RFQ Attachment 1 - Past Performance Questionnaire Template.docx

For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR SOLICITATION M95494-21-Q-0004 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

To Offeror:

Please provide this Past Performance Questionnaire package to each of your “Reference” Government contracting offices according to the instructions in “Instructions to Offerors” of this solicitation.

To Offeror’s Reference:

The Marine Corps Installation Command Contracting Office requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the Contractor (a prospective “Offeror” under our Solicitation) and corresponding contract listed herein. Please complete this Questionnaire in accordance with the Instructions set forth immediately below.

Marine Corps Installation Command Contracting Office agrees to protect your information as for Official Use Only/Source Selection Information consistent with FAR 2.101 and 3.104, as noted in the header on each page of this Questionnaire package.

Instructions for Offerors Reference:

1. Please complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire regarding the Offeror based upon your most recent Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) prepared in accordance with FAR 42.15; provided, you do not actually enter your CPARS into the Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) or the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

2. Please use the attached Rating Instruction (or the equivalent you use in producing your CPARs) in providing the rating assessments that best describe the contractor’s performance on your contract.

3. Please send a copy of the completed Questionnaire directly to the Marine Corps Installation Command Contracting Office by email (preferred) or facsimile so as to be received timely.

Marine Corps Installation Command Contacts POC Name: Anthony Hawkins Email Address: Anthony.D.Hawkins@USMC.mil POC Name: Hanika Torio Email Address: Hanika.Torio@USMC.mil

*THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND SUPPORT

RATING INSTRUCTION

Please provide your assessment of each factor rated in the Questionnaire by using the following rating scale and corresponding definitions (or equivalent you use in producing your Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARS), as may be appropriate in each case.

1. Rating Scale:

· Excellent – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit.

· Good – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

· Fair – Performance meets contractual requirements.

· Poor – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

· Unsatisfactory – Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.

· Not Applicable (N/A) – Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR SOLICITATION M95494-21-Q-0004 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

-TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFERORS (CONTRACTOR’S) REFERENCE-

1. Offeror (Contractor)/Division:___________________________________

DUNS + 4 Number: ________________________________________________

2. Report Type: ____________________________________________________

3. Period Assessed: ________________________________________________

4. Contract #: _____________________________________________________

5. Location of Contractor Performance: _____________________________

6. Reference Contracting Office/Code: ______________________________

7. Contracting Officer (Name/Phone): _______________________________

8. Contract Award Date/Effective Date: _____________________________

9. Contract Completion Date: _______________________________________

10. Contract Award Dollar Value: ___________________________________

11. Contract Current Dollar Value: _________________________________

12. Basis for Contract Award (check all that apply) ___ Negotiated ___ Competitive ___ Non-Competitive

13. Type of Contract (check all that apply) ___ Firm Fixed Price (FFP) ___ Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) ___ FFP (Level of Effort) ___ CPFF (Level of Effort) ___ Time and Material ___ Labor Hour ___ Other

14. Key Subcontractors (list as needed):

Subcontractor Name: ____________________________________________ Cage Code: _____________________________________________________

DUNS + 4: ______________________________________________________

Effort Performed: ______________________________________________

15. Program Title & Acquisition Phase: _____________________________

16. Contract Effort Description: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

· Does this contract include a subcontracting plan?

___ Yes ___ No

· Subcontracting under this contract is covered by a ___[comprehensive] ___[commercial] ___ [N/A} (select one) small business subcontracting plan.

· Date of latest Subcontracting Report/Summary Subcontracting Report: ______________________________________________________

FACTORS RATED:

1. Quality of Product or Service – Assess the contractor’s conformance to contact requirements, specifications, quality of software product and development, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional standards).

2. Timeliness (Schedule Performance) – Assess the contractor’s timeliness against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance.)

___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Unsatisfactory

___ N/A

Comments: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

3. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, including reporting and analyzing variances.

Note: This factor is not rated for firm fixed price, firm fixed price with economic price adjustment, or firm fixed prices level of effort type contracts.

___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Unsatisfactory ___ N/A

Comments:

4. Business Relations – Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. Include the adequacy of the contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems and the contractor’s management of Property in Possession of Contractor (PIPC) also known as Government Furnished Property/Equipment (GFP/GFE). Address the timeliness of award to subcontractors, including subcontractor costs.

___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Unsatisfactory ___ N/A

Comments:

5. Problem Resolution (Management of Key Personnel) – Assess the completeness, timeliness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals (especially responses to change orders, engineering changes proposals, or other undefinitized contract actions). The contractor’s performance in selecting, retaining, supporting, and replacing when necessary, key personnel. The contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Unsatisfactory ___ N/A

Comments:

6. Utilization of Small Business – Assess the contractor’s success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran-owned small business, and women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals.

___ Excellent ___ Good ___ Fair ___ Poor ___ Unsatisfactory ___ N/A

Comments:

OTHER AREAS ASSESSED:

1. Has the contractor been given cure notice(s), show cause notice(s), suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction, etc.?

___ Yes ___ No ___ N/A Comments: _______________________________________________________

2. Recommendation: Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in the proposal, would you award to them today if you had a choice?

___ Yes ___ No

Comments: _______________________________________________________

3. Please provide any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor.

Comments: _______________________________________________________