S-25800-00012909.pdf

PDF 98 KB Posted

Attached to
Three (3) Snowcats
Solicitation number
S-25800-00012897
Issued by
Hood River County, Oregon

About this file

This document appears to be an evaluation scoring sheet for a state and local contract opportunity involving three (3) Snowcats for the Oregon local government entities through the SPIRE grant program. The procurement seeks to acquire three snow vehicles (specifically Snow Cats and Tucker Snowcats) to assist local governments in emergency preparedness. The evaluation process involved three separate evaluators who scored proposals across four key criteria: Proposed Product, Estimated Delivery Schedule, On-Site Training Plan, and Budget, with percentage ratings ranging from 58% to 100% across different evaluation dimensions.

The document reveals that two primary vendors competed in this procurement: Prinoth and Tucker Snowcat. Prinoth received the highest calculated points score of 274.15 and was ranked first, while Tucker Snowcat scored 251.80 and was ranked second. The evaluation methodology appears to normalize scores, with lower normalized scores potentially indicating more favorable proposals. The procurement is funded through the SPIRE grant program, which suggests state-level support for emergency preparedness equipment acquisition for local government entities. The specific budget details and exact grant allocation are not explicitly stated in the provided document.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_Attachment_A~5.pdf PDF
RFQ_Attachment_B.pdf PDF
RFQ_Attachment_C~2.docx DOCX document
RFQ_Attachment_D~4.docx DOCX document
SnowCat_RFQ.pdf PDF
RFQ_Attachment_E~3.docx DOCX document
RFQ_Attachment_G.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 2 Updated Section 1.06 PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE~1.pdf PDF
RFQ_Attachment_F~3.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Agency Contract #: 2024011 Title: S‐258000‐

Evaluator 1 Evaluator 2 Evaluator 3

Proposer / Bidder Criteria Rating % of total points per scale

Rating % of total points per scale

Rating % of total points per scale

Total Calculated Points

Scoring Rank Normalized Score (lower is better)

Proposed Product 95% 89% 90% Estimated Delivery Schedule 90% 94% 89% On Site Training Plan 100% 90% 88% Budget 90% 94% 89%

CALCULATED POINTS 93.5 91.4 89.3

EVALUATOR RANK 1 2 1

Proposed Product 90% 96% 60% Estimated Delivery Schedule 90% 94% 80% On Site Training Plan 85% 89% 58% Budget 92% 92% 78%

CALCULATED POINTS 89.5 93.9 68.5

EVALUATOR RANK 2 1 2

Prinoth 274.15 1 4

00012909Three (3) Snow Cats

Tucker Snowcat 251.80 2 5

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .