RRCC 27-01-RFQ01 Vendor Q&A.pdf
PDF 68 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RRCC 27-01-RFQ01 East Wing Renovation
- Solicitation number
- RFQ1 GJLA 2027000002 3
- Issued by
- Jefferson County, Colorado
About this file
This is a Vendor Questions and Answers document for Red Rocks Community College's Request for Qualifications (RFQ) RRCC 27-01-RFQ01 regarding an East Wing Renovation project in Colorado. The document addresses nine vendor inquiries submitted via email concerning project scope, design requirements, and submission guidelines. Key clarifications include that RRCC will manage staff relocation independently, existing MEP and building systems drawings are available, and furniture and equipment reuse decisions remain to be determined pending vendor and staff coordination. Design reviews are anticipated at the Schematic Design (SD) and Design Development (DD) phases with the President and other impacted staff.
Regarding submission requirements, there is no mandatory page count limit, though vendors are encouraged to maintain reasonable lengths for committee review. The RFQ specifies no font size or page size restrictions. MWBE (Minority-owned and Women-owned Business Enterprise) participation is preferred but not required. Notably, questions and answers from the pre-submittal conference were not made available to the broader vendor pool; only questions submitted via email received responses. The document does not address specific pricing terms, contract duration, award dates, or funding sources for the project.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RRCC 27-01-RFQ01 Vendor Questions and Answers Page 1 of 1
Red Rocks Community College
RRCC 27-01-RFQ01 East Wing Renovation
Vendor Questions and Answers (in blue)
1. Is there a plan for the staff and functions that are being displaced? Will the design team be expected to find temporary solutions or assist with design of temporary spaces?
RRCC will work out relocation of staff.
2. Are existing MEP and building systems drawings available for the rooms and spaces in scope?
Yes.
3. Please clarify the extent of FFE scope of services. Will FFE design services be needed? Will any of the existing furniture or systems be reused?
Suggestions and recommendations would be expected while working with our vendors and staff.
TBD on what furniture or systems will be reused.
4. Will the questions that were asked (and answered) at the Pre-submittal conference be shared?
No. Only questions submitted via email.
5. Are there any requirements for MWBE participation?
Always preferred but not required.
6. What are the anticipated quantities of reviews with the President or other staff impacted by the renovations? At which phase of design are these reviews expected?
I would expect reviews at SD and DD.
7. Is there a maximum page count for the response submittal?
No, but please keep it reasonable for our committee.
8. If there is a limit on page count, what items are excluded from the page count (ie cover pages, tabs/dividers, cover letter, resumes, etc)?
No page count but relevant information is suggested.
9. Are there any font size limitations (ie 10pt) or page size limitations (ie 8.5x11)?
No size limitations.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .