RFQ COMBO - FA701424Q0051.docx

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation

Requirement Title: Secure Operations Console (SOC) Number: FA701424Q0051 Type: Firm Fixed Price Date: August 8, 2024 Questions Due: August 16, 2024, 1600 EST Response Deadline: August 23, 2024, 1600 EST Point(s) of Contact: Primary: SSgt Phelicha, phelicha.silva@us.af.mil Alternate: Mr. Ryan Amos, ryan.amos.5.ctr@us.af.mil General Information

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not be issued.

2. This solicitation is being issued as a Request for Quotations (RFQ) under FAR Part 13.

3. This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through:

Federal Acquisition Circular 2024-02 01/22/2024 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Public Notice 01/22/2024 Department of the Air Force Federal Acquisition Circular 07/07/2023

4. A 100% small business set-aside will be used. The North American Industry Size Classification System (NAICS) code associated with this requirement is 541512. The Small Business Size Standard associated with this NAICS is $34M.

Requirement Information

5. The purpose of this combined synopsis and solicitation is to advertise the requirement to have an Offeror perform Secure Operations Console (SOC) Operator Trainer Services. The objective of this effort is to ensure we develop or modify, maintain and implement our ongoing training program to ensure we provide the Joint Staff (JS) with well-trained and prepared airmen for day-to-day mission support. The Secure Operator Console (SOC) must pass evaluation and certification by the JS Operations Training and Standards Evaluation (OT&SE) Branch. Additional objectives under this contract include: centralize database management supporting both the National Military Command Center (NMCC), and the Alternate NMCC; participation in the development of various NMCS exercises/exercise scenarios; provide monthly and yearly conference statistics; identify possible deficiencies with site equipment and/or personnel; conducting regularly scheduled monthly communications systems tests and assessments for all Emergency Actions communications systems. The trainer(s) will also be required to travel with the OT and SOC operators numerous times per year to maintain proficiency training at remote operating locations. The bid schedule is in the attached Excel spreadsheet (Attachment 4) for your convenience. The quote shall be submitted on company letterhead, and include at a minimum the following information:

All responsible sources may submit a quote, which shall be considered. A firm fixed price contract is contemplated.

6. Refer to the attached PWS for a detailed description of requirements for the service being acquired FA701424Q0051 SOC Operator Trainer Services at the 844thCS/SCON, 1600 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20030. (See attached Performance Work Statement (Attachment 1))

7. Period of Performance is anticipated to be as follows:

Place of Delivery/Performance/Acceptance/FOB Destination:

844thCS/SCON 1600 Air Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20030

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Air force district of Washington

Updated 15 May 24

Combined Synopsis/Solicitation Instructions to Offerors

FAR provision 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial, applies to this acquisition. As prescribed in FAR 12.301(b)(1), the following addendum is provided for this solicitation and hereby amends any language therein:

· Quoted amounts need to be net prices without tax

· The Government reserves the right to award on an "All or None" basis

· The Government reserves the right to reject quotes that are not received by the response deadline

· Provide Quote Expiration Date, Best Delivery Date, and any Discount Terms

· Quotes, attachments, and all other correspondence as listed in this solicitation must be emailed to both points of contact (POCs)

· All questions are to be submitted in writing by August 16, 2024, 1600 EST; any questions submitted after this date will not be answered

· Quotes are required to be valid until September 30, 2024

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the Offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self- sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts:

Part I – Technical Capability

Part II – Price Proposal

Part III – Past Performance Information

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and, if in the contracting officer’s opinion adequate price competition exists, no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists Offerors may be required to submit information other than certified cost or pricing data to support a determination of price reasonableness.

C. Specific Instructions:

Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully compliant and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (Item Numbers) and Performance Work Statement (PWS), and government standards and regulations pertaining to the PWS.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award.

Part I – Technical Capability – Submit one (1) copy & one (1) redacted copy.

Factor 1. Technical - the Capability of the service offered to meet the Governments requirement. The offeror’s proposal shall, at a minimum, address the technical sub factors, as it applies to the Performance Work Statement (PWS).

a. Subfactor 1. Qualifications - The offeror shall provide a summary of positions that identifies the personnel resources and skill set proposed for the fulfillment of PWS requirements. The summary of positions shall address the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), experience, and qualifications outlined in section 2.1.2 and 2.2.2 of the PWS. The proposal must clearly quantify years of experience, must identify when the experience occurred and must describe how the proposed labor categories meet minimum KSA and experience levels identified in the PWS.

b. Subfactor 2. Staffing Plan/Technical - The offeror shall submit a detailed staffing plan. The staffing plan shall explain the proposed number and categories of personnel and shall explain how that mix will be successful in performing the tasks in the PWS. The staffing plan shall demonstrate: (1) an adequate number and categories of personnel proposed to perform the services in the PWS; (2) the offeror’s plan to obtain personnel, minimize turnover and fill vacancies in accordance with the PWS; and (3) that the proposed labor categories are tied to specific PWS tasks.

c. Subfactor 3. Security - The offer shall clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the clearance requirements in section 7.0 of the PWS (Security Instructions). The offeror must hold the minimum facility clearance at the time of proposal submission and all personnel must hold the required clearances prior to commencing work on the task order.

A Rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable” will be assigned for each technical subfactor.

Note: Failure to address any one or more areas of the technical proposal sub factors above will render your technical proposal unacceptable, and therefore, unawardable.

Part II – Price Proposal - Submit one (1) copy (Attachment 4). Offerors shall, at a minimum, submit their pricing on the attached Bid Schedule (Attachment 4). The offeror shall provide unburdened labor rates and fringe benefits for the labor categories.

Factor 2. Price – the Government will evaluate the total price of the offer for award purposes.

a. Offers will be evaluated for fairness & reasonableness, balance, and the unburdened labor rates will be evaluated for realism. Insert proposed unit and extended prices for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including all option periods and option to extend services in accordance with FAR 52.217-8. The offeror shall include a fully completed price schedule of the solicitation in this section of their proposal. Any offeror, which fails to cite a price for each item, or fails to make an entry, which indicates that work will be provided at no charge, will be rejected as non-compliant, and will not be considered for award to this solicitation. Only firm-fixed price offers will be evaluated. The staffing plan shall include a cross-matrix that assigns the proposed labor categories to specific PWS tasks and shall provide an unburdened rate (basic gross compensation rate) and fully burdened rate breakout information for all proposed labor categories to support price proposal. The unburdened labor rates for all proposed labor categories will be evaluated for realism based on the Washington DC area. Unrealistically, low unburdened labor rates may be grounds for eliminating an offeror’s proposal from competition.

b. Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Bid Schedule (Attachment 4). Unit prices must be whole dollar values (e.g. $10.00). The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. The proposal(s) must be submitted for a 1-year base plus four (4) Option Years.

c. (Options) - The Government will evaluate options in accordance with FAR clause 52.217- 5, Evaluation of Options, July 1990, as prescribed in FAR 17.208(c)(1). The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Offerors are required only to price the base and option CLINs. Offerors shall not submit a price for the potential six-month extension of services period.

d. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions. All offerors shall include a completed copy of FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representation and Certifications -- Commercial Item (Oct 2018) or complete electronic annual representations and certifications at the System for Award Management http://www.sam.gov and it shall be returned along with the proposal.

e. Include the total dollar value of your proposal at the bottom of the bid schedule.

PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION - Only references for similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity are desired. Submit one (1) copy (Attachments 5 and 6).

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three (3) Years: Provide information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, etc.

(b) Past Performance References: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of the Offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the Offeror and other sources such as other federal government offices and commercial sources, to assess performance. Provide a list of no more than three (3) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation with a minimum of six (6) months of performance period. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first-time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past and present relevant contracts.

(c) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information, pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime Offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

(End of Addendum) Evaluation Criteria

FAR Provision 52.212-2, Evaluation -- Commercial Items, applies to this acquisition. As prescribed in FAR 12.301(c), the following addendum is provided for this solicitation and hereby amends any language therein:

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1 - Technical Capability Subfactor 1 - Qualification Subfactor 2 - Staffing Plan/Technical Subfactor 3 - Security Factor 2 - Price Factor 3 - Past Performance

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options including the option to extend service to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

52.212-2 Addendum

BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing Offerors’ technical capability, past performance history, and cost or price considerations will be evaluated. By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

A. Technical Capability: Initially, the government technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis assigning one of the ratings described below for the technical factor. If the technical factor is evaluated as “Unacceptable”, it will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, unawardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, either initially or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award. However, the Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. The term “technical” as used herein, refers to non-price factors other than past performance. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the Offeror’s proposal will satisfy the government’s minimum requirements. The Government will use the following table to assess the contractor’s technical acceptability:

TECHNICAL RATINGS

Qualification:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if the Offeror’s proposal clearly demonstrates the Offeror’s qualifications, personnel, and resource skill set to fulfil the PWS requirements. The offeror must clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the PWS in section 3.0 of the PWS (Task Requirements).The summary of positions shall address the knowledge, skills, abilities (KSAs), experience, and qualifications outlined in section 2.1.2 and 2.2.2 of the PWS. The proposal must clearly quantify years of experience, must identify when the experience occurred and must describe how the proposed labor categories meet minimum KSA and experience levels identified in the PWS.

Staffing Plan/Technical:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if the Offeror’s detailed staffing plan clearly explains the proposed number and categories of personnel and explains how that mix will be successful in performing the tasks in the PWS. The offeror must clearly identify how it will meet and comply with the PWS in section 2.0 of the PWS (Task Requirements). The staffing plan shall demonstrate (1) an adequate number and categories of personnel proposed to perform the services in the PWS; (2) the offeror’s plan to obtain personnel, minimize turnover and fill vacancies in accordance with the PWS; and must demonstrate (3) that the proposed labor categories are tied to specific PWS tasks.

Security:

The Offeror will receive an acceptable rating for this technical subfactor if offeror clearly identifies how it will meet and comply with the clearance requirements in section 7.0 of the PWS (Security Instructions). The offeror must hold the minimum facility clearance at the time of proposal submission and all personnel must hold the required clearances prior to commencing work on the task order.

B. Price Evaluation. Next, the government will rank all technically acceptable offers (and unacceptable offers with correction potential) by the total evaluated price (TEP). The government will verify the offeror’s proposed extended price by multiplying the quantities by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the total proposed price. The proposals will be evaluated based on the TEP. The offeror’s TEP will be evaluated for fairness & reasonableness, balance, and the unburdened labor rates will be evaluated for realism. The TEP consists of the total proposed price for all CLINs including Option CLINs for the five-year period (i.e. Base Period and all four (4) Option Periods). The six month extension under FAR 52.217-8, “Option to Extend Services,” will be evaluated; however, it is not part of the TEP. Offerors are not required to submit pricing for a six-month extension of services. The Government will calculate one-half of the last option year (i.e. Option Year 4) to evaluate the six-month extension under FAR 52.217-8. Evaluation of the option period prices shall not obligate the Government to exercise such options.

C. Past Performance. The contracting officer will seek recent and relevant performance information on all Offerors based on: (1) the references provided by the Offeror; and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources.

1. Relevant present/past performance is defined as effort involving a similar scope and similar magnitude of effort and complexity as this solicitation requires. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced Offerors if none of the lower priced Offerors receives a “Substantial Confidence” performance assessment rating. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the Offeror’s ability to provide Secure Operations Console (SOC) Operator Trainer Services.

The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of “Substantial Confidence,” “Satisfactory Confidence,” “Limited Confidence,” “No Confidence,” or “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)” as defined in the table below. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement may be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal Offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history or the Offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Unknown Confidence (Neutral)”, meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. Performance Confidence will be evaluated in accordance with the following Table:

PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Substantial Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Limited Confidence Based on the Offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

2. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation. Relevancy will be evaluated in accordance with the following table:

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY

scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

3. If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment rating and the Offeror is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value to the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award will be made to that Offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

a. If the lowest priced Offeror is not judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment rating, the next lowest priced Offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an Offeror is judged to have a “Substantial Confidence” performance confidence assessment or until all Offerors are evaluated. The Contracting Officer will then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

b. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

Clauses and Provisions

FAR provision 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications -- Commercial Items with alternate I applies to this acquisition; the offeror verifies by submission of their offer that the representation and certifications posted at FAR 52.212-3 have been entered or updated electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) Web site located at http://www.sam.gov/portal in the last 12 months, and are current, accurate, complete, and applicable to this solicitation. Alternatively, if the Offeror has not completed the annual representations and certifications electronically, the Offeror shall complete only paragraphs (c) through (u) of this provision and include a completed copy with its offer.

FAR clause 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions -- Commercial Items applies to this acquisition.

