RFP 8704 Att D Reference Check Form.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Stalker Radar/Lidar Equipment Repair and Calibration Services
Solicitation number
S-DASOBO-00008704
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an Attachment D - Reference Check Form for RFP S-DASOBO-00008704 Stalker Radar Equipment Repair and Calibration Services. The Department of Administrative Services, on behalf of the Oregon State Police, is seeking proposals for the repair, calibration, and recertification of Stalker Radar and Lidar equipment. The RFP requires respondents to provide references, which will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 based on the overall quality of services provided, delivery of service, and responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests. The contract opportunity covers the jurisdictions of Marion County and the City of Salem, Oregon.

The RFP does not provide details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements and sources, or contract amounts. The contract duration and any renewal options are also not specified in the provided documentation.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP 8704 Att B Disclosure Exemption Affidavit.docx DOCX document
RFP 8704 Att F Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan.docx DOCX document
10414 Bid Tab.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Addendum 1~1.docx DOCX document
RFP 8704 Att G Responsibility Inquiry.docx DOCX document
RFP 8704 Att A Master Services Agmt.pdf PDF
RFP 8704 Att C Proposer Information and Certification.docx DOCX document
RFP 8704 Stalker Equipment Services.pdf PDF
RFP 8704 Att E Price Proposal.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP S-DASOBO-00008704 Stalker Radar Equipment Repair and Calibration Services Att D

ATTACHMENT D - REFERENCE CHECK FORM

Reference #1 Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Name of Contact Person #1:

Position/Title of Contact Person #1:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #1:

Email Address:

Name of Contact Person #2:

Position/Title for Contact Person #2:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #2:

Email Address:

Reference #2 Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Name of Contact Person #1:

Position/Title of Contact Person #1:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #1:

Email Address:

Name of Contact Person #2:

Position/Title for Contact Person #2:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #2:

Email Address:

Reference #3 Firm Name:

Firm Address:

Name of Contact Person #1:

Position/Title of Contact Person #1:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #1:

Email Address:

Name of Contact Person #2:

Position/Title for Contact Person #2:

Telephone Number for Contact Person #2:

Email Address:

References will be contacted and asked the questions below. References are worth up to 30 points. Each question will be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 10 based on the following criteria:

0 = Not satisfied 5 = Moderately satisfied 10 = Extremely satisfied.

How would you rate the Proposer’s overall quality of services provided and your overall relationship with the Proposer?

Reference #1:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #2:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #3:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

How would you rate the Proposer’s delivery of service?

Reference #1:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #2:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #3:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

How would you rate the Proposer’s responsiveness to customer service issues and special requests (e.g., reported problems, billing issues, etc.)?

Reference #1:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #2:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Reference #3:

Score: __________ Comments: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .