RFP 2026-1000-0154 Grain Drying and Storage System.pdf
PDF 561 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 26-VSW-DRG-044 Deering Vacuum Sewer Upgrades
- Solicitation number
- RFP 26-VSW-DRG-044 Deering Vacuum Sewer Upgrades
- Issued by
- Anaktuvuk Pass City, Alaska
About this file
This is a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture, soliciting a contractor to design and deliver a grain drying and storage system for the Alaska Plant Materials Center (PMC) in Palmer, Alaska. The system must include a wet bin/holding bin (maximum 30 feet height, 15 feet diameter), minimum three long-term storage bins (maximum 30 feet height, 12 feet diameter, 800–1,200 bushel capacity per bin), a batch or continuous flow dryer capable of processing at least 200 bushels per hour and reducing grain moisture from approximately 22% to 15%, and necessary conveyance systems with easy cleanout points to prevent cross-contamination between grain varieties. The system must fit within a 100' × 50' concrete pad area, be designed for future expansion up to six bins, include remote monitoring systems for each storage bin, and account for Alaska's extreme weather conditions including high winds, heavy snow loads, ice damming, and seismic events. Proposals must be received by May 8, 2026, at 2:00 PM Alaska Time via email or U.S. mail. The state anticipates proposal evaluations to be complete by the week of May 11, 2026, with a Notice of Intent to Award issued that same week and contracts issued by the week of May 25, 2026. The contract term extends from award until June 30, 2026, with possible month-to-month extensions thereafter. No pre-proposal meeting or site inspection is required, though offerors are encouraged to review the specifications carefully.
The budget for this procurement is $315,000.00, with proposals exceeding this amount deemed non-responsive. This is a fixed-price contract with payment made upon approval by the DNR Commissioner or designee, based on a negotiated payment schedule with progress reports. All costs must include equipment, shipping, and unloading at the PMC location; the state will separately procure and install the concrete pad. The minimum requirements for offerors include no contract terminations for cause by the State within the past three years and a proposed price under $315,000. Evaluation criteria weight technical factors at 60% (experience and qualifications 15%, understanding of the project 10%, project schedule/delivery/assembly 5%, and project design/layout 20%) and cost at 40%. Alaska Bidder Preference of 5% (applied to price), Alaska Veteran Preference of 5% (not to exceed $5,000), and Alaska Military Skills Program Preference of 2% (not to exceed $5,000) are available. Subcontractors are not permitted, and joint ventures are prohibited. All work must be performed in the United States. Required insurance includes workers' compensation, commercial general liability with $300,000 minimum combined single limit, and commercial automobile liability with $300,000 minimum combined single limit. No bid bonds, performance bonds, or surety deposits are required.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 26-VSW-DRG-044 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| RFP 2026-1600-0117 Amendment #1.pdf | ||
| RFP 2026-1600-0117 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| RFP 26-33-04 NIA.pdf | ||
| RFP 26-VSW-DRG-044.pdf | ||
| RFP 2026-1600-0270 - Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REV 08/24
STATE OF ALASKA
REQUEST FOR
PROPOSALS (RFP)
OFFERORS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO RETURN THIS FORM.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: IF YOU RECEIVED THIS SOLICITATION FROM THE STATE OF ALASKA’S “ONLINE PUBLIC
NOTICE” WEB SITE, YOU MUST REGISTER WITH THE PROCUREMENT OFFICER LISTED IN THIS DOCUMENT TO
RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS. FAILURE TO CONTACT THE PROCUREMENT OFFICER
MAY RESULT IN THE REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.
ISSUED BY:
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF SUPPORT SERVICES
PRIMARY CONTACT:
LILLY K. CONDUCY
PROCUREMENT OFFICER
LILLY.CONDUCY@ALASKA.GOV
RFP 2026-1000-0154
Grain Drying and Storage System
ISSUED APRIL 14, 2026
STATE OF ALASKA – REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) RFP 2026-1000-0154
GRAIN DRYING AND STORAGE SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION & INSTRUCTIONS
SEC. 1.01 PURPOSE OF THE RFP
SEC. 1.02 BUDGET
SEC. 1.03 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS
SEC. 1.04 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
SEC. 1.05 REQUIRED REVIEW
SEC. 1.06 QUESTIONS PRIOR TO DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS
SEC. 1.07 RETURN INSTRUCTIONS
SEC. 1.08 ENROLLMENT IN IRIS
SEC. 1.09 ASSISTANCE TO OFFERORS WITH A DISABILITY
SEC. 1.10 AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSALS
SEC. 1.11 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP
SEC. 1.12 RFP SCHEDULE
SEC. 1.13 PRE-PROPOSAL
SEC. 1.14 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS
SEC. 1.15 NEWS RELEASES
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SEC. 2.01 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK & CONTRACT INFORMATION
SEC. 3.01 SCOPE OF WORK
SEC. 3.02 CONTRACT TERM AND WORK SCHEDULE
SEC. 3.03 DELIVERABLES
SEC. 3.04 CONTRACT TYPE
SEC. 3.05 PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCEDURES
SEC. 3.06 PROMPT PAYMENT FOR STATE PURCHASES
SEC. 3.07 CONTRACT PAYMENT
SEC. 3.08 CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTMENTS
SEC. 3.09 LOCATION OF WORK
SEC. 3.10 THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS
SEC. 3.11 SUBCONTRACTORS
SEC. 3.12 JOINT VENTURES
SEC. 3.13 RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS
SEC. 3.14 F.O.B. POINT
SEC. 3.15 CONTRACT PERSONNEL
SEC. 3.16 INSPECTION & MODIFICATION - REIMBURSEMENT FOR UNACCEPTABLE DELIVERABLES
SEC. 3.17 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
SEC. 3.18 CONTRACT CHANGES - UNANTICIPATED AMENDMENTS
SEC. 3.19 NONDISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY
SEC. 3.20 INDEMNIFICATION
SEC. 3.21 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
SEC. 3.22 TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT
SECTION 4. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT
SEC. 4.01 INTRODUCTION
SEC. 4.02 PROPOSAL CONTENTS
SEC. 4.03 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
SEC. 4.04 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
SEC. 4.05 PROJECT SCHEDULE, DELIVERY, AND ASSEMBLEY OF EQUIPMENT
SEC. 4.06 DESIGN AND LAYOUT PROJECT
SEC. 4.07 COST PROPOSAL
SEC. 4.08 BID BOND – PERFORMANCE BOND – SURETY DEPOSIT
SEC. 4.09 EVALUATION CRITERIA
SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION
SEC. 5.01 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION PROCESS
SEC. 5.02 EVALUATION CRITERIA
SEC. 5.03 SCORING METHOD AND CALCULATION
SEC. 5.04 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS (15%)
SEC. 5.05 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT (10%)
SEC. 5.06 PROJECT SCHEDULE, DELIVERY, AND ASSEMBLEY OF EQUIPMENT USED FOR THE PROJECT (5%) 19
SEC. 5.07 PROJECT DESIGN AND LAYOUT (20%)
SEC. 5.08 CONTRACT COST (40%)
SEC. 5.09 ALASKA OFFEROR PREFERENCE (10 POINTS)
SECTION 6. GENERAL PROCESS AND LEGAL INFORMATION
SEC. 6.01 INFORMAL DEBRIEFING
SEC. 6.02 ALASKA BUSINESS LICENSE AND OTHER REQUIRED LICENSES
SEC. 6.03 SITE INSPECTION
SEC. 6.04 CLARIFICATION OF OFFERS
SEC. 6.05 DISCUSSIONS WITH OFFERORS
SEC. 6.06 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
SEC. 6.07 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION
SEC. 6.08 FAILURE TO NEGOTIATE
SEC. 6.09 OFFEROR NOTIFICATION OF SELECTION
SEC. 6.10 PROTEST
SEC. 6.11 APPLICATION OF PREFERENCES
SEC. 6.12 ALASKA BIDDER PREFERENCE
SEC. 6.13 ALASKA VETERAN PREFERENCE
SEC. 6.14 ALASKA MILITARY SKILLS PROGRAM PREFERENCE
SEC. 6.15 STANDARD CONTRACT PROVISIONS
SEC. 6.16 QUALIFIED OFFERORS
SEC. 6.17 PROPOSAL AS PART OF THE CONTRACT
SEC. 6.18 ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
SEC. 6.19 HUMAN TRAFFICKING
SEC. 6.20 RIGHT OF REJECTION
SEC. 6.21 STATE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR PREPARATION COSTS
SEC. 6.22 DISCLOSURE OF PROPOSAL CONTENTS
SEC. 6.23 ASSIGNMENT
SEC. 6.24 FORCE MAJEURE (IMPOSSIBILITY TO PERFORM)
SEC. 6.25 DISPUTES
SEC. 6.26 SEVERABILITY
SEC. 6.27 SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
SEC. 6.28 SOLICITATION ADVERTISING
SEC. 6.29 FEDERALLY IMPOSED TARIFFS
SECTION 7. ATTACHMENTS
SEC. 7.01 ATTACHMENTS
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION & INSTRUCTIONS
SEC. 1.01 PURPOSE OF THE RFP
The Department of Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture is soliciting proposals for a Contractor to design and deliver a grain drying and storage system. The Alaska Plant Materials Center (PMC) is in need of a grain drying and storage system for its foundation level small grain production such as barley, oats, wheat, and rye. This system shall also be designed for separation of multiple small grain varieties. Additionally, the system needs to be designed for fast and easy cleanout of the conveyance, storage, and drying systems. The PMC will not be requiring installation of this system.
SEC. 1.02 BUDGET
Department of Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture estimates a budget of $315,000.00 dollars for completion of this project. Proposals priced at more than $315,000.00 will be considered non-responsive.
Approval or continuation of a contract resulting from this RFP is contingent upon legislative appropriation.
SEC. 1.03 DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS
Proposals must be received no later than 2:00 PM Alaska Time on May 08, 2026, as indicated by postmark or email timestamp and late proposals will not be considered.
SEC. 1.04 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
In order for offers to be considered responsive offerors must meet these minimum requirements:
The offeror must not have had a contract terminated for cause by the State within the last three years.
The vendor’s proposed price must be under $315,000.00 or they will be considered non-responsive.
Offerors must detail in their proposal how they meet the minimum requirements identified in Section
1.04. An offeror's failure to meet these minimum requirements will cause their proposal to be considered non-responsive and rejected.
SEC. 1.05 REQUIRED REVIEW
Offerors should carefully review this solicitation for defects and questionable or objectionable material. Comments concerning defects and questionable or objectionable material should be made in writing and received by the procurement officer at least ten days before the deadline for receipt of proposals. This will allow time for the issuance of any necessary amendments. It will also help prevent the opening of a defective proposal and exposure of offeror's proposals upon which award could not be made.
SEC. 1.06 QUESTIONS PRIOR TO DEADLINE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS
All questions must be in writing and directed to the Procurement Officer. The interested party must confirm telephone conversations in writing.
Two types of questions generally arise. One may be answered by directing the questioner to a specific section of the RFP. These questions may be answered over the telephone. Other questions may be more complex and may require a written addendum to the RFP. The Procurement Officer will make that decision.
Deadline to receive questions is no later than 2:00 PM Alaska Time on April 29, 2026.
PROCUREMENT OFFICER: LILLY K. CONDUCY; PHONE 1 (907) 269-0998; TDD 711 (Alaska Relay);
EMAIL: lilly.conducy@alaska.gov.