FAR clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or Executive Orders -- Commercial Items applies to this acquisition; the following checked clauses are hereby included by reference:

x52.203-6, Restrictions on Subcontractor Sales to the Government with Alternate I 52.204-10, Reporting Executive compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards x52.209-6, Protecting the Government's Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment x52.209-9, Updates of Publicly Available Information Regarding Responsibility Matters x52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Set-Aside x52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set Aside x52.219-9, Small Business Subcontract Plan x52.219-28, Post Award SB Representation Program x52.222-3, Convict Labor x52.222-19, Child Labor--Cooperation with Authorities and Remedies x52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities x52.222-26, Equal Opportunity x52.222-35, Equal Opportunity for Veterans x52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers with Disabilities x52.222-37, Employment Reports on Veterans x52.222-40, Notification of Employee Rights x52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires x52.222-50, Combating Trafficking Persons x52.222-54, Employment Eligibility Verification x52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires x52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving x52.225-13, Restrictions on Certain Foreign Purchases x52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award Management

The provisions and clauses listed below have been determined by the contracting officer to be necessary for this acquisition and consistent with customary commercial practices. The following provisions and clauses are hereby included by reference:

52.203-3, Gratuities 52.203-19, Prohibition on Requiring Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements or Statements 52.204-7, System for Award Management 52.204-13, System for Award Management Maintenance 52.204-16, Commercial and Government Entity Code Reporting 52.204-17, Ownership or Control of Offeror 52.204-18, Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance 52.204-20, Predecessor of Offeror 52.204-22, Alternative Line Item Proposal 52.204-23, Prohibition on Contracting for Hardware, Software, and Services Developed or Provided by Kaspersky Lab or Other Covered Entities 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

52.204-26, Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services-Representation 52.204–27, Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application 52.209-11, Representation by Corporations regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law 52.225-25, Prohibition on contracting with Entities Engaging in Certain Activities or Transactions Relating to Iran –Representation and Certification 52.232-40, Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors 52.233-3, Protest after Award 52.233-4, Applicable Law for Breach of Contract Claim 52.247-34, F.O.B Destination 52.253-1, Computer Generated Forms

The following DFARS clauses and provisions cited are applicable to this solicitation:

252.201-7000, Contracting Officer's Representative *If Applicable 252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials 252.203-7002, Requirement to inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights 252.203-7005, Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DOD Officials 252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product 252.204-7015, Notice of Authorized Disclosure of Information for Litigation Support 252.204-7016, Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation 252.204-7017, Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services—Representation 252.204-7018, Prohibition on the Acquisition of Covered Defense Telecommunications Equipment or Services 252.211-7003, Item Identification & Valuation 252.213-7000 Notice to Prospective Suppliers on Use of Supplier Performance Risk System in Past Performance Evaluations 252.223-7001, Hazard Warning Labels 252.223-7008, Prohibition on Hexavalent Chromium 252.225-7001, Buy American Act and balance of Payments Program 252.225-7043, Antiterrorism/Force Protection for Defense 252.225-7048, Export Controlled Items 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests and Receiving Reports 252.232-7006, Wide Area Workflow Payment Instructions 252.232-7010, Levies on Contract Payments 252.243-7001, Pricing of Contract Modifications 252.244-7000, Subcontracts for Commercial Items 252.247-7023, Transportation of Supplies by Sea

The following DAFFARS clauses cited are applicable to this solicitation:

5352.201-9101, Ombudsman 5352.223-9001 Health and Safety on Government Installations 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access to Air Force Installations

The following provisions and clauses are hereby included by full text:

52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference This solicitation incorporates one or more solicitation provisions by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. The offeror is cautioned that the listed provisions may include blocks that must be completed by the offeror and submitted with its quotation or offer. In lieu of submitting the full text of those provisions, the offeror may identify the provision by paragraph identifier and provide the appropriate information with its quotation or offer. Also, the full text of a solicitation provision may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es): https:// farsite.hill.af.mil

52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated By Reference (Feb 1998) This contract incorporates one or more clauses by reference, with the same force and effect as if they were given in full text. Upon request, the Contracting Officer will make their full text available. Also, the full text of a clause may be accessed electronically at this/these address(es): http://farsite.hill.af.mil 52.252-6, Authorized Deviations in Clauses (Apr 1984)

(a) The use in this solicitation or contract of any Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the date of the clause.

(b) The use in this solicitation or contract of any Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (48 CFR Chapter 2) clause with an authorized deviation is indicated by the addition of "(DEVIATION)" after the name of the regulation.

Attachments

1. Attachment 1: SOC PWS

2. Attachment 2: QASP

3. Attachment 3: DD254

4. Attachment 4: Bid Schedule (Excel)

5. Attachment 5: Past Performance Questionnaire

6. Attachment 6: Past Performance Information Form image1.png