RFP Score Sheet _ Engineer Selection City of .pdf

PDF 134 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposals
Solicitation number
PE-61050-NONST-2026-000000011
Issued by
Berrien County, Georgia

About this file

This is a Qualification Evaluation Form for the City of Nashville, Georgia, used to assess and score engineering firms submitting proposals for pre- and post-award services related to community and economic development projects. The City of Nashville is soliciting qualifications from engineering firms to provide comprehensive services including preliminary engineering report preparation, planning, design, cost estimating, bidding, contracting, construction oversight, quality control, and project closeout. The projects focus on critical public infrastructure improvements such as severe weather notification systems, water and sewer systems, street paving, and drainage solutions. The evaluation form does not specify explicit response deadlines, site visit requirements, or bidders' conferences, though the referenced RFP documents contain additional details on these procedural requirements.

The evaluation criteria consist of six weighted factors: the firm's ability to supply all major engineering disciplines, experience with similar construction projects, knowledge of the Nashville community, staff expertise, prior experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and cost competitiveness. Scoring uses a four-point scale ranging from Poor (1) to Excellent (4). The funding sources include federal and state programs administered through the Georgia Department of Community Affairs, specifically CDBG Annual Competition, CDBG Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR), Employee Incentive Program (EIP), Redevelopment Fund (RDF), and Immediate Threat and Danger (ITAD) funds. All contracts are subject to federal and state provisions prescribed by the Georgia DCA and cover multiple projects over a limited time period contingent on grant funding. The evaluation form also requires verification that selected firms carry Errors and Omissions insurance and can meet preliminary engineering report deadlines. This contract opportunity is designated as a Section 3 Covered Contract, and Section 3 Business Concerns are encouraged to apply.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

QUALIFICATION EVALUATION FORM

SELECTION OF ENGINEER FOR

CITY OF NASHVILLE

OWNER:

NAME OF FIRM:

FIRM ADDRESS:

ANTICIPATED FUNDING SOURCE: __________________________________________________________

Evaluate the Engineer and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion. Scoring of RFP’s will be as follows:

Poor

Fair

Good

Excellent

POINTS

CRITERION ASSIGNED

1. Engineer and/or Engineering Firms ability to supply all major disciplines necessary to perform the work.

2. Engineer and/or Engineering Firms experience with this type construction.

3. Engineer and/or Engineering Firms knowledge of community.

4. Engineer and/or Engineering Firms Staff Expertise.

5. Has Engineer and/or Engineering Firm had experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Projects?

6. Is cost competitive?

TOTAL SCORE:

Firm can meet preliminary engineering report (PER) deadline? Yes No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? Yes No

COMMENTS:

NAME OF REVIEWER: DATE OF REVIEW:

QUALIFICATION EVALUATION FORM SELECTION OF ENGINEER FOR
CITY OF NASHVILLE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .