RP017_24 Ad2.pdf

May 3, 2024 Addendum No. 2

RP017-24, Singleton Road Corridor Technology Improvements Project

Please note that If you do not see your question addressed in this addendum it will be issued in an addendum in the near future.

Questions & Answers:

Q1. Is this project a Stage 1 (Planning and POC) or Stage 2 (Full Implementation) Application for the SMART grant?

A1. This project is Stage 1 (Planning and POC).

Q2. Does the County have specific Key Team Members outlined for this pursuit, or if it is at the discretion of the consultant to identify those roles based on the scope?

A2. It is at the discretion of the consultant to identify Key Team Member roles based on the scope.

Q3. Are Consultants encouraged to team with vendors on this project?

A3. It is the County’s intent to award this contract to one firm. If the prime firm wishes to sub out services in order to meet all the requirements of the RFP, they are welcome to do so.

Q4. What is required as SMART Grant proof of compliance?

A4. A written statement within the proposal acknowledging that the SMART Terms &

Conditions have been read and will be adhered to.

Q5. What is the DBE requirement for this project?

A5. Our grant agreement does not impose additional federal procurement requirements beyond compliance with 2 CFR 200.

Q6. Given the recent push for full compliance vs waivers on BABA requirements, can technologies be recommended who are in the process of implementing US Manufacturing?

A6. For this project, Gwinnett County requires that all technologies fully comply with the Buy America and Buy American Act (BABA) requirements. It is the responsibility of the proposers to ensure their proposed technologies meet these standards. If there is uncertainty about compliance or if a proposer wishes to use technologies currently transitioning to U.S. manufacturing, they should directly contact NIST’s Manufacturing Extension Partnership for a determination. Gwinnett County does not evaluate technology compliance with BABA requirements; this assessment should be handled by NIST as they guide and verify compliance for supplier scouting under BABA.

Q7. Please provide a map of the current Gwinnett County infrastructure along the corridor.

A7. We are able to provide a .kmz (Google Earth file) showing signals and ITS infrastructure for the whole County upon request. Interested firms should submit an Open Records Request via the County’s website to obtain this file.

Q8. Are there any bus transit development improvements already scheduled for that corridor, seeing that it is very sparsely marked? If so, where?

RP017-24 Addendum #2

A8. There are no bus transit development improvements currently scheduled for this corridor except for signage upgrades.

Q9. Are there any signal improvement projects already scheduled for the corridor? If so, where?

A9. A signal upgrade is planned for Singleton Road at Thompson Road.

Q10. Are there any pedestrian improvements already scheduled for the corridor? If so, where?

A10. A pedestrian beacon upgrade is planned for Singleton Road at Sarah Court.

Q11. What requirements are there for integrating with existing CV software/hardware?

A11. We do not have specific requirements at this time. It will depend on the software/hardware solutions proposed as part of this project.

Q12. Is the focus of this project on transit or pedestrian improvements?

A12. We would like both types of improvements, however the emphasis is on pedestrians.

Q13. Will there be a transit liaison with whom to coordinate? If so, whom?

A13. Following award, the transit liaison will be provided to the awarded vendor. Any and all communications regarding this project before the award should be directed to Michael Milstein.

Q14. Would Gwinnett County please provide more direction with respect to public engagement? For instance, should public engagement activity be specific to only the Singleton Road corridor with respect to the technology deployment and implementation, or should public engagement also cover a county-wide audience since the Connected Vehicle Technology Master Plan (CVTMP) update is applicable to the entire county?

A14. Active public engagement should be specific to the Singleton Road corridor.

Q15. Is the schedule allowed to be on an 11x17 sheet?

A15. Yes

Q16. Will you please clarify how many pages are allowed in the experience section? Are we allowed to have additional text excluding the 5 full page project writeups?

A16. Please utilize as many pages as needed, however we ask that they be as brief and concise as possible. Excessive boiler plate marketing material is discouraged, and any links included may not be reviewed by the County. Proposals should respond to what is outlined in the proposal documents.

Q17. What are the expectations from the Consultant in terms of compliance with SMART grant terms and conditions, including support for the development of quarterly reports?

A17. The consultant will be responsible for developing quarterly reports and assisting county staff in responding to any questions or other inquiries from federal agencies.

Acknowledge receipt of this addendum on the firm information page of the request for proposal.

Sincerely, Michael Milstein Purchasing Associate II