SEC. 1.07 RETURN INSTRUCTIONS
If submitting a proposal via email, the technical proposal and cost proposal must be saved as separate PDF documents and emailed to lilly.conducy@alaska.gov as separate, clearly labeled attachments, such as “Vendor A – Technical Proposal.pdf” and “Vendor A – Cost Proposal.pdf” (Vendor A is the name of the offeror). The email must contain the RFP number in the subject line.
The maximum size of a single email (including all text and attachments) that can be received by the State is 20 megabytes. If the email containing the proposal exceeds this size, the proposal must be sent in multiple emails that are each less than 20 megabytes, and each email must comply with the requirements described above.
Please note that email transmission is not instantaneous. Similar to sending a hard copy proposal, if you are emailing your proposal, the State recommends sending it ahead of time to ensure the email is delivered by the deadline for receipt of proposals.
If submitting proposals using U.S. mail, or delivery service, offerors must submit one hard copy of their proposal, in writing, to the procurement officer in a sealed package. The cost proposal included in the package must be sealed separately from the rest of the proposal and must be clearly identified. The sealed proposal package(s) must be addressed as follows:
Department of Natural Resources Support Services Division
Attention: LILLY K. CONDUCY Request for Proposal (RFP) Number: 2026-1000-0154
RFP Title: Grain Drying and Storage System 550 W 7th Avenue, Suite 1330
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
It is the offeror’s responsibility to contact the issuing agency at 1 (907) 269-0998 to confirm that the proposal has been received. The State is not responsible for unreadable, corrupt, or missing attachments.
SEC. 1.08 ENROLLMENT IN IRIS
Offerors will be required to be enrolled in the State of Alaska’s Integrated Resource Information System (IRIS) database prior to the award of a contract resulting from this RFP. Enrollment can be done online at the following link: https://iris-vss.alaska.gov. Offerors who are not enrolled prior to the award of a contract will be notified by DNR Procurement. Failure of an offeror to enroll in the IRIS database will delay award of the contract and may delay issuance of contract work.
mailto:lilly.conducy@alaska.gov mailto:lilly.conducy@alaska.gov mailto:lilly.conducy@alaska.gov mailto:lilly.conducy@alaska.gov https://iris-vss.alaska.gov/
SEC. 1.09 ASSISTANCE TO OFFERORS WITH A DISABILITY
Offerors with a disability may receive accommodation regarding the means of communicating this RFP or participating in the procurement process. For more information, contact the procurement officer no later than ten days prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals.
SEC. 1.10 AMENDMENTS TO PROPOSALS
Amendments to or withdrawals of proposals will only be allowed if acceptable requests are received prior to the deadline that is set for receipt of proposals. No amendments or withdrawals will be accepted after the deadline unless they are in response to the state's request in accordance with 2
AAC 12.290.
SEC. 1.11 AMENDMENTS TO THE RFP
If an amendment is issued before the deadline for receipt of proposals, the amendment will be posted on the State of Alaska Online Public Notice (OPN) website. The link to the posting of the amendment will be provided to all who were notified of the RFP and to those who have registered with the procurement officer after receiving the RFP from the OPN.
After receipt of proposals, if there is a need for any substantial clarification or material change in the RFP, an amendment will be issued. The amendment will incorporate the clarification or change, and a new date and time established for new or amended proposals. Evaluations may be adjusted as a result of receiving new or amended proposals.
SEC. 1.12 RFP SCHEDULE
RFP schedule set out herein represents the state’s best estimate of the schedule that will be followed. If a component of this schedule, such as the deadline for receipt of proposals, is delayed, the rest of the schedule may be shifted accordingly. All times are Alaska Time.
ACTIVITY TIME DATE
Issue Date / RFP Released April 14, 2026 Deadline for Receipt of Questions 2:00 PM April 29, 2026 Deadline for Receipt of Proposals / Proposal Due Date 2:00 PM May 08, 2026 ANTICIPATED Proposal Evaluations Complete Week of May 11, 2026 ANTICIPATED Notice of Intent to Award Week of May 11, 2026 ANTICIPATED Contract Issued Week of May 25, 2026
This RFP does not, by itself, obligate the state. The state's obligation will commence when the contract is approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, or the Commissioner's designee. Upon written notice to the Contractor, the state may set a different starting date for the contract. The state will not be responsible for any work done by the Contractor, even work done in good faith, if it occurs prior to the contract start date set by the state.
SEC. 1.13 PRE-PROPOSAL
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 1.14 ALTERNATE PROPOSALS
Offerors may only submit one proposal for evaluation. In accordance with 2 AAC 12.830 alternate proposals (proposals that offer something different than what is asked for) will be rejected.
SEC. 1.15 NEWS RELEASES
News releases related to this RFP will not be made without prior approval of the project manager.
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
SEC. 2.01 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Currently the PMC has very limited grain storage and drying capabilities. In order for foundation seed to be bulked up to higher capacities a larger drying and storage system is required. The PMC produces and maintains foundation level grains which it sells to commercial seed growers. The PMC grows up to six grain varieties each year depending on market demands. These Alaskan varieties are scaled up from several hundred pounds to several hundred bushels. Due to Alaska's extreme climate this grain needs to be dried first in a batch or continuous flow drier to bring moisture levels down from roughly 22% to 15%. Once the grain is below at 15% moisture or lower it will then need to be conveyed to the PMC’s large cleaning line. Ideally, the conveyance of this grain would be fed by an auger or similar from the grain dryer or holding bin, directly into the start of the cleaning line. The least amount of handling and conveyance should be considered when designing this system. All conveyance within this system needs to be easy to clean out as many types (Barley, Wheat, Oat, Rye), varieties of grain will be run through this system during the fall. After the seed is cleaned it will be loaded into a gravity wagon or similar. This gravity wagon will need to be unloaded into long term storage bins to be located onsite. Again, the conveyance from the wagon to the storage bins, between bins, and the output auger of the bins themselves must have easy cleanout points so that different types and/or varieties of grain do not become cross contaminated. Once the bins are loaded, grain will need to be dried until moisture levels reach 10-12% for long term storage. Additionally, a moisture monitoring system will need to be added to monitor each bin throughout the winter or until the seed is removed for sale and or planting.
The system should be designed to reduce the overall handling/conveyance of the grain from the field, though the dryer, seed cleaning line, and finally into storage. Improved handling efficiencies will reduce time, energy, and seed damage. Alaska’s extreme weather conditions should also be taken into consideration. Weather factors such as high winds, heavy snow loads, ice damming, and seismic events will have to be accounted for when designing this system.
SECTION 3. SCOPE OF WORK & CONTRACT INFORMATION
SEC. 3.01 SCOPE OF WORK
The Department of Natural Resources, Division of Agriculture is soliciting proposals for a Contractor to design and deliver a grain drying and storage system at the Plant Material Center located at 5310 S Bodenburg Spur, Palmer, Alaska 99645. The design plans for the grain drying and storage system will need to be reviewed and approved by DNR project manager.
The dimensions of the grain drying and storage system must be:
• Wet Bin/Holding Bin Maximum bin Height -30 feet, Maximum bin Diameter-15 feet.
• Long term storage Bin Maximum bin Height – 30 feet, Maximum bin Diameter 12 feet.
• Maximum area for the grain drying and storage system is 100’ x 50’ (concrete pad).
• Long-term storage bins should have a capacity of 800 -1200 bushel per bin and need a minimum of 3 bins. System needs to be designed to be expanded in the future to incorporate more bins.
• Add a separate wet bin and continuous flow or batch dryer to the system with a drying capacity of at least 200 bushel an hour or more. Dryer will need to be capable of reducing high moisture grain of roughly 22% moisture to 15% moisture.
• Add necessary conveyance from dryer or holding bin to the PMC seed house to the start of commercial seed cleaning line.
• Add necessary conveyance from dryer or holding bin to each long-term storage bin.
• Add the necessary conveyance to move grain in and out of each long-term storage bin.
• Add a remote monitoring system for each bin for long-term storage surveillance.
• Price needs to include all equipment, shipping, and unloading of equipment at/to the Alaska Plant Materials Center.
• DNR Plant Materials center will install a concreate slab to support grain drying/storage system via a separate procurement.
• The contractor must design a multi bin storage and drying system of a minimum of 3 individual grain bins. However, system must be designed to add additional bins (up to six) at a later date.
• Each storage bin must hold 800- 1000 bushels and have drying capabilities heat/air for each bin.
• The batch or continuous flow drier must be included and be able to quickly reduce high moisture levels in grain being harvested during Alaska's cool wet fall. Moisture levels post-harvest are typically between 18-22% moisture.
SEC. 3.02 CONTRACT TERM AND WORK SCHEDULE
The length of the contract will be from the date of award until June 30, 2026. A contract resulting from this RFP.
Unless otherwise provided in this RFP, the State and the successful Offeror/Contractor agree: (1) that any extension of the contract excluding any exercised renewal options, will be considered as a month-to-month extension, and all other terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect and (2) the procurement officer will provide notice to the Contractor of the intent to cancel such month-to-month extension at least 30 days before the desired date of cancellation. A month-to-month extension may only be executed by the procurement officer via a written contract amendment.
SEC. 3.03 DELIVERABLES
The Contractor will be required to provide the deliverables as outlined in Section 3.01 (Scope of Work).
SEC. 3.04 CONTRACT TYPE
This contract is a fixed price contract.
SEC. 3.05 PROPOSED PAYMENT PROCEDURES
The state will make payments based on a negotiated payment schedule. Each billing must consist of an invoice and progress report. No payment will be made until the progress report and invoice has been approved by the project manager.
SEC. 3.06 PROMPT PAYMENT FOR STATE PURCHASES
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 3.07 CONTRACT PAYMENT
No payment will be made until the contract is approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or the Commissioner's designee. Under no conditions will the state be liable for the payment of any interest charges associated with the cost of the contract. The state is not responsible for and will not pay local, state, or federal taxes. All costs associated with the contract must be stated in U.S. currency.
Payment for agreements under $500,000 for the undisputed purchase of goods or services provided to a state agency, will be made within 30 days of the receipt of a proper billing or the delivery of the goods or services to the location(s) specified in the agreement, whichever is later. A late payment is subject to 1.5% interest per month on the unpaid balance. Interest will not be paid if there is a dispute or if there is an agreement that establishes a lower interest rate or precludes the charging of interest.
Any single contract payment of $1 million or higher must be accepted by the Contractor via Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT).
SEC. 3.08 CONTRACT PRICE ADJUSTMENTS
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 3.09 LOCATION OF WORK
The location the work is to be performed, completed, and managed will be at 5310 S Bodenburg Spur, Palmer, Alaska 99645.
The state WILL NOT provide workspace for the Contractor. The Contractor must provide its own workspace.
By signature on their proposal, the offeror certifies that all services provided under this contract by the Contractor and all Subcontractors shall be performed in the United States.
If the offeror cannot certify that all work will be performed in the United States, the offeror must contact the procurement officer in writing to request a waiver at least 10 days prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals.
The request must include a detailed description of the portion of work that will be performed outside the United States, where, by whom, and the reason the waiver is necessary.
Failure to comply with these requirements may cause the state to reject the proposal as non-responsive or cancel the contract.
SEC. 3.10 THIRD-PARTY SERVICE PROVIDERS
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 3.11 SUBCONTRACTORS
Subcontractors shall not be used to perform work under this contract.
SEC. 3.12 JOINT VENTURES
Joint ventures will not be allowed.
SEC. 3.13 RIGHT TO INSPECT PLACE OF BUSINESS
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 3.14 F.O.B. POINT
The F.O.B. point for all items purchased under this contract is the final destination anywhere within the State of Alaska. Ownership of and title to the ordered items remains with the Contractor until the items have been delivered to their final destination and are accepted by the State.
The cost of shipping and delivery to 5310 S Bodenburg Spur, Palmer Alaska 99645 is to be included in the cost proposal.
SEC. 3.15 CONTRACT PERSONNEL
Any change of the project team members or Subcontractors named in the proposal must be approved, in advance and in writing, by the project manager or procurement officer. Changes that are not approved by the state may be grounds for the state to terminate the contract.
SEC. 3.16 INSPECTION & MODIFICATION - REIMBURSEMENT FOR
UNACCEPTABLE DELIVERABLES
The Contractor is responsible for the completion of all work set out in the contract. All work is subject to inspection, evaluation, and approval by the project manager. The state may employ all reasonable means to ensure that the work is progressing and being performed in compliance with the contract.
The project manager or procurement officer may instruct the Contractor to make corrections or modifications if needed in order to accomplish the contract’s intent. The Contractor will not unreasonably withhold such changes.
Substantial failure of the Contractor to perform the contract may cause the state to terminate the contract. In this event, the state may require the Contractor to reimburse monies paid (based on the identified portion of unacceptable work received) and may seek associated damages.
SEC. 3.17 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 3.18 CONTRACT CHANGES - UNANTICIPATED AMENDMENTS
During the course of this contract, the Contractor may be required to perform additional work. That work will be within the general scope of the initial contract. When additional work is required, the project manager will provide the Contractor with a written description of the additional work and request the Contractor to submit a firm time schedule for accomplishing the additional work and a firm price for the additional work. Cost and pricing data must be provided to justify the cost of such amendments per AS 36.30.400.
The Contractor will not commence additional work until the procurement officer has secured any required state approvals necessary for the amendment and issued a written contract amendment, approved by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources or the Commissioner's designee.
SEC. 3.19 NONDISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY
Contractor agrees that all confidential information shall be used only for purposes of providing the deliverables and performing the services specified herein and shall not disseminate or allow dissemination of confidential information except as provided for in this section. The Contractor shall hold as confidential and will use reasonable care (including both facility physical security and electronic security) to prevent unauthorized access by storage, disclosure, publication, dissemination to and/or use by third parties of the confidential information. “Reasonable care” means compliance by the Contractor with all applicable federal and state law, including the Social Security Act and HIPAA. The Contractor must promptly notify the state in writing if it becomes aware of any storage, disclosure, loss, unauthorized access to or use of the confidential information.
Confidential information, as used herein, means any data, files, software, information or materials (whether prepared by the state or its agents or advisors) in oral, electronic, tangible or intangible form and however stored, compiled or memorialized that is classified confidential as defined by State of Alaska classification and categorization guidelines provided by the state to the Contractor or a Contractor Agent or otherwise made available to the Contractor or a Contractor Agent in connection with this contract, or acquired, obtained or learned by the Contractor or a contractor agent in the performance of this contract. Examples of confidential information include, but are not limited to: technology infrastructure, architecture, financial data, trade secrets, equipment specifications, user lists, passwords, research data, and technology data (infrastructure, architecture, operating systems, security tools, IP addresses, etc.).
Additional information that the Contractor shall hold as confidential during the performance of services under this contract includes:
All services, deliverables, materials, communications (including electronic correspondence) DEVELOPED OR OBTAINED, and any draft or preliminary versions produced under this agreement shall be considered work product and are subject to the same terms, conditions, and ownership provisions as the final deliverables. The Contractor shall not disclose, reproduce, or use any work product for purposes outside the scope of this contract without prior written consent from the State.
If confidential information is requested to be disclosed by the Contractor pursuant to a request received by a third party and such disclosure of the confidential information is required under applicable state or federal law, regulation, governmental or regulatory authority, the Contractor may disclose the confidential information after providing the state with written notice of the requested disclosure ( to the extent such notice to the state is permitted by applicable law) and giving the state opportunity to review the request. If the Contractor receives no objection from the state, it may release confidential information within 30 days. Notice of the requested disclosure of confidential information by the Contractor must be provided to the state within a reasonable time after the Contractor’s receipt of notice of the requested disclosure and, upon request of the state, shall seek to obtain legal protection from the release of the confidential information.
The following information shall not be considered confidential information: information previously known to be public information when received from the other party; information freely available to the general public; information which now is or hereafter becomes publicly known by other than a breach of confidentiality hereof; or information which is disclosed by a party pursuant to subpoena or other legal process and which as a result becomes lawfully obtainable by the general public.
SEC. 3.20 INDEMNIFICATION
The Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the contracting agency from and against any claim of or liability for error, omission, or negligent act of the Contractor under this agreement.
The Contractor shall not be required to indemnify the contracting agency for a claim of, or liability for, the independent negligence of the contracting agency. If there is a claim of, or liability for, the joint negligent error or omission of the Contractor and the independent negligence of the contracting agency, the indemnification and hold harmless obligation shall be apportioned on a comparative fault basis. “Contractor” and “contracting agency”, as used within this and the following article, include the employees, agents and other Contractors who are directly responsible, respectively, to each. The term “independent negligence” is negligence other than in the contracting agency’s selection, administration, monitoring, or controlling of the Contractor and in approving or accepting the Contractor’s work.
SEC. 3.21 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Without limiting Contractor's indemnification, it is agreed that Contractor shall purchase at its own expense and maintain in force at all times during the performance of services under this agreement the following policies of insurance. Where specific limits are shown, it is understood that they shall be the minimum acceptable limits. If the Contractor's policy contains higher limits, the state shall be entitled to coverage to the extent of such higher limits.
Certificates of Insurance must be furnished to the procurement officer prior to beginning work and must provide for a notice of cancellation, non-renewal, or material change of conditions in accordance with policy provisions. Failure to furnish satisfactory evidence of insurance or lapse of the policy is a material breach of this contract and shall be grounds for termination of the Contractor's services. All insurance policies shall comply with and be issued by insurers licensed to transact the business of insurance under AS 21.
Workers' Compensation Insurance: The Contractor shall provide and maintain, for all employees engaged in work under this contract, coverage as required by AS 23.30.045, and where applicable, any other statutory obligations including but not limited to Federal U.S.L.
& H. and Jones Act requirements. The policy must waive subrogation against the State.
Commercial General Liability Insurance: covering all business premises and operations used by the Contractor in the performance of services under this agreement with minimum coverage limits of $300,000 combined single limit per claim.
Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance: covering all vehicles used by the Contractor in the performance of services under this agreement with minimum coverage limits of $300,000 combined single limit per claim.
SEC. 3.22 TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT
a. If the Project manager or Procurement Officer determines that the Contractor has refused to perform the work or has failed to perform the work with such diligence as to ensure its timely and accurate completion, the state may, by providing written notice to the Contractor, terminate the Contractor's right to proceed with part or all the remaining work.
b. The Procurement Officer may also, by written notice, terminate this contract under Administrative Order 352 if the Contractor supports or participates in a boycott of the State of Israel.
This clause does not restrict the state's termination rights under the contract provisions of Appendix A, attached in SECTION 7. ATTACHMENTS.
SECTION 4. PROPOSAL FORMAT AND CONTENT
SEC. 4.01 INTRODUCTION
Proposals must include the complete name and address of offeror’s firm and the name, mailing address, and telephone number of the person the state should contact regarding the proposal.
Proposals must confirm that the offeror will comply with all provisions in this RFP; and, if applicable, provide notice that the firm qualifies as an Alaskan bidder. Proposals must be signed by a company officer empowered to bind the company. An offeror's failure to include these items in the proposals may cause the proposal to be determined to be non-responsive and the proposal may be rejected.
The state discourages overly lengthy and costly proposals, however, in order for the state to evaluate proposals fairly and completely, offerors must follow the format set out in this RFP and provide all information requested.
SEC. 4.02 PROPOSAL CONTENTS
The following information must be included in all proposals.
(a) AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE All proposals must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the offeror to the provisions of the RFP. Proposals must remain open and valid for at least 90-days from the date set as the deadline for receipt of proposals.
(b) OFFEROR'S CERTIFICATION By signature on the proposal, offerors certify that they comply with the following:
A. the laws of the State of Alaska;
B. the applicable portion of the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964;
C. the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and the regulations issued thereunder by the federal government;
D. the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the regulations issued thereunder by the federal government;
E. all terms and conditions set out in this RFP;
F. a condition that the proposal submitted was independently arrived at, without collusion, under penalty of perjury; and
G. that the offers will remain open and valid for at least 90 days.
If any offeror fails to comply with [A] through [G] of this paragraph, the state reserves the right to disregard the proposal, terminate the contract, or consider the Contractor in default.
(c) VENDOR TAX ID A valid Vendor Tax ID must be submitted to the issuing office with the proposal or within five days of the state's request.
(d) CONFLICT OF INTEREST Each proposal shall include a statement indicating whether or not the firm or any individuals working on the contract has a possible conflict of interest (e.g., currently employed by the State of Alaska or formerly employed by the State of Alaska within the past two years) and, if so, the nature of that conflict. The procurement officer reserves the right to consider a proposal non-responsive and reject it or cancel the award if any interest disclosed from any source could either give the appearance of a conflict or cause speculation as to the objectivity of the contract to be performed by the offeror.
(e) FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS The offeror must identify all known federal requirements that apply to the proposal, the evaluation, or the contract.
SEC. 4.03 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
Offerors must provide an organizational chart specific to the personnel assigned to accomplish the work called for in this RFP; illustrate the lines of authority; designate the individual responsible and accountable for the completion of each component and deliverable of the RFP.
Offerors must provide a narrative description of the organization of the project team and a personnel roster that identifies each person who will actually work on the contract and provide the following information about each person listed:
• title,
• resume,
• location(s) where work will be performed.
SEC. 4.04 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT
Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative statements that illustrate their understanding of the requirements of the project and the project schedule.
SEC. 4.05 PROJECT SCHEDULE, DELIVERY, AND ASSEMBLEY OF
EQUIPMENT
Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative on how they intend to meet the projects goals and meet the states schedule.
SEC. 4.06 PROJECT DESIGN AND LAYOUT
Offerors must provide comprehensive narrative statements that describe the design of the project in great detail. Project design must address the specifications, operation, and functionality of each individual piece of equipment in the small grain drying and storage system.
SEC. 4.07 COST PROPOSAL
Offerors must complete and submit this Submittal Form. Proposed costs must include all direct and indirect costs associated with the performance of the contract, including, but not limited to, total number of hours at various hourly rates, direct expenses, payroll, supplies, overhead assigned to each person working on the project, percentage of each person's time devoted to the project, and profit. The costs identified on the cost proposal are the total amount of costs to be paid by the state.
No additional charges shall be allowed.
SEC. 4.08 BID BOND – PERFORMANCE BOND – SURETY DEPOSIT
Not applicable to this RFP.
SEC. 4.09 EVALUATION CRITERIA
All proposals will be reviewed to determine if they are responsive. Proposals determined to be responsive will be evaluated using the criterion that is set out in SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA
AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION.
Proposal Submittal Checklist [see section 7.01 (Attachments) for forms]:
Attachments:
1) Submittal Form – Offeror Information (required to be completed by offeror)
2) Cost Proposal Form (required to be completed by offeror)
3) Alaska Bidder Certification Form (completed by offeror if applicable)
4) Federal Debarment Certification Form (required to be completed by offeror)
5) Drugfree Workplace Certification Form (required to be completed by offeror)
Attachments 1, 2, 4, and 5 are required to be submitted with your proposal. If claiming the Alaska Bidder Preference, then Attachments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 will need to be submitted with your proposal.
Proposals not including the required attachments will be determined non-responsive.
SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION
SEC. 5.01 SUMMARY OF EVALUATION PROCESS
The state will use the following steps to evaluate and prioritize proposals:
1) Proposals will be assessed for overall responsiveness. Proposals deemed non-responsive will be eliminated from further consideration.
2) A proposal evaluation committee (PEC), made up of at least three state employees or public officials, will evaluate the Technical portion of all responsive proposals.
3) Each responsive Technical Proposal will be sent to the PEC. No cost information will be shared or provided to the PEC.
4) The PEC will independently evaluate and score the proposals based on the degree to which they meet the stated evaluation criteria.
5) After independent scoring, the PEC will have a meeting, chaired by the procurement officer, where the PEC may have a group discussion prior to finalizing their scores.
6) The evaluators will submit their final individual scores to the procurement officer, who will then compile the scores and calculate awarded points as set out in Section 5.03.
7) The procurement officer will calculate scores for cost proposals as set out in Section 5.08 and add those scores to the awarded points along with factoring in any Alaska preferences.
8) The procurement officer may ask for best and final offers from offerors susceptible for award and revise the cost scores accordingly.
9) The state will then conduct any necessary negotiations with the highest scoring offeror and award a contract if the negotiations are successful.
SEC. 5.02 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals will be evaluated based on their overall value to state, considering both cost and non-cost factors as described below. Note: An evaluation may not be based on discrimination due to the race, religion, color, national origin, sex, age, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, disability, or political affiliation of the offeror.
SEC. 5.03 SCORING METHOD AND CALCULATION
Each Proposal Evaluation Committee (PEC) member will individually evaluate and score each responsive proposal using the criteria and percentage values set out in Section 5. Each percentage value will equal one point, with the total maximum points awarded, per PEC member, for all evaluation sections not to exceed 100 points. Using only whole numbers, PEC members will start with a median score for each evaluation section. The score may either increase or decrease depending on the offeror’s response to each question for that section. As an example, if the Offeror provided responses over and above the evaluation questions in a section, they would receive a higher score. However, if the Offeror’s response fails to address all questions of a section or demonstrates some lack of understanding or competency as it relates to a question for that section, the Offeror would then receive a lower score.
SEC. 5.04 EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS (15%)
Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:
1) Questions regarding the personnel:
a) Do the individuals assigned to the project have experience on similar projects?
b) Are resumes complete and do they demonstrate backgrounds that would be desirable for individuals engaged in the work the project requires?
c) How extensive is the applicable education and experience of the personnel designated to work on the project?
2) Questions regarding the firm and Subcontractor (if used):
a) How well has the firm demonstrated experience in completing similar projects on time and within budget?
b) How successful is the general history of the firm regarding timely and successful completion of projects?
c) Has the firm provided letters of reference from previous clients?
d) If a Subcontractor will perform work on the contract, how well do they measure up to the evaluation used for the offeror?
SEC. 5.05 UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROJECT (10%)
Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:
1) How well has the offeror designed the system to easily dry, convey, separate, and store foundation level small grain seed.
2) Has the offeror incorporated and/or identified easily accessible clean out points throughout the entire system?
3) Does the offerors design minimize grain handling and increased drying and conveyance efficiency?
4) How well has the offeror identified pertinent issues and potential problems related to the drying, conveyance, and long-term storage of seed grain?
SEC. 5.06 PROJECT SCHEDULE, DELIVERY, AND ASSEMBLEY OF
EQUIPMENT (5%)
Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:
1) Does the offeror outline the delivery schedule for equipment needed for the project?
2) Does the offeror outline how all equipment with the RFP will be delivered and unloaded at the
PMC?
3) Since installation is not required for this RFP, did the offeror provide or identify any potential problems associated with assembly of their design?
4) Does the offeror meet the time schedule for the state outlined in the RFP?
SEC. 5.07 PROJECT DESIGN AND LAYOUT (20%)
Proposals will be evaluated against the questions set out below:
1) To what extent does the offeror describe design and layout of the grain storage and drying system?
2) Does it appear that the offeror meets the goals outlined in the scope of work for the RFP?
3) To what length does the offeror describe the specifications, operation, and functionality of each individual piece of equipment in the small grain drying and storage system?
4) To what extent has the offeror identified any potential problems with the design, flow, maintenance, and efficiency of the grain drying and storage system?
SEC. 5.08 CONTRACT COST (40%)
Overall, a minimum of 40% of the total evaluation points will be assigned to cost. After the procurement officer applies any applicable preferences, the offeror with the lowest total cost will receive the maximum number of points allocated to cost per 2 AAC 12.260(c). The point allocations for cost on the other proposals will be determined using the following formula:
[(Price of Lowest Cost Proposal) x (Maximum Points for Cost)] ÷ (Cost of Each Higher Priced Proposal)
Example (Max Points for Contract Cost = 40):
Step 1 List all proposal prices, adjusted where appropriate by the application of applicable preferences claimed by the offeror.
Offeror #1 $40,000 Offeror #2 $42,750 Offeror #3 $47,500
Step 2
In this example, the RFP allotted 40% of the available 100 points to cost. This means that the lowest cost will receive the maximum number of points.
Offeror #1 receives 40 points.
The reason they receive that amount is because the lowest cost proposal, in this case $40,000, receives the maximum number of points allocated to cost, 40 points.
Offeror #2 receives 37.43 points.
$40,000 lowest cost x 40 maximum points for cost = 1,600,000 ÷ $42,750 cost of Offeror #2’s proposal = 37.43
Offeror #3 receives 33.68 points.
$40,000 lowest cost x 40 maximum points for cost = 1,600,000 ÷ $47,500 cost of Offeror #3’s proposal = 33.68
SEC. 5.09 ALASKA OFFEROR PREFERENCE (10 POINTS)
Per 2 AAC 12.260, if an offeror qualifies for the Alaska Bidder Preference, the offeror will receive an Alaska Offeror Preference. The preference will be 10% of the total points available, which will be added to the offeror’s overall evaluation score.
Example:
Step 1
Determine the number of points available to qualifying offerors under this preference:
100 Total Points Available in RFP + 10% Alaska Offeror preference = 10 Points for the preference
Step 2
Determine which offerors qualify as Alaska bidders and thus, are eligible for the Alaska Offeror preference. For the purpose of this example, presume that all proposals have been completely evaluated based on the evaluation criteria in the RFP. The scores at this point are:
Offeror #1 83 points No Preference 0 points Offeror #2 74 points Alaska Offeror Preference 10 points Offeror #3 80 points Alaska Offeror Preference 10 points
Step 3
Add the applicable Alaska Offeror preference amounts to the offerors’ scores:
Offeror #1 83 points Offeror #2 84 points (74 points + 10 points) Offeror #3 90 points (80 points + 10 points)
Offeror #3 is the highest scoring offeror and would get the award, provided their proposal is responsive and responsible.
SECTION 6. GENERAL PROCESS AND LEGAL INFORMATION
SEC. 6.01 INFORMAL DEBRIEFING
When the contract is completed, an informal debriefing may be performed at the discretion of the project manager or procurement officer. If performed, the scope of the debriefing will be limited to the work performed by the Contractor.
SEC. 6.02 ALASKA BUSINESS LICENSE AND OTHER REQUIRED LICENSES
Prior to the award of a contract, an offeror must hold a valid Alaska business license. However, in order to receive the Alaska Bidder Preference and other related preferences, such as the Alaska Veteran Preference and Alaska Offeror Preference, an offeror must hold a valid Alaska business license prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals. Offerors should contact the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, Division of Corporations, Business, and Professional Licensing, PO Box 110806, Juneau, Alaska 99811-0806, for information on these licenses. Acceptable evidence that the offeror possesses a valid Alaska business license may consist of any one of the following:
• copy of an Alaska business license;
• certification on the proposal that the offeror has a valid Alaska business license and has included the license number in the proposal;
• a canceled check for the Alaska business license fee;
• a copy of the Alaska business license application with a receipt stamp from the state's occupational licensing office; or
• a sworn and notarized statement that the offeror has applied and paid for the Alaska business license.
You are not required to hold a valid Alaska business license at the time proposals are opened if you possess one of the following licenses and are offering services or supplies under that specific line of business:
• fisheries business licenses issued by Alaska Department of Revenue or Alaska Department of Fish and Game,
• liquor licenses issued by Alaska Department of Revenue for alcohol sales only,
• insurance licenses issued by Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, Division of Insurance, or
• Mining licenses issued by Alaska Department of Revenue.
Prior to the deadline for receipt of proposals, all offerors must hold any other necessary applicable professional licenses required by Alaska Statute.
SEC. 6.03 SITE INSPECTION
The state may conduct on-site visits to evaluate the offeror's capacity to perform the contract. An offeror must agree, at risk of being found non-responsive and having its proposal rejected, to provide the State with reasonable access to relevant portions of its work sites. Individuals designated by the procurement officer at the state’s expense will make site inspection.
SEC. 6.04 CLARIFICATION OF OFFERS
In order to determine if a proposal is reasonably susceptible for award, communications by the procurement officer or the Proposal Evaluation Committee (PEC) are permitted with an offeror to clarify uncertainties or eliminate confusion concerning the contents of a proposal. Clarifications may not result in a material or substantive change to the proposal. The evaluation by the procurement officer or the PEC may be adjusted as a result of a clarification under this section.
SEC. 6.05 DISCUSSIONS WITH OFFERORS
The state may conduct discussions with offerors in accordance with AS 36.30.240 and 2 AAC 12.290.
The purpose of these discussions will be to ensure full understanding of the requirements of the RFP and proposal. Discussions will be limited to specific sections of the RFP or proposal identified by the procurement officer. Discussions will only be held with offerors who have submitted a proposal deemed reasonably susceptible for award by the procurement officer. Discussions, if held, will be after initial evaluation of proposals by the procurement officer or the PEC. If modifications are made as a result of these discussions, they will be put in writing. Following discussions, the procurement officer may set a time for best and final proposal submissions from those offerors with whom discussions were held. Proposals may be reevaluated after receipt of best and final proposal submissions.
If an offeror does not submit a best and final proposal or a notice of withdrawal, the offeror’s immediate previous proposal is considered the offeror’s best and final proposal.
Offerors with a disability needing accommodation should contact the procurement officer prior to the date set for discussions so that reasonable accommodation can be made. Any oral modification of a proposal must be reduced to writing by the offeror.
SEC. 6.06 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
The procurement officer, or an evaluation committee made up of at least three state employees or public officials, will evaluate proposals. The evaluation will be based solely on the evaluation factors set out in SECTION 5. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND CONTRACTOR SELECTION.
After receipt of proposals, if there is a need for any substantial clarification or material change in the RFP, an amendment will be issued. The amendment will incorporate the clarification or change, and a new date and time established for new or amended proposals.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .