S000000300 Technical Proposal Packet.docx

DOCX document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
Strategic Management Consultant Services
Solicitation number
S000000300
Issued by
Pulaski County, Arkansas

About this file

This document is a Technical Proposal Packet for a state and local contract opportunity in Arkansas. The opportunity involves providing Strategic Management Consultant Services to Pulaski County and the City of Little Rock. The packet requires the prospective contractor to provide information on their experience, proposed solution, and risk mitigation, as well as complete various forms such as a Proposal Signature Page, Recommended Options Form, and Proposed Subcontractors Form. The contract term is not specified.

The pricing details are not included in the packet, but the prospective contractor is required to provide a Completed Pricing Response as part of their proposal. The packet also notes a preference for prospective contractors that hold less than $10 million in current contracts with the State of Arkansas. No further details are provided about any set-asides, incumbents, funding sources, or the current contract environment.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TECHNICAL PROPOSAL PACKET

S000000300

PROPOSAL SIGNATURE PAGE

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR’S INFORMATION

Company:

Address:

City:

State:

Zip Code:

Minority or Women-Owned Designation See the Minority and Women-Owned Business section of the Solicitation.

☐ Not Applicable
AR Certification #: ________________

PROSPECTIVE CONTRACTOR CONTACT INFORMATION

Provide contact information to be used for Solicitation related matters.

Contact Person:

Title:

Phone:

Alternate Phone:

Email:

CONFIRMATION OF REDACTED COPY

☐ YES, a redacted copy of submission documents is enclosed.

☐ NO, a redacted copy of submission documents is not enclosed. I understand a full copy of non-redacted submission documents will be released if requested.

If a redacted copy of the submission documents is not provided with Prospective Contractor’s response packet, and neither box is checked, a copy of the non-redacted documents, except for financial data (other than pricing), will be released in response to any request made under the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). See the Proprietary Information section of the Solicitation.

REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS

By signing and submitting a response to this Solicitation, Prospective Contractor represents, warrants, and certifies that they are not a Scrutinized Company and they do not currently and shall not for the aggregate term of a resultant contract:

☐ Boycott Israel.

☐ Knowingly employ or contract with illegal immigrants.

☐ Boycott Energy, Fossil Fuel, Firearms, or Ammunition Industries.

☐ Employ a Scrutinized Company as a contractor.

Prospective Contractor further represents, warrants, and certifies that it shall not become a Scrutinized Company during the aggregate term of a contract resulting from this solicitation.

An official authorized to bind the Prospective Contractor to a resultant contract shall sign below. The signature below signifies agreement that any exception that conflicts with a Requirement of this Solicitation may cause the Prospective Contractor’s proposal to be rejected.

Authorized Signature: Title:

Printed/Typed Name: Date:

submission requirements checklist The following items must be submitted with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

· Proposal Signature Page

· Proposed Subcontractors Form

· Recommended Options Form

· Information for Evaluation

· Experience (2 pages or less)

· Solution (5 pages or less)

· Risk (2 pages or less)

· Prospective Contractor Current Arkansas Contract Value Certification

· Copy of Prospective Contractor’s Equal Opportunity Policy

· Completed Pricing Response

The following items, which must be submitted prior to a contract award to the Prospective Contractor, may also be included with the Prospective Contractor’s proposal:

· EO 98-04: Contract and Grant Disclosure Form

RECOMMENDED OPTIONS FORM

Prospective Contractors should identify optional recommended services available to the State, along with the schedule impact and cost details of each item. If the Prospective Contractor does not offer optional recommended services, Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box. Responses to this form will not be scored for evaluation purposes.

Costs associated with the optional recommended services must be included on this form and must not be included in the completed Pricing Response.

Prospective Contractor proposes the following optional recommended services under a resulting contract:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

Item Description:

How Will This Add Value?

Schedule Impact:

Cost Details:

☐ Prospective Contractor does not offer optional recommended services.

PROPOSED SUBCONTRACTORS FORM

Prospective Contractors shall complete the form for all subcontractors the Prospective Contractor proposes to use under a resulting contract (Services Contract (SRV-1) Fillable Form, section 14). If the Prospective Contractor does not intend to use subcontractor(s), Prospective Contractor should indicate so by checking the appropriate box.

Prospective Contractors should not include additional information relating to subcontractors on this form or as an attachment to this form.

Prospective Contractor proposes to use the following subcontractor(s) under a resulting contract:

SUBCONTRACTOR’S COMPANY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY, STATE, ZIP

☐ Prospective Contractor does not propose to use subcontractors under a resulting contract.

Rev 12/2023 Page 2 of 2

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – EXPERIENCE

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should provide the Prospective Contractor’s experience and capabilities to meet the Solicitation requirements. The information provided should be prioritized beginning with the most important and/or relevant experience listed first.

Prospective Contractors may expand the space in each table, add a table, or delete a table as needed, but Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above and example shown below.

Example:

Claim of Expertise:
We have a significant amount of experience in providing P-Card and T-Card services to State governments, and consistently delivery high performance.
Documented Performance:
We currently have 10 similar services, with an average rebate to the client of 5% and the average customer satisfaction rating on these services is currently a 9.8 out of 10.

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

Claim of Expertise:

Documented Performance:

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – SOLUTION

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should include a narrative to address and provide a high-level overview of the solution and/or approach proposed using the requirements outlined in the Solicitation.

Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the five-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above.

1. Prospective Contractors should include their philosophy for developing each Plan required as part of the RFP.

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – RISK

Using this template, Prospective Contractors should identify and prioritize major risks that they reasonably foresee could potentially prevent or impair the Prospective Contractor’s delivery of the solution as offered in the proposal or to otherwise fail to meet the State’s desired outcome, specifications, and performance standards, and how they will mitigate, manage, and/or minimize each risk listed.

Prospective Contractors may expand the space in each table, add a table, or delete a table as needed, but Prospective Contractors shall not exceed the two-page limit for this subsection. See RFP Section 3.5 for more information about this subsection.

Prospective Contractors may delete the instructions above and the example shown below.

Example:

Risk Description:
Participating Entity does not understand how to use the Commercial Card Program.
Solution:
A full-time training group will hold education meetings at all Participating Entity locations twice a year throughout the length of the contract.
Documented Performance:
This risk mitigation has been used on the last 4 clients and has received a 10/10 satisfaction rating. These four clients have reported 0 complaints from their constituents regarding the usage of their commercial card program.

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

Risk Description:

Solution:

Documented Performance:

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION – Prospective contractor Current Arkansas contract value certification Using this template, Prospective Contractors should provide the total value of their current contracts with the State of Arkansas. Per 2.1.I of the RFP, the State will give preference to a Prospective Contractor that holds current contracts with a value that is less than 10 million dollars. A Prospective Contractor that holds less than 10 million dollars in current contracts will receive 100 points towards the Technical Proposal Score.

The State may request clarification and/or a detailed breakdown of the provided value.

Total Current Arkansas Contracts Value:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .