RFI_Gun Detection Technology_FINAL 05-22-25.pdf

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

ADVANCED GUN DETECTION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION

THIS IS A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) ONLY. This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP. This RFI does not commit the United States Capitol Police (USCP) to contract for any supply or service. The USCP is not currently seeking proposals. Responders are advised that the USCP will not pay any cost incurred in response to this RFI. All costs associated with responding to this RFI will be solely at the interested party’s expense. Not responding to this RFI does not preclude participation in any future RFP. If a solicitation is released, it will be released via the System for Award Management (SAM) at (https://www.sam.gov). It is the responsibility of the potential responders to monitor the website for any information that may pertain to this RFI. The information provided in this RFI is subject to change and is not binding on the Government. All submissions become the property of the USCP and will not be returned.

NAICS CODE:

541715 – Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

U.S. Capitol Complex, including temporary and adjunct sites and special events. Temporary and adjunct spaces including special event locations are in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia.

PURPOSE:

The United States Capitol Police (USCP), Security Services Bureau (SSB) is seeking information from qualified vendors regarding advanced gun and/or threat detection technology solutions. The objective is to identify, evaluate, and potentially procure systems capable of detecting exposed or concealed firearms or weapons of any kind in real-time to enhance public safety and support law enforcement and first responder operations.

BACKGROUND:

The USCP was established in 1828 with the mission of performing primary mission essential functions in support of the Federal Legislative Branch. The Security Services Bureau (SSB) is responsible for planning, designing, installing, and implementing the USCP’s physical and technical security elements to include using innovative systems and technologies to meet mission needs and ensure that Capitol Complex maintains an operational security posture consistent with USCP requirements to ensure the protection of Congress to ensure its Members, employees, visitors, and facilities are protected and able to fulfill Congress’ constitutional and legislative responsibilities in a safe, secure, and open environment. The USCP SSB is the controlling authority.

https://www.sam.gov/

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), computer vision, and other technologies have enabled the development of solutions that can automatically detect and classify weapons, such as firearms, through integration with existing security infrastructure.

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Delivery of Responses:

The Government requires RFI response submissions be delivered electronically to Linh.Williams@uscp.gov on or before June 24, 2025 at 2:00 pm EST. Contractor files shall have the following file naming convention: <Offeror name> RFI number <date>

B. Questions & Answers:

Questions shall be submitted electronically to Linh.Williams@uscp.gov on or before June 4, 2025 at 2:00 pm EST.

CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS:

A. The contractor must have proven experience providing the items included in this Request for Information (RFI).

B. Potential Offerors shall comply with FAR 52.204-24, Representation Regarding Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment and clause FAR 52.204-25, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment.

C. Potential Offerors shall certify the products they provide comply with the Buy American Act (BAA) or Trade Agreements Act (TAA).

RFI PREPARATION:

This section provides general guidance for preparing RFI responses.

A. Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data: Offerors who include in their responses data that they do not want disclosed to the public for any purpose or used by the Government except for reviewing responses, shall:

1) Mark the title page with the following legend:

“This response includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for any purpose other than to evaluate this response. This restriction does not limit the Government's right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction are contained in sheets identified as containing restricted data”

2) Mark each sheet of data it wishes to restrict with the following legend:

“Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation.”

B. Use of Non-Governmental Personnel in RFI Preparation and Review: The firms listed below prepared, assisted in preparing, provided input to this RFI, including all mailto:Linh.Williams@uscp.gov mailto:Linh.Williams@uscp.gov supporting documentation, or otherwise provided advisory and assistance services to the Government in areas that relate to this RFI. Further, the firms listed below may assist in the RFI review process in an advisory capacity.

Accordingly, USCP may release response data to non-Government advisors for review, analysis, and inputs. The Government may also employ administrative and engineering support services contractors in the handling of RFI documentation for purposes of security and document control. All such personnel will be required to execute a statement to preserve and protect from disclosure any evaluation and contractor proprietary information disclosed to them during the course of these reviews.

Non-Government Firms:

NMR Consulting 6767 Old Madison Pike Suite 210 Huntsville, AL 35806 Attn: L. Jeff Kroeger Senior Security Program Manager Phone: (703) 740-7599 Email: lkroeger@nmrconsulting.com

The firms listed above are subject to contractual Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI) restrictions and are expressly prohibited from competing on this acquisition in any fashion, i.e., being a prime contractor, subcontractor, or teaming partner.

Submission of a response under this RFI will constitute a grant of authority by the submitting company to the Government to allow access by individuals of these firms to any submission information. These individuals will be performing under Government contracts that contain appropriate restrictions on the use and disclosure of information provided to the contractors (e.g., nondisclosure requirements) or will have executed Government disclosure agreements that are intended to ensure that the contractor support personnel handle the information properly and in accordance with applicable law and regulation.

Individuals will be authorized access only to those portions of the responses and discussions that are necessary for them to perform their respective duties.

If an Offeror objects to disclosure of its responses to non-Government advisors, it must provide its written objections to the PCO within ten days of RFI issuance. If an Offeror objects to disclosure of a portion of its response, it shall provide its consent for the remainder of the response to the PCO within the same timeframe. Written objections must include detailed statements of the basis for objection and identify specific portions of the response that the Offeror objects to being disclosed to non- Government advisor(s).

C. RFI Response Requirements mailto:lkroeger@nmrconsulting.com

The respondents are requested to provide the following information in their responses to this

RFI:

1. System Overview

• General description of the gun and/or threat detection system, including key features, physical components, user interface, and model numbers as applicable.

• The underlying technology used (e.g., AI-powered video analytics, metal detectors, X-ray machines).

• Integration capabilities with existing surveillance, communication, and data management systems.

• Overview of AI/computer vision algorithms used for firearm detection and classification.

• Use of AI and machine learning models trained on diverse datasets to improve recognition and reduce errors.

• Ability to cover strategic locations effectively (entry points, blind spots) and scalability for larger or multiple sites.

2. Operational Capabilities

• Detection accuracy rates (false positives/negatives) caused by non-weapons like phones or umbrellas in various environments (e.g., indoor, outdoor, low light). Describe the accuracy for open air (brandished) weapons and concealed weapons.

• Real-time alerting mechanisms and notification workflows for first responders.

• Scalability for deployment across multiple sites or jurisdictions.

• How quickly the system detects a weapon before shots are fired or immediately after.

• The time taken to alert security personnel or law enforcement to enable rapid response.

• Data privacy and security measures in compliance with federal standards.

3. Deployment and Support

• Concept of operations: how the system is deployed, operated, and maintained in the field.

• Required personnel for operation and maintenance.

• Training and support provided to agency staff.

4. Budgetary Cost Information

• Budgetary initial investment costs including hardware, software, and installation.

• Budgetary ongoing operational costs such as maintenance, updates, training, and support.

5. Certifications and Testing

• Compliance with relevant standards and certifications (e.g., DHS SAFETY Act designation, ANSI compliance).

• Summary of independent testing, operational evaluations, or pilot deployments with law enforcement or first responder agencies.

6. Additional Information

• Any patented or proprietary technology which would enhance or restrict the integration of the capability into existing security systems.

• Product maturity, commercial availability, and estimated lead times for delivery and installation.

• Case studies or references from previous deployments, particularly in federal, state, or municipal environments.

• Please include supporting documentation, product brochures, and any additional materials relevant to the evaluation of your solution.

• Specifically reference any of the following in the response:

o Any development, in whole or in part, outside of the United States, or;

o Any use of any third party or open-source data.

7. Acquisition Strategy

• What acquisition strategies (e.g., single award, multiple award, phased approach, etc.) would you recommend for this requirement, and why?

• What are the advantages and disadvantages of your recommended approach(es) in terms of cost, schedule, risk, and performance?

• Are there innovative contracting methods or partnership models (e.g., Other Transaction Authority, public-private partnerships, performance-based contracting) that should be considered?

• What information or clarifications would industry need from the government to better respond to a future solicitation?

DISCLAIMER

This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes and does not constitute a solicitation or guarantee of future procurement.