rfp-rpam-2026-01-scoring.pdf

PDF 55 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Qualifications and Proposal to Provide Real Estate Consulting and Marketing Services
Solicitation number
RFP RPAM 2026-01
Issued by
Hillsborough County, New Hampshire

About this file

This is an evaluation summary document for a Request for Qualifications and Proposal issued by the New Hampshire Department of Administrative Services (RFP RPAM 2026-01) to procure real estate consulting and marketing services. The document presents the results of a competitive evaluation process in which three qualified firms submitted proposals for consideration. The evaluation was conducted based on the qualifications of each firm, the proposed services and approach, the quality and comprehensiveness of their RFP responses, and the quality of live presentations delivered by each proposing firm.

Cushman & Wakefield ranked first overall in the evaluation, followed by NAI Norwood Group in second place and CBRE-Boulos in third place. The ranking was determined solely on the merits of qualifications, proposed services, response quality, and presentation quality, with no other evaluation factors noted in this summary document. The document does not contain details regarding pricing, contract term, deliverables, timelines, or other procurement parameters that would typically be included in the full RFP or award documentation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
rfp-rpam-2026-01.pdf PDF
addendum-3-rfp-rpam-2026-01.pdf PDF
rfp-rpam-2026-01-respondents.pdf PDF
addendum-2-rfp-rpam-2026-01.pdf PDF
addendum-1-rfp-rpam-2026-01.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSAL

TO PROVIDE REAL ESTATE CONSULTING AND MARKETING SERVICES

NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

(RFP RPAM 2026-01)

EVALUATION SUMMARY

Overall Rank Cushman & Wakefield 1 NAI Norwood Group 2 CBRE-Boulos 3

NOTE: Response ranking above is based entirely on qualifications, proposed services, the quality of the RFP response, and the quality of the live presentation.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .