RFP 25-04 Student Health Services Center Addendum No. 2 - Revision to Scoring Criteria_.pdf
PDF 110 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP NO. 25-04 | STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES CENTER
- Solicitation number
- NO. 25-04
- Issued by
- Los Angeles County, California
About this file
This document is an Addendum (Number 2) to a Request for Proposal (RFP Number: 25-04) issued by the Los Angeles Community College District for Student Health Services Centers. The addendum specifically revises the scoring criteria for evaluating proposals, modifying the threshold for recommendation to the Board of Trustees. Originally, proposals needed a score of 75 or higher to be recommended for placement on the qualified providers bench. The revised criteria now require proposals to receive an accumulated score of 65% or higher across three key categories: qualifications/experience/references, staffing/organization, and work plan.
The addendum emphasizes that proposers must acknowledge receipt of this document in writing and incorporate all addenda into their proposal. Failure to identify received addenda may result in the proposal being deemed non-responsive. The revised scoring approach provides more flexibility for potential providers by lowering the scoring threshold while maintaining a comprehensive evaluation process across multiple critical assessment areas.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP Number: 25-04: Student Health Services Center Addendum Number: 2
NOTICE TO PROPOSERS: THIS ADDENDUM SHALL BECOME PART OF THE RFP, AND PROPOSERS SHALL ACKNOWLEDGE, IN WRITING, RECEIPT, AND INCORPORATION OF ALL ADDENDA AND CLARIFICATIONS IN THEIR
RESPONSE. FAILURE OF THE PROPOSER TO RECEIVE ADDENDA SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE PROPOSER FROM ANY OBLIGATION UNDER ITS PROPOSAL AS SUBMITTED. THE PROPOSER SHALL IDENTIFY AND LIST IN ITS PROPOSAL ALL
ADDENDA RECEIVED AND INCLUDED IN ITS PROPOSAL; FAILURE TO DO SO MAY BE ASSERTED BY THE DISTRICT AS A
BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE PROPOSAL NON-RESPONSIVE.
Revised Scoring Criteria
Number Original Revised
1 Need to Adjust the Scoring Criteria narrative for
Section 6.2 – Evaluation Procedures, Second Phase, page 23 of 75.
The Second Phase narrative notes: “… evaluation of the First Phase, proposals with a score of 75 or higher will be recommended to the Board of Trustees for placement on the bench of qualified Student Health Services Centers”.
Revised Narrative.
Proposals must receive an accumulated score of 65% (or higher) in the three categories noted below for recommendation to the Board of Trustees for placement on the bench as qualified providers for the Student Health
Services Centers.
The assessment will be based on the total possible score for the three categories listed in the written proposal (see RFP, Section 6.3):
1. Qualifications, experience and references of proposer
2. Staffing and organization
3. Work plan
Therefore, to be placed on the bench, a Proposal's total score must be 65% or higher in the 3 categories listed above.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .