne |
| ☐ | Garland |
| ☐ | Ashley |
| ☐ | Clark |
| ☐ | |
| Boone | |
| ☐ | Craighead |
| ☐ | Grant |
| ☐ | Bradley |
| ☐ | Columbia |
| ☐ | |
| Carroll | |
| ☐ | Crittenden |
| ☐ | Lonoke |
| ☐ | Chicot |
| ☐ | Dallas |
| ☐ | |
| Conway | |
| ☐ | Cross |
| ☐ | Perry |
| ☐ | Cleveland |
| ☐ | Hempstead |
| ☐ | |
| Crawford | |
| ☐ | Fulton |
| ☐ | Pulaski |
| ☐ | Desha |
| ☐ | Hot Springs |
| ☐ | |
| Franklin | |
| ☐ | Greene |
| ☐ | Saline |
| ☐ | Drew |
| ☐ | Howard |
| ☐ | |
| Johnson | |
| ☐ | Independence |
| ☐ |
| Jefferson | |
| ☐ | Lafayette |
| ☐ | |
| Logan | |
| ☐ | Izard |
| ☐ |
| Lee | |
| ☐ | Little River |
| ☐ | |
| Madison | |
| ☐ | Jackson |
| ☐ |
| Lincoln | |
| ☐ | Montgomery |
| ☐ | |
| Marion | |
| ☐ | Lawrence |
| ☐ |
| Monroe | |
| ☐ | Miller |
| ☐ | |
| Newton | |
| ☐ | Mississippi |
| ☐ |
| Phillips | |
| ☐ | Nevada |
| ☐ | |
| Pope | |
| ☐ | Poinsett |
| ☐ |
| Prairie | |
| ☐ | Ouachita |
| ☐ | |
| Searcy | |
| ☐ | Randolph |
| ☐ |
| St. Francis | |
| ☐ | Pike |
| ☐ | |
| Sebastian | |
| ☐ | Sharp |
| ☐ |
| Polk | |
| ☐ | |
| Scott | |
| ☐ | Stone |
| ☐ |
| Sevier | |
| ☐ | |
| Van Buren | |
| ☐ | White |
| ☐ |
| Union | |
| ☐ | |
| Washington | |
| ☐ | Woodruff |
| ☐ |
| Yell |
| ☐ |
Please indicate the counties where service can be provided. Check All that apply.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .