RFI-424252-IMINT-Annex-B-QRT.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 57 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFI-424252-IMINT
About this file
This is a vendor questionnaire response template for NATO RFI-424252-IMINT, designed to elicit standardized capability information from industry vendors responding to a Request for Information on Imagery Exploitation and Visualization Tools. The template is not itself a solicitation but serves as the structured instrument for gathering comparable vendor responses to inform a subsequent Procurement Invitation for Bid (IFB). Vendors must complete all 128 questions across 19 capability domains, using a standardized six-part response structure for each question: R1 (Support level: Fully/Partially/Not Supported), R2 (Implementation: Native/Integrated/N/A), R3 (Roadmap status if partial/not supported), R4 (Applicable standards), R5 (Documentary evidence), and R6 (Demonstrability). Responses include dropdown selections for structured fields and free-text entries with specified word-count limits.
The questionnaire addresses comprehensive IMINT capabilities spanning data formats and NATO interoperability standards (17 questions); enterprise data management and discovery (10 questions); geospatial analysis (11 questions); data visualization (11 questions); TCPED workflow automation (12 questions); Structured Observation Management/SOM (10 questions); Object-Based Production/OBP (8 questions); Activity-Based Intelligence/ABI (9 questions); federated processing, exploitation, and dissemination/PED (10 questions); AI/ML-enabled exploitation and automation (14 questions); AI/ML-assisted visualization (6 questions); collaboration and dissemination (6 questions); user interface and analyst workflow (8 questions); human factors and usability (3 questions); operational environment and deployment (3 questions); performance and scalability (4 questions); security and information assurance (7 questions); reliability and resilience (5 questions); and commercial support and sustainment (4 questions). The response deadline is 17:00 CET on 8 June 2026, with all correspondence referencing NCIA RFI-424252-IMINT.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI-424252-IMINT.pdf | ||
| RFI-424252.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
COVER-1
| NATO UNCLASSIFIED |
| NATO IMINT Visualization and Exploitation Capability |
| RFI-424252-IMINT-Annex B — Vendor Questionnaire Response Template |
| General Information: | ||
| This document is the structured industry response template for the RFI-424252-IMINT, and is intended to elicit consistent, comparable capability information across responding vendors. | ||
| Disclaimer: | This document does not constitute a solicitation, an invitation for bid, or a commitment by NATO to procure goods or services. Information provided in response to this questionnaire will inform subsequent Procurement Invitation for Bid (IFB). | |
| Questionnaire Overview: | The questionnaire is organised into 19 categorized groups of questions (1 through 19) mapped to the capability domains. Vendors should answer every response field for every question, even where the answer is N/A. | |
| Standardised Response Structure | Every fielding question uses up to a six-part standardised response structure to questions. All listed fields should be completed. See "How to use this workbook below." |
| VENDOR IDENTIFICATION | |||
| Vendor Legal Name | Click to enter Vendor legal name | ||
| Solution / Product Name | Click to enter: | ||
| • | Product name: Product name | ||
| • | Product version: Product version | ||
| • | Product website: Product version | ||
| Primary Point of Contact | Click to enter: | ||
| • | Name: POC Name | ||
| • | Role: POC Role | ||
| • | Email: POC Email | ||
| • | Phone: POC Phone | ||
| • | Address: Address | ||
| Date of Submission | Click to enter submission date DD/MM/YYYY | ||
| Handling Caveat | e.g. "None", "Commercial-in-Confidence", "Company Proprietary" | ||
| HOW TO USE THIS WORKBOOK | |||
| RESPONSES tab | Complete ALL questions. Use dropdowns for structured fields. Free-text fields accept any input but contain a max word count where specified. | ||
| R1 – Supported | Select: YES – Fully Supported / PARTIALLY Supported / NO – Not Supported. |
R1 Detail (if PARTIAL/NO) – max 250 words R2 – Implementation Select: NATIVE / INTEGRATED (3rd-Party) / N/A. If INTEGRATED, complete detail field.
R2 Detail – 3rd-party components – max 100 words R3 – Roadmap If R1 is PARTIAL or NO, select: ON ROADMAP / UNDER EVALUATION / NOT ON ROADMAP / N/A R3 Detail – VERSION / RELEASE / DEPS – max 100 words
| R4 – Standards | Enter applicable standards: STANAGs, MIL-STD, ISO, OGC, MISP, NIST, with specified version(s) |
| R5 – Evidence | Cite URL or document title, version, section/page, or controlled identifier |
| R6 – Demonstrability | Select: DEMONSTRATABLE / NOT DEMONSTRATABLE |
| ⚠ REQUEST FOR INFORMATION — NOT A SOLICITATION | |
| NATO UNCLASSIFIED |
NATO UNCLASSIFIED
NATO UNCLASSIFIED
RESPONSES
| NATO UNCLASSIFIED | RFI-424252-IMINT-Annex B — Vendor Quesionnaire Response Template | ||||||
| Q-ID | Domain | Domain / Topic | Capability Question | R1 – Supported | R1 Detail (only if PARTIAL / NO) – | |
| max 250 words | R2 – Implementation | R2 Detail: 3rd-party components – | ||||
| max 100 words | R3 – Roadmap | R3 Detail: VERSION / RELEASE / DEPS – | ||||
| max 100 words | R4 – Standards & Specs | R5 – Documentary Evidence | R6 – Demonstrability | R6 Detail | % Complete | RAG |
Formula
| Domain 1 Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards (17 questions) | |||||
| Q-1-01 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution ingest, exploit and manage imagery from satellite EO, IR and SAR sensors, manned ISR aircraft, UAS platforms, tactical reconnaissance pods, FMV sensors, multi-spectral and hyperspectral systems, and commercial imagery providers? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-02 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard imagery formats including, but not limited to, GeoTIFF, NITF, NSIF, MrSID, ECW, JPG, JPEG2000, Lidar, COG, NetCDF, ADRG/CADRG, LAS, BMP, CRF, CIB, DTED, GIF, GRIB, PNG? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-03 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard vector data formats including, but not limited to Shapefiles, KML/KMZ, GeoJSON, GML, GPX, MapInfo Tab, VPF, Esri geodatabases.? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-04 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard elevation and 3D data formats including, but not limited to, DEM, DSM, Lidar Point cloud (LAS) data, DTED and TIN? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-05 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively read, write and exchange NATO STANAG-compliant imagery formats and metadata standards (e.g. STANAG 4545 NSIF / NITF, and STANAG 7023) including support for relevant profiles and extension protocols? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-06 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively handle motion imagery and metadata in STANAG 4609 (MISB / MISP-compliant)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-07 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively ingest, process, display, exploit and explort GMTI data per STANAG 4607? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-08 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively support motion imagery tracking metadata per STANAG 4676? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-09 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution implement STANAG 4559, AEDP-17 ISR Product Library (NIRIS / NSILI) for search, discovery and retrieve, as service consumer? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-10 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution implement STANAG 4559, AEDP-17 ISR Product Library (NIRIS / NSILI) for data upload as a service publisher? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-11 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support data search and discovery in STANAG 4559, AEDP-18 ISR Streaming Services? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-12 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support data labelling and binding of classification and provenance metadata in accordance with appropriate standards (e.g. STANAG 4774 for security and confidentiality labelling, STANAG 4778 for securely binding to data, and STANAG 5363 The NATO Core Metadata Specification)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-13 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution operate natively in WGS84, MGRS and UTM reference frameworks, including conversion services with National System for Geospatial-Intelligence (NSG) and NATO Geospatial Board (NGB)-aligned geospatial services? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-14 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support MIL-STD-2525D and 2525E, and APP-6C for common warfighting symbology in maps, briefings and finished products? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-15 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support OGC / OGC API standards (consume and serve) (e.g. WMS, WMTS, WFS, WCS, CSW, GeoPackage)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-16 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support procedural interoperability per AJP-2.7 (JISR doctrine) and AIntP-21 (Allied Intelligence Publication for IMINT), including shared workflows, common terminology and harmonised reporting formats? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-1-17 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support additional doctrinal, NATO or industry standards that the solution implements (e.g. STANAG 6510 AIntP-14, STANAG 6524 AIntP-16, ISO/IEC, NIST, OGC API Records, Features) . | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Domain 2 Enterprise Data Management & Discovery (10 questions) | |||||
| Q-2-01 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support data management, cataloguing, and indexing enterprise-scale data repositories from local/network/cloud repositories? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-02 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support rapid indexing and retrieval of imagery? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-03 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support visualisation of petabyte-scale imagery/data archives? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-04 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support federated search across data/storage repositories? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-05 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support data lifecycle management including ingest, curation, release, archival and disposal, and with auditable evidence of each step? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-06 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support spatial, temporal, semantic, faceted and relationship-based search modes, with results presented in role-appropriate views? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-07 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution provide metadata/attribute, spatial and time-based search and filtering capabilities for data search? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-08 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support analyst-defined saved searches, watch lists and alerting (e.g. notify on new collection within a defined AOI or matching a defined pattern)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-09 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution expose data services and search via documented APIs to enable integration with other NATO and enterprise services? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-2-10 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support policy-driven tiering, retention and disposition/archival for imagery and other data, or derived products? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Domain 3 Geospatial Analysis (11 questions) | |||||
| Q-3-01 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support display filtering based on metadata/attribute, spatial and time-based search and filtering? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-02 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support the management, cataloguing and indexing diverse geospatial datasets (e.g.?) from local and network file/storage locations | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-03 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support manual and automated image enhancement, including, but not limited to: swipe, flicker, brightness, contrast, colour and contrast balance, gamma, saturation, sharpness, change detection, "porthole", two colour multi-view (2CMV) with EO, IR & SAR. | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-04 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution provide terrain and elevation model analysis and visualization? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-05 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support mensuration tools for distance, angle, area, and height calculations? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-06 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution enable automated and manual change detection? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-07 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support visualisation of tracks, routes, and target movement history? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-08 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support visualisation of analytical outputs in map, table and linked graph views? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-09 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution allow correlation of imagery with SIGINT, GEOINT, and OSINT data? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-10 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support correlation services across observation, object and product layers (i.e. find related items across SOM, OBP and finished products)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-3-11 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution provide heatmaps and threat-density overlays? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Domain 4 Data Visualization (11 questions) | |||||
| Q-4-01 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution natively display still imagery, motion imagery, SAR, infrared, hyperspectral, and multispectral data? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-02 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide synchronised multi-pane viewing for comparative analysis? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-03 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution enable pan, zoom, rotate, and dynamic contrast/brightness adjustment with low latency? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-04 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support 2D, 2.5D, and 3D terrain-aware visualisation modes? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-05 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution allow temporal visualisation (“time slider”) for change detection and historical comparison? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-06 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide geospatially accurate rendering using standard map projections and coordinate systems? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-07 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support visualisation of full-motion video (FMV) with frame-by-frame review capability? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-08 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution enable overlay of intelligence annotations, tactical graphics, and operational layers? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-09 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support map coordinates on hover-over, mouse-click, and copy and paste coordinate formats (e.g. DMS, DD, and MGRS). | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-10 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support setting a default coordinate format and converting between between formats (e.g. DMS, DD, MGRS). | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-4-11 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide automatic image enhancement options (sharpening, de-noising, atmospheric correction)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Domain 5 IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation (12 Questions) | |||||
| Q-5-01 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support the full TCPED+ lifecycle (Tasking, Collection, Processing, Exploitation, Dissemination), as a single, integrated workflow? Describe how the workflow aligns to AJP-2.7 (JISR doctrine)? Describe how the solution enahances and/or automtes the TCPED process and cycle. | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-02 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support STANAG 4545 NITF/NSIF imagery specific (EO/IR/SAR) exploitation workflows including amplitude, phase, polarimetric, interferometric (InSAR) and Coherent Change Detection (CCD)products? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-03 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support full motion video (FMV) exploitation (STANAG 4609), including frame extraction, motion imagery markup, MISB-compliant metadata handling and integration with tracker outputs? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-04 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 1 exploitation activities including image quality and usability assessment, NIIRS estimation, metadata extraction and validation, and time-sensitive screening for indications and warning? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-05 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 2 exploitation activities including precise mensuration, geolocation accuracy assessment, object characterisation against recognition catalogues/ontologies (AIntp-3 functional descriptions), SOM feature extraction and geospatial attribution to MGRS, UTM and WGS84? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-06 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 3 exploitation activities including cross-INT fusion (GEOINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, MASINT, OSINT), pattern-of-life analysis, ABI assessments and production of finished intelligence reports compliant with AINTP-21? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-07 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution able to streamline or automate the creation of IMIINT finished intelligence Prodcuts for level 1, 2 and 3? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-08 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution preserve continuity between exploitation levels through persistent observations, evidence chains and analyst-to-analyst handoffs operating over a single underlying data model? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-09 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution provide an audit trail and traceability across the TCPED+ lifecycle, including analyst identity, source platform, time of action and analytical conclusions, in a detectiable tamper-evident manner? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-10 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support automated and analyst-driven tasking workflows, including collection requirement generation, prioritisation, asset allocation and feedback to collection managers? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-11 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution provide tooling for analyst quality assurance and supervisor adjudication of exploitation products prior to dissemination? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
| Q-5-12 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support production of NATO IMINT reporting formats with controlled vocabulary and STANAG-compliant outputs? Examples include: |
1. Initial Phase Interpretation Report (IPIR)
2. Supplemental Photographic Interpretation Report (SUPIR)
3. Reconnaissance Exploitation Report (RECCEXREP)
4. Moving Target Indicator Exploitation Report (MTIEXREP)
| 5. Motion Imagery Exploitation Report (MIEXREP) | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | ||||||
| Domain 6 Structured Observation Management (SOM) (10 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-6-01 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution implement Structured Observation Management as a primary, persistent intelligence data layer (not just as records from imagery exploitation tools)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-02 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support creation of structured observations for objects, events, activities, facilities, equipment, behavioural indicators and geospatial relationships? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-03 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Are observation attributes drawn from a controlled ontology, and can the ontology be extended for mission-specific use cases.? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-04 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Is each observation bound to the source imagery, sensor, collection geometry and the analyst responsible for its creation, with that binding preserved across federation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-05 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Do observations carry STANAG 4774 confidentiality metadata and is that metadata cryptographically bound to the observation through STANAG 4778? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-06 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Do observations persist across missions, analysts and PED nodes, and are they reusable in ABI, OBP and target development workflows without re-creation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-07 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support observation versioning, supersession, decay and confidence evolution so that the intelligence picture evolves with new evidence rather than overwriting prior evidence? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-08 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution expose SOM data via documented APIs for integration, management, automation and federation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-09 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support spatial, temporal, semantic and relationship-based search across the SOM data sources at enterprise scale? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-6-10 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support release-controlled dissemination of SOM holdings (selective release by classification, caveat, mission and audience)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 7 Object-Based Production (OBP) (8 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-7-01 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution implement Object-Based Production with unique, persistent identifiers for objects across missions, analysts and PED nodes? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-02 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution support binding or linking of new observations to existing objects, including merge, split and disambiguation workflows under analyst control? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-03 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution maintain the full observation history and imagery evidence chain for each object, browsable in time order? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-04 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution capture relationships between objects (e.g. command, deployment, co-location, ownership), and surface those relationships in analytical views? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-05 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution maintain per-attribute confidence and source provenance on every object, with the ability to filter intelligence views by confidence threshold? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-06 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution support federated OBP — sharing, syncing and de-conflicting object holdings across federation members — with provenance preserved? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-07 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution support import and export of OBP data via documented schemas aligned to NATO and Allied intelligence data models? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-7-08 | 7 | Object-Based Production (OBP) | Does the solution support target development workflows (e.g. JIPOE-aligned target folders) built directly on OBP entities? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 8 Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) (9 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-8-01 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution support Activity-Based Intelligence workflows operating directly over the SOM and OBP data sources (not as a separate detached analytic environment)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-02 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution detect recurring patterns of life across persistent observation areas, including temporal pattern characterisation and pattern-deviation alerting? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-03 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution identify suspicious or anomalous behaviour indicative of operational intent and present analyst-actionable cues? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-04 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution monitor infrastructure activity, including ports, airfields, logistics nodes and military installations, with structured outputs feeding into SOM/OBP? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-05 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution track force dispositions and movements over time, with confidence scoring and multi-source corroboration? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-06 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution support analysis of operational rhythm, dwell time and activity cycles with visualisations suitable for briefing-grade output? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-07 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution correlate activities across sensors, modalities and intelligence disciplines (GEOINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, MASINT, OSINT)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-08 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution scale ABI analytics to enterprise data volumes (multi-year, multi-theatre persistent collection) without manual analytic re-architecture? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-8-09 | 8 | Activity-Based Intelligence (ABI) | Does the solution support ABI-driven cueing to other ISR collection assets (recommendation of new collection based on detected activity)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 9 Federated PED (10 Questions) | ||||||||
| Q-9-01 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support federated operation across geographically distributed PED nodes operating in different nations, commands and classification environments, by design? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-02 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support distributed Structured Observation Management (SOM) exchange between federated nodes, with classification handling, identity assurance and provenance preserved end-to-end? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-03 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution expose STANAG 4559 (IPL / NSILI) compliant discovery and retrieval services for federated holdings? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-04 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support federated search across multiple nodes without requiring data centralisation, including spatial, temporal, semantic and faceted query types? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-05 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support controlled product synchronisation and replication across federation members, with caveat and release control preserved? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-06 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support multi-analyst, multi-site collaborative exploitation sessions with co-annotation, role-based access control and conflict resolution? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-07 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution support cross-site workflow orchestration including task assignment, status tracking and reach-back coordination aligned to JISR doctrine? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-08 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution operate in disconnected, intermittent and low-bandwidth (DIL) environments and re-synchronise predictably upon reconnection? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-09 | 9 | Federated PED | does the solution support receive, edit, update workflow status and link data products to ISR collection and exploitation tasks? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-9-10 | 9 | Federated PED | Does the solution preserve data consistency, observation provenance and mission continuity across all federation states, including partition and re-join scenarios? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 10 AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation (14 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-10-01 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution provide AI- or ML-enabled automated object detection, classification and identification across EO, IR and SAR modalities? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-02 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution include vehicle, vessel and aircraft recognition models referencing approved equipment libraries (e.g. WEAPONS, MIDB, or other equivalent)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-03 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support Coherent and Continuous Change Detection (CCD) between revisits, including SAR coherence-based change detection? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-04 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support route, activity and pattern-of-life (POL) monitoring over persistent observation areas through ML-derived indicators? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-05 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support object density, activity and anomaly detection from imagery and motion imagery? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-06 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support terrain classification, trafficability and going assessments derived from multi-source imagery and terrain data? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-07 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does AI/M/DL output contain or support defining a confidence score, supporting evidence and a clear indication of model provenance presented to the analyst? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-08 | 10 | Geospatial & Analytical Visualization | Does the solution enable visualisation of confidence scores and AI-assisted detections? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-09 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution enforce analyst validation (human-in-the-loop) before any AI-derived observation is promoted into a finished intelligence product? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-10 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution provide AI explainability mechanisms (e.g. saliency maps, feature contribution, lineage to training data class) accessible to the analyst? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-11 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support integrating third-party or customer-trained ML models, including model upload, validation, deployment and retirement, with full model lifecycle governance? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-12 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution support analyst feedback loops to retrain or refine ML models based on operational use (e.g. correction labels, false-positive marking)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-13 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution operate AI/ML workloads within on-premises, sovereign cloud, deployable / edge), without dependency on commercial public-cloud-services? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-10-14 | 10 | AI/ML-Enabled Exploitation and Automation | Does the solution align with NATO Principles of Responsible Use for AI and with documented ethical AI practices including bias testing, model documentation (model cards) and dataset documentation (datasheets)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 11 AI/ML-Assisted Visualization (6 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-11-01 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution visualise AI-generated detections, classifications, as alerts and notifications? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-11-02 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution allow analysts to accept, reject, or refine AI-generated data and annotations? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-11-03 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution provide explainability overlays for AI-assisted target recognition? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-11-04 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution support automated object tracking visualisation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-11-05 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution display confidence thresholds and uncertainty indicators? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-11-06 | 11 | AI/ML-Assisted Visualization | Does the solution enable AI-assisted prioritisation of imagery review queues? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 12 Collaboration & Dissemination (6 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-12-01 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution support shared exploitation sessions, collaborative annotations, formal review and adjudication workflows, and intelligence lineage tracking? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-12-02 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution preserve institutional knowledge across analyst rotations through templated workflows, training materials and reusable analytical playbooks? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-12-03 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution enable secure sharing of annotated imagery products? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-12-04 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution support export to NATO-standard reporting formats? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-12-05 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution provide briefing-mode visualisation for operational decision-makers? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-12-06 | 12 | Collaboration & Dissemination | Does the solution preserve institutional knowledge across analyst rotations through templated workflows, training materials and reusable analytical playbooks? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 13 User Interface & Analyst Workflow (8 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-13-01 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution provide customisable analyst workspaces and dashboard layouts? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-02 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution enable multi-monitor display support? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-03 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution provide intuitive timeline navigation for imagery exploitation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-04 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution enable bookmarking and session persistence? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-05 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution provide configurable alerting and notification mechanisms? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-06 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution provide role-based views for analysts? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-07 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution support a user interface in the native English language? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-13-08 | 13 | User Interface & Analyst Workflow | Does the solution support multilingual user interface options for coalition operations? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 14 Human Factors & Usability (3 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-14-01 | 14 | Human Factors & Usability | Does the solution minimise analyst cognitive overload through adaptive display management? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-14-02 | 14 | Human Factors & Usability | Does the solution support accessibility and ergonomic interface standards? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-14-03 | 14 | Human Factors & Usability | Does the solution support user-defined visualisation profiles and preferences? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 15 Operational Environment and Deployment (3 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-15-01 | 15 | Operational Environment and Administration | Does the solution support disconnected, intermittent, and low-bandwidth communication scenarios? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-15-02 | 15 | Operational Environment and Administration | Does the solution support configurable and automated deployment patterns (e.g. Chef and Ansible supporting configuration-as-code, infrastructure-as-code) and reproducible deployment artefacts to support assured deployment and audit? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-15-03 | 15 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support distributed and containerized architectures? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 16 Performance & Scalability (4 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-16-01 | 16 | Performance Requirements | Does the solution render large imagery datasets with minimal latency? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-16-02 | 16 | Performance Requirements | Does the solution support real-time or near-real-time streaming of ISR feeds? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-16-03 | 16 | Performance Requirements | Does the solution maintain visualisation responsiveness under degraded bandwidth conditions? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-16-04 | 16 | Performance Requirements | Does the solution support horizontal or vertical scaling to adjust to different volumes of data or user capacity and load? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 17 Security & Information Assurance (7 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-17-01 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution support NATO security classifications and releasability markings? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-02 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution support federated identity via Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) or equivalent National PKIs, including smart-card / token-based authentication? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-03 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution support role-based and attribute-based access control aligned to NATO classification handling rules, with enforcement at data and service layers? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-04 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution support secure visualisation across multiple security domains? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-05 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution provide audit logging of imagery access and analyst interactions? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-06 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Does the solution ensure encrypted transmission and storage of imagery data? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-17-07 | 17 | Security & Information Assurance | Has the solution achieved cyber security accreditation or certification (e.g. NIAPC, Common Criteria, national accreditations)? If so, please identify the accrediting authority, the classification level, and current validity. | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 18 Reliability & Resilience (5 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-18-01 | 18 | Reliability & Resilience | Does the solution maintain operational capability during network degradation? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-18-02 | 18 | Reliability & Resilience | Does the solution architecture support failover and redundancy scenarios? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-18-03 | 18 | Reliability & Resilience | Does the solution ensure visualisation continuity during sensor feed interruptions? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-18-04 | 18 | Reliability & Resilience | Does the solution provide system health monitoring for information services and software components? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-18-05 | 18 | Reliability & Resilience | Does the solution support disaster recovery and operational continuity procedures? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Domain 19 Commercial Support and Sustainment (4 questions) | ||||||||
| Q-19-01 | 19 | Commercial Support and Sustainment | Does your commercial product offer available support tiers, SLAs, response and resolution time targets in English or French? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-19-02 | 19 | Commercial Support and Sustainment | Does your solution offer commercial training for analysts, administrators and developers, including formats (classroom, virtual, asynchronous) and certifications (if any). | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-19-03 | 19 | Commercial Support and Sustainment | Does your solution comprise of COTS and/or FOSS products or components, and commercially available? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started | |||
| Q-19-04 | 19 | Commercial Support and Sustainment | Does your solution support a perpetual or stand-alone license model that does not require a central license server or internet connection (e.g.node-locked, stand-alone, or offline-licensed)? | 0% | ⬜ Not Started |
Questions (Use RESPONSES Tab)
| Question Inventory — Reference Only (complete answers on the RESPONSES tab) | |||
| Q-ID | Domain | Domain / Topic | Capability Question |
| Domain 1 Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards (17 questions) | |||
| Q-1-01 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution ingest, exploit and manage imagery from satellite EO, IR and SAR sensors, manned ISR aircraft, UAS platforms, tactical reconnaissance pods, FMV sensors, multi-spectral and hyperspectral systems, and commercial imagery providers? |
| Q-1-02 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard imagery formats including, but not limited to, GeoTIFF, NITF, NSIF, MrSID, ECW, JPG, JPEG2000, Lidar, COG, NetCDF, ADRG/CADRG, LAS, BMP, CRF, CIB, DTED, GIF, GRIB, PNG? |
| Q-1-03 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard vector data formats including, but not limited to Shapefiles, KML/KMZ, GeoJSON, GML, GPX, MapInfo Tab, VPF, Esri geodatabases.? |
| Q-1-04 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support (e.g. Read, visualize, write and convert) industry standard elevation and 3D data formats including, but not limited to, DEM, DSM, Lidar Point cloud (LAS) data, DTED and TIN? |
| Q-1-05 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively read, write and exchange NATO STANAG-compliant imagery formats and metadata standards (e.g. STANAG 4545 NSIF / NITF, and STANAG 7023) including support for relevant profiles and extension protocols? |
| Q-1-06 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively handle motion imagery and metadata in STANAG 4609 (MISB / MISP-compliant)? |
| Q-1-07 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively ingest, process, display, exploit and explort GMTI data per STANAG 4607? |
| Q-1-08 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution natively support motion imagery tracking metadata per STANAG 4676? |
| Q-1-09 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution implement STANAG 4559, AEDP-17 ISR Product Library (NIRIS / NSILI) for search, discovery and retrieve, as service consumer? |
| Q-1-10 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution implement STANAG 4559, AEDP-17 ISR Product Library (NIRIS / NSILI) for data upload as a service publisher? |
| Q-1-11 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support data search and discovery in STANAG 4559, AEDP-18 ISR Streaming Services? |
| Q-1-12 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support data labelling and binding of classification and provenance metadata in accordance with appropriate standards (e.g. STANAG 4774 for security and confidentiality labelling, STANAG 4778 for securely binding to data, and STANAG 5363 The NATO Core Metadata Specification)? |
| Q-1-13 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution operate natively in WGS84, MGRS and UTM reference frameworks, including conversion services with National System for Geospatial-Intelligence (NSG) and NATO Geospatial Board (NGB)-aligned geospatial services? |
| Q-1-14 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support MIL-STD-2525D and 2525E, and APP-6C for common warfighting symbology in maps, briefings and finished products? |
| Q-1-15 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support OGC / OGC API standards (consume and serve) (e.g. WMS, WMTS, WFS, WCS, CSW, GeoPackage)? |
| Q-1-16 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support procedural interoperability per AJP-2.7 (JISR doctrine) and AIntP-21 (Allied Intelligence Publication for IMINT), including shared workflows, common terminology and harmonised reporting formats? |
| Q-1-17 | 1 | Data Formats / NATO Interoperability & Standards | Does the solution support additional doctrinal, NATO or industry standards that the solution implements (e.g. STANAG 6510 AIntP-14, STANAG 6524 AIntP-16, ISO/IEC, NIST, OGC API Records, Features) . |
| Domain 2 Enterprise Data Management & Discovery (10 questions) | |||
| Q-2-01 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support data management, cataloguing, and indexing enterprise-scale data repositories from local/network/cloud repositories? |
| Q-2-02 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support rapid indexing and retrieval of imagery? |
| Q-2-03 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support visualisation of petabyte-scale imagery/data archives? |
| Q-2-04 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support federated search across data/storage repositories? |
| Q-2-05 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support data lifecycle management including ingest, curation, release, archival and disposal, and with auditable evidence of each step? |
| Q-2-06 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support spatial, temporal, semantic, faceted and relationship-based search modes, with results presented in role-appropriate views? |
| Q-2-07 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution provide metadata/attribute, spatial and time-based search and filtering capabilities for data search? |
| Q-2-08 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support analyst-defined saved searches, watch lists and alerting (e.g. notify on new collection within a defined AOI or matching a defined pattern)? |
| Q-2-09 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution expose data services and search via documented APIs to enable integration with other NATO and enterprise services? |
| Q-2-10 | 2 | Enterprise Data Management & Discovery | Does the solution support policy-driven tiering, retention and disposition/archival for imagery and other data, or derived products? |
| Domain 3 Geospatial Analysis (11 questions) | |||
| Q-3-01 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support display filtering based on metadata/attribute, spatial and time-based search and filtering? |
| Q-3-02 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support the management, cataloguing and indexing diverse geospatial datasets (e.g.?) from local and network file/storage locations |
| Q-3-03 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support manual and automated image enhancement, including, but not limited to: swipe, flicker, brightness, contrast, colour and contrast balance, gamma, saturation, sharpness, change detection, "porthole", two colour multi-view (2CMV) with EO, IR & SAR. |
| Q-3-04 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution provide terrain and elevation model analysis and visualization? |
| Q-3-05 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support mensuration tools for distance, angle, area, and height calculations? |
| Q-3-06 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution enable automated and manual change detection? |
| Q-3-07 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support visualisation of tracks, routes, and target movement history? |
| Q-3-08 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support visualisation of analytical outputs in map, table and linked graph views? |
| Q-3-09 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution allow correlation of imagery with SIGINT, GEOINT, and OSINT data? |
| Q-3-10 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution support correlation services across observation, object and product layers (i.e. find related items across SOM, OBP and finished products)? |
| Q-3-11 | 3 | Geospatial Analysis | Does the solution provide heatmaps and threat-density overlays? |
| Domain 4 Data Visualization (11 questions) | |||
| Q-4-01 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution natively display still imagery, motion imagery, SAR, infrared, hyperspectral, and multispectral data? |
| Q-4-02 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide synchronised multi-pane viewing for comparative analysis? |
| Q-4-03 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution enable pan, zoom, rotate, and dynamic contrast/brightness adjustment with low latency? |
| Q-4-04 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support 2D, 2.5D, and 3D terrain-aware visualisation modes? |
| Q-4-05 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution allow temporal visualisation (“time slider”) for change detection and historical comparison? |
| Q-4-06 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide geospatially accurate rendering using standard map projections and coordinate systems? |
| Q-4-07 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support visualisation of full-motion video (FMV) with frame-by-frame review capability? |
| Q-4-08 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution enable overlay of intelligence annotations, tactical graphics, and operational layers? |
| Q-4-09 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support map coordinates on hover-over, mouse-click, and copy and paste coordinate formats (e.g. DMS, DD, and MGRS). |
| Q-4-10 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution support setting a default coordinate format and converting between between formats (e.g. DMS, DD, MGRS). |
| Q-4-11 | 4 | Data Visualization | Does the solution provide automatic image enhancement options (sharpening, de-noising, atmospheric correction)? |
| Domain 5 IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation (12 Questions) | |||
| Q-5-01 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support the full TCPED+ lifecycle (Tasking, Collection, Processing, Exploitation, Dissemination), as a single, integrated workflow? Describe how the workflow aligns to AJP-2.7 (JISR doctrine)? Describe how the solution enahances and/or automtes the TCPED process and cycle. |
| Q-5-02 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support STANAG 4545 NITF/NSIF imagery specific (EO/IR/SAR) exploitation workflows including amplitude, phase, polarimetric, interferometric (InSAR) and Coherent Change Detection (CCD)products? |
| Q-5-03 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support full motion video (FMV) exploitation (STANAG 4609), including frame extraction, motion imagery markup, MISB-compliant metadata handling and integration with tracker outputs? |
| Q-5-04 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 1 exploitation activities including image quality and usability assessment, NIIRS estimation, metadata extraction and validation, and time-sensitive screening for indications and warning? |
| Q-5-05 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 2 exploitation activities including precise mensuration, geolocation accuracy assessment, object characterisation against recognition catalogues/ontologies (AIntp-3 functional descriptions), SOM feature extraction and geospatial attribution to MGRS, UTM and WGS84? |
| Q-5-06 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support Level 3 exploitation activities including cross-INT fusion (GEOINT, SIGINT, HUMINT, MASINT, OSINT), pattern-of-life analysis, ABI assessments and production of finished intelligence reports compliant with AINTP-21? |
| Q-5-07 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution able to streamline or automate the creation of IMIINT finished intelligence Prodcuts for level 1, 2 and 3? |
| Q-5-08 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution preserve continuity between exploitation levels through persistent observations, evidence chains and analyst-to-analyst handoffs operating over a single underlying data model? |
| Q-5-09 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution provide an audit trail and traceability across the TCPED+ lifecycle, including analyst identity, source platform, time of action and analytical conclusions, in a detectiable tamper-evident manner? |
| Q-5-10 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support automated and analyst-driven tasking workflows, including collection requirement generation, prioritisation, asset allocation and feedback to collection managers? |
| Q-5-11 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution provide tooling for analyst quality assurance and supervisor adjudication of exploitation products prior to dissemination? |
| Q-5-12 | 5 | IMIINT TCPED and Workflow Automation | Does the solution support production of NATO IMINT reporting formats with controlled vocabulary and STANAG-compliant outputs? Examples include: |
1. Initial Phase Interpretation Report (IPIR)
2. Supplemental Photographic Interpretation Report (SUPIR)
3. Reconnaissance Exploitation Report (RECCEXREP)
4. Moving Target Indicator Exploitation Report (MTIEXREP)
5. Motion Imagery Exploitation Report (MIEXREP)
| Domain 6 Structured Observation Management (SOM) (10 questions) | |||
| Q-6-01 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution implement Structured Observation Management as a primary, persistent intelligence data layer (not just as records from imagery exploitation tools)? |
| Q-6-02 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support creation of structured observations for objects, events, activities, facilities, equipment, behavioural indicators and geospatial relationships? |
| Q-6-03 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Are observation attributes drawn from a controlled ontology, and can the ontology be extended for mission-specific use cases.? |
| Q-6-04 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Is each observation bound to the source imagery, sensor, collection geometry and the analyst responsible for its creation, with that binding preserved across federation? |
| Q-6-05 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Do observations carry STANAG 4774 confidentiality metadata and is that metadata cryptographically bound to the observation through STANAG 4778? |
| Q-6-06 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Do observations persist across missions, analysts and PED nodes, and are they reusable in ABI, OBP and target development workflows without re-creation? |
| Q-6-07 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support observation versioning, supersession, decay and confidence evolution so that the intelligence picture evolves with new evidence rather than overwriting prior evidence? |
| Q-6-08 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution expose SOM data via documented APIs for integration, management, automation and federation? |
| Q-6-09 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support spatial, temporal, semantic and relationship-based search across the SOM data sources at enterprise scale? |
| Q-6-10 | 6 | Structured Observation Management (SOM) | Does the solution support release-controlled dissemination of SOM holdings (selective release by classification, caveat, mission and audience)? |
| Domain 7 Object-Based Production (OBP) (8 questions) |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .