RFI_DOIDFBO250068_Attachment_2_Editable_Contractor_RFI_Survey_Response_1.docx
DOCX document 39 KB Posted
- Attached to
- DOI IBC ITOP Portfolio Management Solution
- Solicitation number
- DOIDFBO250068
About this file
This document is a Request for Information (RFI) survey response template from the Department of the Interior (DOI) Interior Business Center (IBC) seeking comprehensive information about potential vendors' capabilities for an Information Technology (IT) Portfolio Management Solution. The RFI solicits detailed vendor responses across multiple dimensions, including company background, business classifications, contract vehicle holdings, and specific technical capabilities related to IT data transparency, capital planning, investment control, and Technology Business Management (TBM) taxonomy.
The survey requires vendors to provide in-depth insights into their solutions' abilities to support core IT portfolio management functions, including shared services for cost/schedule/risk reporting, integration with Folio application, and capabilities for internal governance and external Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reporting. Vendors are instructed to limit their primary response to 10 pages with an optional 10-page capability statement, and must complete a comprehensive questionnaire covering general company information, business categories, government contract vehicles, recommended performance periods, and technical solution specifics.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
INSERT Vendor NAME HERE DOI IBC ITOP RFI Survey Response Vendor DOI OHA BFS RFI Survey
· Please provide answers to all questions based on your proposed solution and any customization required to meet the specifics of this RFI.
· The response is limited to 10 pages with no smaller than 11-point font. However, you may use the Optional Capability Statement, Advice, and Considerations (item 2 under section 1.5 Submission Instructions) to augment your response. This optional item is limited to 10 pages.
· If the information is not applicable to your company, indicate “X” in the “N/A” column.
· In a response that requires ONLY a Yes or No response, indicate an “X” in the appropriate column.
| # |
| RI # |
| Requested Information (RI) |
| N/A |
| YES |
| NO |
| Vendor Response |
GENERAL (G)
| 1 |
| G1 |
| Company name |
Company name:
Company address
Company address:
| 2 |
| G2 |
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) |
| 3 |
| G3 |
| Name and contact information of the individual responsible for the information contained in this RFI response. |
Name (First, Last):
Name (First, Last)
Position Title
Position Title:
Phone number.
Phone number:
E-mail address.
E-mail address:
Web site URL
Web site URL:
| 4 |
| G4 |
| Company physical location (City and State) – i.e., where is the office located that would support this requirement. |
| 5 |
| G5 |
| Which business categories do you fall under? Please select all that apply in the ‘yes’ or ‘no’ column. |
1. Large Business
2. Small Business (SB)
3. Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB)
4. Section 8(a) Business
5. Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB)
6. Economically Disadvantaged Woman-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB)
7. Historically Underutilized Business Zone (HUBZone) Small Business
8. Veteran-Owned Small Business
9. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB)
10. Indian economic enterprise (IEE)
11. Indian Small Business Economic Enterprise (ISBEE)
| 6 |
| G6 |
| What Government-Wide Acquisition Contracts (GWACs), General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule(s) (FSS) Multiple Award Schedules (MAS), and other Government-Wide Contracts do you currently hold that could support this requirement? Provide each overarching GWAC/GSA FSS, IDIQ contract number. |
GWACS (List all that apply):
GSA MAS (List all that apply):
| 7 |
| G7 |
| Recommended period of performance for this type of requirement. |
| 8 |
| G8 |
| Recommended type of contract vehicle for this type of requirement |
| 9 |
| G9 |
| Recommended North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) |
| 10 |
| G10 |
| The requirement is anticipated to be a commercial type of acquisition. |
What is the recommended price arrangement for this effort?
If a Hybrid-type effort is recommended, why?
| 11 |
| IE.1 |
| How does your solution support the core functions of the IT Data Transparency and Capital Planning & Investment Control (CPIC) Project Management Offices (PMOs) for both internal governance and external reporting to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)? |
| 12 |
| IE.2 |
| How does your solution integrate with and leverage the Technology Business Management (TBM) taxonomy for cost categorization, and what is its role in improving IT cost transparency? |
| 13 |
| IE.3 |
| Describe how your solution provides a shared services capability for the collection and reporting of cost, schedule, risk, performance, and contract data to support internal agency governance processes and external OMB reporting requirements. |
| 14 |
| IE.4 |
| How does your solution facilitate integration with the Folio application to streamline manual data entry and reconciliation processes, ensuring consistency and accuracy of reported data? |
Contractor Survey Response to RFI # DOIDFBO250068 DOI IBC ITOP Page 26 of 27
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .