RFPAttD.doc
DOC document 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-25700-00000845
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
The document is a Reference Check Form for a Request for Proposal (RFP) related to the 2006 Cessna (N17386) Aircraft - TIO-540-AJ1A Engine Replacement & Propeller Overhauls project. The project involves the replacement of the engine and overhaul of the propeller for a 2006 Cessna aircraft owned by the state of Oregon and used by the jurisdictions of Marion County and the City of Salem. The Reference Check Form is meant to be completed by references who can provide feedback on the overall quality of services, delivery of service, and responsiveness of the proposer.
The Form includes a rating scale from 0 to 10, with 0 being "Not satisfied" and 10 being "Extremely satisfied", for the reference to provide scores and comments across the three evaluation criteria. No other details about pricing, set asides, incumbents, funding, or contract terms are provided in this document.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| IntRFPAttA- SPO OregonBuys RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5276-3 Attachment E.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFPAttB.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttG.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttC.doc | DOC document | |
| IntRFP S-25700-00000845-ORBuys Airplane Engine Replacement and Repair~2.doc | DOC document | |
| RFPAttF.doc | DOC document | |
| IntRFPAttE- Price Proposal Form.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [###-####-##] – [RFP title]
ATTACHMENT F - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
2006 Cessna (N17386) Aircraft- TIO-540-AJ1A Engine Replacement & Propeller Overhauls Att D
ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM
Proposer Name:
Reference Entity:
Reference Contact Name:
Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Email Address:
Please rate the following questions on a scale of 0-10:
0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.
1. How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
2. How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
3. How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, changes billing, etc.)?
Score: __________ Comments: ______________________________________________________________________________
Version 1.0 - November 19, 2014 DAS Procurement Services, Version 2.0 – December 9, 2016
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .