ADDENDUM #001

Solicitation Number: FDC RFP-27-012

Solicitation Title: Statewide Integrative Corrections Intelligence Platform

Proposals Due By: November 12, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. E.T.

Addendum Number: 001

Addendum Date: October 30, 2026

Failure to file a protest within the time prescribed in Section 120.57(3), Florida Statutes, or failure to post the bond or other security required by law within the time allowed for filing a bond shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. A notice of protest should be filed with the Agency Clerk, Office of General Counsel, 501 South Calhoun Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399; or by Fax: (850) 922-4355; or Email: CO-GCAgencyClerk@fdc.myflorida.com.

Please be advised that the information contained in this Addendum is applicable to the original specifications of the above-referenced solicitation and any subsequent addenda.

Added language to the RFP is highlighted in yellow, while deleted language is stricken.

Addendum #001 includes the Department’s written answers to the written questions received by the deadline in the RFP Timeline.

Addendum #001 also includes the following changes:

[ Remainder of Page Left Blank Intentionally] mailto:CO-GCAgencyClerk@fdc.myflorida.com

RFP-27-012 Page 2 of 60 Addendum #001

Change No 1:

The RFP Timeline is hereby revised as follows:

TIMELINE

The Department established the following Timeline for this RFP. Each Vendor must adhere to this Timeline and any Timeline revision(s). The Department will post any Timeline revision as an addendum to the RFP advertisement in accordance with Section 3.14 of this RFP. All references to the “Timeline” herein refer to the Timeline in this Section.

EVENT DATE/TIME LOCATION

Release of RFP Sept. 21, 2026 Vendor Information Portal (VIP) https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com

Last Day for written inquiries to be received by the Department

Oct. 2, 2026, at 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time (ET)

Submit to: Florida Department of Corrections Bureau of Procurement, Sarah Weirick purchasing@fdc.myflorida.com

Anticipated Posting of written responses to written inquiries

Oct. 30, 2026

VIP:

https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com

Sealed Proposals Due and Opened (Opening Date or

Proposal Opening)

Nov. 12, 2026 at 2:00 p.m., ET

Submit to: Florida Department of Corrections Bureau of Procurement, Sarah Weirick purchasing@fdc.myflorida.com 501 South Calhoun Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Subject: RFP-27-012 Statewide Integrative Corrections Intelligence Platform

Evaluation Team Meeting

Nov. 19, 2026 Nov. 17, 2026 at 3:00 p.m., ET

Florida Department of Corrections 501 South Calhoun Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Anticipated Posting of

Recommended Award

January/February Nov. 23, 2026

VIP:

https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com/

Change No. 2:

Section 1.1, Definitions, is revised as follows:

1.1 Definitions

The following terms used in this RFP, unless the context otherwise clearly requires a different construction and interpretation, have the following meanings:

https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com/ mailto:purchasing@fdc.myflorida.com https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com/ mailto:purchasing@fdc.myflorida.com

RFP-27-012 Page 3 of 60

1.1.1 Agency Term Contract (ATC or Contract): The formal written agreement between the Department and the Contractor, which results from this RFP and is mandatory for use by the entire Department.

1.1.2 Business Day: Days Monday through Friday, excluding State holidays or other official closures.

1.1.3 Business Hours: Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern

Standard Time (EST or ET), excluding State holidays or other official closures, unless otherwise stated in this RFP or resulting Contract.

1.1.4 Contraband: Where used herein, refers to any item inside an institution or facility, on facility property, or in the possession of an inmate that was not authorized.

1.1.5 Contract Manager: The Department employee, or designee, who will serve as a liaison between the Contractor and Department under the Contract and will monitor the Contractor’s progress and Contract performance to ensure the procured products and services conform to the Contract’s requirements.

1.1.6 Contractor: A legally qualified corporation, partnership, or other business entity that submitted a Proposal to the Department in response to this RFP and is awarded the resulting Contract.

1.1.7 Correctional Institution (CI): Any prison or other correctional facility, temporary or permanent, in which Inmates are housed under the custody of the Department.

1.1.8 Corrective Action Plan (CAP): A Contractor’s comprehensive written response to any deficiencies discovered during Contract compliance monitoring, and a plan for remediation of those deficiencies.

1.1.9 Day: A Calendar Day, unless otherwise noted.

1.1.10 Deliverables: Those services, items, and/or materials provided, prepared and delivered to the Department in the course of Contract performance.

1.1.11 Department (FDC): The State of Florida, Department of Corrections.

1.1.12 Evaluation: The process utilized by the Department to evaluate the portions of a

Responsive Proposal against pre-determined, established Evaluation criteria, to determine scores and final ranking of qualified, Responsible Vendors.

1.1.13 Hour(s): Includes business hours and non-business hours.

1.1.14 Independent Third-Party Provider: A Vendor or entity that operates independently of the Department and is not affiliated with, controlled by, or acting on behalf of the Department. The provider must function as an external, impartial organization responsible for delivering the contracted services without influence from the Department.

RFP-27-012 Page 4 of 60

1.1.15 Inmate: Any individual who is legally detained, housed, or otherwise held in custody of a jail or detention facility, whether awaiting trial, sentencing, transfer, or serving a sentence. The term includes all persons under the facility’s supervision and care, regardless of their legal status, classification level, or length of stay.

1.1.16 Investigative Partners: Authorized external law enforcement, public safety agencies, judicial entities, or other designated organizations that collaborate with the Department for criminal or security-related investigative purposes.

Investigative Partners may receive intelligence produced by the platform; however, all requests for information must be submitted through and coordinated by Department staff.

1.1.17 Mandatory Responsiveness Requirements: Terms, conditions, or requirements that must be met by the Vendor to be responsive to this solicitation. Failure to meet mandatory requirements will cause the Department to find a Proposal non-responsive.

1.1.18 Material Deviation: any departure from the mandatory requirements of the RFP that substantially affects the scope, quality, or performance of the goods or services; limits the rights of the buyer or the obligations of the offeror; or impacts the fairness and comparability of the procurement process. Proposals containing a Material Deviation are considered non-responsive and will be rejected.

1.1.19 Minor Irregularity: A variation from the RFP terms and conditions which does not have a significant effect on the price of the Proposal, or the quality of services sought, does not give the Vendor a substantial advantage or benefit not enjoyed by the other Vendors, and does not adversely impact the interests of the Department. A minor irregularity will not result in a rejection of a Proposal.

1.1.20 Near Real Time: For the purposes of this solicitation, “near real time” means that the system must detect, process, and deliver contraband-related RF, device, and analytical intelligence within 30–120 seconds from the point of signal capture or data event. This response window must be consistently maintained under normal operating conditions and must be fast enough to support active investigations, operational decision-making, and timely reporting.

1.1.21 Proposal: A Vendor’s written response submitted in response to this RFP.

1.1.22 Prison Rape Elimination Act (PREA): 28 C.F.R. 115, National Standards to

Prevent, Detect, and Respond to Prison Rape, under the “Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003.” The Act provides for analysis of the incidence and effects of prison rape in federal, state, and local Institutions, and for information, resources, recommendations, and funding to protect individuals from prison rape.

1.1.23 RFP: Request For Proposals.

1.1.24 Responsible Vendor: A Vendor who has the capability in all respects to fully perform the RFP requirements and the integrity and reliability that will assure good faith performance.

RFP-27-012 Page 5 of 60

1.1.25 Responsive Proposal(s): A Proposal, submitted by a responsive and Responsible Vendor, which conforms in all material respects to this RFP.

1.1.26 State: The State of Florida.

1.1.27 Subcontract: An Agreement entered into by the Contractor with any other person or organization that agrees to perform any Contractual obligation for the Contractor, specifically related to securing or fulfilling the Contractor’s obligations to the Department under the terms of the Contract.

1.1.28 Value-Added Services: Additional services and/or commodities the Vendor may offer the Department, at no additional cost, in addition to the services and/or commodities expressly sought by this RFP, which may be unknown to the Department at this time, yet meet its overall goals.

1.1.29 Vendor: A legally qualified corporation, partnership, or other entity submitting a

Proposal to the Department pursuant to this RFP.

1.1.30 Vendor Information Portal (VIP): The State of Florida’s vendor registration, supplier diversity, and bidding system developed in accordance with section 287.042(3), F.S. The Vendor Information Portal is accessible at https://vendor.myfloridamarketplace.com.

Change No. 3:

Section 1.4, Implementation, is revised as follows:

The Vendor must have the capability to implement services, as described herein, at the time of Contract signature, unless the Department approves an alternative timeframe.

Anticipated Project Timeline

Contract sent to Vendor for signature December 1, 2026

Vendor Employee Background Checks completed by

December 30, 2026

Contract Fully Executed by December 30, 2026

Contract work to begin January 4, 2027

Contraband Intelligence Reporting Due to Department

February 15, 2027

Legislative Reporting Due March 1, 2027

Change No. 4

Section 2.5, Minimum Requirements, is revised as follows:

The Vendor's solution must, at a minimum, be fully developed, deployable and must meet the following requirements.

RFP-27-012 Page 6 of 60

2.5.1 Functional Requirements

2.5.1.1 Detect, identify, and analyze Contraband cell phone activity in real time or near-real time without the use of a managed access system.

2.5.1.2 Provide actionable intelligence to support facility security operations and criminal investigations.

2.5.1.3 Generate daily and monthly reports, alerts, visual dashboards, and analytic summaries useful for Departmental staff and investigative partners.

2.5.1.4 Capable to integrate with any future planned or unplanned integrate the cellular managed access system to support coordinated detection, analysis, or operational workflows as required by the Department.

2.5.1.5 Require minimal to no equipment installation.

2.5.2 Compliance Requirements

The platform must comply with:

2.5.2.1 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) CJIS Security Policy.

2.5.2.2 All applicable federal and state laws governing the protection, handling, storage, and transmission of inmate and prison-related information.

2.5.3 Data Ownership

2.5.3.1 The Department shall retain full ownership rights over all data provided to or received from the provider during the program.

2.5.3.2 The provider must implement processes ensuring secure data access, storage, and retrieval without limiting the Department’s ownership or operational use.

Change No. 5

Section 2.7, General Reporting Requirements, is revised as follows:

The Contractor shall submit the reports delineated below, in an approved format, to the Contract Manager. The Department reserves the right to modify reporting requirements as necessary, upon 30 Days’ written notice to the Contractor. The Department encourages the Contractor to submit copies of the required reports by email, utilizing the Microsoft Office Suite and/or Adobe applications. All reports shall include the Contractor’s name, Contract number, mailing address, email address, phone number, location(s), and the Program title. All reports shall be submitted by the dates delineated below and shall be considered late after that date.

RFP-27-012 Page 7 of 60

2.7.1 Program Invoice and Monthly Summary Reports

Program invoices, which shall specify the service dates, the Contractor’s name, contact number, mailing address, federal employer identification number (FEIN), unit rates, and phone number, shall be submitted to the Contract Manager within 10 Days following the end of the month of service or delivery. Invoices must be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre-audit and post-audit thereof, and shall include the following reports:

2.7.1.1 The Monthly Initial Statewide Contraband Intelligence Report shall be completed and made available to the Department by February 10, 2027, and every month thereafter as indicated in Section 2.7.1.2, Monthly Summary Reports, and shall delineate, by service location, the following information to track the provider’s support of the Department in collecting and maintaining all metrics required for legislative reporting:

a. Number of Contraband cell phones identified;

b. Number of terminations confirmed at the subscriber level by mobile phone providers;

c. Number of investigations initiated based on platform intelligence; and

d. Progress and results of such investigations.

2.7.1.2 A system Uptime Report will provide uptime monitoring data (the amount of time the Program was available and operational, excluding standard approved downtime for system maintenance) and submitted monthly, in a format approved by the Contract Manager.

2.7.1.2 Monthly Summary Reports due by the 10th Day of the month following the end of the corresponding month:

2.7.1.2.1 Daily Analytical Reports. The solution must deliver, or enable the Department to pull, daily cellphone analysis reports.

2.7.1.2.2 Statewide Contraband Intelligence Reports. The

solution must automatically generate a report for the Department on a monthly basis to include, at minimum, the requirements listed in 2.7.1.1.

2.7.1.2.3 System Uptime Report will provide uptime

monitoring data (the amount of time the Program was available and operational, excluding standard approved downtime for system maintenance) and submitted monthly, by the 10th day of the month following the end of the corresponding month, in a format approved by the Contract Manager.

RFP-27-012 Page 8 of 60

2.7.2 Quarterly Reports

The Contractor shall provide quarterly performance reports to the Department addressing the Contractor’s compliance with providing the services outlined in this RFP. If issues of non-compliance are identified in the Quarterly Performance Reports, financial consequences will be assessed in accordance with Section

2.6 2.9 of this RFP. The Quarterly Performance Reports shall be submitted by the 10th Calendar Day of the month following the end of the corresponding quarter.

2.7.3 Ad-Hoc Reports

The Contractor shall provide the Department with ad-hoc reports, upon request of the Contract Manager, within the timeframe specified in the request, or specified elsewhere in this RFP.

Change No. 6

Section 2.8, Deliverables and Section 2.9 Performance Measures, are revised as follows:

The following services or service tasks are identified as Deliverables for the purposes of the Contract:

2.8.1 Integrative Corrections Intelligence Platform ; Initial Statewide Contraband

Intelligence Report as indicated in Section 2.7.1.1 and

2.8.2 Maintenance and Support

2.8.2.1 Monthly Summary Reports. This deliverable includes the reports listed in Section 2.7.1.2.

2.8.2.2 Technical support for proposed solution.

2.8.2.3 Quarterly Reports as per Section 2.7.2

Section 2.9, Performance Measures and Financial Consequences

The Department desires to contract with a Vendor who demonstrates its willingness to be held accountable for the achievement of successful Contract performance. By submitting a Response, the Vendor agrees to the Department’s assessment of financial consequences, which are not intended to be a penalty but to incentivize the Vendor’s performance under the Contract.

The performance measures below list the key expectations most critical to the success of the Contract and the financial consequences the Department will assess if an expectation is not met. If a Vendor is unable to achieve a performance measure expectation because of unforeseen circumstances outside of its control, the Vendor may submit a written request, in advance, to the Contract Manager to waive the assessment of the associated financial consequence. The Contract Manager will

RFP-27-012 Page 9 of 60 then review the request to determine whether mitigating circumstances existed beyond the Vendor’s control. For the Department to approve the request, the Vendor must not have contributed to the failed expectation in any manner. The Department does not waive its ability to assess financial consequences by allowing the delivery of an item(s) or completion of services after the time allowed. Nothing in this section shall limit the Department’s right to pursue other remedies available at law or in equity.

Financial consequences shall not exceed the total Contract amount.

Performance Measures (PM)

No. Description Expectation Assessment

Method Financial Consequences

PM-001

Complete Installation of the Corrections Intelligence Platform, including system documentati on, testing and training materials.

The Contractor will complete full installation of the

Corrections Intelligence Platform in accordance with the timeline specified in the

Contractor’s submitted plans.

Installation shall include delivery of all required system documentation (licensing, manuals, configuration documentation), submission of the full testing plan and test results, and delivery of a complete Training Plan with supporting materials. All components must be provided by the required installation deadline, consistent with industry-standard IT deployment practices.

One time

The Department will assess a financial consequence of $500 per day beyond the required installation deadline until all installation activities, including documentation, testing completion, and training materials, are fully delivered.

PM-002

PM-001

Technical Support

The Contractor will respond to all technical support inquiries and service requests within four (4) Business Hours of receipt and will provide resolution or escalation updates within one (1)

Business Day.

Per Occurrence

The Department will assess a financial consequence of $100 per occurrence for failure to meet the required response time.

PM-002

Initial Statewide

Contraband Intelligence

Report

The Initial Statewide Contraband Intelligence

Report, as outlined in Section 2.7.1.1, shall be submitted to the Contract Manager by the 10th Day of February, 2027.

One time

The Department will assess a financial consequence in the amount of $100 per Day beyond the required timeframe, until the Statewide Contraband

Intelligence Report is submitted.

RFP-27-012 Page 10 of 60

PM-003

Monthly Summary Reports

The monthly reports, as outlined in Section 2.7, shall be submitted to the Contract

Manager by the 10th Day of the month and the monthly invoice submitted by the 10th Day of the Month following the month which services were reported.

Monthly

The Department will assess a financial consequence in the amount of $100 per Day beyond the required timeframe, until all monthly reports are submitted.

PM-004

Quarterly Reports

The Quarterly Reports, as outlined in Section 2.7, shall be submitted to the Contract Manager by the 10th Day of the month following the end of the corresponding quarter. The

Contract Manager will make note of each occurrence that the Quarterly Reports are not received within the required timeframe. All Quarterly Reports shall be received by the required timeframe.

Quarterly

The Department will assess a financial consequence in the amount of $100 per Day beyond the required timeframe, until all reports are submitted.

Change No. 7

Section 3.4, Mandatory Responsiveness Requirements, is revised as follows:

The following conditions must be met by the Vendor to be considered responsive to this RFP. These Responsiveness requirements are mandatory. Failure to meet these Responsiveness requirements will result in a Proposal being deemed non-responsive. Copies of Non-Responsive Proposals will be retained in the completed RFP file.

3.4.1 It is mandatory that the Proposal be received by the Department prior to the date and time specified in the Timeline.

3.4.2 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit Attachment II -

Cost Proposal Sheet. The Cost Proposal Sheet should be sealed separately and inserted under Tab E of the Proposal. Grand Total Cost must not exceed 1.5 million dollars, or the Proposal will be considered Non- Responsive.

3.4.3 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit Attachment III

– Evaluation Criteria Form. It should be inserted under Tab E of the Proposal.

3.4.4 3.4.3 It is mandatory that the Vendor sign, have certified by a notary public, and return Attachment IV - Pass/Fail Requirement Certification.

It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

RFP-27-012 Page 11 of 60

3.4.5 3.4.4 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit Attachment V - Foreign Country of Concern Attestation (PUR 1355). It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

3.4.6 3.4.5 It is mandatory that the Vendor sign and return Attachment VI -

Vendor’s Contact Information. It should be inserted under Tab A of the

3.4.7 3.4.6 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit

Attachment VII - Business Reference Form. It should be inserted under Tab B of the Proposal.

3.4.8 3.4.7 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit

Attachment IX - Non-Disclosure Agreement. It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

3.4.9 3.4.8 It is mandatory that the Vendor sign and return Attachment X -

Security Requirements and Procedures. It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

3.4.10 3.4.9 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit

Attachment XI - Vendor Certification Form (PUR 7801). It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

3.4.11 3.4.10 It is mandatory that the Vendor complete, sign, and submit

Attachment XII - Use of Coercion for Labor or Services (PUR 2024). It

3.4.12 3.4.11 If applicable, it is mandatory that the Vendor sign and return

Attachment XIII - Certification of Drug-Free Workplace Program. It

3.4.13 3.4.12 If applicable, it is mandatory that the Vendor sign and return

Attachment XIV - Subcontracting Form. It should be inserted under Tab A of the Proposal.

3.4.14 3.4.13 It is mandatory that the Vendor submit documentation authenticating the Vendor’s financial stability or financial capability.

Documentation must be sealed separately and inserted under Tab F.

Change No. 8

Section 3.5.4, Tab D – Technical Specifications/Service Delivery Approach, is revised as follows:

The Vendor shall provide a narrative Service Delivery Approach identifying how the Vendor will meet the requirements of this RFP. The response should fully describe the Vendor’s methodology for meeting the Department’s requirements for service delivery, outlined in SECTION 2.0 – Scope of Work. The Service Delivery Approach Technical Response shall be prepared in such a manner that

RFP-27-012 Page 12 of 60 it will be understandable to individuals on a programmatic and management level.

The Vendor shall insert the required information for this section under Tab D of the response.

Vendors should be thorough and detailed in their Responses and are encouraged to include any additional relevant information that would assist in evaluating the overall strength of the program.

If offering any Value-Added Services, the Vendor must provide a detailed description of the Value-Added Services the Vendor is offering the Department.

Value-Added Services shall be provided at no cost to the Department and are in addition to those services that meet the minimum service requirements and specifications of this RFP.

3.5.4.1 Reporting Samples

The Vendor shall provide report samples per Section 2.7, General Reporting Requirements.

3.5.4.2 Performance Measures and Financial Consequences

The Vendor shall provide a detailed report of understanding regarding the performance measures and financial consequences listed in Section 2.9, Performance Measures and Financial Consequences of this RFP.

3.5.4.1 System Readiness

The Vendor shall provide a system/solution that is fully developed and deployable to collect the required data with minimal equipment installation per Section 2.5 and 2.7.1.1

3.5.4.2 Functional Requirements

The Vendor shall provide a solution that addresses the functional requirements per Section 2.5.1.

3.5.4.3 Data Collection

The Vendor’s proposal shall clearly state how the Vendor intends to capture cellular data without relying on any existing systems per Section 2.5.1.

3.5.4.4 Integration with Future Systems

The Vendor’s proposal shall clearly state how data would be integrated with any future systems per Section 2.5.1.4.

RFP-27-012 Page 13 of 60

3.5.4.5 Compliance Requirements

The Vendor’s Proposal shall clearly address the Compliance

Requirements per Section 2.5.2.

3.5.4.6 Data Ownership Requirements

The Vendor’s Proposal shall clearly address the Data Ownership requirements per Section 2.5.3.

3.5.4.7 Reporting Samples

The Vendor shall provide report samples per Section 2.7, General Reporting Requirements.

3.5.4.8 Performance Measures and Financial Consequences Statement

The Vendor shall provide a detailed written statement acknowledging and demonstrating their understanding of the performance measures and financial consequences identified in Section 2.9 of this RFP. The statement shall confirm the Vendor’s acceptance of these requirements and the implications of non-compliance.

Change No. 9

Section 4.15, Indemnification and Limitation of Liability, is revised as follows:

1. Indemnification:

a. The Contractor shall be liable for, and shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Department, its employees, agents, officers, heirs, and assignees harmless from any and all claims, suits, judgments, or damages, including court costs and attorneys’ fees arising out of intentional acts, negligence, or omissions by the Contractor, or its employees or agents, in the course of this Contract, including any claims or actions brought under the Civil Rights Act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

b. Nothing herein serves as a waiver of sovereign immunity by either party to which sovereign immunity may be applicable. Further, nothing herein constitutes consent by a State agency or political subdivision of the State of Florida to be sued by third parties in any matter arising out of this Contract.

2. Limitation of Liability:

a. For all claims against the Contractor under the Contract, and regardless of the basis on which the claim is made, the Contractor’s aggregate liability for direct damages under the Contract will be limited to the greater of $200,000 or the dollar value of the Contract (which is the higher of the total estimated value of the Contract or two times the charges for services or commodities rendered by the Contractor under the Contract if no estimated value is determinable). This

RFP-27-012 Page 14 of 60 limitation will not apply to any claim arising under Section K.1. above, Section 4.15,1, Indemnification, of the resulting Contract or any provision of the Contract relating to insurance required to be provided by the Contractor.

b. Unless otherwise specifically enumerated in the Contract, no party will be liable to the other for special, indirect, punitive, or consequential damages, including lost data or records (unless the Contract requires the Contractor to back-up data or records), even if the party has been advised that such damages are possible.

No party will be liable for lost profits, lost revenue, or lost institutional operating savings.

c. For damages other than those excluded in the preceding paragraph, the

Department’s liability is limited to: 1) if the damage is the Department’s failure to pay amounts due to the Contractor for services or commodities received and accepted by the Department pursuant to this Contract, then only the amount due for such services and commodities and any interest owed under Section 215.422, F.S.; or 2) in the event the damage is not related to the Department’s failure to comply with the payment provisions of this Contract, to the maximum of the limited waiver of sovereign immunity provided for in Section 768.28, F.S.

Change No.10

Attachment II, Cost Proposal Sheet, has been replaced in its entirety and attached hereto.

Change No. 11

Attachment III, Evaluation Criteria Form, has been replaced in its entirety and attached hereto.

Change No. 12

Attachment IV, Pass/Fail Requirement Certification and Non-Collusion Certification, has been replaced in its entirety and attached hereto.

[ Remainder of Page Left Blank Intentionally]

RFP-27-012 Page 15 of 60

Revised

ATTACHMENT II – COST PROPOSAL SHEET

Prices must be firm prices and include all packaging, handling, shipping, and other applicable fees.

Deliverables Description Cost

Deliverable 1 Initial Statewide Contraband Intelligence Report (Due February 10, 2027)

Ongoing Support and Maintenance Monthly and Yearly Costs

Deliverable Cost Type Cost

Per month

Deliverable 2 Maintenance and Support $

Monthly Subtotal (x12) $

Grand Total Cost (Deliverable 1 + Monthly Subtotal)) $

NAME OF VENDOR’S ORGANIZATION

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE

NAME OF AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE

FEIN

DATE

RFP-27-012 Page 16 of 60

Revised

ATTACHMENT III – EVALUATION CRITERIA FORM

EVALUATION SCORE SHEETS (USED BY EVALUATORS) VENDOR SHOULD COMPLETE COLUMN 2

RFP

SECTION

REFERENCE

PAGE NUMBER(S)

WHERE INFO. IS

LOCATED

Note: This column is for the Vendor to complete

Category I –Business/Corporate Experience and Qualifications

(Possible Points 250)

TOTAL

POSSIBLE

POINTS

(265)

POINTS AWARDED

Note: This column is for the Department’s Evaluators to complete.

3.5.1 and 3.5.2.1

1. To what extent does the Vendor’s corporate structure and qualifications demonstrate the capability to perform under a Contract?

(Poor – 12.5; Adequate – 25; Good – 37.5;

Exceptional – 50)

3.5.2.2

2. To what extent does the Vendor demonstrate they have experience providing the services outlined in this RFP and that their experience is relevant to the provision of these services in a jail or correctional setting? (Poor

– 12.5; Adequate – 25; Good – 37.5;

Exceptional – 55)

3.17

3. To what extent does the Vendor demonstrate the ability to comply with required licensure, permits, and registration?

(Poor – 12.5; Adequate – 25; Good – 37.5;

Exceptional – 50)

3.5.2

4. How extensive is the experience detailed in the Vendor’s summary of exemplary or qualitative findings, recommendations, or other validations demonstrating operational experience?

(Poor – 5; Adequate – 10; Good – 15;

Exceptional – 30)

3.5

5. To what extent does the Vendor demonstrate stability in providing Contractual services?

(Poor – 7.5; Adequate – 15; Good – 22.5;

Exceptional – 30)

3.5.2.2

6. To what extent do the business/corporate references submitted by the Vendor demonstrate the Vendor’s ability to perform under a Contract from the RFP? (Poor – 12.5;

Adequate – 25; Good – 37.5; Exceptional – 50)

Total Points Awarded - Category I – Business/Corporate Experience and Qualifications ________________

Vendor Name:__________________________ Evaluator’s Name:________________________

RFP-27-012 Page 17 of 60

RFP SECTION

REFERENCE

PAGE NUMBER(S)

WHERE INFO. IS

LOCATED

Note: This column is for the Vendor to complete

Category II – Project Staffing (Possible Points 50)

TOTAL

POSSIBLE

POINTS

(50)

POINTS AWARDED

Note: This column is for the Department’s Evaluators to complete.

3.5.3.1

1. To what extent does the Vendor’s proposed staff reflect the experience required in this

RFP?

(Poor – 6.25; Adequate – 12.5; Good – 18.75; Exceptional – 25)

3.5.3.2

2. Does the proposed staff and staffing model appear appropriate to meet the services sought in the RFP?

(Poor – 6.25; Adequate – 12.5; Good – 18.75; Exceptional – 25)

Total Points Awarded - Category II – Project Staffing ________________

RFP SECTION

REFERENCE

PAGE

NUMBER(S)

WHERE INFO. IS

LOCATED

Note: This column is for the Vendor to complete

Category III – Technical Specifications/Service Delivery Approach

(Possible Points 500)

TOTAL

POSSIBLE

POINTS

(500)

POINTS AWARDED

Note: This column is for the Department’s

Evaluators to complete

3.5.4, 1.4, and 2.5

1. To what extent does the Vendor’s Proposal fully describe the methodology for meeting the Department’s requirements for service delivery by the time indicated in the

RFP?

(Poor 25; Adequate 50, Good 75, Exceptional 100)

3.5.4

2. To what extent does the Vendor’s Proposal provide relevant information that would assist in evaluating the overall strength of the program?

(Poor 25; Adequate 50; Good 75, 3.5.4.1, 1.4, 2.5 and 2.7.1.1

3. Is the proposed software/solution a fully developed, deployable system in place to collect the required data with minimal to no equipment installation?

(Poor 25; Adequate 50; Good 75, 3.5.4.2, 3.5.4.3, and 2.5.1

4. To what extent does the proposed solution clearly meet the Functional Requirements, including how data would be collected without a system already in place?

(Poor 25; Adequate 50, Good 75, RFP-27-012 Page 18 of 60

3.5.4.4 and 2.5.1.4

5. To what extent does the proposed solution describe the methodology for meeting the Department’s requirements for how data would be integrated with any future system?

(Poor 6.25; Adequate 12.5, Good 18.75, Exceptional 25)

3.5.4.5 and 2.5.2

6. To what extent does the proposed solution meet the compliance requirements?

(Poor 6.25; Adequate 12.5, Good 18.75,

3.5.4.6 and 2.5.3

7. To what extent does the proposed solution meet the Data Ownership requirements?

(Poor 6.25; Adequate 12.5, Good 18.75, 3.5.4.7,

3.5.4.8 and 2.7

8. To what extent does the Proposal address the reporting requirements and understanding of Performance Measures and Financial Consequences?

(Poor 6.25; Adequate 12.5, Good 18.75, Total Points Awarded - Category III – Technical Specifications/Service Delivery Post (Total Technical)

Vendor Name: ______________________________ Evaluator’s Name: __________________________________

SUBTOTAL OF TECHNICAL POINTS AWARDED:

CATEGORY I ________ CATEGORY II ________ CATEGORY III ________

EVALUATOR’S NAME: ________________________________________________

EVALUATOR’S SIGNATURE: ___________________________________________

RFP-27-012 Page 19 of 60

COST POINTS WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE BUREAU OF PROCUREMENT.

All Evaluators’ scores for each Category will be combined and averaged to determine the technical point value for that Category. Each Vendor’s technical point value for each Category will then be combined and added to the Cost Point value to determine Final Scores.

For Cost Points, the Vendor submitting the lowest Grand Total Price on Attachment II – Cost Proposal Sheet will receive 185 points. All other Proposals will receive Cost Points according to the following formula:

(N / X) x 185 = Z

Where:

N = Lowest Grand Total Price received by any Proposal X = Vendor’s Grand Total Price Z = Cost Points Awarded

The Department may reject any Proposal not submitted in the manner specified by the solicitation documents.

COST POINTS AWARDED: __________

FDC Representative calculating Cost Points:

NAME: ______________________________ SIGNATURE:____________________________

FINAL SCORE (TOTAL Technical and Cost Points): __________

FDC Representative calculating the Final Score:

NAME: ______________________________ SIGNATURE: ____________________________

RFP-27-012 Page 20 of 60

Revised

ATTACHMENT IV – PASS/FAIL REQUIREMENT CERTIFICATION

AND NON-COLLUSION CERTIFICATION

1. Business/Corporate Experience

The Vendor certifies it has at least three (3) years’ of business/ corporate experience, within the last five (5) years, in providing services relevant to the provision of services of similar size and scope of this solicitation. To ensure the Vendor is qualified to serve Inmate populations, the Vendor(s), whether responding independently, as a partnership, as a joint venture, or with a response that proposes utilization of Subcontractor(s), must collectively have at least three

(3) years of business/corporate experience, within the last five (5) years, providing services of similar size and scope as described in this RFP.

2. Prime Vendor The Vendor certifies it will act as the prime Vendor to the Department for all services provided under the Contract.

3. Meets Legal Requirements The Vendor certifies that its proposed offering/solution, and all services to be provided under the Contract shall be compliant with all laws, rules, and other authority applicable to providing the services including, but not limited to, Florida’s Open Government laws (Article I, Section 24, Florida Constitution, Chapter 119, F.S.).

4. Financial Stability The Vendor attests to its positive financial standing and that its current Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Financial Stress Score has a Financial Stress Class of 1, 2, 3 or 4.

5. Statement of No Inducement The Vendor certifies that it has made no attempt and will make to attempt to induce any other person or firm to submit or not to submit a Reply. Further, the Vendor certifies its Reply contained herein is submitted in good faith and not pursuant to any agreement or discussion with, or inducement from, any firm or person to submit a complementary or other non-competitive Reply.

6. Statement of Non-Disclosure

The Vendor certifies that neither the price(s) contained in this Reply, nor the approximate amount of this Reply have been disclosed prior to award, directly or indirectly, to any other Vendor or to any competitor.

7. Statement of Non-Collusion The Vendor certifies that the prices and amounts in its Reply have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communications, or agreement with any other Vendor or with any entity for the purpose of restricting competition.

8. Statement of Data Security The Vendor attests that all data generated, used, or stored by the Vendor pursuant to the Contract will reside and remain in the United States and will not be transferred outside of the United States.

RFP-27-012 Page 21 of 60

9. Scrutinized Company Certification A. If the vendor provides goods or services of any amount, the vendor certifies:

• The Vendor has completed the “Quarterly List of Scrutinized Companies” section of

Form 7801.

B. If the vendor provides goods or services that could be at or above $1 million, the vendor also certifies:

• The Vendor has completed the “Scrutinized List of Prohibited Companies” section of

Form 7801.

C. The vendor agrees that the Agency can immediately terminate any agreement for cause or disqualify the vendor from further consideration of any purchases, if the following is discovered:

• The vendor is found to have submitted a false certification, after providing notice in accordance with 287.135(5)(a), F.S.;

• The vendor is placed on a list created pursuant to s. 215.473, F.S., relating to scrutinized active business operations in Iran; or

• The vendor is found to have been placed on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott

Israel List or is engaged in a boycott of Israel.

D. The vendor understands the following:

• The Agency may, on a case-by-case basis, make exceptions to these requirements as permitted in s. 287.135(4), F.S.; and

• An unsuccessful vendor has no right to protest the award of a contract or renewal on the basis of a false certification, in accordance with s. 287.135(6), F.S.

10. E-Verify

Every public employer, contractor, and subcontractor shall register with and use the E-Verify system, https://www.e-verify.gov/employers, to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees.

A. The Vendor has completed the E-Verify section in PUR 7801.

B. The vendor understands that a public agency must require that any contractor or subcontractor registers with and uses the E-Verify system to verify the work authorization status of all new employees of the contractor or subcontractor in accordance with s.

448.095(5), F.S.

C. The vendor understands that it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to employ, hire, recruit, or refer, either for herself or himself or on behalf of another, for private or public employment within the state, an alien who is not duly authorized to work by the immigration laws or the Attorney General of the United States, in accordance with s.

448.09, F.S.

D. The vendor has included proof of its E-Verify registration.

E. The primary vendor understands that it must request and maintain an affidavit for all subcontractors stating that the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or https://www.e-verify.gov/employers

RFP-27-012 Page 22 of 60 subcontract with an unauthorized alien. The primary vendor certifies that it will provide subcontractor affidavit(s) to the Department at any time the Department requests.

11. Foreign Countries of Concern Attestation

A. The vendor understands that, if awarded, it will have access to personal identifying information as “personal information” is defined in s. 501.171, F.S.

B. The vendor has included a completed DMS Form PUR 1355.

12. Foreign Gifts, Interest and Contracts

In submitting this bid, proposal or reply, the vendor certifies the following:

A. The vendor has completed the s. 286.101 required disclosures section of PUR 7801;

B. If applicable, the vendor has provided a list to the Department, prior to submission of its bid, proposal or reply, of previous disclosures that were made subject to the requirements of s. 286.101(3), F.S.; and

C. The vendor understands that it is a continuing requirement of this procurement process to make disclosures in accordance with s. 286.101, F.S.

13. The Vendor has completed the PUR 7801 section that relates to the following:

• Convicted Vendor List

• Discriminatory Vendor List

• Antitrust Violator Vendor List

• Suspended Vendor List

14. Forced Labor Vendor List Contractor has completed DMS FORM PUR 7801 and DMS Form PUR 2024;

and understands that pursuant to Section 287.1346, F.S., a Vendor on the Forced Labor Vendor List:

1. May NOT be awarded a contract or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant with an agency for the provision of commodities; or

2. May NOT transact business for the provision of commodities with any agency.

3. May have a contract immediately terminated in accordance with Section 287.1346(4)(a)2., F.S., if the Contractor is placed on the Forced Labor Vendor List.

RFP-27-012 Page 23 of 60

Vendor Name:

Authorized Signature:

Printed Name of Authorized Signor:

NOTARY AFFIRMATION: STATE OF , COUNTY OF

Pursuant to Section 117.05(13)(a), F.S., the signor, subscribed before me by means of physical presence or online notarization, this _______ (Day) of ___________(month), 20 , affirms the contents of this Attachment.

(Place Notary Seal Below) | Signature of Notary Public:

Name of Notary Typed, Printed, or Stamped:

RFP-27-012 Page 24 of 60

Response to Written Questions Statewide Integrative Corrections Intelligence Platform

FDC RFP-27-012

No. Question Answer

I was hoping to have some clarity on the differences between this and the FDC RFI- 26-042

The Florida Department of Corrections RFI-26-042 was issued solely for market research and information-gathering purposes. It allowed the Department to better understand available solutions and industry capabilities. There are no awards issued from an RFI.

RFP-27-012 is a formal solicitation specifically to procure a Statewide Integrative Corrections Intelligence Platform to combat Contraband cell phones. It includes defined requirements and will result in a competitive procurement and potential award.

2a

How many positions will be coming out of this RFP?

At this time, the RFP does not specify a set number of positions. Vendors must propose staffing levels they believe are appropriate to meet the requirements outlined in Section 2.0, Scope of Work of the RFP.

2b Is it only contract work? This RFP is for contracted services as described in

Section 2.0, Scope of Work. No employment opportunities are being solicited through this RFP.

2c

What type of skill sets? All required qualifications and skill sets are detailed within Section 2.0, Scope of Work, Section 2.5, Minimum Requirements, and 2.6 Contractor Staff Requirements, of the RFP. Vendors must refer to those sections when preparing their Proposal.

Do the consultants have to have direct experience within the correctional facility?

As outlined in Section 1.3, Statement of Purpose, the Department is seeking an independent, third-party provider with demonstrated experience in correctional intelligence and technology solutions.

Vendors should ensure their proposed personnel possess the qualifications and expertise necessary to design, implement, and support a statewide integrative corrections intelligence platform as described in Section 2.0, Scope of Work of the RFP.

It says the work is for six months do you think there will be extensions with the project?

The RFP does not state a six (6) month term. As outlined in Section 1.5, Contract Term and Renewal, of the RFP, the initial contract term is one (1) year, pending continued legislative appropriation. The Department may renew the Contract for up to three

(3) renewal years, or portions thereof, in accordance with Section 287.057(14), F.S. Any decision regarding renewal will be made at the Department’s discretion and communicated in writing, as described in the RFP.

RFP-27-012 Page 25 of 60

No. Question Answer

How much travel will be involved?

The RFP does not specify any required travel. As stated in Section 3.18, Travel Expenses, the Department will not be responsible for any travel expenses incurred by the Vendor. Any potential travel shall be incorporated into the Vendor’s Attachment II, Cost Proposal Sheet.

Will they receive their own equipment, or will they have to provide their own?

As per Section 3.5.1 Tab A, Executive Summary, of the RFP, “…the synopsis should contain sufficient detail addressing all elements of the required equipment and service delivery and should be prepared in such a manner that clearly indicates the Vendor’s understanding of the requirements of the RFP, and its intention to comply with those requirements...”

Which managed access system(s) and vendor, at how many current and planned sites? What is the data interface (API, file, latency), and which fields are available (device IDs, dialed digits, signal strength, direction-finding)? Does FDC hold carrier-termination certification (DCFO/CIS)?

The Department does not currently operate a production Managed Access System (MAS).

However, the Department is evaluating a proof-of-concept eMAS solution at a single institution. If operational during implementation of the awarded solution, relevant data from that system may be made available for analysis and integration, as appropriate.

Vendors shall propose a solution capable of collecting the data requested in Section 2.0, Scope of Work, without reliance on a MAS.

References to MAS integration are intended to support interoperability with future capabilities that may become available.

FDC has Designated Correctional Facility Official (DCFO) who are Contraband Interdiction System (CIS) certified.

What other detection sources are in scope (mobile scans, Wi- Fi, drones), and what are their vendors and formats?

The Department does not currently operate any contraband cellular detection systems. However, the awarded Contractor may have access to data from other security-related systems, including drone detection platforms, if available and relevant to the proposed solution. The Department currently utilizes drone detection capabilities, including AirSight/AirGuard technologies. Data formats, interfaces, and available data elements have not been defined as part of this RFP and may vary by system. Vendors shall propose a solution capable of ingesting and analyzing data from multiple sources and adapting to available interfaces and formats as needed.

RFP-27-012 Page 26 of 60

No. Question Answer

Which "existing and planned" systems must we integrate:

ViaPath call records and audio (and does FDC have the right to share them), the offender records system, visitation, digital mail, and the current search-analytics program (integrate or replace)?

The Department's current environment includes data sources such as inmate telephone records, inmate communication platforms, visitor management systems, offender information systems, and other correctional intelligence data sources. Current systems may include ViaPath for inmate telephone services, J-Pay/Securus inmate communication services, DataWorks, entry management for visitor and staff management, and Classification Data Center (CDC)/Offender Based Information System (OBIS) offender data systems, correctPay, ALPRS, HRD. The Department does not currently operate a dedicated search analytics platform, although the Department may have access to partner systems that support investigative activities. Vendors shall propose a solution capable of integrating with relevant Department-approved data sources as necessary to support the requirements of the RFP.

Who are the "investigative partners"? What is shared (reports, case packets, raw data), and by what mechanism?

See Change No. 2 of this Addendum.

How many named and concurrent users, by role?

Which identity provider for single sign-on?

The Department has not specified the number of named or concurrent users by role in the RFP.

Vendors should propose a licensing and user-access model that supports the functional requirements of RFP-27-012, including investigative, administrative, and reporting roles, as described throughout Section…