Attachment_II_Radiological_Evaluation_Critieria_4-10-15pc.pdf

Attachment II Evaluation Criteria

Radiological Equipment Safety Surveys and Radiology Monitoring Services Federal Bureau of Prisons

Offers will be evaluated under the following four headings:

1. Technical Approach – Evaluation Panel

2. Experience – Evaluation Panel

3. Past Performance – Contracting Staff

4. Price – Contracting Staff

TECHNICAL APPROACH

The Government will assess the contractor’s ability to meet the following requirements on a Yes/No basis.

CONTRACTOR’S REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES:

Has the offeror sufficiently demonstrated the ability to meet the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Has the offeror demonstrated the ability to conduct inspections and monitoring of diagnostic radiographic equipment in accordance with the requirements in the Statement of Work?

______Did the offeror demonstrate the ability to provide all labor, material, and equipment necessary to accomplish all services?

______Did the offeror produce a sample scheduale to meet the existing biennial (every two years for each BOP facility) schedule?

______Did the offeror explain their ability to conduct “off-schedule” inspections as necessary when notified by a Bureau institution or COR?

______Did the offeror explain how they would make recommendations for modifying radiographic equipment when needed?

______Did the offeror demonstrate how they would provide the COR a schedule of Bureau facilities the contractor anticipates inspecting during the performance period? (Expectation of 25% during each quarter of performance period.)

______Did the offeror demonstrate how they would provide the COR, upon request, a list of all Bureau facilities and their most recent inspection date, preferably sorted by facility name?

______Did the offeror explain sufficiently their ability to provide refresher training to new staff upon request of COR or

HSA?

______Did the offeror explain sufficiently how the Coordination of travel and scheduling arrangements with the facilities HSA or designee will be accomplished prior to conducting any inspection?

______Did the offeror explain a plan as to how they would notify and provide COR immediately, all required documentation when contractor wishes to add or change inspectors of Bureau facilities?

______Did the offeror demonstrate sufficiently the ability and completion of reporting to provide immediate notification of unusual exposures to COR or HSA by telephone or email?

EQUIPMENT INSPECTION/SERVICES NOT REQUIRED:

______Did the contractor acknowledge in its offer that the inspections and specific services indicated in this section (#1-

3) are not required?

REPORTS:

Has the offeror sufficiently demonstrated the ability to meet the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Did the offeror sufficiently explain how they would provide the final inspection reports to both the HSA and COR within 10 days of survey completion?

______Was the sample of a final report (typical inspection) submitted with the offer have sufficient detail?

______Did the offeror explain sufficiently and provide an example(s) how they would provide the COR by close of business on the 10th business day after the beginning of the performance period, a summary report of inspection data and findings covering inspections conducted during the previous performance period?

_______Did the offeror provide examples of all reports, schedules, and listings to Bureau in searchable electronic format?

COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS:

Has the offeror sufficiently demonstrated the ability to meet the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Did the contractor acknowledge Compliance with all Contract Requirements mentioned?

QUALITY CONTROL:

Has the offeror sufficiently demonstrated the ability to meet the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Did the offeror explain sufficiently the quality controls that will be in place to meet the Bureau’s performance requirements?

______Was the Quality Control Plan provided in the offer explained sufficiently?

CONTRACT PAYMENTS:

the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Did the contractor acknowledge acceptance of the terms of the payment method listed in this section?

SPECIAL SECURITY AND CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS:

the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Did the contractor acknowledge acceptance of the terms in this section and indicate sufficient staff capable to pass the security requirements?

EXPERIENCE

The Government will assess the contractor’s ability to meet the following requirements on a Yes/No basis.

CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS:

the following requirements of the Statement of Work (SOW)?

______Does the contractor’s offer indicate that the contractor’s staff has the required demonstrated experience in diagnostic radiographic equipment inspections?

______Did the contractor provide copies of current required licenses and/or permits as part of its normal business operations in the proposal?

______Did the requested resumes provided by the contractor for all inspectors anticipated to perform the inspections under the contract meet the experience requirement?

______Did the offeror sufficiently demonstrate their ability to perform all the requirements of the Statement of work?

______Did the offeror provide the active SAM verification as requested?

PAST PERFORMANCE

The contractor shall provide past performance information for a minimum of three recent and relevant contracts for the same or similar services. Recent contracts are defined as contracts that were successfully performed and/or completed within the last five years.

Information provided by the contractor regarding past performance shall include contract number, company name, point of contact with telephone number, e-mail and any other relevant information which will assist with the evaluation process, for each contract.

The contractor shall address any instances of past performance problems in referenced contracts, and explain how these problems were resolved. Failure by the contractor to satisfactorily explain past performance problems may have an adverse effect on the past performance evaluation.

_______Did the contractor provide the past performance information requested?

PRICE

The lowest price, technically acceptable proposal will be the award selection.