RFI_HSR_Main_Supplies_10-21-2026.pdf
PDF 254 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HSR HF Dipole and Quad SC Magnet PS and Quench
- Solicitation number
- APP00730MB
- Issued by
-
Department of Energy Office of Science
About this file
This is a Request for Information (RFI)/Sources Sought notice issued by Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC (BSA), operator of Brookhaven National Laboratory under a Prime Contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). BSA is seeking expressions of interest from suppliers regarding design, manufacture, inspection, testing, documentation, and delivery of two high-current power-supply systems for the Electron-Ion Collider Hadron Storage Ring: Model A for the HSR main arc dipole circuit and Model B for the HSR main arc quadrupole circuit. The RFI is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute a commitment or obligate the U.S. Government to pay for information received.
Responses must be submitted electronically to Mark Bryan (mbryan@bnl.gov) no later than December 11, 2026. Interested suppliers should address company background and experience, technical capabilities including two-quadrant operation and high-accuracy current regulation, controls and software interfaces with EPICS systems, quality assurance and NRTL certification capabilities, schedule and cost information, and logistics and delivery details. The RFI requires a Statement of Work Compliance Matrix and Budgetary Pricing Table covering nonrecurring engineering, both Model A and Model B systems with quench protection assemblies, instrumentation racks, PLC/HMI/EPICS software deliverables, and tooling/test equipment. Suppliers should also identify any exceptions to BSA General Terms and Conditions for Noncommercial Items (Revision 25.0, September 2026).
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Date: 10/26/2026
Request for Information (RFI)/Sources Sought
No. APP00730-MB HSR HF Dipole and Quad SC Magnet PS and Quench
To all Potential/Interested Suppliers, Brookhaven Science Associates, LLC (herein known as “BSA”), operator of Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) under a Prime Contract with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is seeking expressions of interest from firms regarding the design, manufacture, inspection, testing, documentation, and delivery of high-current power-supply systems for the Electron-Ion Collider Hadron Storage Ring as outlined in the following attachments:
Attachment A- Statement of Work for the HSR Main Arc Dipole and Quadrupole Power Supplies Attachment B- Technical Specification for the HSR Main Arc Dipole and Quadrupole Power Supplies Attachment C- BNL-QA-101
Please note that this is an RFI/Sources Sought notice, not a Request for Proposal, and no solicitation exists at this time.
This RFI is for informational and planning purposes only and is not to be construed as a commitment by the U.S. Government, nor will the U.S. Government pay for information received. The information from this notice will help the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES) survey available resources.
Background:
The Electron-Ion Collider Project will design, construct, and install accelerator hardware for a new electron storage ring and electron injector and will modify the existing hadron ring to support electron-ion collisions. The Hadron Storage Ring will include superconducting main arc dipole and quadrupole magnets connected in series circuits. BSA anticipates procuring two high-current power-supply systems for the hadron storage ring:
• Model A for the HSR main arc dipole circuit
• Model B for the HSR main arc quadrupole circuit
The systems will provide precisely regulated, ramped current to superconducting magnet loads. Each system is expected to include the main power supply, quench-protection equipment, current measurement and regulation equipment, programmable controls, local operator interfaces, cooling-water interfaces, protective interlocks, and associated instrumentation.
The equipment must safely control high-current magnet circuits with substantial stored energy. The technical requirements include two-quadrant operation, high-accuracy current regulation, redundant quench protection, magnet-energy extraction interfaces, ground isolation, water-cooled power components, PLC-based controls, BNL control-system interfaces, and extensive equipment protection and diagnostics.
The anticipated supplier scope includes engineering, detailed design, analysis, manufacturing, assembly, software and firmware development, factory testing, documentation, packaging, delivery, and potential commissioning support at BNL. Formal preliminary and final design reviews are expected before production.
Please provide the following information:
Company Background & Experience:
1) Has your company designed and manufactured high-current power supplies for superconducting magnets, particle accelerators, or comparable applications within the past ten years? Please provide representative examples, including customer, application, output current, output voltage, power rating, stored load energy, date of delivery, and present operating status.
2) Please identify the location of the proposed engineering, manufacturing, assembly, and factory-testing facilities.
Technical Capabilities:
1) What is the maximum continuous DC current, output voltage, and power rating your company has supplied in a production power-supply system?
2) Describe your experience designing two-quadrant (+V/+I , -V/+I) power supplies for highly inductive superconducting magnet loads.
3) Describe your experience delivering high-accuracy current regulation, repeatability, long-term stability, low ripple, and precise tracking of programmed current waveforms.
4) What regulator architecture would your company normally use for this application?
Address the use of digital or analog current and voltage regulation, loop bandwidth, tuning, waveform tracking, and diagnostic access.
5) Describe your experience integrating precision DCCTs, temperature-stabilized measurement electronics, redundant current measurement, and independent overcurrent protection.
6) What power-conversion topologies would your company consider for this application?
Identify the principal advantages, limitations, and technical risks of the recommended approach.
7) Describe your experience designing water-cooled power-semiconductor systems using deionized low-conductivity water. Include typical operating pressures, flow rates, pressure-drop limitations, leak-detection methods, and material-compatibility controls.
8) Describe your experience designing quench-protection systems, crowbar circuits, high-current DC disconnect equipment, and interfaces to external magnet-energy extraction systems.
9) What high-current and high-power testing capabilities are currently available at your facility?
Controls, Software and Interfaces
1) What software, firmware, PLC, HMI, regulator, and FPGA source files would normally be provided with the delivered equipment? Identify any proprietary elements, license restrictions, development tools, passwords, or third-party dependencies that would not normally be transferred to BSA.
2) Does your company have experience implementing custom FPGA-based or embedded serial interfaces using fixed data frames, cyclic redundancy checks, setpoint loopback, and high-rate measurement transmission? Please provide examples.
3) What experience does your company have integrating power-supply controls with EPICS control systems?
Quality Assurance:
1) What are your capabilities for providing complete documentation package (material certs, heat analysis, inspection reports, NDT records, etc.) with final delivery? Include typical report formats.
2) Does your company have experience obtaining an NRTL certification for power supplies? Identify the NRTL organizations with which you have worked.
3) Are there technical or commercial obstacles to using NRTL-listed or NRTL-recognized components throughout the equipment? Identify any major components that would likely require special evaluation or acceptance.
4) What schedule and approximate cost allowance should BSA anticipate for an NRTL field evaluation of each completed system?
5) What long-term technical support, field service, remote diagnostics, repair, training, and refurbishment services can your company provide?
Schedule & Cost:
1) Can your company support formal preliminary and final design reviews before authorization to begin production? Describe the typical maturity of drawings, analyses, bills of material, software descriptions, test plans, and manufacturing plans available at each review.
2) What is the estimated total duration from contract award through engineering, PDR, FDR, material procurement, manufacturing, factory testing, and delivery?
3) Does your company have the production capacity to manufacture Model A and Model B concurrently?
4) What are the primary cost drivers (material, machining, testing, assembly, shipping, etc.)?
Provide rough percentages or ranged for each.
Logistics & Delivery:
1) What are the anticipated operating and shipping dimensions and weights of each major assembly? Identify any equipment that must be divided into shipping sections.
2) Are there any standard end item documents not identified above? If so, please list them.
3) Is your company able to provide qualified personnel to visit Brookhaven National Laboratory in
Upton, New York, to support installation, assembly, connection, inspection, startup, testing, and commissioning of the power-supply systems? If yes, describe the proposed scope of support, required BNL resources, estimated staffing and duration for this.
4) What warranty period would your company normally provide for equipment of this type, and when would the warranty period begin?
5) Identify any technical requirements that are expected to have a significant effect on cost, schedule, manufacturability, or technical risk.
6) Identify any other technical, quality, schedule, commercial, or logistical concerns that BSA should address before issuing a formal solicitation.
We are open to all information you can and care to provide at this point. Please provide responses to BSA no later than December 11, 2026.
BSA prefers electronic submissions of submittals. Electronic submissions will be accepted by the following method:
• Email submissions should express your interest and describe your capabilities related to delivering this product. Emails shall be sent to Mark Bryan, mbryan@bnl.gov, with the BSA RFI APP00730-MB in the Subject Line.
We trust that the information contained herein is sufficient to permit your company to prepare a submittal outlining:
1) your capabilities
2) estimated lead times
3) compliance matrix listed in Section 1 Table
4) budgetary pricing listed in Section 2 Table
5) Any exceptions you take to BSA General Terms and Conditions for Noncommercial Items (see
Attachment D below)
Attachment D - BSA General Terms and Conditions for Noncommercial Items, Rev. 25.0; (Sept., 2026);
https://www.bnl.gov/ppm/docs/t-and-c/bsa_non-commercial_product_rev25.pdf
However, should you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.
Sincerely, Mark Bryan Contracts Specialist Procurement & Property Management Division Brookhaven National Laboratory Upton, New York 11973 Phone: (631) 344-5660 Email: mbryan@bnl.gov mailto:mbryan@bnl.gov https://www.bnl.gov/ppm/docs/t-and-c/bsa_non-commercial_product_rev25.pdf
1. Table- Statement of Work (SOW)/ Technical Specification Compliance Matrix
Section
Section Description
Comply Yes or
No?
SOW 1 Scope SOW 1.1 Background SOW 2 Applicable Documents SOW 3 Requirements SOW 3.1 Contractor Responsibilities SOW 3.1.1 Technical Performance SOW 3.1.2 Tooling/Fixtures/Test Equipment SOW 3.1.3 Spare Parts/Special Tools SOW 3.1.4 Materials SOW 3.1.5 Government Furnished Material SOW 3.2 Engineering Design and Manufacturing Requirements SOW 3.2.1 Detailed Design Requirements SOW 3.2.1.1 Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Report SOW 3.2.1.2 Final Design Review (FDR) Report SOW 3.2.1.3 Approval to Proceed SOW 3.2.2 NRTL Requirements SOW 3.2.3 Acceptance Test Plan (ATP) SOW 3.3 Management SOW 3.3.1 Program Plan SOW 3.3.2 Progress Communications SOW 3.3.3 Manufacturing/Inspection/Test Plan SOW 3.3.4 Performance Reporting SOW 3.3.5 “Witness” Points SOW 3.4 Design Reviews SOW 3.4.1 Preliminary Design Review Meeting
SOW 3.4.2 Final Design Review Meeting SOW 3.5 Documentation and Data Management SOW 3.5.1 Report/Documentation Format SOW 3.5.2 End Item Documentation Package SOW 3.5.3 Records SOW 3.6 Software Requirements SOW 3.6.1 Software Configuration Control SOW 3.7 Environment, Safety and Health (ESH) SOW 3.8 Marking and Serialization SOW 3.9 Warranty SOW 3.10 Packaging SOW 3.11 Storage SOW 4 Quality Assurance SOW 4.1 Quality System and Facility Access SOW 4.2 Configuration Management SOW 4.3 Inspections and Test Requirements SOW 4.4 Repairs SOW 4.5 Options SOW 5 Deliverables SOW 6 Schedule SOW 7 Value Engineering SPC 1 Scope SPC 1.1 Background SPC 2 Applicable Documents SPC 3 Requirements SPC 3.1 Technical/Performance Characteristics SPC 3.1.1 Enclosure Configuration SPC 3.1.2 Input Power Requirements SPC 3.1.3 Output Requirements
SPC 3.1.4 Power Semiconductor Ratings SPC 3.1.5 Acoustic Noise Requirements SPC 3.1.6 Additional Features SPC 3.1.7 Control States SPC 3.1.8 Operating Modes SPC 3.1.9 Local Instrumentation SPC 3.1.10 Remote Interface SPC 3.1.11 Oscilloscope Monitoring SPC 3.1.12 PLC Interface SPC 3.2 Materials SPC 3.3 Construction/Layout/Location Requirements SPC 3.4 Code/Standard Compliance SPC 3.5 Environment, Safety and Health (ESH) SPC 3.5.1 Material Handling and Electrostatic Discharge SPC 3.5.2 Hazardous Materials SPC 3.5.3 Electrical Safety SPC 3.5.4 Lockout / Tagout SPC 3.5.5 Stored Energy and Capacitor Safety SPC 3.5.6 Pressure Safety SPC 3.5.7 Acoustic Safety SPC 3.6 Marking and Serialization SPC 3.7 Packaging/Shipping SPC 3.8 Storage SPC 4 Verification SPC 4.1 Classification of Inspections SPC 4.2 Inspection/Testing Details/Requirements SPC 4.2.1 Cooling Water Tests SPC 4.2.2 High Potential Testing SPC 4.2.3 Controls and Interlocks
SPC 4.2.4 Electrical Performance SPC 4.2.5 Ramp Performance SPC 4.2.6 Quench Protection Interface Verification SPC A1 Specification Data Sheet SPC App. A Serial Link Interface SPC App. B Figures SPC App. C Waveforms
2. Table- Budgetary Pricing:
Description Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost
Nonrecurring engineering, design, analysis, project management, Preliminary Design Review, and Final Design Review Model A HSR Main Arc Dipole Power Supply System Model A Quench Protection Assembly Model A DCCT, Power Supply Controller, and Instrumentation Rack Model B HSR Main Arc Quadrupole Power Supply System Model B Quench Protection Assembly Model B DCCT, Power Supply Controller, and Instrumentation Rack PLC, HMI, EPICS interfaces, software, firmware, and source-code deliverables Tooling, fixtures, simulated loads, and factory test equipment
Other (Identify such as NRTL/FAT/BSA Site Installation) Total Cost=
| Request for Information (RFI)/Sources Sought |
| No. APP00730-MB |
| HSR HF Dipole and Quad SC Magnet PS and Quench |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .