STATE OF COLORADO

OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

RFP # 2016000106

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

FOR AN

INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD

UTILIZING

DESIGN/BUILD LUMP SUM (LS) SERVICES

For The

Governor’s Office of Information Technology

For The

Replacement of the La Veta Communication Site

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR AN

INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD UTILIZING

DESIGN/BUILD SERVICES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ADVERTISEMENTS

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Introduction/Description of Project B. Minimum Qualifications C. Scope of Services

II. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTALS (STEP I)

A. Schedule B. Mandatory Pre-submittal Conference C. Clarifications D. General Information E. Prequalification Submittals

III. ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSAL (STEP II)

A. Short List B. Oral Interview C. Cost Proposals D. Method of Selection and Award

IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL CRITERIA

1. Qualifications of the Team

2. Qualifications of the Management Team Members

3. Project Management Approach

4. Prior Project Experience/Success

a. Timeliness

b. Budget Considerations

c. Quality

d. Disruption

e. Claims

f. Compliance

5. Miscellaneous Considerations

a. Litigation History

b. Apprenticeship Training Program

c. Other

B. ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS CRITERIA

1. Qualifications of the Team

2. Qualifications of the Management Team Members

3. Project Management Approach

4. Prior Project Experience/Success

5. Miscellaneous Considerations

V. D/B CONTRACT INFORMATION

VI. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND ATTESTATION

VII. COST PROPOSAL FORM

APPENDICES:

Appendix A: Prequalification Submittal/Evaluation Form (To be completed by Jury Panel)

Appendix A1: Oral Interview/Evaluation Form (To be completed by Jury Panel)

Appendix A2: Final Ranking Matrix (To be completed by Jury Panel)

Appendix B: Design/Build Agreement and General Conditions (Sample) (Forms SC-8.0 and SC-8.1)

Appendix C: Certification and Affidavit Regarding Unauthorized Immigrants (Form UI-1) (To be submitted with both Prequalification Submittal and sealed Cost Proposal by Team)

Appendix D: Program Concept, Program and Specifications (As applicable)

Appendix E: Aesthetic Guidelines and Construction Standards (As applicable)

Appendix F: Budget

IPD D/B LS RFP

Rev. 7/2015

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR AN

INTEGRATED PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD UTILIZING

Governor’s Office of Information Technology DTRS (OIT)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. INTRODUCTION/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT

This RFP is to replace the DTRS Communication Tower at the La Veta location in Huerfano County, CO.

The Governor’s Office of Information Technology DTRS intends to select a Design/Build Entity who will design, manage and construct the project as described within. The process to be used in the selection of the firm is comprised of two steps:

STEP I is the Submittal of Prequalification as described in Section II.

STEP II is the Oral Interview/Cost Proposal as described in detail in Section III.

A Jury Panel of individuals who will be involved in the project and/or understand the required services associated with Design/Build Contracting will evaluate responses to this RFP for both STEPS.

Upon completion of the evaluation of the Submittals of Prequalification, a limited number of teams will be invited to the oral interviews.

Sealed cost proposals will be required only from those teams who are interviewed and are to be submitted as indicated in this RFP. Both qualifications and cost will be considered in the final ranking of teams with qualifications given 40% of the value of the weighted criteria and costs in the sealed Cost Proposal given 60%.

Selection and award of this project will be based on a combination of qualifications and costs that represents the best overall value to the State.

B. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

As indicated in the advertisements, Notice is hereby given to all interested parties that all teams will be required to meet minimum requirements to be considered for these projects. To be considered as qualified, interested teams shall have, as a minimum:

· Provided Design/Build Contracting services within the last three (3) years for at least two (2) projects each in excess of $ 500,000. (hard costs), utilizing the expertise present in their Colorado Office; and

· Demonstrated specific Design/Build experience in projects of similar scope and complexity; and

· Demonstrated bonding capability up to $1,000,000. for an individual project coincidentally with current and anticipated workloads; provide letter from surety that affirms this capability.

C. SCOPE OF SERVICES

The scope of services will include assistance to the State during the process of design, construction, and warranty period. Specific tasks to be performed by the Design/Build Contractor (D/B) include those generally performed by the D/B construction community where the Designer is also the Contractor.

II. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTALS (STEP I)

A. SCHEDULE

1. The schedule of events for the RFP process and an outline of the schedule for the balance of the project is as follows:

2. Four (4) hard copies of the Prequalification submittals are due January 19,2016 and shall be received no later than 2:30pm PM (MT), at the following address:

Judy Giovanni Governor’s Office of Information Technology 601 East 18th Avenue, Suite 180 Denver Colorado 80203 judy.giovanni@state.co.us

3. The above schedule is tentative. Responding teams shall be notified of revisions in a timely manner by email. Respondents may elect to verify times and dates by email, but no earlier than 36 hours before the schedule date and time.

B. MANDATORY PRE-SUBMMITTAL CONFERENCE

1. To ensure sufficient information is available to teams preparing submittals, a mandatory pre-submittal conference has been scheduled. The intent of this conference is to tour the site and to have OIT staff able to discuss the project. Teams preparing submittals must attend and sign-in in order to have their submittals accepted. The pre-submittal conference will be held at:

THE SITE VIST WAS HELD SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 ONLY THE CONTRACTORS THAT ATTENDED THE SITE VISIT MAY PROVIDE PROPOSALS THEY ARE:

EasTex Tower Inc Rex Industries Advanced Tower Services

C. CLARIFICATIONS

1. Owner initiated changes to this RFP will be issued under numerically sequenced email addenda. Addenda generally consist of the following items:

a. Clarifications

b. Scope Changes

c. Time and/or Date Changes

Respondents must acknowledge all issued addenda in their submittal and proposal.

2. Respondent initiated requests for clarification will be received any time prior to 12/29/2015. All State responses will be issued by email addenda on or before 1/05/2016.

D. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. All respondents accept the conditions of this RFP, including, but not limited to, the following:

a. All submittals shall become the property of the State of Colorado and will not be returned.

b. Late submittals shall not be evaluated. Facsimile submittals shall not be accepted.

c. Any restriction as to the use of submitted materials must be clearly indicated as proprietary. The requested limitation or prohibition of use or release shall be identified in writing on a cover sheet. Blanket claims of proprietary submittals will not be honored. Cost proposals will be considered proprietary.

d. The State reserves the right to reject any or all proposals on the basis of being unresponsive to this RFP or for failure to disclose requested information.

e. The State shall not be liable for any costs incurred by respondents in the preparation of submittals and proposals nor in costs related to any element of the selection and contract negotiation process.

f. The respondent has reviewed Appendix B and by responding has agreed that the terms and conditions of the sample Design/Build Agreement are expressly workable without reservation.

g. The respondent has reviewed Appendix D and by responding acknowledges the project concept, program and specifications as the initial basis of design.

h. The respondent has reviewed Appendix E and by responding acknowledges the standards for construction as basic standards for design, and the aesthetic guidelines as basic guidelines for design.

2. Appendix F is the estimated budget for the project. The distribution of contract costs is permitted to differ in the Cost Proposal.

E. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTALS (STEP I)

1. Respondent must comply with the following items, a through f. The State retains the right to waive any minor irregularity or requirement should it be judged to be in the best interest of the State. (Note that the primary focus of the Prequalification evaluation will be the firm(s) capabilities).

a. Submit FOUR (4) complete copies of all material.

b. Submittals shall be formatted and tabbed in the exact form and numeric sequence of the Evaluation Form (1 through 5) in Appendix A. A two sided single page cover letter addressed to the Governor’s Office of Information Technology , Judy Giovanni outlining the team qualifications is required at the front of the submittal. (Not counting the cover letter and required Acknowledgement and Attestation form, the entire submittal is to be no more than 200 doubled sided 8 ½’ x 11” sized pages in portrait format, at least 10 font, and stapled, spiral or plastic bound. No loose leaf notebooks or hard bound submittals.

c.

d. Submittals shall be evaluated in accordance with criteria as indicated in SECTION IV. A. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL CRITERIA and ranked on the corresponding Evaluation Form in Appendix A.

e. Response to all items shall be complete.

f. All references shall be current and relevant.

g. Complete and execute the appropriate Acknowledgment and Attestation Form as provided in Section VI and submit at the back of the Prequalification Submittal.

III. ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS (STEP II)

A. SHORT LIST

From the submittals received, a short list of qualified respondents shall be identified using the scoring indicated on the enclosed Prequalification Evaluation Form, Appendix A.

Teams failing to meet the minimum required qualifications will not receive further consideration.

EasTex Tower Inc Rex Industries Advanced Tower

B. ORAL INTERVIEWS -COMPLETE

Mandatory oral interviews shall be conducted for the short listed team only. Interview times and location, will be arranged by the OIT and all short listed teams will be notified in advance. At the option of the State, a visit to the short listed team managing home office and/or representative field office may be required.

C. COST PROPOSALS

1. Only those teams short listed for interview are required to submit their sealed proposals. Cost Proposals are due on the scheduled submission date prior to the start of oral interviews. Only one sealed copy is required. Cost Proposals will remain sealed until after the qualitative scoring and will then be opened. The cost amount will then be considered (60 percent) in conjunction with the qualitative score from the response and interview (40 percent).

a. Submit sealed cost proposal separately. Do not include cost proposal data in the qualifications submittal or the oral interview presentation and handout. Also, do not enclose qualification in sealed cost proposal.

2. Cost Proposals shall be submitted on the form provided in Section VII, without modification. A Cost Proposal shall be accompanied with sufficient detail to clearly identify the cost for design and management services construction and general conditions. Percentage of the cost of work is not an acceptable value. The Cost Proposal should be prepared independently in accordance with the following:

a. Any specific services requested in the RFP and its appendices that are not included should be clearly identified. Exclusion of any required service may result in the proposal being found non-responsive.

1) Appendices D and E of this RFP include the project concept, program and specifications; and aesthetic guidelines and construction standards.

b. Provide a D/B staff schedule with staff by name, position and man-hours (assume 8 hour days) per month estimated on the project.

c. The State reserves the right to reject any Cost Proposal not prepared in the above manner. Proposals that exceed the available funds may be rejected outright but the State reserves the right to negotiate a reasonable cost for service within the available funds. The D/B contract will be a bonded lump sum contract to encompass all design, management and construction work; some allowances may be included.

3. This Cost Proposal is a binding offer to perform the services associated with the Scope of Services described in this RFP. The State, however, reserves the right to negotiate a cost adjustment based on scope clarification subsequent to selection and prior to contract execution.

D. METHOD OF SELECTION AND AWARD

The Jury Panel shall complete a combined evaluation of qualifications and Cost Proposal in accordance with the criteria as indicated in SECTION IV, B. ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS/EVALUATION CRITERIA. Numerical ranking and selection of the most qualified firm (including cost) will then occur on the corresponding evaluation forms in Appendix A1.

The final cost amount and scope of services may be negotiated at the State’s discretion. Award and contract will be contingent on deliverability of key proposed D/B Staff..

IV. EVALUATION CRITERIA

A. PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL CRITERIA

(Note that the primary focus of the Prequalification evaluation will be the Firms capabilities).

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM(S)

· Provide a description of the composition and management structure of your team. Identify the firm’s roles and responsibilities and relevant experience with projects of similar scope and complexity and similar fast track project delivery methods. Describe how the team’s experience will relate to the success of this project.

· Provide a description and separate graphic organizational chart complete with working titles identifying the lines of authority, responsibility and coordination.

· Provide a detailed description of the process of how your team selects qualified sub-contractors and manages them effectively on complex multi-phased projects.

· Provide a detailed description of how your team will maximize the Colorado construction work force on this project.

· Provide your team’s safety record over the last ten years and describe your teams’ efforts to retain and support employees.

2. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS

· Describe the qualifications and relevant experience of the lead design architect/engineer including demonstrated experience working on projects of similar scope and complexity and time commitment for this project.

· Describe the qualifications and relevant experience of the construction manager/general contractor including demonstrated experience working on projects of similar scope and complexity and time commitment for this project.

· Describe the qualifications and relevant experience of other key in-house staff and time commitments for this project.

· Identify all current office locations of the assigned staff and any other resident expertise intended to be provided under this RFP.

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH

· Provide a strategic project approach summary: Include discussion of your team’s approach in providing successful Design/Build services based on prior experience in cost, schedule and quality effectiveness. Include specific examples (1-2 page excerpts) of actual products (estimates, progress reports, schedules, constructibility reviews, value engineering studies, forms, general conditions budgets, organizational structures, etc.).

· Provide a description of design and construction work Project Management Team has capability to self-perform, including qualifications to do such.

4. PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE/SUCCESS

Select your three (3) most relevant projects and provide, at a minimum, the following:

· The project/contract name

· Description of services provided

· Overall design/construction cost of project, as applicable, including initial contract value and change orders including reasons for change orders

· Organizational structure of service delivery under the contract (include the owner’s organization as it interfaced with the respondent’s contract)

· Key assigned in-house staff (name and title)

· Subcontracts (service) used in the performance of the contract

· Schedule history

· Reference(s) for Owner as described in IV.A.3

· Continuing services, if any

a. Timeliness

In general, Design/Build Contracting work is seen as successful if it is on time, on budget, and of acceptable quality. Timeliness is generally based on completion by the originally published date and is indicated by a Certificate of Occupancy. Please demonstrate for each of the above projects how timely delivery occurred.

b. Budget Considerations

Similar to timeliness, being on budget historically means the work was completed within the originally identified available budget. For purposes of this RFP, the State is interested not only in being within budget but also in the respondent’s ability to address and implement the following issues as well:

Demonstrate for the above projects examples of how you accomplished the above cost control services.

c. Quality

Design quality has traditional connotations (coherent, integrated, efficient, flexible, aesthetic, etc.). Construction quality has the obvious traditional connotations (workmanlike, in compliance with the specifications, normal standard of care, etc.). Demonstrate for the above project examples how a high quality of workmanship was achieved.

d. Services Disruption

Demonstrate how your services on the above project examples dealt with issues of disruption at existing facilities, etc.

e. Project Acceptability

Please discuss how your Design/Build Contracting services helped achieve owner satisfaction with regard to project quality and acceptability on your project examples.

f. Compliance

Provide information on how compliance with industry standards of care, building codes, etc. was achieved.

5. MISCELLANEOUS CONSIDERATIONS

a. Claims/Litigation History of Firm

Provide information on any past, current or anticipated claims (i.e., knowledge of pending claims) on respondent contracts; explain the litigation, the issue, and its outcome or anticipated outcome.

b. Apprenticeship Training Program (Optional for Step I Prequalification)

Where an Apprentice Training Program certified by the Office of Apprenticeship located in the Employment and Training Administration in the United States Department of Labor exists in the State, or a comparable program for the training of apprentices is available in the State:

1. Each submitter shall demonstrate access to the certified program or a comparable alternative (Note that it is the responsibility of the submitter to demonstrate the comparability of a non-certified program) and,

2. Each submitter’s subcontractor at any tier with a contract value of two hundred fifty thousand dollars or more ($250,000) shall demonstrate access to the certified program or a comparable alternative.

c. Other

This category is included for other items provided by the respondent. Inclusions may include standard firm promotional literature, testimonials, awards, corporate memberships in professional organizations or sponsorships, additional project/contract histories, etc.

B. ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS EVALUATION CRITERIA

(Note that the primary focus of the Oral Interview evaluation in addition to the Cost Proposal will be the proposed project Management Team Members’ capabilities).

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM

· Explain the composition and structure of your project management team and how the firm will support their efforts in the field throughout this project.

· Are the lines of authority, responsibility and coordination clearly identified?

2. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS

· Explain the prior experience with projects of similar scope and complexity and similar fast track project delivery methods of the lead architect/engineer’s project manager and all other project management team members. Explain their roles and responsibilities and authority and why they are the right team members for this project.

· Explain the prior experience with projects of similar scope and complexity and similar fast track project delivery methods of the construction manager/general contractor’s superintendent and other team members.

· Explain anticipated project management team staff current and projected workload.

· Identify all current office locations and the resident expertise intended to be provided under this RFP. Identify the location of the staff for the performance of this contract, their expertise, and generic equipment that will be located in Colorado and act in support of the anticipated contract.

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH

· Explain the strategic project approach for this project in summary: Include discussion of your team’s approach in providing successful D/B services based on the needs of this specific project utilizing the team’s prior past experience including cost, schedule, and quality control.

· Explain the design and construction work the project management team has the capability to self-perform including qualifications to do such work.

· Provide a detailed description of how your project management team selects qualified sub-contractors and manage them effectively on this project.

4. PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE/SUCCESS

· Explain the most relevant projects the lead architect/engineer, superintendent and the team members have completed together and/or separately and what their role was. OIT may at its discretion contact references and/or conduct independent performance analysis on projects on which the team member has worked).

· Provide descriptions of other related experience of lead design architect/engineer and superintendent and other project management team members.

5. MISCELLANEOUS CONSIDERATIONS

a. Craft Labor Capabilities

Describe the availability of resources that will be utilized to successfully complete the project.

b. Apprenticeship Training Program (Mandatory for Step II)

Describe access to federal or state-approved apprenticeship programs, as available.

c. Other

This category is included for other items provided by the presenter. Inclusions may include testimonials, awards, corporate memberships in professional organizations or sponsorships, additional project/contract histories, etc, intended to demonstrate why this management team is uniquely qualified for this project.

V. D/B CONTRACT INFORMATION

A. Carefully review the D/B Agreement sample (Appendix B) before initiating your response submittal. Any exceptions to the contract must be communicated formally in accordance with the written questions schedule in II.A.

1. Appendix C of this RFP is the Certification and Affidavit Regarding Illegal Immigrants, a mandatory portion of the contract agreement.

2. Appendix D of this RFP includes the project concept, program and specifications that apply to this project and are incorporated by reference into the contract agreement as required initial design criteria. Deviation from the project concept, program and specifications must be justified in writing and approved the (insert Agency/Institution) Representative before incorporation into the project.

3. Appendix E of this RFP includes mandatory construction standards and aesthetic guidelines that are incorporated by reference into the contract agreement. Deviation from the OIT standards must be justified in writing and approved the OIT Representative before incorporation into the project. The design of building and site is required to respond to the aesthetic guidelines. Formal presentation of the proposed design to a review committee for approval may be required.

B. The State reserves the right to make non-material changes to the appended model agreement, including additions and /or modifications that may be necessary to more completely describe the services defined or implied herein.

C. Any and all products, systems, methods, and procedures developed, as a result of this agreement shall remain the exclusive property of the State.

VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

A. Several versions of the Acknowledgment and Attestation Form follow this section. Proper completion of the appropriate form is a mandatory requirement for a respondent to be considered responsive to this RFP Prequalification Submittal.

B. Qualifications made by a respondent in executing this form may render a submittal non-responsive as determined by the State.

VII. COST PROPOSAL FORM

A. Immediately following the Acknowledgement and Attestation Form is a Cost Proposal Form to be utilized to summarize the cost proposal for the services. Only those teams short-listed will be required to submit cost proposals as directed by the OIT.

B. This RFP document, its appendices, and any written addenda issued prior to the submittal of cost proposals, and written clarifications prior to the interview shall serve as the only basis for cost proposals.

C. The respondent, by submitting this proposal, does hereby accept that minor changes by the State to the exhibited contract and its exhibits, which do not adversely affect the respondent, shall not be cause for withdrawal or modification of the amounts submitted herein. Exceptions to the RFP documents and/or modification of the proposal may render the proposal non-responsive.

D. Upon due consideration and review of this document along with its appendices, written addenda, and written clarifications prior to the interview, the respondent does hereby submit the following proposal for Design/Build Contracting services, consistent with the schedules provided in the Statement of Work. Respondents are hereby advised that it is the State’s desire to accelerate design and construction schedules where reasonably possible, without adverse cost impact.

E. Respondent should complete the Cost Proposal Form by filling in all blanks on the form that follows.

F. Appendix F is the estimated budget for the project. The distribution of contract costs is permitted to differ in the Cost Proposal.

IPD D/B LS RFP

Rev. 7/2015

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

(Partnership Format)

Date: ______________________________

By responding to this RFP, the respondent(s) certify that he/she has reviewed the Design/Build sample contract, and its exhibits contained herein, and is familiar with their terms and conditions and finds them expressly workable without change or modification.

We certify and declare that the foregoing is true and correct.

Typed Name:_________________________

Typed Name:_________________________

Commission Expires:_____________________________________

Note: Add additional signature if there are more than two partners.

Rev. 7/2014

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

(Joint Venture Format)

Date: ______________________

By responding to this RFP, the respondent(s) certify that he/she has reviewed the Construction Manager/General Contractor sample contract, and its exhibits contained herein, and is familiar with their terms and conditions and finds them expressly workable without change or modification.

Typed Name: _____________________________

Typed Name: _____________________________ Note:

1. Add additional venture partners as necessary.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

(Corporate Format)

By responding to this RFP, the respondent(s) certify that he/she has reviewed the Design/Build sample contract, and its exhibits contained herein, and is familiar with their terms and conditions and finds them expressly workable without change or modification.

Note: Use full corporate name and attach corporate seal here.

(SEAL)

Rev. 7/2015

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ATTESTATION FORM

(Sole Proprietorship Format)

By responding to this RFP, the respondent(s) certify that he/she has reviewed the Design/Build sample contract, and its exhibits contained herein, and is familiar with their terms and conditions and finds them expressly workable without change or modification.

Typed Name: ________________________

Commission Expires: ___________________

Appendix A

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/EVALUATION FORM

Name of Team:____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project:___________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No:_________________________________________ Date: _______________________

RFP REFERENCE

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Y ____ N ____

If the minimum requirements (including letter from surety) have not been met, specify the reason(s): __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Acknowledgement and Attestation included: Y _____ N _____

SCORE

Weight2 x Rating3 = Score

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM(S)1

· Qualifications of the team x

· Organizational structure/lines of authority x

· Subcontractor selection and management x

· Colorado workforce x

· Safety/Employee support x

2. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS1

· Qualifications and relevant experience of the architect/engineer x

· Qualifications and relevant experience of the construction manager/general contractor x

· Qualifications and relevant experience of in-house staff x

· Location/Access x

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH1

· Approach to successful D/B Services

a. Cost effectiveness x

b. Schedule effectiveness x

c. Quality effectiveness x

· Competitively Bid/Self Performed Work x

4. PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE/SUCCESS1

· Project #1 x

· Project #2 x

· Project #3 x

· Related experience of the team x

5. MISCELLANEOUS1

· Claims/litigation history x

· Apprenticeship Training Program x

· Other x

TOTAL SCORE:

NOTES:

1. Criteria: Agencies/Institutions are encouraged to include additional criteria that reflect unique characteristics of the project under each category to help determine the submitter’s overall qualifications.

2. Weights: Agency/Institutions to assign weights, using whole numbers, to all criteria on evaluation forms for inclusion into RFQ document and prior to evaluations.

3. Ratings: Evaluator to assess the strength of each firms qualifications and assign a numerical rating of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rating. (Use whole numbers)

4. Total Score: Includes the sum of all criteria. Note: a passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is optional and should be assigned by the agency/institution prior to evaluation.

Appendix A1

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS EVALUATION FORM

Name of Team:__________________________________________________________________ Name of Project:_________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No:_________________________________Date:______________________________

SCORE

Weight2 x Rating3 = Score

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE TEAM1

x

2. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS1

x

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH1

x

4. PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE/SUCCESS1

x

5. MISCELLANEOUS

· Craft Labor Capabilities x

· Apprenticeship Training Program x

· Other x

TOTAL SCORE:

1. Criteria: Agencies/Institutions are encouraged to include additional criteria that reflect unique characteristics of the project under each category to help determine the submitter’s overall qualifications.

2. Weights: Agency/Institutions to assign weights, using whole numbers, to all criteria on evaluation forms for inclusion into RFQ document and prior to evaluations.

3. Ratings: Evaluator to assess the strength of each firms qualifications and assign a numerical rating of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rating. (Use whole numbers)

4. Total Score: Includes the sum of all criteria. Note: a passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is optional and should be assigned by the agency/institution prior to evaluation.

Rev. 7/2015 Appendix A2

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

SUBMITTAL AND ORAL INTERVIEW RANKING MATRIX

QUALIFICATIONS 40%/COST 60%

TEAM

QUALIFICATIONS1

AVERAGE

QUALS2

QUALS SCORE3

COST

SCORE4

QUALS

& COST SCORE5

RANK6

1. Insert total score from each evaluator's ORAL INTERVIEW/ COST PROPOSALS/EVALUATION FORMS. (Note that the use of the Matrix for the PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL EVALUATION does not consider cost proposals only qualifications). DO NOT combine the scores of the two evaluation forms.

2. Add all evaluators’ total scores and divide by the number of evaluators to determine the average score for each team’s qualifications.

3. The highest score for qualifications on the evaluation form is to receive 40 points and the other team scores are to be determined as a percentage of the 70 points. To score each average qualification score, use the example formula.

Assume the highest score is 400.

Scoring of Qualifications

4. Determine score for each team’s sealed cost proposal with the lowest cost being equivalent to a score of 40 points. To score each cost, use the example formula.

Assume the lowest cost was $100,000.

Scoring of Costs

5. Add the average qualification score to the cost score to determine cumulative qualifications and cost score.

6. Numerically rank all teams with the highest scoring team being the most qualified.

Appendix B

DESIGN/BUILD LUMP SUM (LS) AGREEMENT (SC-8.0)

(Sample)

THE GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE DESIGN/BUILD LUMP SUM (LS) AGREEMENT (SC-8.1)

(Sample)

Appendix C

CERTIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANTS (FORM UI-1)

STATE OF COLORADO

OFFICE OF THE STATE ARCHITECT

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

CERTIFICATION AND AFFIDAVIT REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANTS

A. CERTIFICATION STATEMENT CRS 8-17.5-101 & 102 (HB 06-1343, SB 08-193)

The Vendor, whose name and signature appear below, certifies and agrees as follows:

1. The Vendor shall comply with the provisions of CRS 8-17.5-101 et seq. The Vendor shall not knowingly employ or contract with an unauthorized immigrant to perform work for the State or enter into a contract with a subcontractor that knowingly employs or contracts with an unauthorized immigrant.

2. The Vendor certifies that it does not now knowing employ or contract with and unauthorized immigrant who will perform work under this contract, and that it will participate in either (i) the “E-Verify Program”, jointly administered by the United States Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration, or (ii) the “Department Program” administered by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment in order to confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired to perform work under this contract.

3. The Vendor shall comply with all reasonable requests made in the course of an investigation under CRS 8-17.5-102 by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment. If the Vendor fails to comply with any requirement of this provision or CRS 8-17.5-101 et seq., the State may terminate work for breach and the Vendor shall be liable for damages to the State.

B. AFFIDAVIT CRS 24-76.5-101 (HB 06S-1023)

4. If the Vendor is a sole proprietor, the undersigned hereby swears or affirms under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Colorado that (check one):

|_| I am a United States citizen, or

|_| I am a Permanent Resident of the United States, or

|_| I am lawfully present in the United States pursuant to Federal law.

I understand that this sworn statement is required by law because I am a sole proprietor entering into a contract to perform work for the State of Colorado. I understand that state law requires me to provide proof that I am lawfully present in the United States prior to starting work for the State. I further acknowledge that I will comply with the requirements of CRS 24-76.5-101 et seq. and will produce the required form of identification prior to starting work. I acknowledge that making a false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in this sworn affidavit is punishable under the criminal laws of Colorado as perjury in the second degree under CRS 18-8-503 and it shall constitute a separate criminal offense each time a public benefit is fraudulently received.

CERTIFIED and AGREED to this _ ____ day of ___ ___, _20 __.

VENDOR:

Vendor Full Legal Name

BY:

Signature of Authorized Representative

Title

Appendix E

AESTHETIC GUIDELINES AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS

N/A Appendix F

BUDGET

Communication Dishes, Waveguide

image2.png image1.wmf oleObject1.bin