RFI 26-066-Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration.pdf

PRINCETON PLASMA PHYSICS LABORATORY

August 5, 2026

Sources Sought / Request for Information (RFI) 26-066 - Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration Support

This is a Sources Sought Notice ONLY. This notice is issued solely for market research and acquisition planning purposes; it does not constitute a Request for Quote (RFQ), Invitation for Bid (IFB), or Request for Proposal (RFP), nor does it promise a future solicitation. Responses are strictly voluntary, and no reimbursement will be provided for costs associated with responding to this notice. Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) is under no obligation to award a contract or expend appropriated funds based on this inquiry.

1. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL), a national laboratory within the Department of Energy, is hereby soliciting information from potential sources regarding Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration Support services. The objective is to obtain limited Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood migration support sufficient to identify PPPL's required readiness work, confirm the minimum viable path forward, support a small set of PPPL-authorized critical actions, and transfer practical knowledge to PPPL staff. The engagement is not intended to be a full end-to-end Redwood migration, broad optimization effort, or extended production support project.

2. SMALL BUSINESS AND SOCIOECONOMIC CONSIDERATION

PPPL is seeking capability statements from all interested parties, including Large Businesses, Small Businesses, and all socioeconomic categories (SDB, 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB, EDWOSB, HUBZone), as well as HBCU/MIs. This information will be used to determine the appropriate level of competition and establish small business subcontracting goals. PPPL reserves the right to consider specific set-asides based on the responses received.

3. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

Interested firms are requested to submit information in the form of a Capabilities and Qualifications Statement that includes: (1) Addressing all the requirements listed below in the Capability Statement Questions Section. The statement of capability shall be UNCLASSIFIED. Any information provided by industry to PPPL because of these sources sought synopsis is strictly voluntary. Responses will not be returned, nor will respondents be notified of the results of the evaluation. The information obtained from industry responses to this notice may be used in the development of an acquisition strategy and a future RFP (if applicable).

This capability statement should indicate the ability to be the prime subcontractor or lower-tier subcontractor and perform all aspects of the effort described herein. It is insufficient to provide only general brochures or generic information. Additionally, your responses must include the following:

name and address of firm, size of business; whether they are Large, Small, SDB, 8(a), WOSB, SD- VOSB, EDWOSB, HUBZone, and HBCU/MI, and affiliate information: parent company, joint venture partners, and potential teaming partners.

4. RESPONSE DUE DATE:

All responses shall be submitted electronically via e-mail to Cheryl Colan at ccolan@pppl.gov no later than 4:30 pm Eastern Standard Time Zone, AUGUST 31, 2026 . When responding please reference RFI 26-066 PPPL Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration Support. Technical and procurement questions should be directed at the above point of contact.

5. OTHER INFORMATION

It is emphasized that these sources sought notice are for planning and information purposes and are NOT to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter into a contractual agreement, nor will PPPL pay for information solicited. Respondents will NOT be notified of the results of the evaluation.

If a solicitation is released, then it and any additional documents will be available on www. SAM.gov.

It is the offeror's responsibility to monitor this website for the release of the solicitation and amendments (if any). Potential offerors will be responsible for downloading their own copy of the solicitation and amendments, if any.

mailto:ccolan@pppl.gov http://www/

Capability Statement Questions

Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration Support

1) Do you have an established methodology for Supply Chain Upgrade

2) How many Oracle Fusion SCM Redwood implementations have you completed?

3) Which SCM modules have you migrated to Redwood?

4) Can you provide customer references for Redwood projects?

5) What lessons have you learned incorporated into your methodology?

6) Which readiness tools and Oracle documentation do you use?

7) Have you identified any process changes required for Redwood pages

8) What customizations need to be redesigned?

9) How do you evaluate Page Composer and Visual Builder extensions?

10) What impact does Redwood have on existing configurations?

1. Oracle Fusion Implementation and Redwood Upgrade Experience

a) What experience does your firm have in Implementing Oracle Fusion Supply Chain modules and

Oracle fusion in general

b) How many Redwood Upgrades have you performed so far? Have you done any supply chain

Redwood upgrades?

2. Oracle 27A Redwood Readiness

a) Which Oracle Fusion SCM pages and transactions will become mandatory in Release 27A?

b) How would you validate our environment against Oracle's 27A mandatory Redwood requirements?

c) How would you identify which of our current business processes will be affected?

d) What Oracle documentation and readiness reports do you use to determine mandatory changes?

3. Impact Assessment

a) What is your approach for conducting a Redwood impact assessment?

b) How will you identify:

1. Business process changes?

2. Configurations impacts?

3. Role and security impacts?

4. Reporting impacts?

5. Integrations impacts?

6. Approval workflow changes?

7. Spreadsheet loaders?

4. Personalizations and Extensions

a) How will you identify existing personalizations that are no longer supported?

b) How will you evaluate:

1. Page Composer customizations

2. Visual Builder Studio extensions

3. Sandbox configurations

c) What remediation approach do you recommend?

5. Security Assessment

a) Which security roles require validation?

b) Are new privileges introduced for Redwood pages?

c) What security regression testing do you recommend?

6. Regression Testing

a) What regression testing framework do you recommend?

b) Which critical SCM business processes should be tested?

c) Do you provide automated regression testing?

d) What Oracle quarterly update test assets do you already have?

7. User Experience and Training

a) What changes will users notice immediately?

b) Which user roles require training?

c) What training materials do you provide?

d) How do you measure user readiness before Production deployment?

e) What governance process do you recommend for continuous Oracle updates?

8. Project Execution

a) Do you have an established methodology for Supply Chain Upgrade

b) What is your recommended timeline for completing the 27A Redwood transition?

c) What project roles do you recommend?

d) What risks do you see for organizations similar to ours?

e) What mitigation strategies have worked on previous Redwood projects?

9. Deliverables

a) What specific deliverables will you provide?

b) Redwood Readiness Assessment

c) Impact Assessment

d) Gap Analysis

e) Feature Enablement Plan

f) Security Assessment

g) Regression Test Scripts

h) Training Materials

i) Cutover Plan

j) Hypercare Support Plan

10. Lessons Learned

a) What are the three biggest issues you've encountered during Redwood transitions?

b) Which Oracle recommendations have proven most valuable?

c) What common mistakes should organizations avoid?

d) What activities should be completed well before the 27A update window?

11. References

a) Can you provide references for customers who have completed mandatory SCM Redwood transitions?

b) Which Oracle Fusion release were those projects based on?

c) What measurable outcomes did those customers achieve?

Oracle Cloud SCM Redwood Migration Support