RFP 260000001604 - Q&A.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Training
Solicitation number
RFP 171 260000001604 2
Issued by
Michigan

About this file

This is a Question and Answer document for RFP 260000001604 issued by the State of Michigan's Office of Highway Safety Planning (OHSP) in conjunction with the Michigan Traffic Safety Commission (MTSC) regarding commercial vehicle driver training and safety outreach services. The RFP seeks a contractor to provide Michigan-licensed commercial vehicle driver training at no cost, with a minimum requirement of reaching 5,000 people annually through outreach activities at events such as the Michigan Safety Conference and Michigan Traffic Safety Summit. The contractor must also provide specialized training in skid recovery and safety instruction for critical situations. The contract establishes separate performance metrics for outreach activities and direct commercial motor vehicle (CMV) training. Key personnel requirements include designation of a Project Director, Financial Officer, and Authorizing Official, with state approval required prior to any personnel changes. The contractor must submit a final project plan within 30 calendar days of contract execution, detailing organizational structure, sub-projects, tasks, timelines, and resources including staff time, equipment, and materials. Annual program plans and contractual budgets must be submitted through the MGX system for sequential review and approval by the MTSC, OHSP, and Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB).

The contract operates under an all-inclusive contractual line budget model, with advertising and public information costs calculated into the overall budget rather than as separate line items. The contractor invoices based on a combination of per-person rates, actual printing costs, and specified fixed monthly costs. Financial Status Reports (FSRs) and progress reports are both due on the 20th of each month. The state does not require background checks beyond motor vehicle record checks for staff accessing state facilities. Unauthorized personnel removal credits of up to $50,000 per individual may be assessed if key personnel are removed without prior state notification; however, replacements due to illness, disability, resignation, or termination for cause are exempted from such penalties. The state assumes no associated risk or provides indemnification related to key personnel requirements, maintaining that employment decisions remain the contractor's responsibility as the employer of record.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Document and Section
Page #
Bidder Question
State Response
1
Schedule A-SOW (Scope) 2nd paragraph
Page 2 of 18
The RFP states: “The program must seek to train Michigan licensed commercial vehicle drivers at no cost and reach a minimum 5,000 people annually through outreach efforts at events such as the annual Michigan Safety Conference and Michigan Traffic Safety Summit. The project must also seek to train Michigan commercial vehicle drivers in skid recovery and safety in critical situations.”

For clarification:

· Does the 5,000-person annual requirement apply exclusively to outreach activities, or does it also include direct CMV training (e.g., skid pad instruction)

· Historically, MCTS and MCDD operated under separate performance metrics. Is the RFP now combining these metrics, or do they remain separate?

1. The 5,000-person annual requirement applies exclusively to outreach activities. The project must seek to train Michigan commercial vehicle drivers in skid recovery and safety in critical situations.

2. These are separate metrics.

2
Schedule A-SOW (Scope)

1.Requirements section 1.1.1.2.2.

Page 3 of 18
Provide public information and safety outreach estimated budget to advertise program services offered to the CMV driving public, trucking groups and private carriers.

The RFP requests an estimated budget for public information and safety outreach to advertise program services. Since this is a contract and not a grant, could you clarify:

· Is it necessary to provide a separate advertising budget,

· Historically, at the request of OHSP, the MTA Education Center operates under a all-inclusive Contractual line budget. MTA invoices OHSP on a combination of per person rate, actual printing costs and specified fixed monthly costs.

· Costs associated with advertising would not be a separate line item since it is calculated into the all-inclusive contractual line budget.

This clarification will help ensure proposals align with the intended contract structure.

No. Expectation is the successful bidder will operate under an all-inclusive contractual line budget, advertising calculated into the contractual budget line.

3
Section 2. Staffing 2.1-2.1.3
Page
Is the Contractor Program Manager/Senior Consultant role equivalent to the Project Director role used in current or prior contracts?

Currently, a Project Director is in place and responsible for the duties and tasks described in this section. Understanding whether these roles are considered the same will help ensure alignment with the RFP requirements.

Yes, Contractor Program Manager and MGX Project Director roles/titles are considered the same.

4
Section 2. Staffing

2.6 Key Personnel 2.6.2. – 2.6.4.

Pages 9-11 of 18
Sections 2.6.2–2.6.4 outline State approval and restrictions regarding Key Personnel, including requirements related to assignment, reassignment, and significant financial penalties (Unauthorized Removal Credits of up to $50,000 per individual).

As a bidder, the Contractor serves as the employer of record and is responsible for all human resource functions, including recruiting, hiring, performance management, and termination. The State/OHSP is not the employer of contractor personnel.

Given this, could the State clarify:

· How these requirements are intended to be applied, particularly in situations involving personnel decisions that are within the Contractor’s control as the employer?

· To what extent the State expects to exercise approval authority over Contractor employees?

· How the Unauthorized Removal Credits and associated financial penalties would be applied in cases where personnel changes occur due to circumstances outside the Contractor’s control (e.g., resignation, termination for cause, or other employment-related matters)?

· Whether these provisions are intended as mandatory contractual requirements or as guidance for coordination and communication?

· Whether the State assumes any associated risk or provides indemnification related to these requirements?

This clarification will help ensure alignment with contractual responsibilities, employment law obligations, and the financial risk outlined in the RFP.

1. Unauthorized Removal Credits will be assessed if Key Personnel are removed from their assignment without the State receiving prior notification.

2. The State expects to have prior notice before a Key Personnel change.

3. An Unauthorized Removal does not include replacing Key Personnel for reasons beyond the reasonable control of Contractor, including illness, disability, leave of absence, personal emergency circumstances, resignation, or for cause termination of the Key Personnel’s employment.

4. These are contractual requirements.

5. The State does not assume any associated risk or provide indemnification related to Key Personnel.

5
Section 2. Staffing

2.6. Key Personnel 2.6.5

Page 11 of 18
Section 2.6.5 states: “The Contractor must identify the Key Personnel, indicate where they will be physically located, describe the functions they will perform, and provide current chronological résumés.”

For clarification, which roles does the State consider Key Personnel under this contract? Does this include only leadership roles (e.g., Program Manager), or all staff funded under the contract??

Key Personnel of this Contract will include a Project Director, Financial Officer, and Authorizing Official.

6
Section 2. Staffing

2.8. Security 2.8.1-2.8.1.4.

Page 13 of 18
Section 2.8.1 requires the Contractor to describe security procedures for staff entering State facilities, including background checks.

The MTA Education Center Inc. conducts motor vehicle record checks for all CDL-holding staff. All other employees have been employed with the MTA for 2 to 12 years, including three former MSP CVED officers, and have all visited a state facility at least once during their employment.

Given that all non-CDL staff are long-term employees with demonstrated experience and familiarity with State facilities, can the State confirm that no additional background checks beyond motor vehicle record checks are required for personnel accessing State facilities? If needed, MTA Education Center Inc., can issues name badges prior to visiting a State facility to meet the requirement.

The State does not require any additional background checks.

7
Section 3. Project Management

3.1. Project Plan

Page 13 of 18
Section 3.1.1 requires the Contractor to submit a final project plan within 30 calendar days of the Effective Date, including the organizational chart and a breakdown of sub-projects, tasks, timeline, and resources.

Since the proposal already includes staffing, project tasks, and associated resources, could the State clarify the level of detail expected in the final project plan? Specifically:

· Should the timeline and task breakdown simply reflect what was included in the proposal, or is additional granularity required?

· How should “resources” be defined—does this include staff time only, or also equipment, materials, and other operational resources?

This clarification will help ensure the final project plan aligns with the State’s expectations.

1. The timeline and task breakdown should reflect what was included in the proposal.

2. The project plan resources should include staff time, equipment, materials, and other operational resources.

8
Section 3. Project Management

3.1.2. Project Management Section 3.1.2.2

Page 14 of 18
Section 3.1.2.2 requires the Contractor to provide a proposed detailed CMV safety training and education annual program plan for the MTSC for approval on specified dates as required by the OHSP.

For clarification, is this plan submitted annually through the MGX system, including the contractor’s proposed program for the upcoming fiscal year along with the associated annual contractual budget, which is then approved sequentially by the MTSC, OHSP, and DTMB.

The plan is to be submitted annually through the MGX system for the upcoming fiscal year, with annual contractual budget. The plan is reviewed and approved sequentially by the MTSC, OHSP, and DTMB.

9
1.1.3.2 Financial Support

3.4 Reporting

6. Invoice and Payments

8. Service Level Agreement Table

Page 4 & 15 & 17 & 18 of 18
Reporting due dates for progress reports, and FSR’s do not align.

Can you clarify actual due dates.

FSR’s are due on the 20th of each month. Progress reports are due on the 20th of each month.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .